this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 36 citations 2 artifacts 2026-05-30T10:59:52.697662

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research report: Caenorhabditis elegans lbp-8 (UniProt O02324; WormBase locus T22G5.6)—functional annotation

1) Gene/protein identity verification (mandatory)

The C. elegans gene lbp-8 is explicitly mapped to the predicted locus T22G5.6 (“lbp-8 = T22G5.6”) in early nematode iFABP gene-family work, where it was classified as one of the nematode intracellular fatty acid-binding protein (iFABP) genes (lbp-1 through lbp-8). (Feb 2000; Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(99)00179-6) (plenefisch2000secretionofa pages 3-4)

Subsequent functional and structural studies on “LBP-8” in C. elegans consistently describe a fatty-acid/lipid-binding protein in the FABP/iLBP group that participates in lysosome-to-nucleus lipid signaling and longevity. (Jan 2015; Science; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857) (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10) (Jul 2019; Scientific Reports; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8) (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3)

No evidence in the retrieved literature suggests this C. elegans lbp-8/T22G5.6 is conflated with a different organism’s “LBP-8”; the key mechanistic papers are explicitly in Caenorhabditis elegans. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, plenefisch2000secretionofa pages 3-4)

2) Key concepts and definitions (current understanding)

2.1 What are FABPs/iLBPs/calycins?

Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs; also termed intracellular lipid-binding proteins, iLBPs) are small, soluble, non-enzymatic proteins that bind hydrophobic ligands (notably fatty acids and metabolites) and support intracellular lipid handling. A 2024 review synthesizes a consensus view that FABPs function as “sensors, conveyors and modulators”: they bind lipid metabolites, shuttle/sequester them, and modulate metabolic/signaling programs (including via nuclear receptor pathways). (Mar 2024; Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine; https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703) (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 1-2, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 5-6)

Structurally, FABPs belong to the calycin/lipocalin-like superfamily, sharing a conserved fold despite low sequence identity, including a β-barrel that encloses a ligand-binding cavity and an α-helical “lid/portal” implicated in ligand entry and membrane interactions. (Mar 2024; https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703) (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 4-5, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 2-4)

2.2 Implication for LBP-8 biochemical function

By this definition, LBP-8’s primary molecular function is expected to be ligand binding and intracellular transport/targeting of hydrophobic metabolites, not catalysis. The C. elegans literature directly supports this: LBP-8 is experimentally characterized as a lipid chaperone that translocates between lysosome and nucleus and drives transcriptional outputs via nuclear receptors. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2)

3) Molecular function: ligands (“substrates”), binding, and structural determinants

3.1 Ligand classes bound by LBP-8

LBP-8 binds long-chain fatty acids and fatty-acid derivatives. In the longevity-defining study, LBP-8 binds arachidonic acid (AA), ω-3 AA, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (DGLA), and the fatty-acid ethanolamide oleoylethanolamide (OEA). In competitive binding assays, OEA bound LBP-8 with ~3× higher affinity than the tested fatty acids (relative comparison reported). (Jan 2015; Science; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857) (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10)

Structural/biochemical follow-up indicates a preference for monounsaturated fatty acyls, and shows that LBP-8 can co-purify with fatty acids and exchange ligands upon exposure to worm lipid extracts (e.g., enrichment for unsaturated species including oleic acid). (Jul 2019; Scientific Reports; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8) (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 9-10)

3.2 Structural basis for binding and trafficking

LBP-8’s crystal structure at 1.3 Å (PDB 6C1Z) shows the canonical FABP fold (helix-turn-helix lid + 10-stranded β-barrel) and defines a ligand cavity (reported surface area ~825 Ų and volume ~1170 ų) lined by hydrophobic residues plus polar residues including conserved R132, implicated in head-group interactions. (Jul 2019; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8) (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 6-7, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3)

A key feature of LBP-8 is a conserved, structural nuclear localization signal (NLS) formed by basic residues (K24/R33/K34). Deletion/mutation of this region abolishes nuclear translocation. (Jul 2019; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8) (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6)

4) Biological role and pathways: lysosome-to-nucleus lipid signaling and longevity

4.1 Core pathway model

The central experimentally supported model is a lysosome-to-nucleus lipid signaling pathway:
1) Lysosomal lipolysis is stimulated via the lysosomal acid lipase LIPL-4.
2) LBP-8 levels increase and LBP-8 translocates from lysosomes to the nucleus.
3) LBP-8 carries lipid ligands (notably OEA) to nuclear hormone receptor machinery.
4) Nuclear receptors NHR-80 (direct OEA-binding) and NHR-49 (partner/cofactor) drive transcriptional programs (e.g., fatty-acid metabolism genes such as acs-2) that promote longevity. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10)

The 2015 Science paper provides causal genetic support: lbp-8 loss-of-function suppresses lipl-4-driven lifespan extension, while lbp-8 overexpression is sufficient to extend lifespan. (https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857) (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10)

4.2 Quantitative phenotypes and transcriptional outputs

Key quantitative outcomes reported include:
- lipl-4 overexpression: ~55% mean lifespan increase. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3)
- lbp-8 overexpression: ~30% mean lifespan increase. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10)
- lbp-8 loss-of-function: reduces lipl-4-mediated lifespan extension by ~46% (reported as reduction of the extension). (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10)
- Nuclear localization requirement: NLS-deleted LBP-8 is excluded from nuclei and shows little/no lifespan extension; transcription of acs-2 increases >10-fold in lbp-8 transgenics but not in NLS-deficient lbp-8 transgenics. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3)
- OEA signaling outputs: after 3 h of OEA-analogue treatment, lbp-8 transcription increased >4-fold and acs-2 >7-fold. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4)

The supporting visual evidence for localization, nuclear enrichment, and lifespan effects is shown in the retrieved figure panels from Folick et al. (LBP-8 lysosomal localization; nuclear localization; lifespan curves; ligand competition/binding assays). (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 5ffc0917, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 6d188de1, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 8dce14ac)

4.3 Receptor/ligand specificity within the pathway

NHR-80 binds OEA directly with Kd = 7.841 µM (intrinsic fluorescence assay), whereas no OEA binding was detected for NHR-49 in that study, consistent with NHR-49 acting in a receptor complex rather than as the direct OEA-binding receptor. (Jan 2015; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857) (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4)

5) Subcellular and tissue localization (where LBP-8 acts)

5.1 Tissue restriction

In the primary longevity pathway study, lbp-8 expression was reported as exclusive to the intestine. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3)

5.2 Organelle and nuclear localization

LBP-8 is predominantly lysosomal in intestinal cells, co-localizing with lysosomal marker LMP-1, and also appears in nuclear and cytosolic fractions; lipl-4 overexpression enhances the nuclear fraction. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10)

The figure evidence retrieved from Folick et al. shows lysosomal co-localization and nuclear localization panels consistent with this dual localization and translocation model. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 5ffc0917, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 6d188de1, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 8dce14ac)

6) Recent developments (prioritizing 2023–2024) and current expert analysis

6.1 2023: NHR-49 as an aging/stress hub contextualizes lbp-8

A 2023 review positions NHR-49 as an essential regulator of stress resilience and healthy aging, describing its roles in fatty-acid catabolism/desaturation and its partnership with NHR-80 (heterodimerization) and cofactors such as MDT-15. While this review excerpt does not focus on LBP-8 directly, it strengthens the pathway-level interpretation that LBP-8’s longevity effect is mediated through an established NHR-49/NHR-80 lipid-metabolism transcriptional module. (Aug 2023; Frontiers in Physiology; https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591) (doering2023nuclearhormonereceptor pages 1-2)

6.2 2024: FABPs as sensors/conveyors/modulators—supporting mechanistic interpretation

The 2024 FABP review provides a modern synthesis that FABPs can act as ligand-dependent nuclear signaling modulators, including in some contexts translocating to the nucleus to engage nuclear receptors. This framework aligns with LBP-8’s experimentally observed lysosome-to-nucleus translocation and receptor-linked transcriptional regulation. (Mar 2024; https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703) (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 4-5, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 5-6)

6.3 Note on 2023–2024 lbp-8-specific primary literature

Within the retrieved corpus, the most detailed LBP-8-specific mechanistic primary literature remains 2015 (Science) and 2019 (Scientific Reports), with additional mechanistic expansion in 2021 (preprint) and 2022 (Nature Cell Biology). The retrieved 2023–2024 sources primarily provide authoritative synthesis and context (NHR-49 biology; FABP family function) rather than new LBP-8-specific experiments. (doering2023nuclearhormonereceptor pages 1-2, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 1-2)

7) Current applications and real-world implementations

1) Aging and lysosome-to-nucleus signaling model system: LBP-8 is used as a genetically tractable node to study how lysosomal lipolysis generates lipid signals that reprogram transcription to alter lifespan (lipl-4 → LBP-8 → NHR-49/NHR-80 → target genes). This pathway provides a concrete experimental system for “organelle communication” in aging. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2)

2) Structure-guided lipid-chaperone biology: The high-resolution LBP-8 structure (6C1Z) and defined NLS residues enable mutational tests of nuclear trafficking and ligand binding, and provide a scaffold for interpreting how sequence divergence preserves a conserved FABP fold with altered cavity chemistry. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 6-7)

3) Inter-tissue lipid signaling context: In a broader lysosomal lipid signaling network, LBP-8 can show additive lifespan extension effects with LBP-3, helping dissect tissue-to-neuron communication (though LBP-3 is the more prominent inter-tissue transporter in that study). (Jun 2022; Nature Cell Biology; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8) (savini2022lysosomelipidsignalling pages 10-10)

8) Evidence summary table

The following evidence matrix summarizes identity, family, localization, ligands, pathways, quantitative phenotypes, and methods.

Claim/Aspect Key findings with quantitative values when available Primary source (year, journal) plus URL
Identity lbp-8 in Caenorhabditis elegans is explicitly mapped to T22G5.6: “lbp-8 = T22G5.6”; classified as one of the nematode intracellular fatty acid-binding protein (iFABP) genes. Later work identifies LBP-8 as the C. elegans lipid/fatty-acid binding protein studied in longevity signaling. (plenefisch2000secretionofa pages 3-4, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2) Plenefisch et al. 2000, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(99)00179-6; Tillman et al. 2019, Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8
Family / structure LBP-8 is an intracellular lipid-binding protein of the FABP/iLBP group within the calycin/lipocalin-like fold class; the 1.3 Å crystal structure (PDB 6C1Z) shows the canonical FABP architecture: N-terminal helix-turn-helix lid plus twisted 10-stranded antiparallel β-barrel. Protein is monomeric at ~16.4 kDa. The portal region supports a “collisional” FABP-like membrane interaction model. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3) Tillman et al. 2019, Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8
General FABP concept relevant to annotation FABPs are small cytosolic lipid-binding proteins that act as sensors, conveyors, and modulators of hydrophobic metabolites; they typically bind fatty acids noncovalently and can shuttle ligands to membranes or nuclear receptors. These family properties support interpreting LBP-8 as a non-enzymatic lipid chaperone rather than an enzyme. (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 1-2, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 4-5, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 2-4, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 5-6) Agellon 2024, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703; Zhang et al. 2020, FEBS Open Bio. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12840
Tissue expression In the key longevity study, lbp-8 was exclusively expressed in the intestine. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857
Subcellular localization LBP-8 localizes predominantly to intestinal lysosomes (co-localization with LMP-1) and is also detected in nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions; lipl-4 overexpression enhances nuclear localization. In an LBP-8::GFP strain, 72–100% of worms showed nuclear enrichment in the first intestinal cell pair under control conditions; rpc-2 RNAi significantly reduced nuclear-enriched LBP-8. Visual evidence is in Folick Fig. 1G–I and 2A–G. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 5-8, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 5ffc0917) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857; Duffy et al. 2021, bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489
Nuclear localization signal LBP-8 contains an N-terminal / structural NLS. Basic residues K24, R33, K34 form a conserved 3D NLS analogous to mammalian FABP5. Deleting or mutating this region abolishes nuclear translocation, and NLS-deficient LBP-8 loses most longevity activity and fails to induce acs-2. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857; Tillman et al. 2019, Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8
Ligands / binding specificity LBP-8 binds long-chain fatty acids and fatty-acid derivatives. Reported ligands include oleoylethanolamide (OEA), oleic acid, arachidonic acid (AA), ω-3 AA, and DGLA; competition assays showed OEA binds with ~3-fold higher affinity than the tested fatty acids. Structural/lipidomic work indicates preference for monounsaturated fatty acyls and identifies co-purifying palmitic (16:0) and oleic (18:1) acids from E. coli and, after exposure to worm extracts, enrichment for myristic (14:0) and unsaturated fatty acids including arachidonic (20:4), linoleic (18:2), and palmitoleic (16:1); oleic acid remained most abundant. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 9-10, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 6-7) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857; Tillman et al. 2019, Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8
Binding pocket features The ligand cavity has solvent-accessible surface area ~825 Ų and volume ~1170 ų; it is lined by hydrophobic residues (F19, F60, L65, F67, F73, F94, F110, T112, F134) plus polar residues including conserved R132 implicated in ligand head-group recognition. Interior/pocket mutants (Q121A, Y123A, R132A) altered ligand interactions. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 6-7, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 8-9) Tillman et al. 2019, Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8
Primary molecular function Best-supported annotation: LBP-8 is a non-enzymatic intracellular lipid chaperone that transfers lysosome-derived lipid signals to the nucleus. It does not catalyze a reaction; instead, it binds hydrophobic ligands and facilitates their delivery to transcriptional regulators. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3, agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 5-6, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857; Agellon 2024, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703
Upstream pathway input LIPL-4 lysosomal lipase induction upregulates lbp-8 and increases nuclear translocation of LBP-8. LIPL-4 overexpression elevates OEA and other fatty acids and extends mean lifespan by about 55%. LBP-8 is required for much of this effect. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857
Downstream pathway / nuclear receptors LBP-8 acts in a lysosome-to-nucleus lipid signaling pathway activating nuclear receptors NHR-49 and NHR-80. OEA binds NHR-80 directly with Kd = 7.841 µM; no OEA binding was detected for NHR-49, consistent with NHR-49 acting as a cofactor/partner. LBP-8 nuclear action increases transcription of targets such as acs-2; acs-2 induction exceeded 10-fold in lbp-8 transgenics but not in NLS-deficient transgenics. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2, doering2023nuclearhormonereceptor pages 1-2) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857; Doering et al. 2023, Frontiers in Physiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591
Nutrient / metabolic regulation nhr-49 regulates lbp-8 expression in nutritional response pathways; earlier work reported ~4-fold compromised lbp-8 expression in fed nhr-49(nr2041) mutants. Review literature in 2023 emphasizes NHR-49 as a central regulator of lipid metabolism, stress resilience, and healthy aging, providing context for LBP-8’s placement in this pathway. (doering2023nuclearhormonereceptor pages 1-2) van Gilst et al. 2005, PNAS. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506234102; Doering et al. 2023, Frontiers in Physiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591
Longevity phenotype lbp-8 overexpression increases mean lifespan by about 30%. lbp-8 loss-of-function does not strongly alter WT lifespan but reduces lipl-4-mediated lifespan extension by about 46%. A transgenic LBP-8 lacking the NLS shows little or no lifespan extension. Visual lifespan evidence is in Folick Fig. 2I. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 5ffc0917) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857
OEA-related quantitative effects OEA or an OEA analogue increased transcription of lbp-8 by >4-fold and acs-2 by >7-fold after 3 h treatment; direct OEA-analogue treatment prolonged WT lifespan but did not further extend lifespan in lipl-4 or lbp-8 transgenics. nape-1 loss suppressed lifespan extension in lipl-4 Tg and lbp-8 Tg by about half. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4) Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857
Additional phenotypic / functional effects A 2021 proteomic-genetic study reported that LBP-8 overexpression reduced fat storage and upregulated mitochondrial β-oxidation genes; in a screen, day-17 survival averaged 56% alive vs 38% WT for the overexpression strain under EV controls. (duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 1-5, duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 5-8) Duffy et al. 2021, bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489
Protein partners / nuclear retention Anti-FLAG IP-MS identified 45 candidate LBP-8 interactors (≥50-fold enrichment cutoff; replicate correlations R = 0.89–0.94). Several genes were required for LBP-8-mediated longevity, especially the nuclear factor RPC-2, which was also necessary for robust nuclear localization of LBP-8; nuclear import, rather than export, was required for the longevity effect. (duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 1-5, duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 5-8, duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 18-27) Duffy et al. 2021, bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489
Relationship to inter-tissue lipid signaling In a broader lysosomal lipid-signaling network, LBP-3 and LBP-8 can have additive effects on lifespan; nhr-49 is required downstream of intestine-derived lysosomal lipid signaling to neuropeptide pathways. However, lbp-8 alone had minimal effect on some neuropeptide transcripts compared with lbp-3. (savini2022lysosomelipidsignalling pages 10-10) Savini et al. 2022, Nature Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8
Key methods supporting annotation Gene-family mapping / sequence inspection; transgenics and mutant analysis; RNAi; lysosome marker co-localization (LMP-1); nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation; lifespan assays; fluorescence competition binding; intrinsic fluorescence for receptor binding; X-ray crystallography (1.3 Å, PDB 6C1Z); 1,8-ANS binding assays; differential scanning fluorimetry; circular dichroism; lipid extraction and mass spectrometry; anti-FLAG IP-MS proteomics. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 5-8, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 10-11, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 5ffc0917) Plenefisch et al. 2000, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(99)00179-6; Folick et al. 2015, Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857; Tillman et al. 2019, Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8; Duffy et al. 2021, bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489

Table: This table summarizes identity, molecular function, localization, pathway placement, ligands, phenotypes, and methods for C. elegans LBP-8 using only the cited evidence sources. It is useful as a compact evidence matrix for functional annotation of lbp-8/T22G5.6 (UniProt O02324).

lbp-8 (T22G5.6; UniProt O02324) encodes an intracellular fatty-acid binding protein (FABP/iLBP; calycin/lipocalin-like fold) expressed in the intestine, localized primarily to lysosomes but capable of nuclear translocation via a conserved structural NLS. LBP-8 binds long-chain lipids including OEA (higher relative affinity vs tested fatty acids) and functions as a lysosome-to-nucleus lipid chaperone that engages the NHR-49/NHR-80 transcriptional module (with direct OEA binding shown for NHR-80, Kd ~7.841 µM), thereby inducing lipid-metabolic transcriptional programs (e.g., acs-2) and promoting longevity when overexpressed. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10, folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4, tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6, plenefisch2000secretionofa pages 3-4)

References

  1. (plenefisch2000secretionofa pages 3-4): John Plenefisch, Hong Xiao, Baisong Mei, Jinming Geng, Patricia R Komuniecki, and Richard Komuniecki. Secretion of a novel class of ifabps in nematodes: coordinate use of the ascaris/caenorhabditis model systems. Molecular and biochemical parasitology, 105 2:223-36, Feb 2000. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-6851(99)00179-6, doi:10.1016/s0166-6851(99)00179-6. This article has 57 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3): Andrew Folick, Holly D. Oakley, Yong Yu, Eric H. Armstrong, Manju Kumari, Lucas Sanor, David D. Moore, Eric A. Ortlund, Rudolf Zechner, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 347:83-86, Jan 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857, doi:10.1126/science.1258857. This article has 316 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10): Andrew Folick, Holly D. Oakley, Yong Yu, Eric H. Armstrong, Manju Kumari, Lucas Sanor, David D. Moore, Eric A. Ortlund, Rudolf Zechner, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 347:83-86, Jan 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857, doi:10.1126/science.1258857. This article has 316 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 1-2): Luis B. Agellon. Importance of fatty acid binding proteins in cellular function and organismal metabolism. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703, doi:10.1111/jcmm.17703. This article has 27 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 5-6): Luis B. Agellon. Importance of fatty acid binding proteins in cellular function and organismal metabolism. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703, doi:10.1111/jcmm.17703. This article has 27 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 4-5): Luis B. Agellon. Importance of fatty acid binding proteins in cellular function and organismal metabolism. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703, doi:10.1111/jcmm.17703. This article has 27 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 2-4): Luis B. Agellon. Importance of fatty acid binding proteins in cellular function and organismal metabolism. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703, doi:10.1111/jcmm.17703. This article has 27 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4): Andrew Folick, Holly D. Oakley, Yong Yu, Eric H. Armstrong, Manju Kumari, Lucas Sanor, David D. Moore, Eric A. Ortlund, Rudolf Zechner, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 347:83-86, Jan 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857, doi:10.1126/science.1258857. This article has 316 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 9-10): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 6-7): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 5ffc0917): Andrew Folick, Holly D. Oakley, Yong Yu, Eric H. Armstrong, Manju Kumari, Lucas Sanor, David D. Moore, Eric A. Ortlund, Rudolf Zechner, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 347:83-86, Jan 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857, doi:10.1126/science.1258857. This article has 316 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 6d188de1): Andrew Folick, Holly D. Oakley, Yong Yu, Eric H. Armstrong, Manju Kumari, Lucas Sanor, David D. Moore, Eric A. Ortlund, Rudolf Zechner, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 347:83-86, Jan 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857, doi:10.1126/science.1258857. This article has 316 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules media 8dce14ac): Andrew Folick, Holly D. Oakley, Yong Yu, Eric H. Armstrong, Manju Kumari, Lucas Sanor, David D. Moore, Eric A. Ortlund, Rudolf Zechner, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosomal signaling molecules regulate longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 347:83-86, Jan 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857, doi:10.1126/science.1258857. This article has 316 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  17. (doering2023nuclearhormonereceptor pages 1-2): Kelsie R. S. Doering, Glafira Ermakova, and Stefan Taubert. Nuclear hormone receptor nhr-49 is an essential regulator of stress resilience and healthy aging in caenorhabditis elegans. Frontiers in Physiology, Aug 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591, doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591. This article has 27 citations.

  18. (savini2022lysosomelipidsignalling pages 10-10): Marzia Savini, Andrew Folick, Yi-Tang Lee, Feng Jin, André Cuevas, Matthew C. Tillman, Jonathon D. Duffy, Qian Zhao, Isaiah A. Neve, Pei-Wen Hu, Yong Yu, Qinghao Zhang, Youqiong Ye, William B. Mair, Jin Wang, Leng Han, Eric A. Ortlund, and Meng C. Wang. Lysosome lipid signalling from the periphery to neurons regulates longevity. Nature Cell Biology, 24:906-916, Jun 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8, doi:10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8. This article has 94 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 5-8): Jonathon Duffy, Qinghao Zhang, Sung Y. Jung, and Meng C. Wang. Lipid chaperone lbp-8 coordinates with nuclear factors to promote longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. bioRxiv, Sep 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489, doi:10.1101/2021.09.09.459489. This article has 1 citations.

  20. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 8-9): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  21. (duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 1-5): Jonathon Duffy, Qinghao Zhang, Sung Y. Jung, and Meng C. Wang. Lipid chaperone lbp-8 coordinates with nuclear factors to promote longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. bioRxiv, Sep 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489, doi:10.1101/2021.09.09.459489. This article has 1 citations.

  22. (duffy2021lipidchaperonelbp8 pages 18-27): Jonathon Duffy, Qinghao Zhang, Sung Y. Jung, and Meng C. Wang. Lipid chaperone lbp-8 coordinates with nuclear factors to promote longevity in caenorhabditis elegans. bioRxiv, Sep 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489, doi:10.1101/2021.09.09.459489. This article has 1 citations.

  23. (tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 10-11): Matthew C. Tillman, Manoj Khadka, Jonathon Duffy, Meng C. Wang, and Eric A. Ortlund. Structural characterization of life-extending caenorhabditis elegans lipid binding protein 8. Scientific Reports, Jul 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. plenefisch2000secretionofa pages 3-4
  2. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 3-6
  3. folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 1-3
  4. folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 4-10
  5. folick2015lysosomalsignalingmolecules pages 3-4
  6. doering2023nuclearhormonereceptor pages 1-2
  7. savini2022lysosomelipidsignalling pages 10-10
  8. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 1-2
  9. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 2-3
  10. agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 1-2
  11. agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 5-6
  12. agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 4-5
  13. agellon2024importanceoffatty pages 2-4
  14. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 9-10
  15. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 6-7
  16. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 8-9
  17. tillman2019structuralcharacterizationof pages 10-11
  18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(99
  19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857
  20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8
  21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703
  22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591
  23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8
  24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703;
  25. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12840
  26. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857;
  27. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489
  28. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506234102;
  29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8;
  30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-6851(99
  31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258857,
  32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46230-8,
  33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17703,
  34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1241591,
  35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00926-8,
  36. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.09.459489,