rgn (M9PFV8) architecture and family-placement checks

Script: rgn_architecture.py (run with uv run --script rgn_architecture.py > rgn_architecture_results.json).
Raw output: rgn_architecture_results.json. Sequences are fetched live from UniProt REST.

Questions

  1. Does Rgn carry the determinants that make TGN38/TGOLN2 (the PAINT seeds of PANTHER:PTN000575073) a trans-Golgi network resident: a single transmembrane segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine sorting motif (SDYQRL)?
  2. Is there detectable pairwise similarity between Rgn and the TGN38/TGOLN2 seeds, compared with the C-type lectins (REG1A, REG3A, fly lectin-galC1) that sit in a different PANTHER family (PTHR22803)?
  3. Does the Rgn CTLD retain canonical sugar/Ca2+-binding motifs (EPN or QPD, and WND)?

Methods

Results

Comparator PANTHER TM-like segment C-terminal YxxPhi Local score vs Rgn Max shuffled score Fraction of shuffles >= real
TGOLN2 human O43493 PTHR23211:SF0 (PAINT seed) 381-404 YQRL 95.0 129.0 0.345
Ttgn1/TGN38 rat P19814 PTHR23211:SF0 (PAINT seed) 301-324 YQRL 79.5 98.0 0.12
REG1A human P05451 PTHR22803 none none 161.0 72.5 0.0
REG3A human Q06141 PTHR22803 none none 101.0 65.0 0.0
lectin-galC1 fly Q9VIX1 PTHR22803 none none 81.0 70.5 0.0

Rgn itself (M9PFV8, 808 aa; and isoform Q9Y102, 800 aa) has no TM-like segment after the signal peptide and no C-terminal YxxPhi motif.

The best local alignments of Rgn to TGOLN2 (Rgn residues 278-753) and TGN38 (Rgn residues 258-493) fall in the charged, low-complexity region that MobiDB-lite marks as disordered, and their scores are within the range of composition-matched shuffled sequences. Rgn similarity to the PTHR22803 C-type lectins maps to the Rgn CTLD (residues ~43-201) and exceeds every shuffled control.

CTLD (70-199): cysteines at 74, 91, 174, 190 and 198. EPN absent; QPD absent; WND absent.

Isoforms: Q9Y102 (isoform A/D) is identical to M9PFV8 (isoform B/C) except that it lacks 8 residues (YVQLISNS) inside the CTLD, near residue 160 of M9PFV8.

Interpretation