vgrG1b (PA0095, Q9I737) notes

Review session 2026-11-05 (PseudoCAP IBA-seed protocol, tier 2)

Fetched with just fetch-gene PSEAE Q9I737 --alias vgrG1b; accession matches the
worklist (reviewed entry VGR1B_PSEAE). No deep-research provider key was
available. PMID:21325275 and PMID:24794869 read in full; PMID:30455305 is
abstract only (fetched with just fetch-pmid), but its abstract states the
decisive facts.

Identity and literature

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale other seeds IBD stands without this seed?
PTN002088178 GO:0033103 protein secretion by the type VI secretion system 3 (Q9I737, Q9I741, Q9I0F3) 13 (3 taxa) GO:0033103, IMP, PMID:21325275 (PseudoCAP) WRONG The cited paper's vgrG1b result is negative on both counts (the mutant secretes Hcp1 and the other VgrGs normally; its own release needs no ClpV). An IMP row cannot rest on that. The term itself is true of vgrG1b on later evidence (PMID:30455305, PMID:24794869), so the fix is the reference, not the term. Full text read, so CONFIRMED. vgrG1a (Q9I741) and vgrG1c (Q9I0F3), both SOUND (IDA PMID:20114026, IMP PMID:21325275) Yes — the node rests on the vgrG1a and vgrG1c seeds, so no GO_CENTRAL defect
PTN002088178 GO:0033104 type VI protein secretion system complex 3 (Q9I737, Q9I0F3, Q9I741) 13 (3 taxa) GO:0033104, IMP, PMID:21325275 (PseudoCAP) WRONG Same reference problem. Complex membership is defensible for a spike protein whose cargo delivery needs the H1-T6SS cluster, but not core: the Hcp1 apparatus assembles and fires without VgrG1b. as above Yes

One PSEUDOCAP defect (WRONG_REFERENCE, REPOINT PMID:21325275 ->
PMID:30455305, CONFIRMED) is recorded on the GO:0033103 IMP row and covers both
rows. No GO_CENTRAL defect: the node term suits the clade (13 leaves, all VgrG
spike proteins in three taxa) and the IBDs survive without this seed.

Decisions summary