MLO (barley, P93766) curation notes
2026-10-02 — initial review
Sources: UniProt P93766, GOA (2 IEA rows), falcon deep research, cached abstracts
(PMID:9054509, 10574976, 11919636, 12114562, 15703292, 15352871, 28095124) and full text
(PMID:20170486, 36588121). Most barley papers are cached as abstracts only.
Identity / structure
Molecular function evidence
- Ca2+-dependent calmodulin binding PMID:11919636
and in vivo FRET PMID:15703292.
Not in GOA -> proposed NEW GO:0005516.
- Channel hypothesis: Arabidopsis paralogs are Ca2+ channels
PMID:36588121.
Deep research cites a 2026 bioRxiv preprint (modeling) and reported Ba2+/Mg2+ currents for HvMLO, but no peer-reviewed barley conductance data in the cache. Not annotated; raised as a question.
Biological role
Decisions
- GO:0006952 defense response (IEA, InterPro2GO): MODIFY -> GO:0031348 negative regulation
of defense response. Sign of the IEA is wrong for the wild-type protein. Comparator:
Arabidopsis MLO2 carries GO:0031348 (TAIR IMP, acts_upstream_of_or_within). No
"negative regulation of defense response to fungus" term exists (checked QuickGO/OLS).
Did NOT propose "defense response to fungus": that would assert MLO executes defense,
which is a necessity/phenotype inversion.
- GO:0016020 membrane (IEA): MODIFY -> GO:0005886 plasma membrane.
- NEW GO:0005516 calmodulin binding (IDA, PMID:11919636).
Open questions
- Does HvMLO conduct Ca2+? If yes, calcium channel activity should become the core MF.
- Is the regulatory process term overreaching given purely genetic evidence?