this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 32 citations 2 artifacts 2026-05-31T17:46:08.534441

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research Report: Functional Annotation of S. cerevisiae TIM9 (UniProt O74700)

0) Mandatory identity verification (disambiguation)

The target protein is Tim9 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c, encoded by TIM9 (YEL020W-A / YEL020BW) and annotated in UniProt as “Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM9” (UniProt O74700; user-supplied context). The literature evidence gathered here consistently describes yeast Tim9 as a small TIM family protein localized to the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS), forming hetero-oligomeric chaperone complexes with Tim10 (and Tim12) that facilitate the TIM22 carrier pathway. This matches the UniProt description and the expected small Tim family/domain architecture (twin CX3C motifs; Tim10-like family) (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).

1) Key concepts, definitions, and current understanding

1.1 Small TIM chaperones (definition)

Small TIMs are a set of small (∼10 kDa class) soluble IMS chaperones that escort hydrophobic mitochondrial membrane-protein precursors after they pass through the TOM complex, preventing aggregation in the aqueous IMS and enabling transfer to downstream insertases/translocases (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1, chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5).

1.2 TIM22 “carrier pathway” and Tim9’s central role

Hydrophobic multi-pass inner-membrane proteins lacking N-terminal presequences (classically metabolite carrier proteins) are inserted via the TIM22 translocase, and small TIM complexes are required for their transit across the IMS from TOM → TIM22 (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).

Tim9’s primary functional role is therefore chaperone-like binding and transfer of hydrophobic internal-signal precursors rather than catalysis or transport. In practice, Tim9 is a core component of the peripheral IMS module of the TIM22 pathway, physically and functionally coupled to TIM22 via Tim12 and membrane subunits (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).

1.3 Localization and biogenesis (MIA pathway)

Tim9 is located in the mitochondrial IMS (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4). Small TIM proteins (including Tim9) are imported through TOM and undergo oxidative folding in the IMS via the MIA (mitochondrial import and assembly) pathway, which introduces disulfides in the conserved CX3C motifs (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1).

2) Molecular function, complexes, substrates, and mechanism

2.1 Complex composition and stoichiometry

Multiple sources converge on two principal assemblies:

  1. Soluble Tim9–Tim10 heterohexamer in the IMS
  2. Stoichiometry: Tim9:Tim10 = 3:3 (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5)
  3. Approximate complex mass: ~70 kDa (kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4)

  4. TIM22-associated docking complex

  5. Stoichiometry: Tim9–Tim10–Tim12 = 3:2:1, localized on the TIM22 translocase (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5)
  6. Tim12 is described as stably associated with Tim22 and facilitates docking/hand-off to the TIM22 insertase (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5).

At the translocase scale, the yeast TIM22 complex is described as ~300 kDa, composed of Tim22/Tim54/Tim18/Sdh3 plus the small Tim module (Tim9/Tim10/Tim12) (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 1-2, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).

2.2 Substrate specificity: carrier proteins and other hydrophobic clients

The canonical TIM22 substrate class is mitochondrial carrier proteins (MCPs), including exemplars such as AAC2/Pet9 (ADP/ATP carrier), Pic/Pic2, and Dic1, which are cited as model TIM22 cargos (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 1-2). Biochemical substrate-binding evidence indicates that Tim10 (alone) can bind the ATP/ADP carrier (AAC) similarly to the Tim9–Tim10 complex, whereas Tim9 alone does not bind AAC, supporting a model where Tim10 provides key substrate-binding elements within the complex (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 6-7).

Small TIMs can also assist trafficking of some outer-membrane β-barrel proteins toward the SAM complex, indicating broader IMS “holdase/escort” functions beyond only inner-membrane carriers (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 9-9).

2.3 Mechanism (handoff from TOM to TIM22)

In the prevailing model synthesized in authoritative reviews and pathway studies, Tim9-containing small TIM complexes:
1) capture/release hydrophobic precursors emerging from TOM into the IMS,
2) maintain them in an insertion-competent state,
3) dock onto the TIM22 translocase (via Tim12 and membrane adaptors such as Tim54), and
4) deliver precursors for membrane insertion through Tim22 (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).

3) Structural basis of function (client binding and complex stability)

3.1 Core fold and conserved motifs

Small TIM proteins (including Tim9) contain conserved twin CX3C motifs that form two intramolecular disulfide bonds, stabilizing a compact helical bundle suitable for IMS chaperone activity (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1, chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5).

3.2 Hexamer architecture and interfaces

A detailed comparative structural analysis identifies conserved intersubunit contacts (aromatic packing and electrostatic ion pairs) that stabilize the Tim9–Tim10 hexamer and rationalize why specific point mutations disrupt assembly (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6). Conserved contacts include aromatic residues in Tim9 (e.g., F29/F36) and a network of intersubunit ion pairs (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6).

3.3 Genetic evidence linking structure to function

Mutations in conserved residues of yeast Tim9 destabilize the Tim9–Tim10 complex:
- tim9-19 (E52G) and tim9-3 (V40A + S60P) show no detectable Tim9–Tim10 heterohexamer in detergent-solubilized mitochondria, linking those residues to complex integrity and thus function in import (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6).

3.4 Client-binding clefts and specificity (molecular biophysics)

High-resolution biophysical work on small TIM chaperones demonstrates that TIM9·10 recognizes hydrophobic clients primarily through a hydrophobic cleft formed by chaperone helices, whereas TIM8·13 is tuned toward clients with substantial hydrophilic/disordered segments via electrostatic interactions (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 1-2, sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 8-9). In this framework:
- The carrier-like client Ggc1 shows a ~5–10-fold preference for TIM9·10 (relative to TIM8·13), while Tim23 shows a modest preference for TIM8·13 (∼1.5-fold), capturing the client-specific division of labor between chaperone complexes (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3).
- TIM9·10 can form “fuzzy” complexes driven by many weak, rapidly interconverting (<1 ms) contacts (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3).

Quantitative binding example (Tim23 IMS segment): TIM8·13 binds the Tim23 IMS fragment with Kd = 66 ± 8 μM, whereas TIM9·10 binding to Tim23IMS is undetectable by ITC in the reported assays, consistent with a primarily hydrophobic-client specialization for TIM9·10 (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 3-4, sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 8-9).

Stoichiometry (chaperone:precursor): Biophysical measurements converge on 1:1 chaperone:Tim23 stoichiometry for TIM9·10–Tim23 and TIM8·13–Tim23, while an exception is noted for a carrier (Ggc1) where two TIM9·10 complexes hold one precursor (2:1) (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 7-8, sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3).

4) Recent developments (prioritizing 2023–2024)

4.1 2023: TIM22 pathway is integrated with mitochondrial quality control via Yme1

A 2023 Journal of Cell Science study identified functional crosstalk between TIM22 and the i-AAA protease Yme1 in S. cerevisiae, providing a modern view in which carrier import capacity must be balanced with proteostasis:
- The authors state that excess TIM22 pathway cargos can cause proteostatic stress and cell death, and that Yme1 contributes to TIM22 substrate proteostasis and TIM22 complex stability (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 1-2).
- Phenotypically, yme1Δ cells show severe respiratory growth defects at 37°C on non-fermentable medium (YPG), and partial impairment of TIM22 (e.g., tim18Δ or tim22K127A) rescues the yme1Δ respiratory growth defect under these conditions (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 2-3).
- Conversely, Tim22 overexpression worsens growth of yme1Δ under tested conditions, consistent with a model where elevated carrier-pathway throughput can be deleterious when quality control is compromised (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 2-3).

Although this study focuses on TIM22 and Yme1, Tim9’s relevance is direct because Tim9 is part of the TIM22 peripheral module and thereby contributes to the flux of hydrophobic substrates that drive the proteostatic phenotype (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 1-2).

4.2 2024: Review synthesis—small TIM assembly state is surveilled by Yme1

A 2024 mini-review in Biochemical Society Transactions consolidates evidence that:
- Tim9 and Tim10 assemble into an essential heterohexameric Tim9/10 complex that chaperones hydrophobic preproteins from TOM to TIM22 (kan2024roleofyme1 pages 3-4).
- Small TIM proteins are imported via the redox-sensitive Mia40/MIA pathway, and unassembled small TIM components can be targeted for proteolytic degradation by Yme1, with assembly into the Tim9/10 complex being protective (kan2024roleofyme1 pages 3-4).
- TIM22 complex stability is decreased in Δyme1 cells and import efficiency is particularly affected under heat stress conditions, linking TIM22 pathway competence (and therefore Tim9/Tim10 function) to protease-mediated quality control (kan2024roleofyme1 pages 3-4).

4.3 2024: Updated structural interpretations of small TIM docking to TIM22

A 2024 structural thesis on TIM22 proposes mechanistic features relevant to Tim9/Tim10 delivery:
- Yeast Tim9/Tim10 termini are longer and flexible, with “tentacle” mobility hypothesized to help engage precursors, consistent with a stable hexamer core and flexible substrate-interaction periphery (valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51).
- The IMS-facing helix of TIM22 near its N-terminus is interpreted as a candidate small TIM docking site, positioned close to the membrane to facilitate insertion (valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51).

5) Current applications and real-world implementations

  1. Model system for mitochondrial membrane protein biogenesis: TIM9 is routinely used in yeast as part of the canonical TIM22 carrier-pathway framework, enabling mechanistic dissection of how hydrophobic membrane proteins are escorted through aqueous compartments to their insertase (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).

  2. Structural/biophysical platforms for chaperone specificity: Small TIM chaperones (including TIM9·10) are used as experimentally tractable systems to study “fuzzy” chaperone-client binding, competition, and specificity tuning via hydrophobic versus electrostatic interactions (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3, sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 8-9).

  3. Proteostasis and quality control studies: Tim9’s pathway role places it at the intersection of protein import and mitochondrial quality control. The demonstrated genetic interactions between TIM22 and Yme1 provide a functional context for studying how import flux, chaperone availability, and protease capacity jointly shape mitochondrial health (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 2-3, kan2024roleofyme1 pages 3-4).

6) Expert opinions and authoritative synthesis

Across reviews and primary studies, a consistent expert-level interpretation emerges:
- Tim9 is best viewed as a specialized, soluble IMS holdase chaperone, whose biological necessity stems from the requirement to traffic highly hydrophobic, multi-pass clients across the IMS without aggregation and with correct delivery to TIM22 (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4).
- Modern mechanistic work emphasizes that specificity is not purely “one chaperone per client,” but rather emerges from the physicochemical matching between client features (hydrophobic TM segments vs. hydrophilic disordered regions) and chaperone cleft properties, enabling competition and transfer between small TIM complexes (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3, sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 8-9).

7) Evidence map (summary table)

The following table consolidates the main functional annotation points, quantitative values, and citations.

Category Key points Evidence details (specific stoichiometries, sizes, mutations, residue pairs) Key sources (author year journal) URL
identity TIM9 in this report matches Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tim9, a small TIM family mitochondrial protein corresponding to UniProt O74700; it is an intermembrane-space chaperone, not an enzyme or transporter. Small TIM proteins are typically ~8–12 kDa; in yeast, Tim9 is one of five small TIMs (Tim8, Tim9, Tim10, Tim12, Tim13). Tim9 belongs to the zf-Tim10/DDP family with conserved twin CX3C motifs. (guillen2023uniqueinteractionsand pages 1-5, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1) Gentle et al. 2007 Mol Biol Evol; Guillén et al. 2023 bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031 ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542777
localization Tim9 localizes to the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS), where it acts between TOM-mediated entry and TIM22-mediated inner-membrane insertion. Multiple sources place Tim9 in the IMS as a soluble chaperone module that escorts hydrophobic precursors after TOM transit. (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4) Chaudhuri et al. 2020 Biomolecules; Kumar et al. 2020 J Cell Sci https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643 ; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244632
complexes Tim9 forms the canonical Tim9–Tim10 heterohexamer and also participates in a Tim9–Tim10–Tim12 docking complex linked to TIM22. Tim9:Tim10 complex stoichiometry is 3:3; the TIM22-associated complex is Tim9–Tim10–Tim12 = 3:2:1; the soluble Tim9/Tim10 complex is about ~70 kDa; TIM22 machinery is about ~300 kDa. Tim12 is stably associated with Tim22 and helps dock the chaperone complex to the translocase. (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4) Chaudhuri et al. 2020 Biomolecules; Kumar et al. 2020 J Cell Sci https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643 ; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244632
substrates Tim9’s primary substrate class is hydrophobic multi-pass inner-membrane proteins, especially mitochondrial carrier proteins imported via the TIM22 pathway. Substrates include metabolite carriers such as the ATP/ADP carrier (AAC) and other carrier-type proteins; sources also note involvement with some internal-signal translocase subunits (e.g., Tim22, Tim23, Tim17 in pathway context). Small TIMs can also contribute to transfer/assembly of some outer-membrane β-barrel proteins to SAM. (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 6-7, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 9-9, kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4) Chaudhuri et al. 2020 Biomolecules; Gentle et al. 2007 Mol Biol Evol; Kumar et al. 2020 J Cell Sci https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643 ; https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031 ; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244632
mechanism Tim9 acts as a chaperone/escort factor that prevents aggregation of hydrophobic precursors in the aqueous IMS and transfers them from TOM to TIM22. Tim9/Tim10 releases hydrophobic clients from TOM and hands them to TIM22; Tim12-containing complex mediates docking to the TIM22 translocase. Structural work supports hydrophobic client-binding clefts in the Tim9/Tim10 hexamer and flexible terminal “tentacles” involved in precursor engagement. (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 3-3, sucec2020structuralbasisof media 57627111, valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51) Chaudhuri et al. 2020 Biomolecules; Sučec et al. 2020 Sci Adv; Valpadashi 2024 PhD thesis https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643 ; https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263 ; https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-10678
structure & motifs Tim9 is a small TIM chaperone with twin CX3C motifs, disulfide-stabilized fold, and conserved intersubunit contacts required for hexamer stability. Small TIM hexamers are described as donut/propeller-like with a relatively flat face and terminal tentacle-like extensions. Conserved contacts include aromatic interactions involving Tim9-F29, Tim9-F36 and ion-pairing involving the conserved Tim9 glutamate. In mutant analysis, tim9-19 = E52G and tim9-3 = V40A + S60P caused loss of detectable Tim9–Tim10 heterohexamer in detergent-solubilized mitochondria. Crosslinks reported for yeast Tim9/Tim10 include K58–K81, K58–K45, and K81–K68. (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 6-7, valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51) Gentle et al. 2007 Mol Biol Evol; Valpadashi 2024 PhD thesis https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031 ; https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-10678
biogenesis (MIA) Tim9 itself is imported into the IMS and undergoes oxidative folding via the MIA pathway. After TOM passage, small TIMs are oxidatively folded by the MIA (mitochondrial import and assembly) machinery; the conserved CX3C cysteines form two intramolecular disulfide bonds important for structural integrity. (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 6-7, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1) Chaudhuri et al. 2020 Biomolecules; Gentle et al. 2007 Mol Biol Evol https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643 ; https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031
phenotypes & genetics Tim9 function is genetically important for mitochondrial protein import and cell viability; disruption of conserved residues destabilizes the chaperone complex. The 2023 comparative source states Tim9 (with Tim10 and Tim12) is essential in yeast. Older yeast mutant data show tim9-19 (E52G) and tim9-3 (V40A, S60P) abolish detectable Tim9–Tim10 hexamer. Related tim10ts mutants reduce Tim10 and Tim9 expression at 37°C, causing death unless functionally rescued, illustrating the essentiality of the Tim9/Tim10 chaperone function for at least one indispensable substrate. (guillen2023uniqueinteractionsand pages 1-5, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6, gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 7-7) Guillén et al. 2023 bioRxiv; Gentle et al. 2007 Mol Biol Evol https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542777 ; https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031
recent developments 2023-2024 Recent work emphasizes the broader proteostasis integration of the TIM22 pathway and updated structural interpretation of small TIM–TIM22 interactions, rather than discovering a new primary function for Tim9. 2023 work linked TIM22 pathway activity to Yme1-dependent mitochondrial proteostasis, indicating that excess TIM22 substrates can drive stress and that Yme1 supports TIM22 complex stability. A 2024 structural analysis/thesis proposed an IMS-facing TIM22 helix as a small TIM docking site near the membrane; a nearby human disease mutation (TIM22 V33L) may impair chaperone binding. 2024 review literature also reiterates that Tim9/Tim10 is an essential IMS chaperone module in the TIM22 pathway. (valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51) Valpadashi 2024 PhD thesis; Kumar et al. 2023 J Cell Sci https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-10678 ; https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260060

Table: This table summarizes the functional annotation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tim9 (UniProt O74700), including identity, localization, complexes, substrates, mechanism, structural features, MIA-dependent biogenesis, genetic evidence, and recent 2023–2024 developments. It is useful as a concise evidence map for curated gene-function annotation.

8) Key references (URLs and publication dates)

9) Limitations and gaps

References

  1. (chaudhuri2020tim17updatesa pages 2-5): Minu Chaudhuri, Chauncey Darden, Fidel Soto Gonzalez, Ujjal K. Singha, Linda Quinones, and Anuj Tripathi. Tim17 updates: a comprehensive review of an ancient mitochondrial protein translocator. Biomolecules, 10:1643, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643, doi:10.3390/biom10121643. This article has 25 citations.

  2. (kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4): Abhishek Kumar, Srujan Kumar Matta, and Patrick D'Silva. Conserved regions of budding yeast tim22 have a role in structural organization of the carrier translocase. Journal of Cell Science, Jul 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244632, doi:10.1242/jcs.244632. This article has 8 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1): I. Gentle, A. Perry, F. Alcock, V. Likic, P. Doležal, E. T. Ng, A. Purcell, Malcolm McConnville, Thomas Naderer, Anne-Laure Chanez, Fabien Charrière, Caroline Aschinger, A. Schneider, K. Tokatlidis, and T. Lithgow. Conserved motifs reveal details of ancestry and structure in the small tim chaperones of the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Molecular biology and evolution, 24 5:1149-60, May 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm031. This article has 118 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 1-2): Abhishek Kumar, Tejashree Pradip Waingankar, and Patrick D'Silva. Functional crosstalk between the tim22 complex and yme1 machinery maintains mitochondrial proteostasis and integrity. Journal of Cell Science, Jan 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260060, doi:10.1242/jcs.260060. This article has 9 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 6-7): I. Gentle, A. Perry, F. Alcock, V. Likic, P. Doležal, E. T. Ng, A. Purcell, Malcolm McConnville, Thomas Naderer, Anne-Laure Chanez, Fabien Charrière, Caroline Aschinger, A. Schneider, K. Tokatlidis, and T. Lithgow. Conserved motifs reveal details of ancestry and structure in the small tim chaperones of the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Molecular biology and evolution, 24 5:1149-60, May 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm031. This article has 118 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 9-9): I. Gentle, A. Perry, F. Alcock, V. Likic, P. Doležal, E. T. Ng, A. Purcell, Malcolm McConnville, Thomas Naderer, Anne-Laure Chanez, Fabien Charrière, Caroline Aschinger, A. Schneider, K. Tokatlidis, and T. Lithgow. Conserved motifs reveal details of ancestry and structure in the small tim chaperones of the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Molecular biology and evolution, 24 5:1149-60, May 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm031. This article has 118 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6): I. Gentle, A. Perry, F. Alcock, V. Likic, P. Doležal, E. T. Ng, A. Purcell, Malcolm McConnville, Thomas Naderer, Anne-Laure Chanez, Fabien Charrière, Caroline Aschinger, A. Schneider, K. Tokatlidis, and T. Lithgow. Conserved motifs reveal details of ancestry and structure in the small tim chaperones of the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Molecular biology and evolution, 24 5:1149-60, May 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm031. This article has 118 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 1-2): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 8-9): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 3-4): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 7-8): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 2-3): Abhishek Kumar, Tejashree Pradip Waingankar, and Patrick D'Silva. Functional crosstalk between the tim22 complex and yme1 machinery maintains mitochondrial proteostasis and integrity. Journal of Cell Science, Jan 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260060, doi:10.1242/jcs.260060. This article has 9 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (kan2024roleofyme1 pages 3-4): Kwan Ting Kan, Joel Wilcock, and Hui Lu. Role of yme1 in mitochondrial protein homeostasis: from regulation of protein import, oxphos function to lipid synthesis and mitochondrial dynamics. Biochemical Society Transactions, 52:1539-1548, Jun 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20240450, doi:10.1042/bst20240450. This article has 9 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51): Anusha Valpadashi. Structural and functional characterization of TIM22 complex in the inner mitochondrial membarne. PhD thesis, University Goettingen Repository, 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-10678, doi:10.53846/goediss-10678.

  16. (guillen2023uniqueinteractionsand pages 1-5): Linda S. Quiñones Guillén, Fidel Soto Gonzalez, Chauncey Darden, Muhammad Bismillah Khan, A. Tripathi, Joseph T. Smith, Ayorinde Cooley, Victor Paromov, Jamaine Davis, Smitā Miśra, and Minu Chaudhuri. Unique interactions and functions of the mitochondrial small tims in trypanosoma brucei. bioRxiv, May 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542777, doi:10.1101/2023.05.29.542777. This article has 2 citations.

  17. (sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 3-3): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  18. (sucec2020structuralbasisof media 57627111): Iva Sučec, Yong Wang, Ons Dakhlaoui, Katharina Weinhäupl, Tobias Jores, Doriane Costa, Audrey Hessel, Martha Brennich, Doron Rapaport, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Beate Bersch, and Paul Schanda. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Science Advances, Dec 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0263. This article has 38 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 7-7): I. Gentle, A. Perry, F. Alcock, V. Likic, P. Doležal, E. T. Ng, A. Purcell, Malcolm McConnville, Thomas Naderer, Anne-Laure Chanez, Fabien Charrière, Caroline Aschinger, A. Schneider, K. Tokatlidis, and T. Lithgow. Conserved motifs reveal details of ancestry and structure in the small tim chaperones of the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Molecular biology and evolution, 24 5:1149-60, May 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031, doi:10.1093/molbev/msm031. This article has 118 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. kumar2020conservedregionsof pages 1-4
  2. kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 1-2
  3. gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 6-7
  4. gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 5-6
  5. sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 2-3
  6. kumar2023functionalcrosstalkbetween pages 2-3
  7. valpadashi2024structuralandfunctional pages 51-51
  8. gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 1-1
  9. gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 9-9
  10. sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 1-2
  11. sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 8-9
  12. sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 3-4
  13. sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 7-8
  14. guillen2023uniqueinteractionsand pages 1-5
  15. sucec2020structuralbasisof pages 3-3
  16. gentle2007conservedmotifsreveal pages 7-7
  17. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031
  18. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542777
  19. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643
  20. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244632
  21. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263
  22. https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-10678
  23. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260060
  24. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20240450
  25. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121643,
  26. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244632,
  27. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm031,
  28. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260060,
  29. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0263,
  30. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20240450,
  31. https://doi.org/10.53846/goediss-10678,
  32. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542777,