NOTCH1 review notes

2026-07-14 — cerebellum-module quality audit

Evidence re-review, 2026-09-20: context and family transfer

The SLIT-seeded PTN002911625 trace does not establish a NOTCH1-specific axon-guidance mechanism, but it also does not refute one. The axon-guidance IBA is now UNDECIDED: direct Drosophila evidence identifies a noncanonical Notch/Disabled/Trio pathway for axon growth and guidance independent of canonical cell-fate signaling [PMID:18062953, “Molecular separation of two signaling pathways for the receptor, Notch.”]. A neutral focused OpenScientist report has been submitted by the coordinating reviewer to distinguish directional guidance, neurite growth and cell-fate effects in human NOTCH1; no duplicate was launched. Enzyme-inhibitor activity is retained as non-core because Notch ankyrin repeats compete with HIF for FIH hydroxylation [PMID:17573339, “Asparaginyl hydroxylation of the Notch ankyrin repeat domain by factor inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor.”], with follow-up FIH sequestration/cross-talk evidence PMID:18299578. Broad transcription/coactivator and cell-periphery terms remain core where they directly capture canonical NOTCH1 function. DLL3 was removed from the list of canonical activating trans ligands. All 378 rows were screened, preserving pleiotropic developmental processes as non-core where appropriate.

Focused axon-guidance report adjudication, 2026-09-20

The completed OpenScientist report is incorporated with a material identifier correction. The report calls the fly/mouse WITH/FROM genes Notch orthologs, but FlyBase FBgn0264089 is sli, and MGI:1315202/1315203/1315205 are Slit3, Slit1 and Slit2. A fresh QuickGO exact-term query confirms those identifiers. Independent primary Notch evidence remains biologically relevant: PMID:21246649 establishes the Trio GEF1/Rac contribution, and PMID:29343637 separates cleavage/tyrosine-dependent axon patterning from cell-fate signaling. PMID:10465425 measures neurite outgrowth/morphology, while PMID:27040987 examines mammalian noncanonical synaptic-protein expression. Neither these different outputs nor absent STRING edges prove loss of guidance. The report did not align the fly determinants or reconstruct the PAINT tree; human conservation remains UNDECIDED. The report is complete and no duplicate query was launched.