Functional annotation of *Medicago truncatula* RAM1 (UniProt G7L166) Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 42 citations 2026-10-02T08:26:54.223942

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Functional annotation of Medicago truncatula RAM1 (UniProt G7L166)

Identity and principal function

The target is MtRAM1, a plant GRAS-family transcriptional regulator, not the similarly named MtRAM2 enzyme. The supplied UniProt record assigns G7L166 to M. truncatula RAM1, locus MTR_7g027190, with a GRAS domain (Pfam PF03514; InterPro IPR005202). Independently, a Medicago genetic study identifies Medtr7g027190 as RAM1: a transposon insertion in that locus produces the ram1-3 phenotype, and introducing a wild-type copy complements it. The publication does not itself print the UniProt accession, so the accession-to-locus mapping is taken from the supplied record. MtRAM2, in contrast, encodes a glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase downstream of RAM1. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 3-6, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 6-8, gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 3-5)

Primary functional annotation: MtRAM1 coordinates the root-cell transcriptional program that permits arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to develop finely branched arbuscules in the root cortex. These transient intracellular fungal structures are enclosed by a plant-derived periarbuscular membrane and provide the interface for reciprocal nutrient exchange. RAM1 is a regulator of this program—not an enzyme with a substrate, a phosphate transporter, or a lipid-export protein. Its GRAS-domain assignment and genetic behavior support a role in transcriptional protein complexes; direct DNA binding by MtRAM1 alone has not been established for the downstream promoters discussed below. (gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 1-3, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 3-6, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13)

Experimental basis: what happens without RAM1?

The strongest stage-resolved evidence comes from Park et al. (Plant Physiology, October 2015; DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01155). At 2–6 days after inoculation, ram1-3 roots had approximately normal numbers of successful initial penetration events and unpenetrated fungal hyphopodia compared with controls. Once fungi entered cortical cells, however, they generally formed a thick arbuscule trunk with no branches or only one or two thick branches; the fine branches of mature arbuscules were absent. The defect remained evident at eight days and at three and five weeks. Complementation and genetic co-segregation tied it to Medtr7g027190. Thus, under the conditions tested, MtRAM1 is indispensable chiefly for arbuscule maturation and branching, not for the first penetration of the root. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 6-8)

At three to five weeks, fungi colonized approximately 18–25% of ram1-3 root length, compared with approximately 70–80% in wild-type controls. This substantial late reduction must not be mistaken for proof of an initial-entry block: impaired arbuscules can also prevent a productive infection from expanding. Earlier work had reported defective hyphopodium formation in ram1-1; Park et al. explicitly revisited that interpretation and found similar unbranched-arbuscule phenotypes for ram1-1 and ram1-3 in a side-by-side comparison. An independent study also observed predominantly small, incompletely developed arbuscules in ram1-2. These differing early- versus late-stage observations should be retained rather than collapsed into a single absolute statement about fungal entry. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 6-8, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13, gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 3-5)

Pathway and molecular mechanism

Upstream signals. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide signals engage the plant common symbiosis-signaling pathway, which includes nuclear calcium signaling and the calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase CCaMK. CYCLOPS/IPD3 and gibberellin-sensitive DELLA regulators act upstream of RAM1 transcription in the established pathway model. In Medicago, constitutively active DELLA1 increased RAM1 transcripts even without fungal inoculation; the accompanying induction of RAM2, RAD1 and EXO70I depended on RAM1. A CYCLOPS-bound RAM1-promoter element and CYCLOPS–DELLA interactions have also been studied, but important promoter, heterologous-cell and rescue experiments were conducted in other species, notably Lotus japonicus and Nicotiana benthamiana. They support the conserved model without demonstrating every molecular step directly in native Medicago root cells. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13, pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationofa pages 46-47, pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationof pages 11-13, pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationofa pages 45-46)

RAM1 also has a measurable pre-contact transcriptional role. Hohnjec et al. (BMC Genomics, November 2015; DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7) exposed five-day-old Medicago roots to fungal Myc-LCOs for six hours. Of 348 genes activated by Myc-LCOs but not Nod-LCOs under their thresholds, only 21 remained responsive in ram1-1 and 28 in nsp1-1. Dependence on both GRAS regulators was therefore pronounced for this treatment-defined gene set; Nod-LCO responses were more preferentially NSP1-dependent. These expression data place RAM1 in the response to fungal signals but do not establish direct binding of RAM1 to all 348 genes. (hohnjec2015preannouncementofsymbiotic pages 5-7, hohnjec2015preannouncementofsymbiotic pages 7-9)

Downstream arbuscule program. In colonized ram1-3 roots, induction of the phosphate-transporter gene MtPT4 and the lipid-biosynthetic gene MtRAM2 was undetectable in the tested assays; STR, EXO70I, VAPYRIN and several other arbuscule-associated transcripts remained near basal levels. Expressing RAM1 at roughly 100 times vector-control levels in nonmycorrhizal roots caused small but significant increases in RAM2, STR, EXO70I and RAD1 transcripts. These combined loss- and gain-of-function results support RAM1-dependent expression, but diminished fungal colonization can contribute to changes measured in whole roots. MtRAM2 supplies a lipid-biosynthetic enzyme; STR/STR2 are membrane ABC transporters implicated in plant-to-fungus lipid transfer; MtPT4 is a plant phosphate transporter. None of those biochemical activities belongs to the RAM1 protein itself. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 8-11, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13, petersen2022functionalanalysisof pages 18-21)

A plausible molecular explanation is assembly of GRAS transcriptional complexes. MtRAM1 interacts with NSP2, RAD1 and TF80 in yeast interaction experiments; earlier work associates RAM1 with the RAM2 promoter through NSP2. Crucially, Park et al. could not demonstrate MtRAM1 binding to STR or EXO70I upstream sequences, nor activation of those promoters by a tested RAM1–RAD1 combination. Accordingly, describing STR and EXO70I as RAM1-dependent genes is justified; calling them confirmed directly DNA-bound MtRAM1 targets is not. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 8-11, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13)

RAM1 also participates in a transcription-factor cascade controlling exchange at the arbuscule. In Medicago, WRI5a is an AP2-domain regulator of lipid provision; WRI5a and RAM1 influence one another’s transcript abundance. Unlike the unproven direct MtRAM1–STR interaction, WRI5a binding to AW-box elements of the STR promoter was tested by promoter alteration, yeast one-hybrid and electrophoretic mobility-shift experiments. Increased WRI5a expression also increased RAM1 transcripts, but the authors noted no AW box in the examined 1-kb RAM1 promoter and considered this WRI5a-to-RAM1 effect potentially indirect. (jiang2018medicagoap2domaintranscription pages 1-2, jiang2018medicagoap2domaintranscription pages 4-6, jiang2018medicagoap2domaintranscription pages 9-10)

Where does the protein act?

The relevant tissue and cell type is the Medicago root, particularly cortical cells participating in arbuscule development. RAM1-promoter reporters were active in colonized cortical regions; another experimental system detected promoter activation near approaching fungal hyphae before physical contact. Reporter activity establishes a site of gene expression, not the physical location of the RAM1 protein. As a transcriptional regulator working with symbiotic nuclear signaling factors, MtRAM1 is expected to act principally in plant nuclei, not at the fungal surface, in the periarbuscular membrane or outside the cell. Nuclear fluorescence from an MtRAM1–NSP2 bimolecular-fluorescence-complementation pair has been described in heterologous tobacco leaves, but the examined studies did not establish native MtRAM1 protein localization independently with an MtRAM1-only fusion in Medicago roots. Nuclear localization should therefore be recorded as a strong functional inference with limited protein-localization evidence, rather than as a demonstrated native localization. (gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 1-3, gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 3-5, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 3-6, petersen2022functionalanalysisofa pages 212-216, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 44-53)

Developments in 2023–2024 and practical significance

A 2023 Medicago study by Zhang et al. (Nature Communications, September 2023; DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2) places the RAM1-associated program in a more finely regulated network. It shows that the downstream AP2/ERF factors ERM1 and WRI5a promote lipid-export genes and activate ERF12; ERF12 subsequently recruits a TOPLESS-related corepressor and opposes arbuscule-promoting transcription. The newly demonstrated promoter-binding and negative-feedback mechanisms concern ERM1, WRI5a and ERF12; they should not be attributed to direct MtRAM1 binding of those promoters. The authors also report that ERM1 overexpression increases RAM1 expression, consistent with network feedback rather than proof of direct ERM1–RAM1 promoter binding. (zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 5-6, zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 10-11, zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 9-10, zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 8-9)

The particularly informative 2024 RAM1 manipulation study is in tomato, not the requested Medicago protein. Ho-Plágaro et al. (Journal of Experimental Botany, May 2024; DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae210) tested the tomato orthologue SlGRAS27/SlRAM1, gene Solyc02g094340.1. Silencing impaired colonization and arbuscules, but constitutive overexpression also reduced colonized root length—by 41% at 82 days—and suppressed strigolactone production. A strigolactone analogue largely rescued overall colonization, not normal arbuscule development. This is a warning that RAM1 dosage and timing matter; it is not direct evidence that Medicago G7L166 represses strigolactone synthesis. (hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 4-6, hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 3-4, hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 11-12)

Current implementation is primarily experimental. RAM1 mutants, complemented roots, promoter reporters and targeted expression profiling are established tools for dissecting mycorrhizal development. In the model grass Brachypodium, constitutive expression of its own RAM1 orthologue yielded approximately twice the arbuscule density in the sampled root volume without a significant increase in total fungal colonization; it also caused stunted, bushy shoots and poor seed production. Such proof-of-concept work motivates more spatially controlled manipulation but does not demonstrate improved yield or field deployment of engineered MtRAM1. Likewise, a Medicago seaweed-extract experiment reported increased mycorrhization and leaf area, yet its RAM1/RAD1 expression response did not establish RAM1 as the cause of those benefits. (muller2020constitutiveoverexpressionof pages 6-8, muller2020constitutiveoverexpressionof pages 1-4, hines2021alkalineextractof pages 7-8, hines2021alkalineextractof pages 2-4, hines2021alkalineextractof pages 1-2)

Annotation judgment: assign G7L166 a high-confidence role as a GRAS-family regulator of arbuscular-mycorrhizal transcription and cortical arbuscule branching, with experimentally supported effects on symbiotic lipid-supply, membrane-development and nutrient-exchange gene programs. Assign a probable nuclear site of action, while flagging native protein localization and direct binding of most putative downstream genes as unresolved. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 6-8, park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13, petersen2022functionalanalysisofa pages 212-216)

References

  1. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 3-6): H. Park, Daniela Floss, Véronique Lévesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, and M. Harrison. Hyphal branching during arbuscule development requires reduced arbuscular mycorrhiza11[open]. Plant Physiology, 169:2774-2788, Oct 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155, doi:10.1104/pp.15.01155. This article has 175 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 6-8): H. Park, Daniela Floss, Véronique Lévesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, and M. Harrison. Hyphal branching during arbuscule development requires reduced arbuscular mycorrhiza11[open]. Plant Physiology, 169:2774-2788, Oct 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155, doi:10.1104/pp.15.01155. This article has 175 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 3-5): Enrico Gobbato, Ertao Wang, Gillian Higgins, Syeda Asma Bano, Christine Henry, Michael Schultze, and Giles ED Oldroyd. ram1andram2function and expression during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis andaphanomyces euteichescolonization. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 8:e26049, Oct 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.26049, doi:10.4161/psb.26049. This article has 114 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (gobbato2013ram1andram2functionandexpression pages 1-3): Enrico Gobbato, Ertao Wang, Gillian Higgins, Syeda Asma Bano, Christine Henry, Michael Schultze, and Giles ED Oldroyd. ram1andram2function and expression during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis andaphanomyces euteichescolonization. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 8:e26049, Oct 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.26049, doi:10.4161/psb.26049. This article has 114 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13): H. Park, Daniela Floss, Véronique Lévesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, and M. Harrison. Hyphal branching during arbuscule development requires reduced arbuscular mycorrhiza11[open]. Plant Physiology, 169:2774-2788, Oct 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155, doi:10.1104/pp.15.01155. This article has 175 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationofa pages 46-47): Transcriptional regulation of RAM1, a central regulator of arbuscule branching in arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis This article has 0 citations.

  7. (pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationof pages 11-13): Priya Pimprikar and Caroline Gutjahr. Transcriptional regulation of arbuscular mycorrhiza development. Plant and Cell Physiology, 59:673–690, Apr 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy024, doi:10.1093/pcp/pcy024. This article has 166 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationofa pages 45-46): Transcriptional regulation of RAM1, a central regulator of arbuscule branching in arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis This article has 0 citations.

  9. (hohnjec2015preannouncementofsymbiotic pages 5-7): Natalija Hohnjec, Lisa F. Czaja-Hasse, Claudia Hogekamp, and Helge Küster. Pre-announcement of symbiotic guests: transcriptional reprogramming by mycorrhizal lipochitooligosaccharides shows a strict co-dependency on the gras transcription factors nsp1 and ram1. BMC Genomics, Nov 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7, doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7. This article has 42 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (hohnjec2015preannouncementofsymbiotic pages 7-9): Natalija Hohnjec, Lisa F. Czaja-Hasse, Claudia Hogekamp, and Helge Küster. Pre-announcement of symbiotic guests: transcriptional reprogramming by mycorrhizal lipochitooligosaccharides shows a strict co-dependency on the gras transcription factors nsp1 and ram1. BMC Genomics, Nov 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7, doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7. This article has 42 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 8-11): H. Park, Daniela Floss, Véronique Lévesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, and M. Harrison. Hyphal branching during arbuscule development requires reduced arbuscular mycorrhiza11[open]. Plant Physiology, 169:2774-2788, Oct 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155, doi:10.1104/pp.15.01155. This article has 175 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (petersen2022functionalanalysisof pages 18-21): ACA Petersen. Functional analysis of zinc finger proteins in the arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis of medicago truncatula suggests a regulatory involvement of the palm1 transcription …. Unknown journal, 2022.

  13. (jiang2018medicagoap2domaintranscription pages 1-2): Yina Jiang, Qiujin Xie, Wanxiao Wang, Jun Yang, Xiaowei Zhang, N. Yu, Yun Zhou, and Er-Tao Wang. Medicago ap2-domain transcription factor wri5a is a master regulator of lipid biosynthesis and transfer during mycorrhizal symbiosis. Molecular Plant, 11:1344-1359, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006, doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006. This article has 182 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (jiang2018medicagoap2domaintranscription pages 4-6): Yina Jiang, Qiujin Xie, Wanxiao Wang, Jun Yang, Xiaowei Zhang, N. Yu, Yun Zhou, and Er-Tao Wang. Medicago ap2-domain transcription factor wri5a is a master regulator of lipid biosynthesis and transfer during mycorrhizal symbiosis. Molecular Plant, 11:1344-1359, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006, doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006. This article has 182 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (jiang2018medicagoap2domaintranscription pages 9-10): Yina Jiang, Qiujin Xie, Wanxiao Wang, Jun Yang, Xiaowei Zhang, N. Yu, Yun Zhou, and Er-Tao Wang. Medicago ap2-domain transcription factor wri5a is a master regulator of lipid biosynthesis and transfer during mycorrhizal symbiosis. Molecular Plant, 11:1344-1359, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006, doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006. This article has 182 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (petersen2022functionalanalysisofa pages 212-216): ACA Petersen. Functional analysis of zinc finger proteins in the arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis of medicago truncatula suggests a regulatory involvement of the palm1 transcription …. Unknown journal, 2022.

  17. (park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 44-53): H. Park, Daniela Floss, Véronique Lévesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, and M. Harrison. Hyphal branching during arbuscule development requires reduced arbuscular mycorrhiza11[open]. Plant Physiology, 169:2774-2788, Oct 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155, doi:10.1104/pp.15.01155. This article has 175 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  18. (zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 5-6): Qiang Zhang, Shuangshuang Wang, Qiujin Xie, Yuanjun Xia, Lei Lu, Mingxing Wang, Gang Wang, Siyu Long, Yunfei Cai, Ling Xu, Ertao Wang, and Yina Jiang. Control of arbuscule development by a transcriptional negative feedback loop in medicago. Nature Communications, Sep 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2. This article has 57 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 10-11): Qiang Zhang, Shuangshuang Wang, Qiujin Xie, Yuanjun Xia, Lei Lu, Mingxing Wang, Gang Wang, Siyu Long, Yunfei Cai, Ling Xu, Ertao Wang, and Yina Jiang. Control of arbuscule development by a transcriptional negative feedback loop in medicago. Nature Communications, Sep 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2. This article has 57 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  20. (zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 9-10): Qiang Zhang, Shuangshuang Wang, Qiujin Xie, Yuanjun Xia, Lei Lu, Mingxing Wang, Gang Wang, Siyu Long, Yunfei Cai, Ling Xu, Ertao Wang, and Yina Jiang. Control of arbuscule development by a transcriptional negative feedback loop in medicago. Nature Communications, Sep 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2. This article has 57 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  21. (zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 8-9): Qiang Zhang, Shuangshuang Wang, Qiujin Xie, Yuanjun Xia, Lei Lu, Mingxing Wang, Gang Wang, Siyu Long, Yunfei Cai, Ling Xu, Ertao Wang, and Yina Jiang. Control of arbuscule development by a transcriptional negative feedback loop in medicago. Nature Communications, Sep 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2. This article has 57 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  22. (hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 4-6): Tania Ho-Plágaro, María Isabel Tamayo-Navarrete, Sanja Ćavar Zeljković, Petr Tarkowski, and José Manuel García-Garrido. A dual regulatory role for the arbuscular mycorrhizal master regulator ram1 in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 75:5021-5036, May 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae210, doi:10.1093/jxb/erae210. This article has 9 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  23. (hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 3-4): Tania Ho-Plágaro, María Isabel Tamayo-Navarrete, Sanja Ćavar Zeljković, Petr Tarkowski, and José Manuel García-Garrido. A dual regulatory role for the arbuscular mycorrhizal master regulator ram1 in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 75:5021-5036, May 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae210, doi:10.1093/jxb/erae210. This article has 9 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  24. (hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 11-12): Tania Ho-Plágaro, María Isabel Tamayo-Navarrete, Sanja Ćavar Zeljković, Petr Tarkowski, and José Manuel García-Garrido. A dual regulatory role for the arbuscular mycorrhizal master regulator ram1 in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 75:5021-5036, May 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae210, doi:10.1093/jxb/erae210. This article has 9 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  25. (muller2020constitutiveoverexpressionof pages 6-8): Lena M. Müller, Lidia Campos-Soriano, Veronique Levesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, Dierdra A. Daniels, Sunita Pathak, Hee-Jin Park, and Maria J. Harrison. Constitutive overexpression of ram1 increases arbuscule density during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in brachypodium distachyon. BioRxiv, Jun 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.15.146233, doi:10.1101/2020.06.15.146233. This article has 1 citations.

  26. (muller2020constitutiveoverexpressionof pages 1-4): Lena M. Müller, Lidia Campos-Soriano, Veronique Levesque-Tremblay, Armando Bravo, Dierdra A. Daniels, Sunita Pathak, Hee-Jin Park, and Maria J. Harrison. Constitutive overexpression of ram1 increases arbuscule density during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in brachypodium distachyon. BioRxiv, Jun 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.15.146233, doi:10.1101/2020.06.15.146233. This article has 1 citations.

  27. (hines2021alkalineextractof pages 7-8): Sarah Hines, Timo van der Zwan, Kevin Shiell, Katy Shotton, and Balakrishnan Prithiviraj. Alkaline extract of the seaweed ascophyllum nodosum stimulates arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their endomycorrhization of plant roots. Scientific Reports, Jun 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9. This article has 37 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  28. (hines2021alkalineextractof pages 2-4): Sarah Hines, Timo van der Zwan, Kevin Shiell, Katy Shotton, and Balakrishnan Prithiviraj. Alkaline extract of the seaweed ascophyllum nodosum stimulates arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their endomycorrhization of plant roots. Scientific Reports, Jun 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9. This article has 37 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  29. (hines2021alkalineextractof pages 1-2): Sarah Hines, Timo van der Zwan, Kevin Shiell, Katy Shotton, and Balakrishnan Prithiviraj. Alkaline extract of the seaweed ascophyllum nodosum stimulates arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their endomycorrhization of plant roots. Scientific Reports, Jun 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9. This article has 37 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

Citations

  1. park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 6-8
  2. park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 3-6
  3. park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 11-13
  4. pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationofa pages 46-47
  5. pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationof pages 11-13
  6. pimprikar2018transcriptionalregulationofa pages 45-46
  7. hohnjec2015preannouncementofsymbiotic pages 5-7
  8. hohnjec2015preannouncementofsymbiotic pages 7-9
  9. park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 8-11
  10. petersen2022functionalanalysisof pages 18-21
  11. petersen2022functionalanalysisofa pages 212-216
  12. park2015hyphalbranchingduring pages 44-53
  13. zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 5-6
  14. zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 10-11
  15. zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 9-10
  16. zhang2023controlofarbuscule pages 8-9
  17. hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 4-6
  18. hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 3-4
  19. hoplagaro2024adualregulatory pages 11-12
  20. muller2020constitutiveoverexpressionof pages 6-8
  21. muller2020constitutiveoverexpressionof pages 1-4
  22. hines2021alkalineextractof pages 7-8
  23. hines2021alkalineextractof pages 2-4
  24. hines2021alkalineextractof pages 1-2
  25. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01155
  26. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7
  27. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2
  28. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae210
  29. open
  30. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155
  31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7
  32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2
  33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae210
  34. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01155,
  35. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.26049,
  36. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy024,
  37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2224-7,
  38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.006,
  39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41493-2,
  40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae210,
  41. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.15.146233,
  42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9,