UniProt: Q9H3L0 (MMAD_HUMAN). Gene MMADHC (a.k.a. C2orf25, cblD). 296 aa, MW ~32.9 kDa.
Predicted N-terminal mitochondrial transit peptide (1..38, ECO:0000255); mature chain 39..296.
Structure solved for C-terminal domain (residues 108-296; PDB 5CUZ/5CV0/6X8Z) — a nitro-FMN
reductase-like fold [PMID:26364851, not cached: "molecular mimicry ... new subfamily of nitro-FMN reductases"].
MMADHC is the cblD-complementation-group protein and acts as a branch-point / adaptor in
intracellular cobalamin (vitamin B12) trafficking, functioning downstream of MMACHC (cblC)
in the cytosol. It is NOT an enzyme (the "-DHC" refers to the disease methylmalonic aciduria and
homocystinuria, not a dehydrogenase).
GOA carries GO:0140104 molecular carrier activity (IBA + multiple IDA/EXP/TAS from Reactome & primary
papers) as the F-aspect term — this is the "carries/hands-off cobalamin" adaptor activity, NOT an enzyme
activity. There is no catalytic/EC term in GOA and none should be invented. Retain molecular carrier activity
as the MF for core_functions.
The IPI "protein binding" (GO:0005515) annotations (PMID:32296183 HuRI high-throughput Y2H hits: CINP,
CREB5, POU4F2, TBC1D7; PMID:27771510 MTR/MTRR/MMACHC; PMID:23415655 MMACHC) are uninformative bare
protein-binding — mark as over-annotated per curation policy (do NOT REMOVE experimental IPIs), noting the
biologically meaningful partners (MMACHC, MTR, MTRR) are captured by the molecular carrier activity + BP terms.
Add file:human/MMADHC/MMADHC-uniprot.txt to references for the UniProt FUNCTION/SUBCELLULAR quote support.
Applied projects/ORGANELLES.md Policy to the four GO:0005739 rows. Question: is the
mitochondrial pool of MMADHC in the matrix (GO:0005759)? Lines of evidence:
Caveat: no sub-mitochondrial fractionation or protease-protection assay exists for MMADHC
(PMID:23270877 is abstract-only here: IF + subcellular fractionation; PMID:42709793 used
crude mitochondria). Matrix is therefore a curator inference (IC). Four lines agree, so
policy rule 4 applies.
Changes: IBA (GO_REF:0000033; PAINT PTN008546602 seeded only by Q9H3L0's own root
annotation) and IEA (GO_REF:0000044, SL-0173) KEEP_AS_NON_CORE -> MODIFY to GO:0005759;
HTP (PMID:34800366) and IDA (PMID:23270877) stay KEEP_AS_NON_CORE with reasons noting the
assays resolve only the organelle; NEW IC GO:0005759 row; core_functions locations now
cytosol + mitochondrial matrix (the single branch-point core function spans both pools).
Expected validator warning: mixed actions on GO:0005739 (policy-driven: direct vs synthesis rows). (Superseded 2026-10-18: the synthesis rows are no longer MODIFYed, so this warning no longer occurs.)
After the PR #5208 review, the IBA/IEA mitochondrion rows are kept (not MODIFYed to the matrix): their sources correctly assert the organelle and could not resolve further. The mitochondrial matrix stays as the NEW IC row, added alongside the root rows as GO does for DARS2 and MMUT.
Question put to OpenScientist: does the mitochondrial pool perform part of the core
AdoCbl-supply function in the matrix, or is the decisive activity cytosolic? Report:
MMADHC-hypotheses/mmadhc-mitochondrial-pool-adocbl/openscientist.md. Verdict "partially
supported": the matrix location is well supported, the matrix-side function is unresolved
[file:human/MMADHC/MMADHC-hypotheses/mmadhc-mitochondrial-pool-adocbl/openscientist.md "No
direct physical interaction between MMADHC and any mitochondrial cobalamin enzyme (MMAB,
MMUT, MMAA) has been demonstrated in any assay."]. Checked its key citations:
PMID:24722857 and PMID:26364851. It missed the
mouse Afg3l2 paper, which links mitochondrial Mmadhc accumulation to increased AdoCbl
PMID:41411131.
Decision: the mitochondrial pool matters for the AdoCbl branch, but where its molecular
step happens is unknown. So the matrix stays on the NEW location row and is removed from
the core function's locations (which records where the characterized activity occurs:
the cytosol, with MMACHC). The mitochondrion rows stay KEEP_AS_NON_CORE. The open question
is recorded as a core-function knowledge gap, with a compartment-restricted rescue and
matrix proximity labelling as suggested experiments.