SKIP (FBgn0051163) isoform comparison

Script: compare_isoforms.py (stdlib only; queries the UniProt REST API for all
UniProtKB entries cross-referenced to FlyBase FBgn0051163). Raw output: output.txt.

Question

Diao et al. 2009 (PMID:19463952) mapped binding of the Shal (Kv4) K+ channel to the
eight C-terminal residues that are unique to the short isoform SKIP3 (SAM1 domain plus
a 61-residue C-terminal tail). Does the product reviewed here, A0A0B4K6C1 (1034 aa,
NP_001247234.1), carry those residues?

Results (from output.txt)

accession length shared N-terminal prefix with A0A0B4K6C1 last 8 residues last 8 present in A0A0B4K6C1
A0A0B4KH49 128 120 VSLAFNLY False
Q8SZS0 (SKIP1, PB/PC) 952 120 SGPLKSST True
A0A0B4KHM3 1027 880 SGPLKSST True
A0A0B4K6C1 1034 1034 SGPLKSST True
Q0KI30 1064 483 SGPLKSST True
A0A0B4KHV7 1080 120 QDDRLEDQ False

A0A0B4KH49 (128 aa) is identical to A0A0B4K6C1 over its first 120 residues (the SAM1
region) and then ends in an eight-residue tail, VSLAFNLY, that does not occur in
A0A0B4K6C1. This matches the published description of SKIP3, which shares all of its
sequence with SKIP1 except the C-terminal eight residues that are needed for Shal binding.
A0A0B4KH49 is therefore the SKIP3 product, and the Shal-binding octapeptide is absent
from A0A0B4K6C1.

A0A0B4K6C1 is a long isoform like SKIP1: N-terminal SAM1, central disordered region, SH3
domain and C-terminal SAM2 (UniProt FT DOMAIN lines). Shal binding and Shal-inactivation
regulation demonstrated for SKIP3 cannot be transferred to it.

Caveats

The identification of A0A0B4KH49 as SKIP3 rests on the sequence architecture described in
the paper (120 shared + 8 unique residues). The paper's own SKIP3 cDNA sequence was not
retrieved for a direct comparison.