hydA (P13061, PHNS_DESDA) — periplasmic [NiFe] hydrogenase small subunit

Identity and partner subunit

Are they genuine partners? Yes, despite carrying different UniProt taxon ids.
Checks performed in this review (live UniProt/NCBI queries, 2026-10-28):

Function

The division of labour in [NiFe] hydrogenases is well established and is visible
in the two records themselves: the bimetallic Ni–Fe catalytic centre is carried
by the large subunit (Q9L868 FT BINDING residues for Ni(2+) and Fe cation),
while the small subunit carries the iron–sulfur relay — two [4Fe-4S] clusters
and one [3Fe-4S] cluster — that conducts electrons between the active site and
the external redox partner
[UniProtKB:P13061 COFACTOR: Name=[4Fe-4S] cluster ... Note=Binds 2 [4Fe-4S] clusters.;
COFACTOR: Name=[3Fe-4S] cluster ... Note=Binds 1 [3Fe-4S] cluster.].
The structural work on this very enzyme shows the cluster chain running up to the
[NiFe] centre PMID:11191224
and identifies the physiological acceptor as the tetrahaem cytochrome c3, docking
at the distal [4Fe-4S] cluster of the small subunit
PMID:11191224.

Therefore, for the small subunit:

InterPro2GO defects (recorded as source_defects)

The live interpro2go file maps the two [NiFe] hydrogenase signatures onto
ferredoxin-specific terms:

InterPro:IPR001821 [NiFe]-hydrogenase, small subunit > GO:ferredoxin hydrogenase activity ; GO:0008901
InterPro:IPR001821 [NiFe]-hydrogenase, small subunit > GO:ferredoxin hydrogenase complex ; GO:0009375
InterPro:IPR018194 Nickel-dependent hydrogenase, large subunit, nickel binding site > GO:ferredoxin hydrogenase activity ; GO:0008901

GO:0008901 is defined as "Catalysis of the reaction: 2 reduced ferredoxin + 2 H+
= 2 oxidized ferredoxin + H2" (the [FeFe]/ferredoxin reaction, EC 1.12.7.2), and
GO:0009375 ferredoxin hydrogenase complex is an intracellular complex term.
Neither fits a periplasmic cytochrome-c3-linked [NiFe] enzyme (EC 1.12.2.1).
Suggested repointing: GO:0033748 hydrogenase (acceptor) activity (acceptor-agnostic,
suitable for a family-level signature) and GO:0044569 [Ni-Fe] hydrogenase complex.

Relation to the CMMMech record (data/records/palladium.yaml)

CMMMech grounds the palladium mechanism in D. desulfuricans to this pair of
accessions. Two points where the CMMMech text is stronger or looser than the
evidence supports (noted here only; CMMMech is not edited by this review):

  1. The functional_role for P13061 reads "…small iron-sulfur subunit (EC 1.12.2.1;
    HydA / Ddes_1039) mediating H2 oxidation and periplasmic electron transfer".
    H2 oxidation chemistry happens at the Ni–Fe site of the large subunit; the
    small subunit mediates the electron transfer half of that sentence. The EC number
    properly belongs to the holoenzyme.
  2. The Q9L868 entry is given target_organism: NCBITaxon:876 (species level), which
    mirrors UniProt but obscures that the sequence is from ATCC 27774 — the same
    strain as P13061. The two protein examples are operon partners (Ddes_1038/
    Ddes_1039), which is stronger support for the "periplasmic [NiFe] hydrogenase
    system" claim than the record currently states.

The Pd(II)-reduction evidence itself remains indirect for either subunit:
Lloyd et al. used D. desulfuricans ATCC 29577 (a different strain) and inferred
hydrogenase involvement from H2 dependence and Cu2+ pretreatment, explicitly noting
that no deletion mutants were available
PMID:9797331,
and Mikheenko et al. worked in D. fructosivorans
PMID:18689514.
No GO annotation of metal (Pd/U/Tc) reduction is proposed for either subunit here:
no experiment localises Pd(II) reduction to this enzyme, and a hydrogenase reducing
a soluble metal ion non-specifically is not evidence that it executes a
characterised biological process.