fimT (PA4549, UniProt Q9HVN0) review notes

No deep-research provider was available. These notes come from my own reading
of the cached publications, PubMed/Europe PMC searches, live QuickGO queries
(2026-11-03) and the UniProt entry.

Identity

Literature

The GO:0016888 row (PseudoCAP IDA, PMID:18174131)

Live QuickGO, 2026-11-03:

PMID:18174131 is Chiang et al. 2008, ATPase assays and NTPase-motif
mutagenesis of PilB, PilT and PilU PMID:18174131. Abstract only: no PMC copy
(PMID-to-PMCID conversion returns none), the publisher page returned 403, and
Europe PMC text-mined gene mentions are only ATPase/NTPase terms. I have not
read the full text.

Assessment:

  1. GO:0016888 is wrong for FimT. CONFIRMED from primary data: the live
    QuickGO query shows the identical wrong id on the pilU row from the same
    paper and date, while pilB and pilT got the adjacent GO:0016887; the
    completed pilU review established that slip. FimT's sequence has no
    nuclease domain (GspH/N_methyl pilin only), and no paper reports nuclease
    activity for any FimT.
  2. The paper probably has nothing on FimT, so repointing to GO:0016887 is
    not the fix. The abstract positively names PilB, PilT and PilU as the
    proteins purified and mutated and calls them motor proteins; FimT is a
    minor pilin, not an NTPase, so it cannot be one of the ATPases. The fimT
    row looks like a duplicate of the pilU row keyed onto the wrong gene
    product (the pilU row already exists, so the fimT copy should be deleted,
    not moved). Confidence PROBABLE: I read only the abstract, so I cannot
    exclude that the full text uses FimT somehow (e.g. as a control), but no
    reading of an NTPase paper would support a nuclease or ATPase function
    for a pilin.
  3. Cause of the gene-product slip: unknown. PA4549 and PA0396 are not
    similar locus tags; pilB is PA4526, near PA4549 in the genome, but pilB's
    row from the paper is separate and correct.

Recorded as two PSEUDOCAP source defects on the row: WRONG_TERM (CONFIRMED,
requested_change CHECK, since the corrected term depends on point 2) and
WRONG_GENE_PRODUCT (PROBABLE, DELETE_ROW, the pilU row G3XCX3 being where the
assertion belongs).

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

fimT (PA4549, Q9HVN0) is not in projects/PSEUDOCAP/iba_seed_worklist.yaml:
none of its PseudoCAP rows seeds a PAINT IBD with PseudoCAP support. It also
receives no IBA (no PANTHER family assignment in UniProt; QuickGO returns no
GO_REF:0000033 rows), so there is no IBA to assess.

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale
none - - - GO:0016888, IDA, PMID:18174131 (PseudoCAP; seeds no IBD) WRONG Same off-by-one id as the pilU row from the same paper and date (live QuickGO); FimT is a pilin with no nuclease domain, and the ATPase paper's abstract concerns only PilB/PilT/PilU. Delete the row.
none - - - GO:0043683, IDA, PMID:8682785 (PseudoCAP; seeds no IBD) SOUND (evidence code questionable) FimT overexpression replaces FimU in fimbrial biogenesis; the abstract describes genetics (mutant, overexpression suppression), which fits IGI/IMP better than IDA. Abstract only, so no defect recorded.

Decisions summary