The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
The requested target is correctly identified as A. thaliana DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA-BINDING PROTEIN 1 (DRB1), better known as HYPONASTIC LEAVES 1 (HYL1): locus At1g09700, UniProt O04492. The literature’s DRB1/HYL1 identity, two N-terminal double-stranded-RNA-binding domains (dsRBDs), and role with DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1) agree with the supplied UniProt/InterPro/Pfam annotations. Studies of mammalian DRB1 or plant homologues such as MdDRB1, OsDRB1, and SlDRB1 were not used as direct evidence for this annotation.
DRB1/HYL1 is not an enzyme. It is a dsRNA-binding specificity, positioning, and assembly factor in the plant miRNA microprocessor. Its principal function is to bind structured primary/pre-miRNA substrates and cooperate with catalytic RNase III enzyme DCL1 and SERRATE (SE), increasing cleavage efficiency and—especially—cleavage-site accuracy. Its best-established site of action is the nucleus, including nuclear “dicing bodies” or D-bodies, although regulated nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling and additional cytoplasmic functions have also been reported (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 1-2).
HYL1 contains two tandem N-terminal dsRBDs, corresponding to the supplied AtDRB-like_DSRM_1, AtDRB-like_DSRM_2, InterPro dsRBD, and Pfam dsrm annotations. Structural work distinguishes a canonical first domain, dsRBD1/HR1, responsible for dsRNA recognition, from a more unusual dsRBD2/HR2, which provides an important homodimerization surface. The protein also has a nuclear-localization region and a less-conserved, substantially disordered C-terminal region implicated in protein interactions, localization, and stability. Expression of the tandem N-terminal dsRBD region can rescue core defects of hyl1 mutants, showing that these domains are sufficient for much of the canonical miRNA-processing function (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, bhagat2018dynamicregulationof pages 1-4).
The target therefore belongs functionally to the plant DRB/HYL family of double-stranded-RNA-binding cofactors. The domain composition does not support an intrinsic catalytic reaction: HYL1 lacks RNase III catalytic domains, and cleavage is executed by DCL1 (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2).
HYL1 recognizes the double-stranded stem or miRNA/miRNA duplex region of structured pri-miRNAs/pre-miRNAs rather than catalyzing RNA hydrolysis. Within the nuclear DCL1–HYL1–SE complex, it promotes productive substrate engagement and helps orient DCL1 relative to the transition between single- and double-stranded RNA. Thus, the most precise annotation is double-stranded pri-/pre-miRNA-binding microprocessor cofactor that promotes accurate and efficient DCL1 cleavage* (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2006serrateisa pages 6-6).
A prominent mechanistic model is that the HYL1 homodimer acts as an anchor or molecular ruler. Canonical first cleavage commonly occurs approximately 15–17 nucleotides from an ssRNA–dsRNA junction. In hyl1 mutants, correct products decrease and aberrant cuts appear in either double- or single-stranded precursor regions, depending on the allele. These results indicate that HYL1 interprets precursor geometry and constrains where DCL1 cuts, although the diversity of plant precursor structures means that a rigid universal-ruler model is probably too simple (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 12-13).
DCL1 is the catalytic RNase III component, HYL1 is the dsRNA-binding accuracy factor, and SE is another RNA/protein-interaction cofactor. Physical interaction between HYL1 and DCL1, together with pri-miRNA accumulation and diminished mature-miRNA production in hyl1, dcl1, and se mutants, supports their operation as a functional nuclear complex. Increased pri-miRNA abundance in processing mutants—but not in a control defective mainly in mature-miRNA stabilization—specifically implicates this complex in precursor cleavage rather than merely product stability (yang2006serrateisa pages 6-6).
HYL1 self-association has been demonstrated by yeast two-hybrid, recombinant pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation, and bimolecular fluorescence-complementation approaches. Gly147 and Leu165 in dsRBD2 are critical for dimer formation. Disrupting dimerization leaves HYL1–DCL1 binding intact but causes aberrant cleavage-site selection, retention of pri-miRNAs in HYL1-containing complexes, reduced processing efficiency, reduced accuracy, and strong mutant phenotypes. Dimerization therefore has a direct mechanistic role rather than simply increasing complex abundance (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 4-5).
| Aspect | Best-supported annotation | Key experimental evidence | Confidence / caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity and domains | Arabidopsis thaliana DRB1 is HYL1, matching the supplied At1g09700/O04492 target. It contains two tandem N-terminal dsRNA-binding domains: dsRBD1 is canonical and RNA-binding, while dsRBD2 is noncanonical and contributes to dimerization. | Structural analysis defined the tandem dsRBD architecture. Expressing the tandem N-terminal region rescued hyl1-2, showing that it is sufficient for core miRNA-processing function (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2). | High. The accession and locus mapping come from the supplied UniProt record; the literature independently confirms the DRB1/HYL1 alias and matching architecture. |
| Catalytic status and substrate | HYL1 is a nonenzymatic dsRNA-binding specificity and positioning factor, not an RNase. It recognizes structured pri-miRNA or pre-miRNA regions and helps position catalytic DCL1 relative to ssRNA–dsRNA junctions. | Structural and genetic evidence assigns cleavage to RNase III enzyme DCL1 and RNA recognition or positioning to HYL1. Canonical cleavage occurs approximately 15–17 nt from the ssRNA–dsRNA junction (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 12-13). | High for noncatalytic cofactor status; moderate for a universal molecular-ruler model because precursor structures and processing modes vary. |
| DCL1–SE complex | HYL1 acts with DCL1 and SERRATE in the nuclear plant miRNA microprocessor, promoting efficient and precise pri-miRNA cleavage and mature-miRNA accumulation. | HYL1 physically interacts with DCL1. hyl1, dcl1, and se mutants accumulate pri-miRNAs or generate inaccurate products, supporting a functional DCL1–HYL1–SE complex (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2006serrateisa pages 6-6). | High. DCL1 is catalytic, whereas HYL1 and SERRATE are accessory processing factors. |
| Homodimerization | HYL1 homodimerizes through dsRBD2. The dimer is proposed to orient DCL1 for correct cleavage-site selection. | Yeast two-hybrid, pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation, and bimolecular fluorescence complementation demonstrated self-association. Gly147 and Leu165 are critical; disrupting dimerization preserved DCL1 binding but caused inaccurate cleavage, pri-miRNA retention in HYL1 complexes, and lower processing efficiency (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 4-5). | High for dimerization and its functional importance; the exact anchor or ruler geometry remains a mechanistic model. |
| Nuclear localization and dicing bodies | HYL1 performs its primary processing function in the nucleus and concentrates with DCL1 and SERRATE in nuclear dicing bodies distinct from Cajal bodies. | Fluorescence-localization and interaction studies place HYL1 and DCL1 in nuclear D-bodies; genetic loss of either protein impairs nuclear pri-miRNA processing (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 4-5). | High for nuclear and D-body localization. Whether D-bodies are principally active processing sites, assembly sites, or both remains incompletely resolved. |
| Cytoplasmic and downstream roles | HYL1 undergoes nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling and can dimerize in the cytosol. Available evidence also links cytoplasmic HYL1 to miRNA-mediated translational repression. | HYL1 dimerization was detected in both nucleus and cytosol, while its C-terminal region influenced localization and stability. Prior work summarized in the gathered evidence identifies cytoplasmic HYL1 as a translational-repression factor (bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 16-17, bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 1-2). | Moderate. Cytoplasmic localization is supported experimentally, but detailed translational-repression measurements were not present in the gathered excerpts. |
| Phosphorylation and stability | HYL1 activity, localization, and abundance are controlled by reversible phosphorylation and proteolysis. CPL1/2-mediated dephosphorylation promotes active HYL1, while MPK3 phosphorylates conserved Ser42 and affects shuttling and degradation. | MPK3-dependent Ser42 phosphorylation, nuclear–cytosolic redistribution, altered HYL1 stability in mpk3, and contributions of the C terminus to stability and localization were reported experimentally (bhagat2018dynamicregulationof pages 1-4, bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 1-2). | Moderate to high. Phosphoregulation is established, but the effects of particular phosphorylation states and enzymes remain mechanistically complex. |
| 2024 precursor-structure research | Reconstitution of the Arabidopsis DCL1–SERRATE–HYL1 machinery in yeast confirmed that precursor-duplex geometry influences processing. DCL1 recognition of a 2-nt 3′ overhang contributes to precise second cleavage. | Bulge position altered cleavage activity and precision. Weakening the DCL1 PAZ-domain 3′-overhang pocket shifted miR-5p termini by 1–2 nt and reduced second-cleavage precision for most assessed Arabidopsis miRNAs (zhang2024structuraldeterminantsin pages 8-8). | High for DCL1 and precursor-structure effects. HYL1 was part of the reconstituted complex, but the study did not isolate a new HYL1-specific biochemical activity. |
| 2024 osmotic-stress research | DRB1 is required for an appropriate miRNA response to mannitol-induced osmotic stress and is the principal DRB factor for production of miR160, miR164, miR167, and miR396 under the tested conditions. | In 15-day-old drb1 seedlings, 100 of 221 detected miRNAs, or 45.2%, changed significantly after mannitol treatment; 94 of those 100, or 94.0%, decreased. Conversely, 119 of 123 altered miRNAs, or 96.7%, increased in stressed wild type. The four highlighted miRNAs were reduced approximately twofold or more in unstressed drb1 seedlings (pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 1-2, pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 16-17). | Moderate to high. The molecular genotype effect is strong, but mannitol is a laboratory osmotic-stress proxy and does not establish field-level drought tolerance. |
| 2024 auxin and root-development research | DRB1 cooperates with other DRB proteins to regulate the miR160–ARF10/ARF16/ARF17 module involved in Arabidopsis root responses to auxin. | Recent mutant studies identify DRB1 as a primary factor for miR160 production and connect defective DRB activity with altered miR160-mediated responses (pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 1-2, pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 16-17). | Moderate. The gathered evidence supports DRB1 involvement in miR160 production, but detailed auxin-treatment and root-phenotype measurements were unavailable in the cited excerpts. |
Table: Compact evidence map for the verified Arabidopsis DRB1/HYL1 target, distinguishing established molecular functions from mechanistic models and recent 2024 findings.
The primary site of HYL1 activity is the nucleus. HYL1, DCL1, and SE concentrate in D-bodies, nuclear foci associated with miRNA-complex assembly and/or processing. HYL1 and DCL1 define bodies distinct from canonical Cajal bodies. The evidence firmly establishes colocalization and dependence of nuclear pri-miRNA processing on these proteins, although the relative contributions of diffuse nucleoplasmic, cotranscriptional, and D-body-localized processing remain under investigation (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 4-5).
HYL1 also undergoes nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling and can dimerize in both compartments. Evidence summarized in the 2022 study further links cytoplasmic HYL1 to miRNA-mediated translational repression, extending its function beyond precursor processing. Because the detailed measurements from that translational-repression study were not available in the retrieved text, this should be regarded as a supported secondary function rather than the defining annotation (bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 16-17, bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 1-2).
HYL1 is regulated by phosphorylation, localization, and proteolytic stability. CPL-family phosphatases promote the hypophosphorylated, processing-competent state; inappropriate phosphorylation impairs accurate processing and strand selection. MPK3 phosphorylates the conserved Ser42, affects nuclear–cytosolic shuttling, and promotes turnover. In mpk3 mutants, HYL1 was reported to be hyperphosphorylated yet more stable and less readily degraded, illustrating that HYL1 regulation depends on combinations of sites and modifying enzymes rather than a simple binary phosphorylation switch. Its C-terminal region also contributes to stability and localization (yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, bhagat2018dynamicregulationof pages 1-4, bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 1-2).
A 2023 study added FREE1 as a negative regulatory input. Nuclear FREE1 associates with the microprocessor regulator CPL1 and disrupts productive HYL1–SE–CPL1 association. Nuclear FREE1 inactivation increases those associations and shifts HYL1 from an inactive hyperphosphorylated form toward active hypophosphorylated HYL1, thereby increasing miRNA biogenesis. This connects endosomal/ESCRT-associated machinery to nuclear miRNA regulation rather than changing HYL1’s core biochemical function. Li et al., published November 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202255037.
HYL1 operates near the beginning of the canonical plant miRNA pathway:
HYL1 therefore affects downstream gene regulation indirectly by controlling the amount, termini, and strand identity of mature miRNAs. Its effects on development, hormones, and stress are largely consequences of perturbing particular miRNA–target modules rather than evidence that HYL1 itself is a hormone receptor or stress-signaling enzyme (pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 1-2, yang2006serrateisa pages 6-6).
A proposed later role links HYL1 to nuclear AGO1 loading through the intrinsically disordered scaffold CARP9. CARP9 interacts with HYL1, mature miRNA, and AGO1 and was proposed to stabilize a post-processing HYL1–CARP9–AGO1 complex. This suggests continuity between accurate duplex production and effector loading, but it remains less foundational than HYL1’s DCL1-cofactor role. Tomassi et al., published September 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.20.00258.
A 2024 study reconstituted Arabidopsis DCL1–SE–HYL1 processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It showed that the position of asymmetric bulges within miRNA/miRNA duplexes can alter cleavage efficiency, precision, or both. Recognition of the pre-miRNA’s 2-nt 3′ overhang by the DCL1 PAZ-domain pocket was important for precise second cleavage; weakening this interaction shifted miR-5p termini by 1–2 nt* and reduced precision for most assessed Arabidopsis miRNAs. This work refines current understanding of the substrate features handled by the HYL1-containing complex, but its newly isolated determinants were mainly assigned to precursor geometry and DCL1 rather than to a new catalytic activity of HYL1 (zhang2024structuraldeterminantsin pages 8-8). Zhang and Li, published August 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16974.
In 15-day-old seedlings exposed to mannitol, 100 of 221 detected miRNAs (45.2%) changed significantly in drb1. Of these, 94/100 (94.0%) decreased. Wild-type plants showed the opposite global response: 119/123 altered miRNAs (96.7%) increased. Under control conditions, loss of DRB1 caused an approximately twofold or greater reduction in miR160, miR164, miR167, and miR396, supporting DRB1 as their primary DRB cofactor under the tested conditions. DRB1, DRB2, and DRB4 jointly affected miR399 and miR408 regulation (pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 1-2, pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 16-17). Pegler et al., published November 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312562.
These results are molecular evidence for defective osmotic-stress adaptation in drb1, not proof that manipulating DRB1 will improve crop drought tolerance. Mannitol is a controlled osmotic-stress proxy, and altered miRNA profiles may include both adaptive and maladaptive effects.
Two 2024 studies connected DRB1 with control of the miR160–ARF10/ARF16/ARF17 module. DRB1 is a major determinant of miR160 production; DRB2 and, in roots, DRB4 also contribute. Perturbing these DRB proteins alters miR160 abundance, ARF target expression, and root responses to endogenous manipulations or exogenous 2,4-D. The mechanistic interpretation is that DRB1 controls an upstream RNA-processing step, while altered AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR expression produces the developmental phenotype (pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 1-2, pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 16-17). Zimmerman et al., published August 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15081042; and December 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121648.
HYL1/DRB1 is currently most valuable as a research and biotechnology control point, rather than as a deployed agricultural product. Demonstrated or plausible uses include:
However, HYL1 processes many miRNA families, so global overexpression or suppression is likely to be pleiotropic. More realistic translational strategies would alter tissue-specific expression, selected interaction surfaces, or individual MIR precursor structures. No evidence retrieved here establishes field deployment, commercial cultivars, or agronomic benefit from direct Arabidopsis DRB1 manipulation.
Recommended primary annotation: “Double-stranded RNA-binding, noncatalytic cofactor of the Arabidopsis nuclear DCL1–SERRATE microprocessor; binds structured pri-/pre-miRNA substrates and promotes efficient, precise cleavage and mature-miRNA accumulation.”
Localization annotation: “Predominantly nuclear, including miRNA dicing bodies; capable of regulated nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling, with secondary cytoplasmic/post-processing functions.”
Strongest evidence: structural determination, domain-rescue genetics, direct protein-interaction assays, mutant precursor/product profiles, in-vitro/reconstituted processing, and cleavage-site mapping (yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 4-5, yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 12-13, zhang2024structuraldeterminantsin pages 8-8).
Main uncertainties: the exact physical ruler/anchor mechanism across structurally diverse pri-miRNAs; how much processing occurs in D-bodies versus cotranscriptionally elsewhere in the nucleus; and the general importance of HYL1’s proposed cytoplasmic and AGO1-loading functions relative to its established nuclear role.
References
(yang2010structureofarabidopsis pages 1-2): Seong Wook Yang, Hong-Ying Chen, Jing Yang, Satoru Machida, Nam-Hai Chua, and Y. Adam Yuan. Structure of arabidopsis hyponastic leaves1 and its molecular implications for mirna processing. Structure, 18 5:594-605, May 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2010.02.006, doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.02.006. This article has 203 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 1-2): Xi Yang, Wenqing Ren, Qiuxia Zhao, Peng Zhang, Feijie Wu, and Yuke He. Homodimerization of hyl1 ensures the correct selection of cleavage sites in primary mirna. Nucleic Acids Research, 42:12224-12236, Oct 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku907, doi:10.1093/nar/gku907. This article has 76 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 1-2): Prakash Kumar Bhagat, Deepanjali Verma, Kirti Singh, Raghuram Badmi, Deepika Sharma, and Alok Krishna Sinha. Dynamic phosphorylation of mirna biogenesis factor hyl1 by mpk3 involving nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling and protein stability in arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23:3787, Mar 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073787, doi:10.3390/ijms23073787. This article has 18 citations.
(bhagat2018dynamicregulationof pages 1-4): Prakash Kumar Bhagat, Deepanjali Verma, Raghuram Badmi, and Alok Krishna Sinha. Dynamic regulation of hyl1 provides new insights into its multifaceted role in arabidopsis. bioRxiv, Aug 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/396861, doi:10.1101/396861. This article has 4 citations.
(yang2006serrateisa pages 6-6): Li Yang, Ziqiang Liu, Feng Lu, Aiwu Dong, and Hai Huang. Serrate is a novel nuclear regulator in primary microrna processing in arabidopsis. The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 47 6:841-50, Sep 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02835.x, doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02835.x. This article has 533 citations.
(yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 12-13): Xi Yang, Wenqing Ren, Qiuxia Zhao, Peng Zhang, Feijie Wu, and Yuke He. Homodimerization of hyl1 ensures the correct selection of cleavage sites in primary mirna. Nucleic Acids Research, 42:12224-12236, Oct 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku907, doi:10.1093/nar/gku907. This article has 76 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(yang2014homodimerizationofhyl1 pages 4-5): Xi Yang, Wenqing Ren, Qiuxia Zhao, Peng Zhang, Feijie Wu, and Yuke He. Homodimerization of hyl1 ensures the correct selection of cleavage sites in primary mirna. Nucleic Acids Research, 42:12224-12236, Oct 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku907, doi:10.1093/nar/gku907. This article has 76 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(bhagat2022dynamicphosphorylationof pages 16-17): Prakash Kumar Bhagat, Deepanjali Verma, Kirti Singh, Raghuram Badmi, Deepika Sharma, and Alok Krishna Sinha. Dynamic phosphorylation of mirna biogenesis factor hyl1 by mpk3 involving nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling and protein stability in arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23:3787, Mar 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073787, doi:10.3390/ijms23073787. This article has 18 citations.
(zhang2024structuraldeterminantsin pages 8-8): Hui Zhang and Fengle Li. Structural determinants in the mirna/mirna* duplex and the dcl1 paz domain for precise and efficient plant mirna processing. The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 120:109-122, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16974, doi:10.1111/tpj.16974. This article has 5 citations.
(pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 1-2): Joseph L. Pegler, Jackson M. J. Oultram, Christopher P. L. Grof, and Andrew L. Eamens. Drb1, drb2 and drb4 are required for an appropriate mirna-mediated molecular response to osmotic stress in arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25:12562, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312562, doi:10.3390/ijms252312562. This article has 1 citations.
(pegler2024drb1drb2and pages 16-17): Joseph L. Pegler, Jackson M. J. Oultram, Christopher P. L. Grof, and Andrew L. Eamens. Drb1, drb2 and drb4 are required for an appropriate mirna-mediated molecular response to osmotic stress in arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25:12562, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312562, doi:10.3390/ijms252312562. This article has 1 citations.