No deep-research provider was available; literature collected by PubMed search
and cached abstracts or full texts. PMID:16030218 (Kosono et al. 2005) is
abstract-only here (PMC1196046 is a scanned PDF). Verdicts kept consistent
with the completed PA1055 (ShaC) and PA1057 (ShaE) reviews.
PTN002162936 = PTHR34703 root (LUCA), 19 leaves/16 taxa. GOA: 19 GO_Central
GO:0015385 IBAs plus 263 TreeGrafter rows (live QuickGO). Sole seed PA1059.
B. subtilis MrpG (O05227) has no experimental GO:0015385 row. No GO:0035725
IBA from this node. Includes Thermococcus MBH subunit C proteins TK2082
(MbhC) and TK1224 (MbxC).
| PTN node | node term | n_seeds | leaf IBAs | seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) | verdict | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTN002162936 | GO:0015385 sodium:proton antiporter activity | 1 (sole) | 19 (GO_Central; plus 263 TreeGrafter) | GO:0015385, IMP, PMID:16030218 | INDIRECT-PHENOTYPE | The abstract describes no PA1059 mutant. The evidence is a PA1054 disruption plus whole-cluster complementation of E. coli TO114. Right as contributes_to (MrpG Pro81 is needed for Mrp antiport), not as enables + IMP. The LUCA-root node also covers MBH/MBX hydrogenase subunit C proteins (TK2082, TK1224), for which a stand-alone antiporter MF is doubtful. |
PMID:16030218 is still abstract-only here: the PubMed MCP returns no body
text (the PMC copy, PMC1196046, is a scanned PDF the publisher does not
release as XML), and the PMC, Europe PMC and ASM pages were not retrievable.
The WRONG_EVIDENCE_CODE (IMP) defects on this gene rest on the abstract not
describing a mutant of this gene, so they are lowered from PROBABLE to
SUSPECTED. The WRONG_QUALIFIER defects (enables vs contributes_to) rest on
positive statements in other Mrp papers and stay PROBABLE. The reference
correctness for PMID:16030218 is changed from MISCITED to UNVERIFIED.
Annotation actions are unchanged.
The full text of Kosono et al. 2005 was supplied by the user and read. It
supersedes the earlier notes above that describe this paper as abstract-only.
The only sha mutant the paper constructs is the PA1054 insertion; the
cluster-level evidence comes from expressing the whole PA1054-PA1059 cluster,
or the cluster with PA1054 disrupted, in an antiporter-deficient E. coli
strain. There is no PA1059 mutant, so the IMP evidence-code defects on PA1059 are CONFIRMED.