statA evidence notes

2026-09-20 focused OpenScientist report incorporation

Read all findings, evidence matrix, limitations and leads in statA-hypotheses/proliferation-and-defense-response/openscientist.md. The report resolves the STATb proliferation source and acknowledges: "Vegetative growth rate of statA-null — Not directly quantified in the retrieved literature." Its defense assessment similarly states: "statA in bacterial killing / S-cell function — Untested."

The report does not establish STATa-specific loss of either function. Metazoan source leaves, a distinct TirA defense pathway and direct STATb growth evidence are not exclusion tests. Retain GO:0042127 and GO:0006952 as non-core ancestral inferences from PTN000927860. Differentiation is not itself proliferation evidence, and osmotic stress is not defense evidence. The report is DISPUTED for its donor-composition and absence-of-assay rejection rationale. No duplicate report requested.

Recovery PR evidence follow-up (2026-09-22)

Anchor the retained STAT defense inference to the actual PAINT IBD row, or remove the unsupported negative ACG/SDF-1 assertion from supporting evidence; keep the report assessment in the reason.

Literature review integration (2026-10-04)

Cross-gene briefing for GO editors and PAINT curators: https://claude.ai/artifact/4MLfbbbWWnLchDvspwdPuM