G6pc2 (mouse, Q9Z186, MGI:1277193) review notes

2026-11-08 Session 1: de novo review

Context

Reviewed as part of the BGEEDB_EXPRESSION project (projects/BGEEDB_EXPRESSION.md).
Mouse was chosen for the richest Bgee data. The project's controlled design for
this family is the sister paralogs G6pc1/G6pc3 against G6pc2 in the tissues
where gluconeogenesis can run (liver, kidney cortex, small intestine; from the
pathway-satisfiability engine).

Inputs: 17 GOA rows (5 MF, 5 CC, 7 BP), the UniProt record, the claude_code
deep-research file (treated as a lead list), and the generated Bgee report
(G6pc2-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md).

Identity and protein features

Catalytic activity (GO:0004346)

Physiological role

Gluconeogenesis (GO:0006094): REMOVE (IBA + IEA, consistent)

Insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis

Cellular component

Curation gaps (not knowledge gaps)

Deep research (claude_code) verification

2026-11-09: targeted check — does G6pc2 contribute to glucose production?

Question: is there any direct measurement of glucose production or gluconeogenic flux in
G6pc2-deficient animals or G6PC2 variant carriers that could overturn the gluconeogenesis REMOVE?
PubMed searches combined G6pc2/IGRP/G6PC2 with clamp, tracer, isotope, glucose production,
glucose turnover, pyruvate tolerance and gluconeogenesis, plus searches for human variant studies
of hepatic or endogenous glucose production and for extra-islet expression.

Outcome: the REMOVE stands. The reason now weighs PMID:19669124 explicitly.

2026-11-09: blinded OpenScientist check on gluconeogenesis

Run: just gene-hypothesis-research openscientist mouse G6pc2 --record-slug existing-go-0006094-remove --as-function-hypothesis (3 iterations). The prompt held the neutral
hypothesis "G6pc2 has gluconeogenesis (GO:0006094)", the term, the deep-research file and four
PMIDs cited by this review (32213654, 23274894, 10078553, 25552595); it did not hold the REMOVE
decision, its rationale, the Bgee report or the literature check above. Report:
G6pc2-hypotheses/function-hypothesis-go-0006094/openscientist.md.

2026-11-10: alpha-cell function added (Bahl 2025), during the human G6PC2 review

While reviewing human G6PC2 (genes/human/G6PC2/) I read the full text of Bahl et al. 2025
(PMID:39742505, Sci Transl Med), which was not in this review. It is the first functional
study of G6PC2 in alpha cells and it uses a mouse conditional knockout, so it is mouse
evidence and belongs here.

What the paper shows

What changed in this review

Validation: env -u UV_NATIVE_TLS just validate mouse G6pc2 passes with no errors, after
just backfill-record-sections genes/mouse/G6pc2 (no changes needed; the new quotes are
publication quotes, not UniProt).