| PTN node | node term | n_seeds | leaf IBAs | seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) | verdict | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTN000138516 | GO:0006548 L-histidine catabolic process | 1 (sole seed) | 8 (8 taxa) | GO:0006548 L-histidine catabolic process, IMP, PMID:4290562 (PseudoCAP) | UNVERIFIABLE | The 1967 abstract measures a pooled FIGLU-degrading capacity (step IV) that HutF and HutE both provide, and describes no hutF mutant; as a pre-cloning study it cannot assign anything to PA5106. The claim is correct (HutF catalyses the first step of the deiminase FIGLU branch, PMID:16475788), so the IBD conclusion is sound for HutF-family leaves; the anchor should be PMID:16475788. Node breadth: three nematode leaves (C. elegans cpin-1 Q20166, C. briggsae, Pristionchus) lack the HutF family signatures (IPR010252, TIGR02022, HutF_N) that the bacterial leaves carry; their IBAs may be over-propagation. |
| PTN000138516 | GO:0050416 formimidoylglutamate deiminase activity | 1 (sole seed) | 8 (8 taxa) | GO:0050416 formimidoylglutamate deiminase activity, IDA, PMID:16475788 (PseudoCAP); also UniProt EXP PMID:17128965 | SOUND | Purified PA5106 deiminates FIGLU to N-formylglutamate and ammonia, with kinetics, metal dependence and mutagenesis (PMID:17128965) and structures (PMID:25559274). The term suits the bacterial HutF leaves (all TIGR02022). Same nematode caveat. |
The full text of Lessie and Neidhardt 1967 (J Bacteriol 93, 1800-1810) was supplied by the user and read. Its mutants are a urocanase-deficient strain, a histidine auxotroph and regulatory mutants with altered repression. Step IV is measured only as crude-extract formiminoglutamate degradation (shared by HutF and HutE in PAO1) and there is no hutF mutant. The WRONG_REFERENCE defect on the IMP row is now CONFIRMED and the reference is marked MISCITED.
Topology fetched with projects/PSEUDOCAP/panther_tree.py node PTN000138516 --depth 5
--leaves (PTHR11271). PTN000138516 is the family's LUCA SPECIATION root; every leaf is
subfamily PTHR11271:SF48.
| Child node | Event / taxon | Leaves | Subfamilies | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTN000884852 | SPECIATION, Rhabditida-Chromadorea | 3 (Q20166 cpin-1, A8Y0T4 cpin-1, A0A2A6BT36) | SF48:3 | Over-propagated: no HutF signatures, no known histidine-degradation route |
| PTN000138520 | SPECIATION, Eubacteria | 5 (Q9HU77 hutF, Q9KZ77, Q89GV1, Q8PAA5 sdeB, Q9ZC76) | SF48:5 | Correct anchor for both IBDs |
| PTN000138522 | SPECIATION, Proteobacteria | 4 | SF48:4 | Narrower option |
| PTN001681702 | SPECIATION, Gammaproteobacteria | 3 (Q8PAA5, Q9HU77, Q9ZC76) | SF48:3 | Narrowest clade option; smallest clade holding Q9HU77 is its own leaf PTN002462020 |
The earlier concern is confirmed by the topology: the nematode leaves are not scattered
through the tree but form one clean child clade, so moving the GO:0006548 and GO:0050416
IBDs from PTN000138516 to PTN000138520 removes all three unsupported leaf IBAs without
touching any bacterial leaf. Note that within the bacterial clade only Q9HU77 is a
characterised formimidoylglutamate deiminase; the other four leaves are named
chlorohydrolase/hydrolase, which the tree cannot resolve further - that would need
enzymology on one of Q9KZ77, Q89GV1, Q8PAA5 or Q9ZC76. The P. aeruginosa leaf IBAs
reviewed here are unaffected (ACCEPT stands).