TFAP2A (AP-2alpha, P05549) review notes

2026-10-05 — initial review (claude-code)

Identity and molecular activity

Network layer: border specifier AND crest specifier (reiterative)

Choice of NC process term (project convention)

Comparator check (QuickGO, recorded 2026-10-05)

Query: QuickGO annotation/downloadSearch?geneProductId=<all UniProt accessions for tfap2a/b/c/d/e in human 9606, mouse 10090, rat 10116, zebrafish 7955, X. laevis 8355, X. tropicalis 8364, chicken 9031 (153 accessions from UniProt REST)>&goId=GO:0014029,GO:0014034,GO:0014036,GO:0014032,GO:0014033,GO:0001755,GO:0014031&goUsage=descendants.
Result (76 rows):
- Zebrafish tfap2a: GO:0014036 IMP (PMID:14534133), GO:0014036 IGI (PMID:20885782), GO:0014032 IGI (PMID:17258188,
17724731, 19439494, 19955371, 21963426, 22241841).
- Zebrafish tfap2c: GO:0014036 IGI (PMID:20885782), GO:0014032 IGI (several).
- Mouse Tfap2a (P34056): GO:0014032 IMP (PMID:8622766). Rat Tfap2a: GO:0014032 ISO.
- Human TFAP2A/B/C, X. laevis and X. tropicalis tfap2a, chicken TFAP2A: none.

So orthologs in two vertebrate MODs carry NC terms. Absence in human and frog is a coverage gap: the frog border papers
(Luo 2003, de Crozé 2011) were never curated to the unreviewed frog entries. It is not a convention. This is
the same pattern found for myc-a and pax3-a.

Evolution / outgroups

Annotation decisions (summary)

Open issues