ACVR2A review notes

2026-10-25 — activin module member audit

Reviewed all 102 seeded annotation rows against retrieved publications, with a
separate activin type II receptor core and BMP receptor core. The review does
not equate a type II receptor with the downstream type I receptor that directly
phosphorylates R-SMADs. No NEW annotations were proposed.

The original PMID titles were synchronized from the fetched publication cache.
Perplexity research failed with insufficient quota; the required Falcon attempt
failed authentication and its perplexity-lite fallback also failed. This file
records manual research; no provider report was fabricated.

PDZ-domain binding evidence

PMID:16648306(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16648306/) maps ARIP2 isoform
recognition to the ActRIIA C-terminal PDZ-binding motif. The direct human
fragmentomics source PMID:36115835(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36115835/)
does not name ACVR2A in its main text, but Supplementary Dataset 1 does.
The publisher file 41467_2022_33018_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx was retrieved through
Europe PMC supplementary files.
The PDZ-PBM interactome sheet contains 266 ACVR2A/P27037 rows for the natural
and assayed peptide VDFPPKESSL. Its FP_aver_uM column gives these direct
fluorescence-polarization affinities (with FP_stdev_uM):

PDZ domain Mean affinity (µM) SD (µM)
DLG4_3 194.67 15.72
SCRIB_1 85.41 2.82
SNX27 47.52 4.66
MAST2 11.51 0.30

These data substantiate the specific PDZ-binding class behind the generic binding
rows. They do not make all 266 tested pairs positive, nor establish endogenous
full-length receptor complexes for every screen hit. The review preserves those
limits and retains PDZ binding as a peripheral interaction activity.

Uncertainty and ontology scope

The ovarian cytoplasmic localization (PMID:14738881), TSC22D1 interaction
(PMID:21791611), and source-specific ActRIIA/ActRIB interaction in PMID:8622651
require full assay inspection. Abstract emphasis on a different receptor does not
establish misattribution; these rows remain UNDECIDED. Other papers independently
establish the general ACVR2A/ACVR1B complex.

Both receptor kinase activities descend from the broad protein kinase terms.
BMP signaling descends from cellular response to BMP/growth-factor stimulus.
These checked relationships justify refinements. Activin binding is not a
descendant of growth factor binding in the checked GO hierarchy, so that binding
row was retained rather than claiming a false descendant refinement.

The IBA refinements express term granularity, not a fault in experimental donors
or a claim that PAINT performs pairwise transfer. Patterning is retained with
mouse double-mutant evidence (PMID:10452853), without equating mouse embryonic
phenotypes to a directly assayed human developmental phenotype.

PR5541 follow-up, 2026-10-25

Record the independently verified type I versus type II receptor-class error in UniProt as a CONFIRMED WRONG_TERM source defect, retaining the evidence-backed MODIFY action. This is recorded for upstream reporting, not reported externally.