CGRRF1 (Q99675) review notes

Identity

Origin / discovery

ER membrane E3 ligase / ERAD context

IMPORTANT caveat on E3 activity (negative result)

Protein interactions

Tissue expression

Summary of curation decisions

Proposed (not in GOA, supported by structure/homology, not added as accepted annotations)

2026-11-05 ORGANELLES ER batch 2 (endoplasmic reticulum rows)

Rows: GO:0005783 IEA (GO_REF:0000044, SL-0095) and IDA (PMID:27485036), both ACCEPT (unchanged).

Checks:
- UniProt: "Endoplasmic reticulum {ECO:0000269|PubMed:27485036}"; no TRANSMEM, SIGNAL or TOPO_DOM features [file:human/CGRRF1/CGRRF1-uniprot.txt].
- PMID:27485036 (full text): candidates chosen by "(1) having a RING-finger motif (C3H2C3 or C3HC4) and (2) having transmembrane domain(s)" (TMHMM); "RNFT1, RNF185, CGRRF1 and RNF19B partially colocalised with endogenous PDI, an ER-resident chaperone, indicating their localisation to the ER" (stably overexpressed V5-tagged protein, COS-1).
- InterPro extra features (queried 2026-11-05): Phobius TM 15-38, N-terminus 1-14 non-cytoplasmic, 39-332 cytoplasmic; no signal peptide. This is the same sequence line as TMHMM, not an independent one.

Outcome: both rows stay ACCEPT with dated ORGANELLES sentences. NEW GO:0005789 considered and not added: the anchor is predicted only, and the only ER assay is partial co-staining of an overexpressed tagged construct (organelle-level); UniProt's other curated location is the nucleus (PMID:22361696). Judgement call: by the BAK1 tail-anchor logic (TM, no signal peptide, one ER assay) a membrane row could be argued; it was held back because the ER assay is on overexpressed protein and UniProt does not annotate the TM.