InterPro domain mappings correctly identify SVP as a MADS/K-box transcription factor and support conserved DNA-binding and dimerization capabilities, but domain-only mappings should not transfer regulatory direction such as positive transcriptional regulation to this SVP entry.

Phylogenetic inference supports conserved MADS transcription factor cis-regulatory DNA binding and RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulation for SVP.

UniProt maps SVP to the nucleus, consistent with its transcription factor role.

The negative-regulation-of-translation annotation is a logical consequence of the seeded GO:0000900 annotation. The local SVP evidence supports transcriptional repression, not translational repression; both the source annotation and this propagated inference should be flagged upstream to TAIR/GOA.

AtSubP predicts nuclear localization, consistent with SVP's MADS-box TF domains.

The original cloning paper identifies SVP as a MADS-box transcription factor and describes svp loss of function as early flowering, supporting SVP as a repressor of the floral transition.

This genome-wide Arabidopsis transcription factor analysis supports the conserved DNA-binding transcription factor family context but is not SVP-specific experimental evidence.

The cached abstract supports AP1/SEP3 interaction biology but does not expose SVP-specific interaction evidence for the GOA SVP protein-binding row.

This family-level MADS-box analysis supports the MADS transcription factor classification used to interpret SVP domain-based annotations.

The paper reports a yeast two-hybrid map of Arabidopsis MADS protein interactions, but the cached text does not expose the exact SVP partner rows asserted by the GOA/IntAct entry.

SVP and AGL24 have opposite effects on floral transition, and AP1-SVP dimers interact with SEU/LUG corepressor-associated proteins to regulate AGAMOUS during early flower development.

SVP participates in ambient-temperature control of flowering and directly represses FT expression through CArG-motif binding.

SVP interacts with FLC and represses flowering-time targets downstream of circadian/light inputs; svp suppresses late flowering in lhy;cca1 continuous-light conditions.

GI can bind the FT repressor SVP and binds FT promoter regions near SVP binding sites, linking SVP to the photoperiodic flowering network.

FLM-beta interacts with SVP at lower temperatures, while high temperature reduces SVP-FLM-beta repressor complex abundance through SVP degradation.

The cached abstract supports EFM as an FT repressor directly promoted by SVP, but it does not expose the SVP DNA-binding assay details for the GOA sequence-specific DNA-binding row.

CrY2H-seq produced a high-throughput Arabidopsis transcription factor interaction network. The cached article body does not expose the exact SVP partner rows used by the GOA/IntAct protein-binding annotation.

TFS1 is a direct target of FLC and SVP; ChIP-qPCR supports SVP binding at a CArG-containing region, and SVP/FLC repress TFS1 transcription with repressive chromatin modifications.

UniProt records SVP as a 240 amino acid nuclear MADS-box protein with a MADS domain, K-box domain, repressor keyword, multiple splice isoforms, and curated function in floral transition repression.

The deep research synthesis identifies SVP as a nuclear MIKC-type MADS-box transcription factor whose primary role is repressing flowering through temperature- and vernalization-responsive MADS repressor complexes.

PTHR48019 places SVP in the broad MADS-box/MEF2 transcription factor family, supporting conserved transcription factor and dimerization context but not SVP-specific biological process directionality.