this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 19 citations 2 artifacts 2026-05-30T17:55:56.620204

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research Report: Functional Annotation of meg-2 (UniProt Q21127; ORF K02B9.2) in Caenorhabditis elegans

Executive summary

Caenorhabditis elegans meg-2 encodes Protein MEG-2 (Maternal-effect germ cell defective 2), an embryo-restricted germ-plasm factor that acts transiently during early embryogenesis but is essential for later germline development. Primary evidence supports that MEG-2 (i) localizes to embryonic germline condensates (classically described as P granules), (ii) acts redundantly with its paralog MEG-1, and (iii) is now best understood as part of a module that maintains germline P-body–like condensates in the P4 blastomere to control maternal mRNA deadenylation/decapping and proper germline founder-cell fate. No enzymatic activity is currently attributed to MEG-2; it is instead described as an intrinsically disordered/low-complexity protein that likely serves as a condensate organizer/scaffold in post-transcriptional regulation. (leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8, kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2)

1) Gene/protein identity verification and disambiguation

2) Key concepts and definitions (current understanding)

2.1 Maternal-effect germ cell defective (MEG)

“Maternal-effect” indicates the phenotype arises from loss of maternal gene product deposited in the egg; embryos from mutant mothers can fail in germline development even if the zygotic genotype is otherwise viable. MEG proteins are germ-plasm components required redundantly for fertility and germline development. (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16)

2.2 Germ plasm condensates: P granules versus germline P-bodies

2.3 Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and condensate regulation

MEG proteins are serine-rich/low-complexity factors implicated in condensate assembly/disassembly dynamics. In this framework, MEG-2 is viewed as a non-enzymatic regulator whose physical properties (e.g., charge and disorder) contribute to condensate behavior and downstream mRNA regulation. (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2)

3) Molecular function: what MEG-2 does (and does not do)

3.1 No known enzymatic or transporter activity

Across the primary sources retrieved here, MEG-2 is not assigned a catalytic reaction, substrate specificity, or transporter substrate. Instead, it is treated as a novel, low-complexity/IDP-like regulatory protein required for proper germline development through organization of RNP condensates and post-transcriptional regulation. (kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3, wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2)

3.2 Functional role supported by genetics and cell biology

(A) Condensate-associated localization during embryogenesis
- GFP::MEG-2 localizes to P granules in the embryonic P lineage (P2/P3/P4) and the primordial germ cells Z2/Z3 (embryonic stages). (leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8)

(B) Redundant requirement with MEG-1 for germline development
- Extra copies of MEG-2 (GFP::MEG-2) can partially rescue sterility of meg-1 mutants at 25°C, supporting functional redundancy and dosage sensitivity across MEG-1/2. (leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8)
- Genetic analyses across MEG family members indicate synthetic sterility: for example, meg-1 mutants show ~4% sterility and meg-3 meg-4 ~30% sterility, while meg-1 meg-3 meg-4 are 100% sterile; critically, meg-1 meg-2 embryos can still assemble embryonic P granules yet display fully penetrant Meg sterility, suggesting MEG-dependent germline function is not reducible to visible P-granule assembly alone. (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16)

(C) Germline P-body maintenance and maternal mRNA control in P4 (MEG-1/2 module)
- MEG-1/2 are required to maintain high levels of P-body proteins CGH-1 (DDX6) and EDC-3 specifically in the P4 blastomere; MEG-1/2 are not required for PGL-3 localization to P4, and POS-1 levels in P4 are largely unaffected in meg-1 meg-2 double loss (POS-1 reduction becomes apparent in quadruple meg depletion). (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6)
- Functional readout: in meg-1 meg-2 embryos, poly-A levels are increased in P4 despite SL1 levels decreasing/not changing, consistent with compromised mRNA deadenylation/turnover activity in P4. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media aca4ef46)
- Transcriptome consequences: RNA-seq identified 550 upregulated and 230 downregulated mRNAs in meg-1 meg-2 embryos versus wild type; 223/550 (40%) of upregulated mRNAs overlap “deadenylated POS-1 targets” (defined by longer poly-A tails upon pos-1 RNAi), with Fisher’s exact test P=0.0002—supporting a functional relationship between MEG-1/2 and POS-1-regulated deadenylation programs. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6)

4) Subcellular localization and developmental timing

4.1 Early embryo (P lineage) localization

4.2 P4 stage specialization: germline P-bodies

The most detailed mechanistic and quantitative work emphasizes the P4 blastomere (the germline founder precursor), where MEG-1/2 maintain germline P-bodies enriched for mRNA decapping/deadenylation regulators and coordinate proper turnover and translation activation of maternal mRNAs. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 10-11, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media aca4ef46)

5) Phenotypes of loss-of-function and genetic interactions

5.1 Maternal-effect sterility and germline failure

5.2 Fate mis-specification and marker penetrance (quantitative)

In meg-1 meg-2 embryos (meg-1(vr10) meg-2(RNAi) or deletion of the operon reported in the same study), P4 descendants show:
- Ectopic muscle program marker hlh-1 expression in 21/23 embryos (vs 0/21 wild type). (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8)
- Failure to robustly activate germline transcriptional program marker xnd-1 in 16/24 embryos. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8)
- Extra P-granule-positive cells in 50% of bean-to-comma embryos and 100% of non-fed L1 larvae, consistent with abnormal germline program deployment/maintenance. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8)

5.3 Interactions with nanos family members (nos genes)

A targeted genetic-interaction analysis (performed in a meg-1 mutant background but explicitly noting MEG-2 redundancy) reported:
- nos-3 loss suppresses meg-1 sterility (restores fertility).
- nos-2 loss enhances meg-1 sterility and abolishes proliferation beyond Z2/Z3, causing early and pronounced germ cell degeneration.
These observations support that MEG-1/2 function interfaces with nanos-dependent germline proliferation and survival pathways. (kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3)

5.4 Relationship to phosphorylation-controlled granule dynamics (inference relevant to MEG-2)

A mechanistic model for MEG proteins suggests phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycles regulate condensate dynamics. Although direct kinase/phosphatase targeting was shown for MEG-1/MEG-3 in that work, MEG-2 is discussed as likely contributing to disassembly based on predicted charge properties: predicted unphosphorylated pI MEG-2 = 6.04 (acidic), compared with MEG-3/4 basic pIs. This supports a hypothesis that MEG-1/2 (including MEG-2) bias toward disassembly roles, while MEG-3/4 provide stronger assembly contributions. (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16)

6) Current applications and real-world implementations

Although MEG-2 itself is a basic research target, meg-2/MEG-2 biology is deployed as a practical experimental system in several ways:
1. Condensate biology/phase separation in vivo: MEG proteins serve as a genetically tractable paradigm to dissect rules of biomolecular condensate specialization in embryos (P granules vs germline P-bodies) using quantitative imaging and genetics. (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6)
2. Post-transcriptional regulation assays: Germline P-body biology in P4 is interrogated by combining immunofluorescence of RNP components (e.g., CGH-1, EDC-3, POS-1), in situ hybridization for poly-A and SL1 RNAs, and RNA-seq of early embryos—an integrated toolkit for mRNA turnover and translational activation studies in vivo. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6)
3. Germline fate specification readouts: The system provides cell fate and differentiation readouts (e.g., hlh-1, xnd-1; germline proliferation in larvae) for linking condensate state to developmental outcomes. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8, kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3)

7) Expert opinions and authoritative synthesis

8) Recent developments (2023–2024 emphasis) and limitations

9) Quantitative data highlights (for quick reference)

Key quantitative findings from Cassani & Seydoux (2022) include:
- RNA-seq: 550 upregulated, 230 downregulated mRNAs in meg-1 meg-2 vs WT; 223/550 (40%) overlap deadenylated POS-1 targets; P=0.0002. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6)
- Fate mis-specification: hlh-1 ectopic in 21/23 embryos; xnd-1 activation fails in 16/24 embryos. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8)
- Sterility: 100% sterile under meg-1/2 loss paradigms reported in that study. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8)
- Imaging quantification sample sizes in P4: CGH-1 WT n=10 vs meg-1/2 n=12; EDC-3 WT n=12 vs meg-1/2 n=9; POS-1 WT n=19 vs meg-1/2 n=8; poly-A/SL1 WT n=26 vs meg-1/2 n=13. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6)

10) Evidence map of key sources

The following table summarizes the most relevant primary and review sources, with dates and URLs.

Year Citation (short) Publication type Main meg-2-related findings (localization/function/phenotype/interactions) Key quantitative data/statistics URL/DOI Notes on evidence strength (meg-2 specific vs meg-1/2 combined)
2008 Leacock & Reinke, Genetics Primary research Verified target identity in C. elegans: MEG-2 corresponds to the embryo-specific maternal-effect germ cell defective protein encoded by meg-2/K02B9.2. GFP::MEG-2 localizes to embryonic P granules in the P lineage (P2/P3/P4) and Z2/Z3; MEG-2 is functionally redundant with MEG-1, and increased MEG-2 dosage can partially compensate for loss of MEG-1. P-granule association is transient and embryo-restricted. MEG-1/MEG-2 localization starts at ~4–8-cell stage and fades by ~100-cell stage when Z2/Z3 are born; nos-2 staining in late P4/Z2/Z3 was seen in ~52% vs ~55% of meg-1 vs wild type embryos (MEG-1-focused control context); meg-1 sterility is high (>90% at restrictive temperature) and GFP::MEG-2 partially rescues meg-1 sterility at 25°C (leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8) https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080218 Strongest direct source for MEG-2 identity/localization; some phenotype data are meg-1-centered, with MEG-2 mainly inferred through redundancy and rescue (leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8)
2010 Updike & Strome, J. Andrology Review Reviews P-granule assembly/function in C. elegans and places MEG proteins within the embryonic germ plasm/P-granule pathway. Useful for pathway context and expert interpretation that P granules regulate post-transcriptional gene control in the germ line. No meg-2-specific quantitative statistics in retrieved context. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.109.008292 Contextual review; not meg-2-specific and not primary evidence in the retrieved excerpts.
2011 Kapelle & Reinke, genesis Primary research MEG-1 and MEG-2 are closely related, transient P-granule proteins acting during early embryogenesis but affecting later germ-cell proliferation/survival. Loss of meg-2 enhances sterile phenotypes, supporting redundancy with meg-1. Study highlights genetic interactions in the MEG-1/2 module with nanos-family genes, especially functional opposition/synergy involving nos-2 and nos-3. Expression window emphasized for MEG proteins: 4-cell to 28-cell stages; no direct meg-2-only penetrance values in retrieved excerpt. Reported directionality: nos-3 loss suppresses meg-1 sterility, nos-2 loss enhances meg-1 sterility and abolishes proliferation beyond Z2/Z3 (kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3) https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20726 Moderate evidence for MEG-2 because it is discussed mainly as a redundant paralog of MEG-1; strongest for genetic interaction logic, weaker for meg-2-specific mechanistic detail (kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3)
2014 Wang et al., eLife Primary research Positions MEG proteins as intrinsically disordered, serine-rich regulators of embryonic RNA-granule dynamics. Although direct biochemical targeting was shown for MEG-1/3, the paper infers that MEG-2, like MEG-1, likely contributes to granule disassembly because of its acidic character. Crucially, fertility defects in MEG mutants can be uncoupled from visible P-granule assembly defects, implying a broader germ-plasm activity. Predicted unphosphorylated pI: MEG-1 6.63; MEG-2 6.04; MEG-3 9.74; MEG-4 9.33. Sterility examples: meg-1 ~4% sterile; meg-3 meg-4 ~30% sterile; meg-1 meg-3 meg-4 100% sterile. meg-1 meg-2 embryos still assemble embryonic P granules yet share fully penetrant Meg sterility with meg-1 meg-3 meg-4 (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04591 Strong for MEG network logic and phase-separation model; indirect for MEG-2 molecular mechanism because phosphorylation was demonstrated for MEG-1/3, not directly for MEG-2 in retrieved text (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16)
2019 Marnik & Updike, Traffic Review Reviews membraneless organelles/P granules in C. elegans and the role of intrinsically disordered proteins in phase separation. Useful for expert framing of MEG proteins as scaffold-like regulators of condensate behavior. No meg-2-specific quantitative statistics in retrieved context. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12644 Broad condensate review; useful conceptual context only, not direct meg-2 evidence.
2020 Lee et al., eLife Primary research Demonstrates that P granules recruit mRNAs via condensation with intrinsically disordered MEG-3, establishing a mechanistic framework for how MEG-family proteins can organize RNA-rich condensates. Not meg-2-specific, but highly relevant for interpreting MEG-2 as an IDP-associated germ-plasm factor in mRNA handling. ~500 mRNAs bound/recruited in vivo by MEG-3-based mechanism; localization to P granules enriches maternal RNAs in the germ lineage (from abstract/snippet context). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52896 Indirect evidence only for meg-2; included as mechanistic context on MEG-family/P-granule biology rather than as a meg-2 study.
2021 Oyewale thesis snippet Thesis / supporting mention Low-weight supporting mention that meg-1 and meg-2 are expressed in the embryonic P lineage and degraded concomitant with PGC birth, consistent with their transient embryonic role. No primary quantitative meg-2 data extracted in retrieved snippet. https://doi.org/10.25673/82467 Very low evidence weight; secondary/thesis mention only, included solely as supportive context.
2022 Cassani & Seydoux, Development Primary research Major update: MEG-1/2 are redefined as components of germline P-bodies, distinct from canonical P granules. In P4, MEG-1/2 maintain P-body factors (CGH-1/DDX6, EDC-3), promote deadenylation/turnover of maternal mRNAs, support translational activation of germline determinants (nos-2, Y51F10.2, xnd-1), and are required for correct germline founder-cell fate. MEG-1/2 genetically/functionally interact with POS-1, MEG-3/4, and factors such as GLD-2/GLD-3. In meg-1 meg-2 embryos: RNA-seq found 550 upregulated and 230 downregulated mRNAs; 223/550 (40%) upregulated genes overlap deadenylated POS-1 targets (Fisher’s exact test P=0.0002). hlh-1 ectopic expression in 21/23 embryos vs 0/21 WT; robust xnd-1 activation fails in 16/24 embryos; extra P-granule-positive cells in 50% of bean-to-comma embryos and 100% of non-fed L1s; 100% sterile. Quantification sample sizes included: CGH-1 WT n=10 vs meg-1/2 n=12; EDC-3 WT n=12 vs meg-1/2 n=9; POS-1 WT n=19 vs meg-1/2 n=8; poly-A/SL1 WT n=26 vs meg-1/2 n=13 (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 10-11, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 2-3, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media aca4ef46) https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920 Strongest modern functional source, but almost all key results are for MEG-1/2 combined loss rather than MEG-2 alone. Still highly relevant because MEG-2 is part of the obligate functional pair in embryo germline P-bodies (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 10-11, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 2-3, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media aca4ef46)
2022 Phillips & Updike, Genetics Review Authoritative review summarizing germ granules and sub-granules in C. elegans germline gene regulation. Supports the current view that distinct condensates partition functions such as mRNA regulation, small-RNA pathways, and inheritance. Useful for expert interpretation of MEG-1/2 findings within broader germ-granule biology. No meg-2-specific quantitative statistics in retrieved context. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyab195 High-value expert review for synthesis, but not direct evidence for meg-2 alone.

Table: This table summarizes the main primary and review sources relevant to C. elegans meg-2 (UniProt Q21127/K02B9.2), emphasizing where evidence is directly about MEG-2 versus inferred from combined MEG-1/2 biology. It is useful for distinguishing strong gene-specific findings from broader germ-granule context.

Figures (visual evidence)

Conclusion

MEG-2 (meg-2/K02B9.2; UniProt Q21127) is best characterized as a transient embryonic germ-plasm condensate protein that functions redundantly with MEG-1 to ensure robust germline fate and development. The strongest current mechanistic model places MEG-1/2 in P4-stage germline P-bodies, where they maintain mRNA decay/processing factors and coordinate maternal mRNA deadenylation/turnover and translational activation programs tied to POS-1 targets, thereby preventing germline-to-soma fate errors and ensuring germline establishment. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6, cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8, leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8)

References

  1. (leacock2008meg1andmeg2 pages 6-8): Stefanie W Leacock and Valerie Reinke. Meg-1 and meg-2 are embryo-specific p-granule components required for germline development in caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 178:295-306, Jan 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080218, doi:10.1534/genetics.107.080218. This article has 40 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (kapelle2011c.elegansmeg‐1 pages 1-3): William S. Kapelle and Valerie Reinke. C. elegans meg‐1 and meg‐2 differentially interact with nanos family members to either promote or inhibit germ cell proliferation and survival. genesis, 49:380-391, May 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20726, doi:10.1002/dvg.20726. This article has 14 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16): Jennifer T Wang, Jarrett Smith, Bi-Chang Chen, Helen Schmidt, Dominique Rasoloson, Alexandre Paix, Bramwell G Lambrus, Deepika Calidas, Eric Betzig, and Geraldine Seydoux. Regulation of rna granule dynamics by phosphorylation of serine-rich, intrinsically disordered proteins in c. elegans. eLife, Dec 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.04591, doi:10.7554/elife.04591. This article has 438 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 10-11): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media aca4ef46): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 2-3): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media 7cba390d): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies media aec712ed): Madeline Cassani and Geraldine Seydoux. Specialized germline p-bodies are required to specify germ cell fate in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nov 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920, doi:10.1242/dev.200920. This article has 35 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. wang2014regulationofrna pages 15-16
  2. cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 5-6
  3. cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 6-8
  4. cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 1-2
  5. cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 10-11
  6. cassani2022specializedgermlinepbodies pages 2-3
  7. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080218
  8. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.109.008292
  9. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20726
  10. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04591
  11. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12644
  12. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52896
  13. https://doi.org/10.25673/82467
  14. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920
  15. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyab195
  16. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080218,
  17. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20726,
  18. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200920,
  19. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.04591,