TMEM187 review notes

Why this gene was selected

TMEM187 (formerly CXorf12/ITBA1) is a gene whose name says only that it is a membrane protein, and
until 2026 that was the whole of what was known. GOA carries three CC rows and a GO:0005515 protein binding from a single binary-interactome screen - no biological process, no molecular function beyond
bare binding. A 2026 Blood paper supplies a cellular localisation and a biological role, but the
molecular function is still not determined, and the temptation here is to invent one.

What the 2026 paper establishes

PMID:41824385

Localisation, stated more precisely in the body than in the abstract:
PMID:41824385. The topology is six transmembrane helices,
consistent with the UniProt record (TRANSMEM 8-28, 43-63, 88-108, 113-133, 140-162, 190-210):
PMID:41824385

Biological role, with loss-of-function and gain-of-function in three systems:
PMID:41824385,
PMID:41824385, and - the cleanest test, since mice have no endogenous orthologue -
PMID:41824385.
Summary: PMID:41824385

Mechanism: PMID:41824385 and
PMID:41824385 The binding is nucleotide-state-selective:
PMID:41824385

Why I did not assert a molecular function

The CC and BP claims are reasonably clear. The MF is not, and the right response is to say so rather than
to reach for a plausible-sounding term.

What is actually demonstrated at the molecular level is one thing: TMEM187 binds RAB11A, preferentially in
its GDP-bound state, by co-immunoprecipitation in HEK293 and K562 cells. That supports GO:0031267 small GTPase binding and nothing beyond it. Everything past that point is inference:

So core_functions asserts locations and processes and deliberately asserts no molecular_function.
Per CLAUDE.md, an omitted id says "not established"; a wrong id says something false in a machine-readable
field that other tooling will believe. The RAB11A binding is instead recorded where it belongs, as a
curatable GO:0031267 annotation in existing_annotations, and the missing activity is written up as a
MF_DARK knowledge gap.

A caution about the rest of the TMEM187 literature

Searching PubMed for TMEM187 returns mostly two things that are not about TMEM187's function: Xq28
fine-mapping studies of systemic lupus erythematosus, where TMEM187 is one of several genes in a linkage
block around IRAK1/MECP2 and is not itself implicated (e.g. PMID:22904263), and machine-learning
"biomarker" papers that list TMEM187 among five genes correlated with osteoporosis. Neither supports any
GO annotation, and neither is cited here.

Curation position taken

Open question for experts

Does TMEM187 inhibit GRAB-catalysed nucleotide exchange on RAB11A directly? That is the single experiment
that would convert the current binding annotation into a real molecular function - and, if it failed,
would send the field looking for a different activity for a six-pass Golgi protein.