AT4G38370 (Q0WW53): evidence and exact-input prediction review

The fold-level name is reasonable. The only emitted GO term is generic catalytic activity; the TIGAR structural donor does not establish a particular phosphatase substrate or glycolytic role for AT4G38370.

Input identity and functional boundary

Q0WW53 maps to AT4G38370 and PTHR47821:SF2. Its 225-residue sequence contains an N-terminal RHG motif. The emitted donor Q7ZVE3 is zebrafish TIGAR B. Exploratory global alignment preserves the donor catalytic histidine and proton-donor/acceptor residues, but is highly gapped and has low overall identity; the apparent mismatch at a transition-state contact is not reliable evidence of catalytic loss. No TIGAR-specific substrate assignment follows from this alignment.

Biological evidence

The
recombinant human and zebra fish enzymes hydrolyze fructose-2,6-bisphosphate as
well as fructose-1,6-bisphosphate but not fructose 6-phosphate in vitro.

Exact non-GO claims

The complete emitted record is preserved in AT4G38370-protnlm-source.json. Assessments below address the selected protein product; evidence on longer products is identified explicitly.

Protein name

Phosphoglycerate mutase-like protein

CNN (CS 2). “Phosphoglycerate mutase-like protein” is a qualified fold-level description consistent with the histidine-phosphatase domain assignment. The “-like” wording does not assert phosphoglycerate turnover or a glycolytic pathway role.

Emitted GO claims

All 1 emitted GO claims are individually assessed in AT4G38370-protnlm-predictions-review.yaml.

Family integration

PTHR47821:SF2 places the target among phosphoglycerate-mutase-family proteins. The histidine-phosphatase fold encompasses different phosphosugar reactions, so a common RHG catalytic motif cannot identify a substrate. It also does not establish the specialized secreted phytase architecture of another histidine-phosphatase branch.

Evidence limits

No target-specific biochemical study was located under AT4G38370 or Q0WW53. The TIGAR primary report is abstract-only and explicitly establishes donor enzymology. The genuine Falcon synthesis supplies family hypotheses but does not establish a target reaction. The sequence comparison is exploratory: sparse global alignments are not used to call residue loss or to identify an evolved pseudoenzyme.

Exact sequence mapping: AT4G38370-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md. Global alignments can place nonhomologous alternative tails opposite gaps or distant residues; only conserved segments and explicitly retained feature intervals support functional transfer.

2026-10-21 — Full re-review, independent of the ProtNLM2 predictions

Done without opening any ProtNLM file or prediction-evidence folder.

Entry identity

Evolutionary placement

Catalytic residues (new script catalytic_residues_rereview.py)

Literature

PubMed and Europe PMC searches for At4g38370, Q0WW53 and F4JTN4 found no functional study. Europe PMC
returned two hits that only mention the locus in large-scale data (a phylogenetic marker set and an
embryo single-nucleus expression study). PMID:22223895 is the large-scale proteomics study behind PE
level 1. The falcon report agrees that no gene-specific literature exists.

Changes to the review

Relative

No experimentally characterised ortholog or paralog exists within PTHR47821. The next item is the
canonical reference-proteome entry for the same gene, F4JTN4, which holds the TAIR GO rows and has no
review. It would go in genes/ARATH/AT4G38370__F4JTN4.

The PANTHER family review interpro/panther/PTHR47821/PTHR47821-review.yaml agrees on the SF2
placement. Its coherence is UNKNOWN and it leans on TIGAR, which is in a different family. The review
does not disagree on subfamily placement. No module in modules/ mentions this gene.