TNFRSF10A / DR4 notes
Core role
- TNFRSF10A is DR4/TRAIL-R1, a type I TNF-receptor-family death receptor for
TNFSF10/TRAIL. The original cloning paper identified a TRAIL receptor
"designated death receptor-4, DR4" with a cytoplasmic death domain
PMID:9082980.
- The first DR4 report did not see FADD use in its assay system, but this was
resolved quickly by Schneider et al., who showed that "TRAIL induces
apoptosis through two closely related receptors, TRAIL-R1 (DR4) and
TRAIL-R2 (DR5)" and that DR4/DR5 signaling is FADD dependent PMID:9430228.
GO rows to generic apoptosis, signal transduction, and death-domain-receptor
apoptotic signaling are therefore correct in direction but should be narrowed
to GO:0036462 TRAIL-activated apoptotic signaling pathway.
- TNFRSF10A does not just bind ligand in isolation: receptor clustering and
death-domain signaling are part of the molecular activity. GO:0036463 TRAIL
receptor activity is the best replacement for imported protein binding,
TRAIL binding, death receptor activity, signaling receptor activity,
and DR4 oligomerization rows that are really describing this same
receptor-level function.
- Palmitoylation is a DR4-specific activation determinant. Rossin et al. found
that "DR4 is palmitoylated" and that this modification is required for raft
localization and oligomerization during TRAIL-induced signaling
PMID:19090789. The specific active location should be
GO:0044853 plasma membrane raft; broader membrane-raft rows can be
modified to that term.
Accessory and trafficking evidence
- ARAP1 is a trafficking/accessory interactor rather than the core DR4
molecular function. The cached abstract reports DR4 intracellular-region
binding, co-precipitation, co-localization in ER/Golgi, plasma membrane, and
early endosomes, and compromised DR4 cell-surface localization after ARAP1
knockdown PMID:18165900. That supports a biological role in DR4
mobilization, but not retention of a generic GO:0005515 protein binding
row for TNFRSF10A.
- ZDHHC3/GODZ regulates DR4 delivery and TRAIL sensitivity. The paper reports
that "GODZ binds to DR4, but not to DR5" and localizes DR4 to the plasma
membrane through its DHHC motif PMID:22240897. Golgi and cytosol rows from
this paper are non-core trafficking pools; plasma membrane remains a core
location.
- DJ-1/PARK7 inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis by binding FADD and blocking
pro-caspase-8 recruitment PMID:21785459. The resulting TNFRSF10A-FADD and
TNFRSF10A-CASP8 co-complex imports support the receptor-proximal TRAIL
pathway, whereas a TNFRSF10A-PARK7 bare binding row over-scopes the receptor.
- The CUL3/caspase-8 aggregation paper sits downstream of the receptor. Its
title-level cache supports that it is about "caspase-8 mediate extrinsic
apoptosis signaling" PMID:19427028, so TNFSF10 edges can be folded into
TRAIL receptor activity and CASP8 co-complex rows into the TRAIL pathway.
- Two IntAct imports from the DR5-peptide paper were left
UNDECIDED: the
cached record is abstract-only and focused on "Multivalent DR5 peptides"
PMID:20103630, so local evidence is not enough to accept or reject its
DR4/TNFSF10A edges.
- The LGALS3BP interaction from the interferon-stimulated-gene AP-MS screen was
also left UNDECIDED: the cached abstract only describes a
"mass-spectrometry-based survey" PMID:30833792 and does not expose the
TNFRSF10A-specific evidence.
Reactome and pathway-model exports
- The TRAIL/TRAILR1 GO-CAM places TNFRSF10A in
GO:0036462 TRAIL-activated apoptotic signaling pathway, with a receptor
molecular function in the plasma-membrane raft. A second HPV E6 model also
keeps TNFRSF10A/TNFRSF10B at the plasma membrane in the same pathway.
- Reactome rows for TNFSF10 binding to TNFRSF10A/B, receptor trimerization,
FADD recruitment, and initiator-caspase recruitment at the DISC are
direct enough to keep as plasma-membrane assertions for DR4. The DR5-only
procaspase-8 dimerization event is not; its summary explicitly places the
event at a "TRAIL receptor-2:FADD receptor complex"
[Reactome:R-HSA-141156].
- TP53-driven transcription of the TNFRSF10A gene is a recurring export trap.
The Reactome event describes p53 stimulating transcription of TRAIL receptor
genes [Reactome:R-HSA-5633441]; that is a gene-expression event, not a
cellular-component observation on mature DR4 protein.
- NF-kappaB output is real but contextual. Both 1997 DR4/DR5 papers and a
pancreatic adenocarcinoma paper support TRAIL-receptor NF-kappaB activation
[PMID:9430227; PMID:9430228; PMID:11464292]. Those rows are non-core relative
to the receptor's apoptotic DISC function and should use a modern canonical
NF-kappaB signaling term rather than the old NIK wording.
- The mechanical-stimulus rows trace to a prostate-cancer BAD paper and only
use IEP/expression-pattern evidence for TNFRSF10A. They should stay marked as
over-annotation, because changed DR4 transcript or surface expression after a
stretch assay does not make DR4 a performer of the mechanical-stimulus
response.