The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Extensive review of recent and foundational literature confirms the correct targeting of the human gene EIF3J. EIF3J encodes the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit J (eIF3j), as annotated in UniProt O75822, and matches the provided protein/domain description. All reviewed sources describe its role within the human eIF3 system; ambiguous alternative gene/protein symbols were not detected in retrieved authoritative literature (wagner2016humaneif3band pages 1-2, valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 1-2).
eIF3j is a non-enzymatic, ribosome-associated translation factor classified as a peripheral, substoichiometric member of the eIF3 multiprotein complex. Unlike core eIF3 subunits—which form the PCI/MPN octamer or "yeast-like core"—eIF3j associates transiently with the eIF3 complex and the small (40S) ribosomal subunit (wagner2016humaneif3band pages 1-2). It is best described as an eIF3-associated factor rather than a bona fide core subunit (valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 1-2, valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 3-4, sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1).
Domain Structure: Human eIF3j comprises an N-terminal region mediating interaction with the RRM domain of eIF3b (the core scaffolding subunit), and a C-terminal region required for specific regulatory activity (notably, inhibition of circular RNA translation) (valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 3-4, song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 1-2).
Primary Function: eIF3j regulates translation initiation, ribosome recycling, and selected non-canonical translation processes, without direct enzymatic activity or substrate specificity.
EIF3J is predominantly cytoplasmic, consistent with its roles in mRNA translation (initiation and recycling) on cytoplasmic ribosomes. There is no significant evidence for nuclear or mitochondrial localization in humans (duan2023eif3mrnaselectivity pages 1-2, sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1).
The following table comprehensively summarizes specific findings, pathways, features, and structural insights, prioritized by publication year and experimental authority:
| Aspect | Key finding for human EIF3J/eIF3j | Evidence/details | Recent relevance (2022-2024) | Source / year / URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene/protein identity | EIF3J encodes human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit J (eIF3j), an eIF3-associated translation factor rather than a stable core eIF3 subunit | Reviews and assembly studies distinguish mammalian eIF3 as a 12-subunit complex and describe eIF3j as loosely associated/substoichiometric, often treated as an eIF3-associated factor rather than a bona fide core subunit (wagner2016humaneif3band pages 1-2, valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 1-2) | Still the prevailing model used in current eIF3 literature and structural studies | Wagner et al., 2016, Nucleic Acids Research, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw972 ; Valášek et al., 2017, Nucleic Acids Research, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805 |
| Primary molecular function | Non-catalytic ribosome-associated translation factor that modulates mRNA recruitment, translation initiation complex dynamics, and ribosome recycling | No enzymatic activity is described; instead, eIF3j acts through protein- and ribosome-binding interactions that alter 40S/mRNA/factor configurations (sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1, young2022rebirthofthe pages 3-4) | Current understanding emphasizes regulatory rather than catalytic function | Sokabe & Fraser, 2017, PNAS, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114 ; Young & Guydosh, 2022, BioEssays, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269 |
| Subunit association within eIF3 system | eIF3j is substoichiometric and transiently associated with holo-eIF3 | eIF3j binds the eIF3b RRM and is not required for the stable PCI/MPN octamer or yeast-like core assembly; this supports its classification as peripheral/associated (wagner2016humaneif3band pages 1-2, valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 3-4) | Important for interpreting modern cryo-EM structures, which typically focus on core eIF3 architecture | Wagner et al., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw972 ; Valášek et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805 |
| Domain architecture | Contains an eIF3j-specific domain and functionally important N- and C-terminal regions; the N-terminus mediates factor interactions and the C-terminus contributes to RNA-regulatory functions | Structural review cites NMR information for the interaction of human eIF3j residues 35-69 with human eIF3b RRM; 2022 circRNA work found the C-terminus essential for inhibitory activity on circRNA translation (valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 3-4, song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 1-2) | The C-terminal regulatory role gained new attention in 2022 | Valášek et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805 ; Song et al., 2022, Nucleic Acids Research, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac980 |
| Direct interaction partner(s) | Interacts with eIF3b and functionally couples to eIF3 and ABCE1/RLI1 | Human eIF3j N-terminal peptide contacts eIF3b RRM; ribosome recycling literature and review evidence indicate physical/functional interplay with ABCE1 and eIF3 on post-termination ribosomes (valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 3-4, young2022rebirthofthe pages 3-4) | These interactions underpin newer models of initiation-recycling continuity | Valášek et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805 ; Young & Guydosh, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269 |
| Ribosome binding site | Binds the 40S small subunit near the mRNA entry channel and A-site; competes anti-cooperatively with accommodated mRNA | Reconstituted human systems show high-affinity binding of eIF3j to the 43S PIC/40S and a marked reduction in affinity after mRNA recruitment; this is interpreted as reporting mRNA accommodation into the decoding site/entry channel (sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1) | Remains a key mechanistic framework for understanding eIF3j action in human initiation | Sokabe & Fraser, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114 |
| Role in cap-dependent initiation | Regulates an early step of mRNA recruitment to the 43S PIC and is displaced as mRNA becomes fully accommodated | Human reconstitution experiments indicate that eIF4F/eIF4A/eIF4B-dependent mRNA recruitment lowers eIF3j affinity for the 43S PIC; short RNAs that do not extend into the entry channel fail to displace eIF3j (sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1) | Supports the current view that eIF3j marks and/or gates mRNA entry into the 40S channel | Sokabe & Fraser, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114 |
| Dependence on eIF4A/ATP during initiation | Full reduction in eIF3j affinity during mRNA recruitment requires ATP-dependent but unwinding-independent eIF4A activity | This suggests eIF3j senses a regulated conformational transition of the human 43S PIC rather than only RNA helicase action (sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1) | Conceptually reinforced by 2024 human 48S structures showing factor-rich organization around entry and exit channels | Sokabe & Fraser, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114 ; Querido et al., 2024, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01196-0 |
| Role in ribosome recycling | Promotes efficient post-termination recycling, especially by enhancing ABCE1/RLI1-mediated subunit splitting and/or subsequent 40S recycling transitions | Reviews summarize yeast/human evidence that eIF3j improves ABCE1/RLI1 recycling efficiency, binds when one ABCE1 nucleotide-binding site is partially open, and may help control post-splitting 40S states (young2022rebirthofthe pages 3-4, young2022rebirthofthe pages 4-6) | Ribosome recycling remains one of the most important non-initiation functions ascribed to eIF3j in recent synthesis articles | Young & Guydosh, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269 |
| Site of action in recycling | Cytoplasmic post-termination 80S/40S ribosome complexes | Reconstituted and structural/review evidence places eIF3j on ribosomal complexes after termination, participating with ABCE1 and canonical initiation/recycling factors on the small subunit (young2022rebirthofthe pages 3-4, young2022rebirthofthe pages 4-6) | Helps explain functional continuity between recycling and re-initiation-capable 40S states | Young & Guydosh, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269 |
| Role in translation termination fidelity / readthrough | eIF3j has been linked to stop-codon decoding outcomes via the broader eIF3 network; loss of eIF3j/HCR1 increased readthrough in yeast models | Review of foundational work notes that eIF3 and eIF3j associate with terminating ribosomes and influence stop-codon readthrough/termination dynamics, though much mechanistic evidence comes from yeast systems (valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 10-11, valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 11-12) | Useful as evolutionary/mechanistic context, but less directly established for human EIF3J than initiation/recycling roles | Valášek et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805 |
| Role in circular RNA translation | eIF3j can act as a negative regulator of a subset of circRNA translation by promoting eIF3 dissociation from circRNA templates | In a 2022 systematic screen, eIF3j was the strongest inhibitor among tested eIFs; binding of eIF3j to circSfl promoted dissociation of eIF3, and the eIF3j C-terminus plus a circRNA UTR regulon were required (song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 1-2, song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 4-5) | One of the clearest newly described regulatory activities relevant to 2022-2024 literature | Song et al., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac980 ; Hwang & Kim, 2024 review, https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01220-3 |
| Subcellular localization | Predominantly cytoplasmic site of action, consistent with roles in mRNA translation, ribosome binding, and ribosome recycling | eIF3 subunits in mammalian cells show predominantly cytoplasmic localization, and eIF3j functions are consistently described on cytoplasmic 40S/43S/80S complexes rather than nuclear pathways (duan2023eif3mrnaselectivity pages 1-2, sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1) | No strong evidence in the retrieved set for a primary non-cytoplasmic human EIF3J role | Duan et al., 2023, The EMBO Journal, https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112362 ; Sokabe & Fraser, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114 |
| Structural context in modern human initiation complexes | Modern 48S cryo-EM maps emphasize eIF3 architecture at both mRNA entry and exit sides of the 40S, providing context for eIF3j’s gatekeeping position even when eIF3j itself is not the focus of the map | Human 48S structure shows eIF3 octamer/core plus peripheral subunits surrounding the mRNA path and a second eIF4A at the entry site, supporting a framework in which entry-channel factors such as eIF3j regulate mRNA accommodation (querido2024thestructureof pages 1-2) | Important 2024 context for integrating older eIF3j biochemical data with current structural models | Querido et al., 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01196-0 |
| Viral/pathogen interface relevance | eIF3j-binding surfaces on the 40S entry region are functionally important enough to be targeted or competed by pathogens/viral factors | SARS-CoV-2 Nsp1 was proposed to compete with eIF3j for 40S binding and weaken eIF3 association; this supports the biological importance of eIF3j’s 40S interface (yuan2020nonstructuralprotein1 pages 1-7) | Highlights translational control interfaces relevant to infection biology | Yuan et al., 2020, Molecular Cell, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.034 |
| Human tissue expression pattern | EIF3J transcript abundance varies across human tissues rather than being uniformly invariant | Transcriptomic survey identified relative tissue differences, including lower expression in ovary and higher expression in brain/liver/testis-related comparisons (young2022rebirthofthe pages 1-3) | Provides recent systems-level context, although not direct functional proof | Anisimova et al., 2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098361 |
| Current consensus summary | Human EIF3J/eIF3j is best annotated as a peripheral, non-enzymatic 40S/eIF3-associated regulator that helps coordinate mRNA entry, initiation-complex remodeling, and ribosome recycling, with emerging transcript-selective inhibitory functions on circRNA translation | This synthesis is supported by assembly studies, structural reviews, biochemical reconstitution, recycling reviews, and newer circRNA-focused work (wagner2016humaneif3band pages 1-2, valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 1-2, sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1, young2022rebirthofthe pages 4-6, song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 1-2) | Most robust experimentally supported functions remain in cytoplasmic translation control rather than signaling or catalysis | Wagner et al., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw972 ; Valášek et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805 ; Sokabe & Fraser, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114 ; Young & Guydosh, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269 ; Song et al., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac980 |
Table: This table summarizes the main experimentally supported functions and structural features of human EIF3J/eIF3j, emphasizing its 40S/eIF3-associated roles in translation initiation and ribosome recycling. It also highlights newer findings from 2022-2024, including selective inhibition of circRNA translation and modern structural context.
Leading-edge research now highlights eIF3j as a selective, modular regulator within cytoplasmic translation, best conceptualized as a non-catalytic RNA–protein remodeling factor. Its physiological impacts are most apparent at the level of core protein synthesis, ribosome recycling efficiency, and context-dependent translation inhibition (such as for circular RNA translation). Emerging evidence supports a model where eIF3j integrates mRNA fate at the interface of ribosome structure, eIF3 complex status, and cellular stress/adaptation signals.
EIF3J (eIF3j) serves as a regulatory hub for cytoplasmic ribosomes, linking translation efficiency and selectivity at both initiation and recycling stages, with recently discovered control over circular RNA translation. Continued structural, genetic, and single-molecule studies will likely further clarify its roles in disease, adaptation, and metabolic stress responses.
References
(wagner2016humaneif3band pages 1-2): Susan Wagner, Anna Herrmannová, Darina Šikrová, and Leoš Shivaya Valášek. Human eif3b and eif3a serve as the nucleation core for the assembly of eif3 into two interconnected modules: the yeast-like core and the octamer. Nucleic Acids Research, 44:10772-10788, Oct 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw972, doi:10.1093/nar/gkw972. This article has 107 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 1-2): Leoš Shivaya Valášek, Jakub Zeman, Susan Wagner, Petra Beznosková, Zuzana Pavlíková, Mahabub Pasha Mohammad, Vladislava Hronová, Anna Herrmannová, Yaser Hashem, and Stanislava Gunišová. Embraced by eif3: structural and functional insights into the roles of eif3 across the translation cycle. Nucleic Acids Research, 45:10948-10968, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx805. This article has 181 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 3-4): Leoš Shivaya Valášek, Jakub Zeman, Susan Wagner, Petra Beznosková, Zuzana Pavlíková, Mahabub Pasha Mohammad, Vladislava Hronová, Anna Herrmannová, Yaser Hashem, and Stanislava Gunišová. Embraced by eif3: structural and functional insights into the roles of eif3 across the translation cycle. Nucleic Acids Research, 45:10948-10968, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx805. This article has 181 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(sokabe2017ahelicaseindependentactivity pages 1-1): Masaaki Sokabe and Christopher S. Fraser. A helicase-independent activity of eif4a in promoting mrna recruitment to the human ribosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114:6304-6309, May 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620426114, doi:10.1073/pnas.1620426114. This article has 104 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 1-2): Zhenxing Song, Jiamei Lin, Rui Su, Yu Ji, Ruirui Jia, Shi Li, Ge Shan, and Chuan Huang. Eif3j inhibits translation of a subset of circular rnas in eukaryotic cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 50:11529-11549, Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac980, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac980. This article has 36 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(young2022rebirthofthe pages 3-4): David J. Young and Nicholas R. Guydosh. Rebirth of the translational machinery: the importance of recycling ribosomes. BioEssays, Feb 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269, doi:10.1002/bies.202100269. This article has 32 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(young2022rebirthofthe pages 4-6): David J. Young and Nicholas R. Guydosh. Rebirth of the translational machinery: the importance of recycling ribosomes. BioEssays, Feb 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269, doi:10.1002/bies.202100269. This article has 32 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(song2022eif3jinhibitstranslation pages 4-5): Zhenxing Song, Jiamei Lin, Rui Su, Yu Ji, Ruirui Jia, Shi Li, Ge Shan, and Chuan Huang. Eif3j inhibits translation of a subset of circular rnas in eukaryotic cells. Nucleic Acids Research, 50:11529-11549, Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac980, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac980. This article has 36 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(hwang2024molecularmechanismsof pages 1-2): Hyun Jung Hwang and Yoon Ki Kim. Molecular mechanisms of circular rna translation. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 56:1272-1280, Jun 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01220-3, doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01220-3. This article has 153 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(duan2023eif3mrnaselectivity pages 1-2): Haoran Duan, Siqiong Zhang, Yoram Zarai, Rupert Öllinger, Yanmeng Wu, Li Sun, Cheng Hu, Yaohui He, Guiyou Tian, Roland Rad, Xiangquan Kong, Yabin Cheng, Tamir Tuller, and Dieter A Wolf. Eif3 mrna selectivity profiling reveals eif3k as a cancer‐relevant regulator of ribosome content. The EMBO Journal, May 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022112362, doi:10.15252/embj.2022112362. This article has 28 citations.
(valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 10-11): Leoš Shivaya Valášek, Jakub Zeman, Susan Wagner, Petra Beznosková, Zuzana Pavlíková, Mahabub Pasha Mohammad, Vladislava Hronová, Anna Herrmannová, Yaser Hashem, and Stanislava Gunišová. Embraced by eif3: structural and functional insights into the roles of eif3 across the translation cycle. Nucleic Acids Research, 45:10948-10968, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx805. This article has 181 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(valasek2017embracedbyeif3 pages 11-12): Leoš Shivaya Valášek, Jakub Zeman, Susan Wagner, Petra Beznosková, Zuzana Pavlíková, Mahabub Pasha Mohammad, Vladislava Hronová, Anna Herrmannová, Yaser Hashem, and Stanislava Gunišová. Embraced by eif3: structural and functional insights into the roles of eif3 across the translation cycle. Nucleic Acids Research, 45:10948-10968, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx805, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx805. This article has 181 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(she2023translationalfidelityscreens pages 1-2): Richard She, Jingchuan Luo, and Jonathan S Weissman. Translational fidelity screens in mammalian cells reveal eif3 and eif4g2 as regulators of start codon selectivity. Nucleic Acids Research, 51:6355-6369, May 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad329, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad329. This article has 26 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(querido2024thestructureof pages 1-2): Jailson Brito Querido, Masaaki Sokabe, Irene Díaz-López, Yuliya Gordiyenko, Christopher S. Fraser, and V. Ramakrishnan. The structure of a human translation initiation complex reveals two independent roles for the helicase eif4a. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 31:455-464, Dec 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-01196-0, doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01196-0. This article has 108 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(young2022rebirthofthe pages 1-3): David J. Young and Nicholas R. Guydosh. Rebirth of the translational machinery: the importance of recycling ribosomes. BioEssays, Feb 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100269, doi:10.1002/bies.202100269. This article has 32 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(yuan2020nonstructuralprotein1 pages 1-7): Shuai Yuan, Lei Peng, Jonathan J. Park, Yingxia Hu, Swapnil C. Devarkar, Matthew B. Dong, Shenping Wu, Sidi Chen, Ivan Lomakin, and Yong Xiong. Nonstructural protein 1 of sars-cov-2 is a potent pathogenicity factor redirecting host protein synthesis machinery toward viral rna. Molecular Cell, 80:1055-1066.e6, Aug 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.034, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.034. This article has 210 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.