this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 27 citations 2 artifacts 2026-06-03T05:48:43.866904

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research report: Functional annotation of thiI (UniProt Q88CY4, locus PP_5045) in Pseudomonas putida KT2440

Executive summary (identity verified)

The Pseudomonas putida KT2440 gene thiI (UniProt Q88CY4) encodes a tRNA sulfurtransferase (tRNA 4-thiouridine synthase; EC 2.8.1.4) responsible for installing 4-thiouridine (s4U) in cellular tRNA. In P. putida KT2440, deletion of thiI causes a drastic reduction of s4U in bulk tRNA, directly supporting this assignment. In contrast, deletion of tudS_KT does not alter tRNA s4U levels, demonstrating that ThiI is the s4U “writer” while TudS is functionally distinct (a recycling/desulfidation enzyme acting on small-molecule 4-thio-nucleotide derivatives). (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0)

1) Key concepts and definitions (current understanding)

1.1 What is s4U and why does it matter?

4-thiouridine (s4U) is a post-transcriptional sulfur modification of uridine found in bacterial (and some archaeal) tRNAs, typically at position 8 in the tRNA core. It is one of the best-studied tRNA sulfur modifications and contributes to tRNA structural stability and can participate in light/UV-associated physiology because s4U is UV-reactive. (rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2)

1.2 What is ThiI?

ThiI is the canonical enzyme family responsible for tRNA uridine C4 thiolation to generate s4U. ThiI is an ATP-dependent tRNA-modifying enzyme (PP-loop/adenylation chemistry) that uses a sulfur donor supplied by cellular sulfur trafficking pathways (classically via cysteine desulfurases such as IscS). (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8)

1.3 Important distinction: ThiI (writer) vs TudS/RudS (erasers/salvage)

Recent work has clarified that bacteria can also encode “eraser”/recycling activities acting on s4U-containing molecules:
* TudS (DUF523) enzymes are Fe–S cluster-dependent desulfidases that preferentially act on 4-thiouridine-5′-monophosphate (4-thio-UMP) rather than intact thiolated tRNA, consistent with a role in recycling/detoxifying tRNA degradation products. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 1-2)
* RudS enzymes (TudS fused to DUF1722) are described as tRNA s4U de-modifying enzymes (“erasers”) that can remove s4U from intact tRNA in vivo. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 1-1)

This is critical for annotation: ThiI is the biosynthetic writer of s4U, while TudS/RudS represent distinct, downstream removal/recycling functions. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 1-1)

2) Primary biochemical function of P. putida KT2440 ThiI (Q88CY4)

2.1 Reaction catalyzed (writer function)

ThiI catalyzes ATP-dependent conversion of a tRNA uridine to 4-thiouridine (s4U) (classically at U8). The reaction proceeds via uridine activation by adenylation followed by sulfur transfer to the C4 position of uridine. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8)

2.2 Substrate specificity (tRNA recognition)

ThiI is a tRNA-binding enzyme. Reviews emphasize that the THUMP domain captures the tRNA 3′-CCA terminus, and proper tRNA architecture is essential for catalysis. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7)

2.3 Sulfur source and intermediates (mechanism)

Authoritative mechanistic summaries describe a canonical bacterial pathway:
1. Cysteine desulfurase IscS mobilizes sulfur from L-cysteine to form an IscS persulfide.
2. Persulfide sulfur is transferred to ThiI (in E. coli, to a rhodanese-like domain cysteine, classically referenced as Cys456).
3. ThiI uses ATP to activate the target uridine (adenylated intermediate), and a second cysteine (classically Cys344) assists incorporation of sulfur into tRNA, with a disulfide proposed during turnover.

These residue numbers are from E. coli and serve as mechanistic guidance by homology; the specific residue numbering for Q88CY4 was not directly provided in the retrieved corpus. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2)

2.4 Domain architecture (family-level understanding; supports function inference)

ThiI is described as a multi-domain enzyme. Across bacteria, ThiI proteins include:
* an N-terminal ferredoxin-like domain,
* a central THUMP RNA-binding domain,
* a PP-loop (ATP-binding/adenylation) domain,
* and in some lineages a rhodanese-like domain implicated in sulfur transfer.

Reviews emphasize that ThiI architecture varies across taxa (e.g., some bacteria lack a canonical rhodanese domain), indicating mechanistic diversity in how the sulfur is handled. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2)

3) Organism-specific evidence in Pseudomonas putida KT2440

3.1 Direct functional evidence: thiI is required for tRNA s4U in KT2440

Fuchs et al. (2023, Communications Biology, DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5, URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5; published 2023) quantified 4-thiouridine in bulk tRNA by mass spectrometry and reported that a ΔthiI strain shows drastically reduced s4U relative to wild type (normalized to dihydrouridine). This provides direct, strain-specific evidence that P. putida ThiI is the s4U synthase. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0)

3.2 Distinguishing ThiI from TudS_KT in KT2440

The same study tested ΔtudS_KT and observed virtually no difference in bulk-tRNA s4U versus wild type, concluding that TudS_KT does not act on tRNA-incorporated s4U in vivo in KT2440. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7)

3.3 Cellular location

No KT2440-specific localization experiment was retrieved. However, the substrate is cellular tRNA, implying a cytosolic/intracellular site of action for ThiI (consistent with general tRNA modification biology). (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2)

4) Recent developments (prioritizing 2023–2024)

4.1 2023: TudS function clarified and connected to P. putida KT2440 salvage/recycling

Fuchs et al. (2023) provide mechanistic and genetic evidence that TudS enzymes preferentially act on 4-thio-UMP rather than intact thiolated tRNA and that the KT2440 TudS enables growth using 4-thiouracil/4-thiouridine as uracil/uridine sources in minimal media, supporting a recycling/detoxification role for tRNA degradation products. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 1-2, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7)

This helps functional annotation by cleanly separating pathways:
* ThiI: biosynthesis of s4U in tRNA (writer).
* TudS: salvage/recycling of 4-thio-UMP (not a tRNA eraser in KT2440 under tested conditions). (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 1-2)

4.2 2023: Updated expert synthesis of ThiI structural biology

Hori (2023, Genes, Jan 2023, DOI: 10.3390/genes14020382, URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382) synthesizes structural and mechanistic work on THUMP-domain tRNA modification enzymes including ThiI. It emphasizes the THUMP domain’s role in capturing the tRNA CCA end, the ATP-dependent activation step, and the canonical IscS→ThiI sulfur transfer model in bacteria. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, hori2023transferrnamodification pages 17-18)

4.3 2024: Emergence of RudS as a tRNA s4U “eraser” family

Jamontas et al. (2024, Nucleic Acids Research, Aug 2024, DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae716, URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716; published Aug 2024) report RudS, a widespread enzyme family (TudS fused to DUF1722) that can remove s4U from tRNA.

Key quantitative findings and mechanistic features include:
* Prevalence: 857 homologs in 884 reference genomes; co-occurrence with ThiI in 637 genomes (suggesting frequent pairing of writer and eraser functions). (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 6-7)
* Effect size: heterologous expression in E. coli reduced tRNA s4U by 4.7- to 26-fold (RudS_KT reported at the high end). (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 6-7, jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 7-7)
* Cofactor: RudS_KT shows Fe–S features; a ferene assay measured ~1.01 Fe per monomer (interpreted as partial occupancy/damage for an Fe–S enzyme). (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 8-9)
* Physiology: RudS_KT overexpression reduced a UVA-induced growth lag from ~105 min to ~60 min, consistent with a role in mitigating UVA-associated s4U stress. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 12-13)

These findings are directly relevant to ThiI functional annotation because they show the s4U mark can be dynamically removed in some bacterial contexts. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 1-1)

5) Current applications and real-world implementations

5.1 Analytical implementations: quantifying s4U to validate gene function

Mass spectrometry of bulk tRNA modifications is used as a direct functional readout for thiI activity in P. putida KT2440, where ΔthiI serves as a control showing strong depletion of s4U. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0)

5.2 Nanopore tRNA sequencing as an implementation for modification mapping

RudS work uses nanopore-based nano-tRNAseq to infer conversion of s4U back to U at a specific tRNA position in vivo (supporting the “eraser” role). (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 7-7)

5.3 Metabolic salvage and detoxification of sulfur-modified nucleotide derivatives

In KT2440, TudS_KT supports growth when 4-thiouracil/4-thiouridine are provided as exogenous sources, indicating a real cellular implementation of salvage/recycling of sulfur-modified uracil derivatives. This is relevant when interpreting sulfur-modification homeostasis: loss of ThiI affects the tRNA modification mark, while TudS affects how degradation products are recycled. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7)

6) Expert opinions and authoritative interpretations

6.1 Consensus mechanism (expert reviews)

Hori (2023) and Shigi (2021) converge on a model where ThiI operates as an ATP-dependent adenylating sulfurtransferase acting on tRNA, with sulfur delivery commonly routed through cysteine desulfurases (e.g., IscS) and persulfide intermediates. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8)

6.2 Caution on cross-species mechanistic inference

Reviews emphasize that ThiI architecture and sulfur-trafficking solutions vary between lineages (e.g., Firmicutes ThiI proteins lacking a rhodanese domain and different sulfur donors/partner desulfurases). Thus, while the IscS-persulfide model is strongly supported in E. coli and is commonly applied by homology, direct biochemical confirmation in KT2440 is still desirable for substrate/partner specificity. (shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2)

7) Statistics and quantitative data (recent studies)

Key quantitative results relevant to ThiI/s4U biology from 2023–2024 literature include:
* ΔthiI effect in KT2440: bulk-tRNA s4U levels are drastically reduced in ΔthiI; ΔtudS_KT shows virtually no change vs WT (mass spectrometry; normalization to dihydrouridine). (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0)
* RudS prevalence: 857 homologs in 884 reference genomes; 637 genomes encode both RudS and ThiI. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 6-7)
* RudS effect size on tRNA s4U: 4.7–26-fold decreases upon heterologous overexpression. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 6-7)
* UVA phenotype modulation: growth-lag reduced ~105 min → ~60 min with RudS_KT overexpression after UVA exposure. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 12-13)
* RudS Fe content (proxy for Fe–S cofactor occupancy): ~1.01 Fe per monomer reported by ferene assay. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 8-9)

8) Evidence-based functional statement for annotation

thiI (Q88CY4; PP_5045) in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 encodes a cytosolic tRNA uridine sulfurtransferase required for biosynthesis of tRNA 4-thiouridine (s4U), an ATP-dependent modification installed in tRNA (classically U8). The canonical mechanism involves adenylation of the target uridine and sulfur transfer via persulfide chemistry supplied by cysteine desulfurase pathways (IscS-like), though direct biochemical identification of the sulfur donor/partner in KT2440 was not captured in the retrieved corpus. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0)

Summary table (for curation)

Aspect Evidence summary Key sources (year + DOI/URL)
Identity The target is ThiI / PP_5045 / UniProt Q88CY4 from Pseudomonas putida KT2440, annotated as a tRNA sulfurtransferase / tRNA 4-thiouridine synthase in the ThiI family. In P. putida KT2440, deletion of thiI drastically reduces bulk tRNA 4-thiouridine (s4U), supporting that this gene is the organism’s bona fide s4U-forming ThiI rather than the distinct TudS/RudS desulfurases (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7). Fuchs et al., 2023, Communications Biology, published 2023, DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5; Hori, 2023, Genes, Jan 2023, DOI: 10.3390/genes14020382, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382
Reaction Current understanding is that ThiI catalyzes ATP-dependent thiolation of uridine in tRNA to form 4-thiouridine (s4U), typically at position 8. The mechanistic model is adenylation of the target uridine followed by sulfur transfer to C4 of uridine (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, Nov 2021, DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111937, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937; Rajakovich et al., 2012, Jul 2012, DOI: 10.1128/JB.00842-12, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Substrates Substrates are tRNA containing the target uridine plus ATP; the THUMP-containing RNA-binding region recognizes tRNA and the 3′-CCA end is important/essential for catalysis in ThiI systems. The PP-loop domain activates the tRNA uridine by adenylation (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937; Rajakovich et al., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Sulfur donor In the canonical bacterial mechanism summarized from E. coli and related systems, sulfur is mobilized from L-cysteine by the cysteine desulfurase IscS, transferred as a persulfide to ThiI, then inserted into tRNA. This is the best-supported mechanistic inference for P. putida ThiI, although the cited conversation does not include a P. putida-specific biochemical reconstitution of sulfur transfer (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, hori2023transferrnamodification pages 17-18, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937; Rajakovich et al., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Cofactors ThiI is generally considered ATP-dependent. Many bacterial ThiI enzymes are not Fe–S-cluster dependent, although some archaeal ThiI homologs use Fe–S clusters. For the KT2440 protein, available conversation evidence supports assignment as a canonical bacterial ThiI rather than an Fe–S ThiI; no direct evidence here shows a metal cofactor requirement for Q88CY4 (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937
Domains Reviews describe ThiI as a multi-domain enzyme with N-terminal ferredoxin-like domain, central THUMP domain for tRNA binding/CCA-end capture, and PP-loop pyrophosphatase / adenylation domain. Some ThiI proteins also carry a C-terminal rhodanese-like domain (RLD) that accepts sulfur; this domain architecture varies across taxa. UniProt annotation for Q88CY4 is consistent with a ThiI-family protein containing ThiI-associated and rhodanese-like features (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, hori2023transferrnamodification pages 17-18, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937; Rajakovich et al., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Key residues Canonical ThiI mechanism highlights two catalytic cysteines in E. coli: Cys456 in the rhodanese-like domain receives sulfur from IscS, and Cys344 assists sulfur incorporation, with a disulfide proposed during turnover. These residue numbers are organism-specific and should be treated as homology-based mechanistic guidance, not directly validated numbering for Q88CY4 in the evidence provided here (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937; Rajakovich et al., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Localization The functional context is intracellular/cytosolic, acting on mature cellular tRNA. No evidence in the cited materials suggests secretion, membrane localization, or periplasmic function; ThiI acts where tRNA sulfur modification occurs (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7, shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Shigi, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937; Rajakovich et al., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Pathway links ThiI sits in the tRNA sulfur-modification network and, in some bacteria, also links to thiamine (thiazole) biosynthesis. The cited reviews and Salmonella/Bacillus studies show that ThiI can be bifunctional or mechanistically diverge across phyla; therefore, for P. putida KT2440 the strongest direct evidence supports the tRNA s4U pathway, while any thiamine-biosynthesis role remains an inference from family knowledge rather than KT2440-specific proof in the cited conversation (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 17-18, rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2). Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382; Rajakovich et al., 2012, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
Organism-specific evidence In P. putida KT2440, ΔthiI drastically reduces tRNA s4U, whereas ΔtudS_KT has virtually no effect on bulk tRNA s4U. This cleanly separates ThiI as the writer of the s4U tRNA modification from TudS as a distinct desulfidase/recycling enzyme acting on 4-thio-UMP/4-thiouracil-derived metabolites, not on intact tRNA in this organism (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 1-2, fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0). Fuchs et al., 2023, Communications Biology, published 2023, DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5
Annotation caveat Recent literature introduces RudS as a bona fide bacterial tRNA s4U de-modifying enzyme, but the specific P. putida KT2440 protein discussed in Fuchs et al. 2023 is TudS_KT, which was concluded not to desulfurize intact tRNA in vivo. Thus, ThiI functional annotation for Q88CY4 should not be conflated with TudS/RudS pathways (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7). Fuchs et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5; Hori, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382

Table: This table summarizes the best-supported functional annotation for Pseudomonas putida KT2440 ThiI (Q88CY4/PP_5045), separating organism-specific evidence from broader ThiI-family mechanistic inference. It is useful for distinguishing the s4U-writing activity of ThiI from separate TudS/RudS desulfidase pathways.

Notes on limitations / gaps

Key recent references (URLs and publication dates)

References

  1. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7): J Fuchs, R Jamontas, MH Hoock, and J Oltmanns. Tuds desulfidases recycle 4-thiouridine-5'-monophosphate at a catalytic cluster. Unknown journal, 2023.

  2. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle media fa9f0ea0): J Fuchs, R Jamontas, MH Hoock, and J Oltmanns. Tuds desulfidases recycle 4-thiouridine-5'-monophosphate at a catalytic cluster. Unknown journal, 2023.

  3. (rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2): Lauren J. Rajakovich, John Tomlinson, and Patricia C. Dos Santos. Functional analysis of bacillus subtilis genes involved in the biosynthesis of 4-thiouridine in trna. Journal of Bacteriology, 194:4933-4940, Jul 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00842-12, doi:10.1128/jb.00842-12. This article has 55 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7): Hiroyuki Hori. Transfer rna modification enzymes with a thiouridine synthetase, methyltransferase and pseudouridine synthase (thump) domain and the nucleosides they produce in trna. Genes, 14:382, Jan 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382, doi:10.3390/genes14020382. This article has 15 citations.

  5. (shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8): Naoki Shigi. Biosynthesis and degradation of sulfur modifications in trnas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22:11937, Nov 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937, doi:10.3390/ijms222111937. This article has 32 citations.

  6. (fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 1-2): J Fuchs, R Jamontas, MH Hoock, and J Oltmanns. Tuds desulfidases recycle 4-thiouridine-5'-monophosphate at a catalytic cluster. Unknown journal, 2023.

  7. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 1-1): Rapolas Jamontas, Audrius Laurynėnas, Deimantė Povilaitytė, Rolandas Meškys, and Agota Aučynaitė. Ruds: bacterial desulfidase responsible for trna 4-thiouridine de-modification. Nucleic Acids Research, 52:10543-10562, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716, doi:10.1093/nar/gkae716. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (hori2023transferrnamodification pages 17-18): Hiroyuki Hori. Transfer rna modification enzymes with a thiouridine synthetase, methyltransferase and pseudouridine synthase (thump) domain and the nucleosides they produce in trna. Genes, 14:382, Jan 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382, doi:10.3390/genes14020382. This article has 15 citations.

  9. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 6-7): Rapolas Jamontas, Audrius Laurynėnas, Deimantė Povilaitytė, Rolandas Meškys, and Agota Aučynaitė. Ruds: bacterial desulfidase responsible for trna 4-thiouridine de-modification. Nucleic Acids Research, 52:10543-10562, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716, doi:10.1093/nar/gkae716. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 7-7): Rapolas Jamontas, Audrius Laurynėnas, Deimantė Povilaitytė, Rolandas Meškys, and Agota Aučynaitė. Ruds: bacterial desulfidase responsible for trna 4-thiouridine de-modification. Nucleic Acids Research, 52:10543-10562, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716, doi:10.1093/nar/gkae716. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 8-9): Rapolas Jamontas, Audrius Laurynėnas, Deimantė Povilaitytė, Rolandas Meškys, and Agota Aučynaitė. Ruds: bacterial desulfidase responsible for trna 4-thiouridine de-modification. Nucleic Acids Research, 52:10543-10562, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716, doi:10.1093/nar/gkae716. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 12-13): Rapolas Jamontas, Audrius Laurynėnas, Deimantė Povilaitytė, Rolandas Meškys, and Agota Aučynaitė. Ruds: bacterial desulfidase responsible for trna 4-thiouridine de-modification. Nucleic Acids Research, 52:10543-10562, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716, doi:10.1093/nar/gkae716. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 8-10): Naoki Shigi. Biosynthesis and degradation of sulfur modifications in trnas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22:11937, Nov 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937, doi:10.3390/ijms222111937. This article has 32 citations.

  14. (rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 2-3): Lauren J. Rajakovich, John Tomlinson, and Patricia C. Dos Santos. Functional analysis of bacillus subtilis genes involved in the biosynthesis of 4-thiouridine in trna. Journal of Bacteriology, 194:4933-4940, Jul 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00842-12, doi:10.1128/jb.00842-12. This article has 55 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 1-2
  2. fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 1-2
  3. jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 1-1
  4. hori2023transferrnamodification pages 5-7
  5. fuchs2023tudsdesulfidasesrecycle pages 6-7
  6. jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 6-7
  7. jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 8-9
  8. jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 12-13
  9. jamontas2024rudsbacterialdesulfidase pages 7-7
  10. shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 7-8
  11. hori2023transferrnamodification pages 17-18
  12. shigi2021biosynthesisanddegradation pages 8-10
  13. rajakovich2012functionalanalysisof pages 2-3
  14. 4Fe-4S
  15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5;
  16. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382
  17. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716;
  18. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382;
  19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937;
  20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00842-12
  21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937
  22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05450-5
  23. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716
  24. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00842-12,
  25. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020382,
  26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111937,
  27. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae716,