dsbB2 (PA0538, P57701) review notes

DsbB family (Pfam PF02600; IPR003752; PANTHER PTHR36570), four TM helices,
two periplasmic disulfides (UniProt FT DISULFID). Reviewed together with its
paralog dsbB1 (genes/PSEAE/dsbB1); both reviews make the same calls.

Naming caution

Arts et al. 2013 worked in PA14: PMID:24327342. UniProt PA14 entries Q02TM7 (PA14_07000) and Q02EA7
(PA14_69400) are identical in sequence to PAO1 P57701 (PA0538, UniProt
"dsbB2") and P21482 (PA5256, UniProt "dsbB1") respectively (full sequences
compared, 2026-11-05). So this gene (PA0538) is the paper's PaDsbB1 (PA14_07000). Both paralogs
carry identical PseudoCAP rows, so the swap causes no annotation error; it is
raised as a suggested question.

Literature (no deep-research provider; own reading, 2026-11-05)

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale other seeds IBD stands without this seed?
PTN002195183 GO:0006457 protein folding 2 11 (8 taxa) GO:0006457, IMP, PMID:24327342 (PseudoCAP) SOUND Full text read: double mutant fails to fold disulfide-containing envelope proteins, complemented by either gene; DsbB does a step of oxidative folding (DsbA reoxidation, shown in vitro). the paralog (dsbB1 (genes/PSEAE/dsbB1)), same paper and same sound evidence Yes. The other seed is equally sound; the node is a DsbB clade and the term suits it

No PSEUDOCAP or GO_CENTRAL defect. The node's GO:0015035 IBD rests on
E. coli DsbB and is also sound.

Other decisions