PA1055 (Q9I4R9, ShaC) notes

2026-10-28 review (PseudoCAP IBA-seed worklist, rank 21)

No deep-research provider was available; literature collected by PubMed search
and cached abstracts or full texts. The PseudoCAP-cited paper (PMID:16030218,
Kosono et al. 2005) is abstract-only here: its PMC copy (PMC1196046) is a
scanned PDF with no text, and the PDF could not be retrieved.

Identity

What PMID:16030218 shows

Mrp/Sha complex biology (family)

Annotation decisions (summary)

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale
PTN002160376 GO:0015385 sodium:proton antiporter activity 1 (sole) 24 GO:0015385, IMP, PMID:16030218 INDIRECT-PHENOTYPE The abstract describes no PA1055 mutant. The row rests on a PA1054 (shaA) disruption and on complementation of E. coli TO114 by the whole PA1054-PA1059 cluster. That shows the Sha complex is a Na+/H+ antiporter, not that PA1055 enables antiport alone. Biologically right as contributes_to (a subunit of the antiporter complex), wrong as enables + IMP. The node is the LUCA root of the subunit-C family and includes MBH/MBX hydrogenase subunits (TK2086, TK1221), for which a stand-alone antiporter MF is doubtful.
PTN002160376 GO:0035725 sodium ion transmembrane transport 1 (sole) 24 GO:0035725, IMP, PMID:16030218 SOUND As a subunit of the complex responsible for Na+ extrusion, PA1055 takes part in Na+ transmembrane transport. Structural work places MrpC at the putative Na+ pathway. The process fits the whole clade, MBH Na+-translocating modules included. Caveat: the IMP code looks wrong for PA1055, since the abstract describes no PA1055 mutant; filed as a CHECK.

Audit 2026-10-29: confidence matched to what was read

PMID:16030218 is still abstract-only here: the PubMed MCP returns no body
text (the PMC copy, PMC1196046, is a scanned PDF the publisher does not
release as XML), and the PMC, Europe PMC and ASM pages were not retrievable.
The WRONG_EVIDENCE_CODE (IMP) defects on this gene rest on the abstract not
describing a mutant of this gene, so they are lowered from PROBABLE to
SUSPECTED. The WRONG_QUALIFIER defects (enables vs contributes_to) rest on
positive statements in other Mrp papers and stay PROBABLE. The reference
correctness for PMID:16030218 is changed from MISCITED to UNVERIFIED.
Annotation actions are unchanged.

Full-text check of PMID:16030218 (2026-11-05)

The full text of Kosono et al. 2005 was supplied by the user and read. It
supersedes the earlier notes above that describe this paper as abstract-only.
The only sha mutant the paper constructs is the PA1054 insertion; the
cluster-level evidence comes from expressing the whole PA1054-PA1059 cluster,
or the cluster with PA1054 disrupted, in an antiporter-deficient E. coli
strain. There is no PA1055 mutant, so the IMP evidence-code defects on PA1055 are CONFIRMED.