SAGA1 (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) curation notes

UniProt A0A2K3D7T6 (TrEMBL, "CBM20 domain-containing protein"); locus Cre11.g467712
(CHLRE_11g467712v5); 1,626 aa, ~168 kDa predicted (~180 kDa on gels).

Deep research

Deep research was not run. The falcon provider currently returns HTTP 402 and
perplexity is unavailable in this environment, so the wrapper was skipped on
instruction. The review rests on the cached primary literature listed below.
No -deep-research-*.md file exists for this gene.

Sequence features (UniProt record)

Literature summary

Itakura et al. 2019 (PMID:31455733): discovery, phenotype, Rubisco binding

Meyer et al. 2020 (PMID:33177094): the Rubisco-binding motif

Photosynth Res 2023 (PMID:36656499; abstract only)

Hennacy et al. 2024 (Nat Plants PMID:39548241; preprint PMID:39211136): tubule biogenesis

Crans et al. 2026 (PNAS PMID:42090253; preprint PMID:41659582): direct starch binding

Atkinson/Chan et al. 2024 (PNAS PMID:38241434): Arabidopsis proto-pyrenoid

Expansion microscopy preprint 2026 (PMID:42465278)

Decisions on the questions raised

  1. Was SAGA1 starch binding measured directly? Yes. Crans et al. 2026 (PMID:42090253) did an in vitro pull-down of purified SAGA1 CBM20 (tandem construct) with starch granules and competition with β-cyclodextrin and maltoheptaose. GO:2001070 is therefore justified by experiment and no longer only by the InterPro mapping. I added a NEW IDA row and accepted the IEA. The module annoton text "direct starch binding by SAGA1 has not been measured" is now out of date.
  2. Pyrenoid tubule location (GO:0160223). Supported. SAGA1 localizes along the matrix-traversing membranes, enriched at their periphery and entry sites (PMID:39548241, PMID:42465278), and co-fractionates with membranes. Added as NEW (IDA). I did not add a separate NEW for GO:1990732 pyrenoid, because pyrenoid tubule is part_of pyrenoid (a redundant ancestor). The matrix-starch interface role is captured at the pyrenoid level in core_functions.
  3. Process term for tubule/thylakoid biogenesis. GO has no "pyrenoid tubule assembly" term. The closest is GO:0010027 thylakoid membrane organization.
  4. Participation test. SAGA1 is not a substrate or a mere requirement. It physically binds both partners: Rubisco through its RBMs (Y2H; in vitro motif binding) and the membranes (co-pelleting, membrane localization in Arabidopsis). Its proposed role is to supply the adhesive membrane-matrix bond that pulls thylakoid membranes into the matrix. Together with MITH1 it is sufficient for this in a heterologous system. That is a structural contribution to the reorganisation step, comparable to the scaffold case, so the term passes.
  5. Comparator check. Arabidopsis proteins that physically shape thylakoids, VIPP1 and FZL, carry GO:0010027 (IMP/IBA in QuickGO). The term is used for structural organisers.
  6. Added as NEW (IMP + IDA from the reconstitution).
  7. The remaining uncertainty is how SAGA1 binds membranes. It has no predicted transmembrane segment, so it may bind via a membrane protein or lipid.
  8. Molecular function for the tubule-initiation role. The module asserts none. In core_functions I used GO:0043495 protein-membrane adaptor activity, because the published mechanism is a protein (Rubisco)-membrane adhesive bridge. This rests on direct Rubisco binding plus membrane association. Its weakest link is that the mode of membrane binding is uncharacterised, and this is flagged in the report.

Not annotated