PA5089 (pldB, Tle5b) review notes

UniProt: Q9HU94 (unreviewed, 745 aa), "PLD phosphodiesterase domain-containing
protein". Locus PA5089. The literature name is PldB (also Tle5b).

Identity and genomic context

Family and catalytic motif

Europe PMC searches on aeruginosa AND (PldA OR PldB) AND "phospholipase D",
aeruginosa AND PldB and aeruginosa AND PldA AND trans-kingdom (2026-11-05)
returned PMID:24832454, PMID:23552891, PMID:31417515, PMID:32356524 (immunity
protein structures) and PMID:36216841 (PldA structure); no paper reporting a
purified-PldB phospholipase assay was found.

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale other seeds IBD stands without this seed?
PTN004499769 GO:0004630 D-type glycerophospholipase activity 24 713 (91 taxa) GO:0004630, IMP, PMID:24832454 (PseudoCAP) SOUND The cited paper characterises PldB, which is this gene (PA5089), as a phospholipase D effector with antibacterial activity in the prey periplasm, and the protein carries the family's HKD motif. The evidence code is IMP, so the activity itself rests on the family assignment plus the toxicity phenotype rather than on an assay visible in the cached abstract; the claim is nevertheless the family-defining activity and the node term is at exactly that level. Human PLD1 (Q13393), yeast SPO14 (SGD:S000001739), rat Pld1/Pld2 (RGD:3349, RGD:3350), mouse (MGI:109585, MGI:892877), ten Arabidopsis PLDs, zebrafish, Dictyostelium, PomBase SPAC2F7.16c, Candida, and PA3487/pldA Yes - comfortably. The characterised eukaryotic PLDs alone place the activity at this node.

No GO_CENTRAL defect for the GO:0004630 IBD. One node-level observation is
recorded instead on the second IBD at the same node, GO:0009395 phospholipid
catabolic process (4 eukaryotic seeds, no PAO1 seed): propagating an endogenous
lipid-turnover process term to a secreted interbacterial toxin conflates the
roles. That is handled as MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED on the leaf row with a
propagation_review, not as an upstream defect, because the node term is
defensible for the eukaryotic members that seeded it.

No PSEUDOCAP defect for this gene: the seed row cites the paper about this
locus. (Contrast genes/PSEAE/pldA, where the same PseudoCAP row was copied onto
PA3487 and cites this PldB paper instead of the PldA papers.)