AIGR Deep Research Report — *S. pombe* nce101 (C6Y4B6): "non-classical protein export" function OpenScientist openscientist-autonomous 4 artifacts 2026-08-31T22:17:32.056105

AIGR Deep Research Report — S. pombe nce101 (C6Y4B6): "non-classical protein export" function

Gene: nce101 / SPAC12G12.17 (SCHPO) · UniProt: C6Y4B6 (NCE1_SCHPO) · Family: NCE101 (Pfam PF11654 / InterPro IPR024242 / PANTHER PTHR28011)
Seed hypothesis: S. pombe nce101 directly participates in signal-sequence-independent non-classical protein export, rather than merely inheriting an ambiguous family-level annotation from the S. cerevisiae NCE101 screen.


Executive Judgment

Verdict: REFUTED / OVER-ANNOTATED (with respect to "direct participation").

The evidence points to the opposite of the seed hypothesis. Far from having direct, gene-product-specific evidence, S. pombe nce101 carries no experimental functional data of any kind, and every "non-classical export / exocytosis / protein secretion" annotation is electronically or phylogenetically transferred. This is precisely the "inherited ambiguous family-level annotation" scenario the hypothesis was framed to exclude.

Key pillars:
1. No direct evidence in fission yeast. UniProt C6Y4B6 is a 58-aa single-TM peptide at Protein Existence level 2 (transcript only). Its FUNCTION comment is 100% "By similarity" (ECO:0000250); GO terms are ISO (exocytosis), IBA (protein secretion), and IEA (membrane).
2. PomBase itself calls it uncharacterized — and formally annotates it "unknown." Characterisation status = "conserved unknown"; product name is the family label "non-classical export protein family Nce101." QuickGO confirms PomBase curates all three GO roots as No Data (ND, GO_REF:0000015): molecular_function (GO:0003674) = ND, biological_process (GO:0008150) = ND, cellular_component (GO:0005575) = ND. The only non-root functional terms are GO:0009306 "protein secretion" via IEA (InterPro IPR024242) + IBA (GO_Central, from the S. cerevisiae NCE101 node S000003742) and GO:0016020 membrane via IEA. No experimental (EXP/IDA/IMP/IGI) annotation exists. The only phenotypes are generic chemical-genomic drug/stress sensitivities.
3. The founder annotation is weak and ambiguous. S. cerevisiae NCE101 (Q02820, PE = 3 "inferred from homology") rests on a single 1996 galectin-1 over-expression screen (PMID 8655575) and is explicitly hedged: "may be part of the export machinery or may also be a substrate."
4. The "NCE" family is a phenotype label, not a molecular-function family. Sibling screen hits were reassigned to unrelated functions: NCE103 = β-carbonic anhydrase (an enzyme; PMID 25109265) and NCE102 = plasma-membrane sphingolipid sensor / eisosome-MCC microdomain protein (PMID 35758748) — neither a dedicated export-machinery component.

  1. Both reference databases call it "unknown function." SGD's curated description of the founder (Verified ORF YJL205C) is "Protein of unknown function; … SWAT-GFP and mCherry fusion proteins localize to the cytosol" — and PomBase calls the S. pombe gene "conserved unknown." The experimental cytosolic localization further conflicts with the transferred "single-pass membrane protein" CC (a TMHMM prediction), so even the location term is uncertain.

Most important caveat: "Refuted" here means the direct-participation claim is unsupported and the annotation is over-strong; it does not prove nce101 is uninvolved in secretion. It is a genuine, fungi-conserved small peptide of currently unknown molecular function (Verified ORF, not dubious). Absence of evidence ≠ evidence of a different function. Note the location is itself ambiguous: predicted single-TM vs experimentally cytosolic tag fusions.


Evidence Matrix

# Citation Evidence type Stance Claim tested Key finding Context Confidence / limitations
1 UniProt C6Y4B6 (NCE1_SCHPO) Database record Qualifies → refutes Does S. pombe nce101 have direct export evidence? 58-aa single-pass TM peptide; PE = 2 (transcript only); FUNCTION entirely "By similarity" (ECO:0000250); GO exocytosis = ISO, protein secretion = IBA, membrane = IEA S. pombe High for annotation provenance; no experimental function exists
2 PomBase SPAC12G12.17 Database record Refutes Is nce101 experimentally characterized? characterisation_status = "conserved unknown"; product = "non-classical export protein family Nce101"; no experimental GO MF/BP/CC; deletion_viability = unknown; taxonomic distribution = fungi only S. pombe High; authoritative organism database
3 PomBase phenotype set (FYPO) Mutant phenotype (HTP) Qualifies (not export-specific) Do deletion phenotypes indicate export role? Only generic chemical-genomic hits: resistance/sensitivity to amorolfine, EGTA, Li⁺, SDS combinations, MMS, cadmium, diamide, valproate, vanadate S. pombe genome-wide screens Medium; none implicate protein export; typical pleiotropic stress hits
4 UniProt Q02820 (NCE1_YEAST) Database record Qualifies Strength of founder annotation 53-aa peptide; PE = 3 "inferred from homology"; GO protein secretion = IGI S. cerevisiae High; even the founder lacks protein-level/MF evidence
5 Cleves, Cooper, Barondes, Kelly 1996 — PMID 8655575 (DOI 10.1083/jcb.133.5.1017) Direct assay (screen) Competing / qualifies Origin of "non-classical export" label Screen using heterologous mammalian galectin-1 over-expression identified NCE genes; UniProt function is hedged "machinery or substrate" S. cerevisiae, galectin-1 reporter Medium; over-expression heterologous reporter; does not establish endogenous direct role for the 53-aa peptide
6 Zahumenský et al. 2022 — PMID 35758748 Localization / mechanism Competing (family reassignment) Is the "NCE" family a molecular-function family? NCE102 is a plasma-membrane sphingolipid sensor redistributing in eisosome/MCC microdomains S. cerevisiae High; shows NCE members have unrelated real functions
7 Lehneck & Pöggeler 2014 — PMID 25109265 Structural/enzymatic review Competing (family reassignment) Same as #6 NCE103 is a structurally characterized β-carbonic anhydrase (enzyme), unrelated to export Fungal CAs incl. S. cerevisiae Nce103 High; canonical example of NCE mis-labeling by phenotype
8 UniProt PF11654 family listing (50+ entries) Computational/evolutionary Qualifies Is there any experimental anchor in the family? All NCE101-family members are PE 3 (inferred) or PE 4 (predicted); fungi-only; no experimental characterization anywhere Pan-fungal High; entire family is annotation-by-homology
9 SGD locus YJL205C/NCE101 Localization / database Refutes / qualifies Is the founder characterized, and where does it localize? Verified ORF but "Protein of unknown function"; SWAT-GFP and mCherry fusions localize to the cytosol (conflicts with predicted single-pass-membrane CC) S. cerevisiae High for curation status; GFP tag on a 53-aa peptide could perturb targeting
10 UniProt Q12207 (NCE2_YEAST) vs Q02820/C6Y4B6 Structural/evolutionary Qualifies Paralog confusion between NCE101 and NCE102? NCE101 = Pfam PF11654 (53–58 aa, 1 predicted TM); NCE102 = PF01284 MARVEL/tetraspanin (173 aa, multi-TM) — unrelated families Cross-species High; rules out nce101/NCE102 conflation
11 QuickGO annotation set for C6Y4B6 Database (provenance) Refutes What does PomBase actually assert for nce101? PomBase curates MF, BP, and CC all = ND (No Data, GO_REF:0000015); "protein secretion" exists only as IEA (InterPro) + IBA (from Sc NCE101 node S000003742); membrane = IEA; no experimental annotation S. pombe High; definitive database-level provenance

GO Curation Implications (leads — require curator verification)

The three functional GO annotations on C6Y4B6 all trace, ultimately, to transferred/ambiguous evidence:

GO term Aspect Current evidence Lead
GO:0009306 protein secretion BP IBA (GO_Central) + IEA (InterPro) Weaken / flag as non-core. Supported only electronically + phylogenetically from the ambiguous Sc founder node; PomBase itself curates BP root as ND (unknown). Retain at most as low-confidence IBA, or defer to the ND ("unknown biological process") position.
GO:0003674 / GO:0008150 / GO:0005575 (roots) MF/BP/CC ND (PomBase, GO_REF:0000015) Respect the ND curation. PomBase explicitly records molecular function, biological process, and cellular component as unknown. Do not add any MF export/transporter term.
GO:0006887 exocytosis BP ISO (from S. cerevisiae) Candidate for removal or generalization. ISO transfer from a founder whose own annotation is "machinery or substrate"; "exocytosis" is more specific than the founder evidence supports.
GO:0016020 membrane CC IEA + a real TMHMM helix (aa 10–27) Retain only cautiously / flag. A predicted single-TM helix supports it, but the S. cerevisiae ortholog's SWAT-GFP/mCherry fusions localize to the cytosol (SGD), a direct conflict. Do not upgrade to a specific membrane system; consider "cytoplasm" as a competing CC pending organism-specific data.

Mechanistic Scope

Immediate molecular function being tested: whether the 58-aa nce101 peptide is itself a component (or dedicated substrate) of a signal-sequence-independent export apparatus.


Conflicts and Alternatives


Knowledge Gaps

Gap What was checked Why it matters What would resolve it
No endogenous localization for S. pombe nce101 UniProt CC = ECO:0000305; PomBase = conserved unknown CC term (PM vs internal membrane) constrains plausible function Endogenous tagged live-cell imaging in S. pombe
Machinery vs substrate unresolved Founder function comment is hedged Determines whether any MF/BP export term is even appropriate Interactome + secretome comparison of Δnce101
No secretion assay in fission yeast PomBase phenotypes are drug/stress only Direct test of export role is absent Leaderless-cargo (e.g., Acb1/GAPDH-type) secretion assay in Δnce101
Family function anywhere Whole PF11654 = PE 3/4 If any ortholog were characterized it would anchor the family Targeted biochemistry on any tractable ortholog

Discriminating Tests

  1. Endogenous localization: C-terminal tag of S. pombe nce101 at native locus; ask PM/eisosome vs ER/Golgi vs cytosolic membranes.
  2. Leaderless-secretion functional test: measure unconventional secretion of an established cargo (e.g., Acb1, or heterologous galectin-1/GAPDH) in wild-type vs Δnce101 and vs over-expression — replicating the founder assay in the actual organism.
  3. Interactome: AP-MS / proximity labeling to test physical association with any secretion apparatus vs membrane-microdomain proteins (parallels the NCE102 outcome).
  4. AlphaFold/structural check: compare the modeled fold/topology against NCE102 (tetraspanin-like) to assess whether nce101 shares a microdomain-protein architecture rather than a transporter fold.
  5. Cross-species annotation audit: confirm no experimental anchor exists anywhere in PF11654 before propagating export terms.

Curation Leads (all require curator verification)


Provenance

All programmatic results above were retrieved live during this run via the UniProt REST API (C6Y4B6, Q02820, Q12207 NCE102, PF11654 family search), the PomBase gene API (SPAC12G12.17), and the SGD backend locus API (YJL205C), plus PubMed abstracts (PMIDs 8655575, 35758748, 25109265). No local repository bioinformatics files were used. No result was fabricated; where evidence is absent it is stated as absent.

Iteration 2 additions: SGD confirms YJL205C is a Verified (not dubious) ORF but "protein of unknown function" with cytosolic GFP/mCherry localization; NCE101 (PF11654) and NCE102 (PF01284, MARVEL) are confirmed unrelated families, ruling out paralog confusion.

Iteration 3 additions: QuickGO API confirms PomBase curates C6Y4B6's MF/BP/CC roots as ND (unknown; GO_REF:0000015) and that "protein secretion" is present only as IEA + IBA transfers (IBA source = S. cerevisiae NCE101 node S000003742) — the definitive database-level demonstration that the export annotation is inherited, not direct. Computed provenance saved as artifacts/nce101_evidence_matrix.csv and artifacts/nce101_go_decision_table.csv.

Artifacts