dnajc6 (A0A8M9QG43) - zebrafish auxilin - notes

Zebrafish auxilin (dnajc6; TrEMBL A0A8M9QG43, 974 aa RefSeq XP_021332835.1). The only
primary study of the zebrafish gene is Bai et al. 2010 PMID:20082716, which is
centred on the paralog gak but characterises zAux in parallel: domain structure
(PTEN-like region, clathrin-binding motif, J domain, no kinase), HeLa-cell
localisation of GFP-zAux, Drosophila rescue with J-domain dependence, and the
neural-restricted expression pattern.

Re-review 2026-09-28

Validation on entry reported one error: the GO:0072583 clathrin-dependent
endocytosis IEA row (GO_REF:0000117, ARBA) is no longer in the refreshed goa.tsv,
although the refreshed uniprot.txt still lists it (DR GO; GO:0072583; P:clathrin-dependent endocytosis; IEA:UniProtKB-ARBA.). The row was therefore
converted to action: NEW (original_reference_id pointing at the uniprot.txt DR
line) rather than deleted, because the zebrafish protein has direct in vivo evidence
for the process PMID:20082716 and the human ortholog carries the term by
IBA and IMP.

Row-level changes:

Also rewritten: description (standalone biology, mentions the gak paralog and
neural expression), core_functions (single co-chaperone entry; cytosol dropped from
locations), references (added the zebrafish and human uniprot.txt files with
findings; reference_review on PMID:20082716 verified against the cached title),
suggested questions/experiments (phosphatase activity, clathrin binding, dnajc6 loss
in zebrafish). Validation ends with zero errors and no warnings.

Follow-up after PR review (2026-10-04)

core_functions now names ATPase activator activity (GO:0001671) as the molecular function instead of Hsp70 protein binding (GO:0030544), matching the core-function prose (auxilin recruits Hsc70 and stimulates its ATPase) and the guidance to prefer an informative activity over a binding term; the binding row remains in existing_annotations as the mechanistic basis. clathrin-dependent endocytosis (GO:0072583) was dropped from directly_involved_in because clathrin coat disassembly (GO:0072318), which remains, is the precise step auxilin performs and the broader term is its ancestor.

Quote cleanup (2026-10-04)

2026-10-21 — Full re-review, independent of the ProtNLM2 predictions

ProtNLM2 output was not opened or used. Evidence: cached literature, UniProt, the
PTHR23172 PAINT file and family review, and a new sequence comparison
(A0A8M9QG43-bioinformatics/compare_isoforms_rereview.py, RESULTS-rereview.md;
no existing bioinformatics files were touched; there were none).

Identity of the benchmark accession

Evolutionary grounding

Changes

Relative to review next

Canonical product of the same gene, A0A8M9Q6X2 (dnajc6, 979 aa), relation
same_gene_canonical; no review exists. Suggested folder genes/DANRE/dnajc6 (no
dnajc6 folder exists; this folder is keyed by accession). Closest characterised
ortholog human DNAJC6 (O75061) already has a COMPLETE review.

Modules: modules/synaptic_vesicle_endocytosis.yaml and
modules/synaptic_vesicle_cycle.yaml mention auxilin/DNAJC6.

just validate DANRE A0A8M9QG43: valid, no warnings.

2026-10-21 — Characterised comparator (PR #5304 review)

The same-gene relative reviewed in this batch now lives in genes/DANRE/dnajc6__A0A8M9Q6X2/ (renamed from the bare-symbol
folder so it does not shadow this accession's folder). That relative has no experimental data of its own, so the
experimentally characterised comparator for this gene is human DNAJC6 (auxilin), already reviewed in genes/human/DNAJC6/. It sits in the same
PANTHER subfamily (PTHR23172:SF4) as this target.

2026-10-21 — NEW rows withdrawn: already annotated on another product of the same gene

The re-review proposed NEW rows (GO:0030276) on this accession. GOA already carries the same terms on
another product of the same gene, reviewed in genes/DANRE/dnajc6__A0A8M9Q6X2/. GOA propagates gene-level
annotations to one representative product per gene, so adding them to a second product fills a
convention rather than a curation gap. The rows were withdrawn, following the rule applied across the
ProtNLM2 re-review cohorts (first raised in the review of PR #5303). The gene-level function is unchanged.