GPR75 review notes

Gene: human GPR75 (UniProt O95800), class A rhodopsin-like GPCR, 540 aa, chr 2p16.
Reviewed as part of a contested-function batch (see also GPR158, GPR25).

The contested annotation

GOA carries GO:0016493 C-C chemokine receptor activity three times on human GPR75,
with IBA, IEA (Ensembl ortholog transfer) and ISS — and no experimental
evidence code anywhere. The paired process term GO:0070098 chemokine-mediated
signaling pathway is carried on the same footing (IEA + ISS).

Where the IBA actually comes from (checked, not assumed)

The brief's premise was that the IBA has no experimental donor. That is not quite
right, and it matters
. The WITH/FROM field of the human IBA is
MGI:MGI:2441843|PANTHER:PTN002796002. MGI:2441843 resolves to mouse Gpr75
(confirmed at informatics.jax.org), and QuickGO shows that mouse Gpr75 carries
GO:0016493 with IDA from PMID:17001303. So the IBD behind this IBA is
experimentally grounded — in exactly one descendant, the mouse orthologue.

Two consequences:

  1. Per CLAUDE.md, donor count is not a proxy for evidential strength, and a node
    seeded by one well-characterised MOD gene can be sound. So the propagation is not
    mechanically defective, and REMOVE on "no experimental donor" grounds would have
    been wrong.
  2. But because the only experimental descendant cited is the mouse orthologue, the IBA
    carries no information beyond the mouse-to-human transfer already recorded twice
    as ISS (UniProtKB:Q6X632) and as the Ensembl Compara IEA (also Q6X632). All four
    rows reduce to a single 2006 heterologous-expression study.

That study:
PMID:17001303 and
PMID:17001303

It was later supported in human neuroblastoma cells lacking the canonical CCL5 receptors:
PMID:29772059 and
PMID:29772059, concluding
PMID:29772059

So the claim is not fabricated. It is, however, a proposal that the field has declined
to adopt.

Why it is nevertheless an over-annotation

1. IUPHAR still calls GPR75 an orphan.
PMID:40362321 and
PMID:40362321

2. Both candidate agonists are explicitly contested in 2025-2026 reviews.
PMID:40757922
PMID:40362321

3. The 2026 cryo-EM structures argue against any orthosteric ligand, chemokine
included.

PMID:41545757 revealing
PMID:41545757, and the receptor is constitutively active without a ligand:
PMID:41545757

A collapsed extracellular domain is a harder problem for an 8 kDa chemokine than for a
small molecule: chemokine receptors engage their ligands over a large N-terminal /
extracellular-loop surface (CRS1) before the ligand N-terminus inserts into the pocket
(CRS2). Neither site appears to exist here.

4. GPR75 is not a chemokine receptor by descent. Its closest relatives by
transmembrane sequence are peptide receptors of other families, not CCRs:
PMID:40362321

What GPR75 is solidly

A plasma-membrane, Gq-coupled class A GPCR:
PMID:40362321, with a Gq-bound cryo-EM structure
(PMID:41545757), and the only thing GOA should confidently assert about its molecular
function is GO:0004930.

Its genetics are strong and independent of the ligand question: human loss-of-function
variants protect against obesity, and rodent knockouts are lean and insulin-sensitive.
Those are organismal phenotypes and do not license a molecular-function claim.

Curation position taken

Unresolved