pcrB (yerE; BSU06600; O34790) notes

Provenance of this review

Activity

In vivo fate and physiological role of the product

GO term choices

Review session 2026-11-06: resolution of the two reviewer critiques

Both open questions from the merged PR review of the plan above were re-tested
before the review was written. Both changed the plan.

1. The planned NEW GO:0042158 lipoprotein biosynthetic process row: DROPPED

Asked explicitly which entity performs the step. LhaT transfers the acetyl
group to the lipoprotein; the acetyl group itself comes from acetyl-CoA via
YvoF; the HepG carrier is released and reloaded, so PcrB's product contributes
no atom to Ac-LP. PcrB is three steps upstream and supplies a regenerated
cofactor. The ΔpcrB result is necessity evidence, which is what being
required for a process looks like whether or not the gene participates in it.

The earlier comparator check was the wrong comparison. Lgt and Lnt modify the
lipoprotein themselves, so they do the work. Re-run against gene products in
the same role - enzymes that make a donor or carrier consumed by a
protein-modification process (QuickGO annotation API, biological_process,
2026-11-06):

Donor/carrier synthase Consumer modification Carries the consumer's process term?
FDPS P14324 (makes FPP) protein farnesylation No; isoprenoid/cholesterol biosynthesis only
GGPS1 O95749 (makes GGPP) protein geranylgeranylation No
MAT2A P31153, metK P0A817 (make SAM) protein/DNA methylation No; GO:0006556 only
ACLY P53396, ACSS2 Q9NR19 (make acetyl-CoA) protein acetylation No
bioB P12998, bioF P12999 (make biotin) protein biotinylation No; GO:0009102 only
UppS P60472 (makes Und-P) peptidoglycan biosynthesis Yes, GO:0009252 IMP
DPM1 O60762 (makes Dol-P-Man) GPI/O-mannosylation Yes, GO:0006506 IDA, GO:0035269 IDA

So the two precedents the notes leaned on are the two exceptions, and both
differ from PcrB in the way CLAUDE.md's thyroglobulin/fibrin/C3 cases differ
from angiotensinogen: Und-P and Dol-P-Man are themselves glycosylated
intermediates that carry the growing product, whereas HepG only ferries an
acetyl group it does not contribute. The term is dropped; the reasoning is
recorded as a suggested_questions entry asking GO whether the
carrier-synthase exclusion is deliberate practice. This also keeps the gene
consistent with the merged module, which puts GO:0042158 on the LhaT annoton.

Correction (2026-11-06, from the PR #6063 review). DPM1 does not belong in
the table as a counterexample at all. It charges the carrier with the group it
donates (GDP-Man to Dol-P-Man), which makes it the analogue of YvoF, not of
PcrB. PcrB builds the carrier backbone, so its matched-role comparators are
DHDDS/NUS1 (dolichol), HepS/HepT (the C35 donor PcrB itself consumes) and UppS.
That leaves UppS as the single genuine counterexample, which strengthens the
drop rather than weakening it. The repository already holds the matched-role
precedent: modules/bacterial_undecaprenyl_phosphate_carrier_supply.yaml models
UppS with GO:0016094 polyprenol biosynthetic process alone and no downstream
glycan process. The suggested_questions entry was rewritten accordingly.

2. GO:0008611 ether lipid biosynthetic process: USED, but as an added row, not a replacement

Definition (OLS, 2026-11-06): "lipids that contain (normally) one lipid alcohol
in ether linkage to one of the carbon atoms (normally C-1) of glycerol."

The C-3 objection dissolves on inspection. In HepGP the ether is on the
glycerol carbon distal to the phosphate. That is the same physical position
as C-1 in the mirror-image sn-glycerol-3-phosphate numbering used for
plasmanyl/plasmenyl lipids; the number differs only because sn numbering is
fixed by backbone stereochemistry. The two hedged "normally" clauses cover
exactly this. UniProt independently calls the reaction an ether-bond-formation
step, and the family survey states the family forms "an ether bond between
glycerol-1-phosphate and polyprenyl diphosphates" PMID:24684232. No new term
is needed for ether-bond formation as such.

But the planned MODIFY was wrong on a different ground, which the plan had not
checked: GO:0008611 is not a descendant of GO:0046474. Its parents are
GO:0008610 lipid biosynthetic process, GO:0046485 ether lipid metabolic
process and GO:0046504 glycerol ether biosynthetic process (OLS). Replacing
GO:0046474 with it would therefore discard a true claim (HepGP is a
glycerophospholipid; UniProt's PATHWAY line says so) rather than refine it.

Comparator check on the process term (QuickGO + UniProt REST, 2026-11-06):

Resolution adopted: GO:0046474 rows (IBA, IDA, IEA) are ACCEPTed as core,
since no descendant of that term names heptaprenylglyceryl phosphate or any
archaeal-type ether lipid, so the general term is already as precise as the
evidence allows. GO:0006650 is MODIFYed to GO:0046474 (parent to the
specific child the gene already carries). GO:0008611 is added as a NEW
row (IDA, PMID:21761520) because it states the one thing the glycerophospholipid
terms do not - that PcrB forms the ether linkage - and PcrB performs that step
itself. This would be the term's first prokaryotic use, which is noted in the
row. The ontology question (clarify the definition; add a child for isoprenoid
or archaeal-type ether lipid biosynthesis) is recorded in
suggested_questions, not as proposed_new_terms, since the existing term is
usable as written. The module's GO:0008611 assertion on the PcrB step is
therefore upheld.

Other decisions

2026-11-07 module audit: source scope and complete annotation review

Rechecked all existing annotation rows, references and core functions against the frozen sources. No machine payload, row order or historical NEW assertion was changed; no new annotation was added. The default Falcon attempt failed with HTTP403 and produced no provider report; manual review is documented here instead. Normal PAINT-loss checks returned no IRD/IKR.

Magnesium binding is accepted as a central catalytic cofactor requirement. Historical ether-lipid and cytoplasm NEW payloads/actions remain intact, with bounded reasons and substantive source quotations. PcrB directly forms the phosphorylated ether lipid; carrier use in Bacillus is distinguished from bulk membrane synthesis, family-wide function and unresolved membrane translocation. Generic IBA refinement uses target assays, without reconstructing a clade from the donor list. The author-thesis precursor-feeding evidence does not prove EgsA supplies the native pool.

PR6167 round1 correction — 2026-11-07

The historical claim above that GO:0008611 would be the first prokaryotic use is withdrawn. The historical query tested Archaea and Bacillota, not all Bacteria. Current exact-term QuickGO finds 5,192 rows including 17 bacterial rows (16 UniPathway electronic mappings and Myxococcus CarF IDA from PMID:31604315); descendant-inclusive counts are 5,432. The primary CarF abstract establishes plasmanylethanolamine desaturation, not GGGPS chemistry. Full query URLs/responses, identities and adjudication are in analysis/module_audits/bacterial_heptaprenylglyceryl_ether_lipid/round1-gene-consultation/comparator-adjudication.md.

The same-role archaeal P0C882/O26652/O29844 GGGPS comparators still have glycerophospholipid, not ether-lipid, BP annotations. Official HAMAP MF_00112 maps GO:0046474 while explicitly describing ether formation. This explains a concrete propagation gap but not every annotation or any curator's intent; O29844 also has InterPro/PANTHER mapping support. Direct PcrB chemistry and the current broad ether-lipid definition justify retaining the historical NEW despite that unresolved specific convention. Both-direction ancestry confirms GO:0008611 and GO:0046474 are neither ancestors nor descendants. No row/action/payload/order changed.

Magnesium binding is now explicit in the opening of the existing synthase core description, consistent with its accepted cofactor-binding row. CoreFunction uses a Term for molecular_function and has no cofactor slot; the cofactor descriptor belongs to module functions, so it was not imposed on this gene schema. No separate binding-only core or NEW was added. The primary Mg omission/EDTA result remains the supporting evidence [PMID:23322418, “No product was found, indicating that Mg2+ is likely essential for catalysis.”].