Functional annotation report: *ets1-a* (UniProt P18755), *Xenopus laevis* Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 24 citations 2 artifacts 2026-10-01T23:38:28.032642

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Functional annotation report: ets1-a (UniProt P18755), Xenopus laevis

Identity and interpretation of the evidence

The target is the African clawed frog protein c-Ets-1A, encoded by ets1-a/ets1a, not human ETS1 or the Xenopus tropicalis ets1 protein. The supplied UniProt record identifies P18755 as an ETS-family protein with an ETS DNA-binding domain, an Ets1 N-terminal flank, and a pointed/SAM-related domain. This assignment agrees with experimental work that explicitly cloned the X. laevis ets1a open reading frame and distinguished it from the second X. laevis copy, ets1b. The gene symbol 'ets1-a' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein: much of the developmental literature calls the proteins collectively “Ets1,” and its loss-of-function reagents reduce both copies. Consequently, those experiments establish a role for X. laevis Ets1 activity, not a uniquely demonstrated endogenous requirement for P18755. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 3-4, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7)

Primary molecular function and site of action

Ets1-A is a sequence-specific transcriptional regulator, not an enzyme, transporter, or extracellular structural protein. Its ETS domain supports DNA-associated transcriptional control; in experimentally expressed X. laevis Ets1a, the ETS-containing region also mediates association with histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1). The most clearly established frog genomic target is the BMP-responsive id3 promoter: FLAG-tagged frog Ets1a occupied its predicted binding region in embryo chromatin-immunoprecipitation assays. Co-immunoprecipitation, deletion constructs and promoter-chromatin assays support a model in which Ets1-associated HDAC1 lowers local histone-H4 acetylation and id3 expression. HDAC1, rather than Ets1-A, supplies the deacetylase activity; the study did not establish the complete set of DNA sequences or genes recognized by endogenous P18755. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 7-9, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 9-10, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription media 4bc0cb80)

Ets1-A’s functional site is inferred to be the nucleus, because it acts at a chromatin-bound promoter and participates in transcriptional regulation. The retrieved frog experiments demonstrate promoter occupancy by expressed tagged Ets1a, but do not establish a quantitative, endogenous Ets1a-versus-Ets1b subcellular distribution. Tissue expression should therefore not be mistaken for a protein-localization assay. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 7-9)

At the tissue level, ets1a transcripts occur in premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest, including streams that contribute to the cardiac neural crest, and in presumptive heart mesoderm. Compared with ets1a, ets1b is more prominent in presumptive crest and persists more broadly in the later first heart field; ets1a becomes increasingly restricted to blood islands there. Earlier ets-1 expression mapping also detected transcripts in neural-crest derivatives and developing vascular/endothelial territories, although those older assays did not assign every signal to the modern ets1a homeolog. These are embryonic expression sites, not evidence of secretion into blood or extracellular space. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 18-20, meyer1997ets1andets2 pages 1-1, meyer1997ets1andets2 pages 5-6)

Developmental pathways and biological processes

FGF inputs and BMP-output control. In X. laevis embryos, inhibition of FGF signaling reduced ets1 expression, whereas eFGF induced it in animal-cap experiments; Wnt3a gave a weaker induction. The authors also placed ets1 downstream of the neural-crest regulator Lrig3. These experiments identify upstream regulatory inputs but do not establish that each acts specifically on endogenous ets1a rather than ets1b. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 3-4)

Downstream, excess cloned Ets1a attenuated transcriptional output from the BMP pathway without reducing Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation. Ets1a repressed id3, while added Id3 partially relieved repression of neural-crest markers. The Ets1–HDAC1 interaction and decreased promoter histone acetylation provide a more precise mechanism than describing Ets1-A simply as a BMP inhibitor: it regulates a BMP-responsive gene at the level of transcriptional/chromatin output, rather than demonstrably blocking BMP receptors or Smad phosphorylation. Pharmacological HDAC inhibition reversed Ets1-dependent repression of foxd3, although that intervention does not by itself prove that HDAC1 is the only relevant deacetylase in vivo. The promoter-binding and acetylation experiments are illustrated in the study’s Figure 8. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 7-9, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 9-10, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription media 4bc0cb80)

Neural-crest migration is the best-supported developmental role of combined Ets1 activity. In whole X. laevis embryos, reducing both homeologs did not obviously prevent initial foxd3 and snail2 expression, but neural-crest cells subsequently failed to extend and segregate normally into migratory streams. For one morpholino, disrupted cranial-crest segmentation/extension was observed in 17/20 (85%) and 20/24 (83%) embryos in reported assays. Independently, transplantation of Ets1-depleted cranial-crest tissue into wild-type hosts supported a requirement within the crest for normal migration. Thus, impaired migration and delamination are better-established physiological outcomes than an absolute requirement for initial whole-embryo crest induction. The effects of ectopic high-dose Ets1a are different: excess expression represses crest markers, consistent with a dosage- and context-dependent regulatory role, not a simple one-directional specification switch. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 6-7, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 4-6, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7)

Heart development involves two distinguishable tissues. Fate-map-guided Ets1 knockdown in neural crest disrupted its migration and was associated with malformed or missing aortic arch arteries and a misshapen outflow tract. Targeting presumptive heart mesoderm instead caused much more severe endocardial and heart-tube defects, including diminished endocardial tissue and absent ventricular trabeculae; expression of the cardiac marker Tbx20 was reduced in 15/19 embryos in a reported assay, and cardiac gene expression was rescued by Ets1 add-back. These experiments show distinct tissue requirements but used a morpholino recognizing both Ets1a and Ets1b. They do not identify a direct Ets1a DNA target responsible for endocardium formation, nor demonstrate that P18755 alone accounts for the cardiac phenotype. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 4-6, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 8-10)

Additional, more tentative regulatory links. In X. laevis, Ets1 manipulation altered expression of msmb3L: overexpression increased it and knockdown reduced it. msmb3L depletion itself disturbed crest migration, with abnormal sox10-marked streams in 9/13 (69.2%) embryos at stage 20. However, ChIP did not detect Ets1 binding at the tested proximal msmb3L promoter site, so direct regulation at that site is unsupported. The underlying ets1 knockout RNA-seq discovery was performed in X. tropicalis, not in an X. laevis ets1a-specific mutant. Separately, embryo immunoprecipitation showed association of Ets1 with the transcriptional cofactor Vgll3; co-expression increased an MCAT-sequence reporter by approximately 1.7-fold in cultured cells. Neither study demonstrates an indispensable, homeolog-specific Ets1-A interaction at a native neural-crest target. (wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 8-10, wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 2-4, simon2017vestigiallike3is pages 8-11)

The following evidence summary separates protein-specific constructs from shared-homeolog perturbations:

Finding Strongest primary assay Paralog-specific status Key citation
Ectopically expressed Ets1 binds the id3 promoter, recruits HDAC1, and reduces local histone-H4 acetylation, supporting direct repression of BMP-responsive id3. X. laevis embryo ChIP, co-immunoprecipitation, deletion mapping, and promoter histone-acetylation assays Ets1a-derived construct: the cloned open reading frame was explicitly X. laevis ets1a, making this the closest protein-specific evidence for P18755; however, it tests tagged or overexpressed protein rather than endogenous native P18755 alone. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 7-9, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription media 4bc0cb80)
Combined Ets1 depletion blocks cranial neural-crest migration or stream extension: 85% (17/20) and 83% (20/24) in representative experiments. Antisense-morpholino loss of function followed by whole-mount marker analysis Not P18755-specific: reagents depleted both ets1a and ets1b, so the phenotype establishes combined Ets1-homeolog function, not a unique endogenous role for Ets1a/P18755. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 6-7, wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 4-6)
Ets1 has separable tissue-autonomous roles: it supports cardiac neural-crest migration and is required in heart mesoderm for endocardial and cardiac development; mesodermal knockdown reduced Tbx20 in 15/19 embryos. Fate-map-targeted morpholino injection, neural-crest transplantation, cardiac histology, in situ hybridization, and rescue Not P18755-specific: the shared translation-blocking morpholino targeted Ets1a and Ets1b; both homeologs are expressed in these tissues, with Ets1b reported as more prominent. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 8-10)
Ets1 positively regulates msmb3L expression, but ChIP did not detect binding at the predicted proximal msmb3L promoter site; regulation may therefore be indirect or occur through another element. X. laevis gain- and loss-of-function RT-PCR plus FLAG-Ets1 ChIP-qPCR, with id3 as a positive control Not P18755-specific: experiments refer to Ets1 without demonstrating an Ets1a-only endogenous effect; direct promoter occupancy was negative. (wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 8-10)
Vgll3 interacts with Ets1 in embryos, and co-expression stimulated an MCAT reporter by approximately 1.7-fold. Embryo immunoprecipitation and HEK293 luciferase-reporter assay Not P18755-specific: the study did not distinguish Ets1a from Ets1b, and the reporter result does not prove that the interaction is required for endogenous neural-crest transcription. (simon2017vestigiallike3is pages 8-11)

Table: Primary evidence for Xenopus laevis ets1-a/P18755, with explicit separation of Ets1a-derived construct results from experiments that jointly perturb ets1a and ets1b. This prevents combined-homeolog phenotypes from being overstated as native P18755-specific functions.

Current use, recent research, and limitations

The real-world application of these findings is experimental functional annotation and developmental modeling: accessible Xenopus embryos permit spatially targeted perturbation, crest transplantation, promoter-ChIP assays, and separate assessment of neural-crest and cardiac-mesoderm contributions to heart formation. Comparisons with human congenital-heart phenotypes are biologically informative, but the frog studies are not a clinical validation of P18755 as a therapeutic target. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 4-6, nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 3-4)

Recency assessment. The strongest direct X. laevis mechanistic studies identified here were published in 2015 and 2017; the 2020 follow-up tested X. laevis msmb3L while deriving its mutant-transcriptome results from X. tropicalis. Retrieved 2024 cardiac-development synthesis discusses, among other topics, human ETS1-associated chromatin findings; it supplies no new experiment uniquely identifying frog Ets1-A/P18755 function. It would therefore be misleading to label human ETS1 results, X. tropicalis mutant data, or general 2023–2024 neural-crest findings as recent direct evidence for P18755. A remaining priority is an ets1a-selective endogenous perturbation with an ets1b comparison and rescue, coupled to endogenous protein-localization and target-occupancy measurements. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3, simon2017vestigiallike3is pages 8-11, wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 2-4, wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 8-10, li2024themolecularmechanisms pages 6-7)

Principal sources and publication dates

References

  1. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 3-4): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7): Shuyi Nie and Marianne E. Bronner. Dual developmental role of transcriptional regulator ets1 in xenopus cardiac neural crest vs. heart mesoderm. Cardiovascular research, 106 1:67-75, Apr 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvv043. This article has 50 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 7-9): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 9-10): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription media 4bc0cb80): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 18-20): Shuyi Nie and Marianne E. Bronner. Dual developmental role of transcriptional regulator ets1 in xenopus cardiac neural crest vs. heart mesoderm. Cardiovascular research, 106 1:67-75, Apr 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvv043. This article has 50 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (meyer1997ets1andets2 pages 1-1): David E. Meyer, Marcel Durliat, F. Senan, Michael W. Wolff, Michèle André, J. Hourdry, and Par Julien Remy. Ets-1 and ets-2 proto-oncogenes exhibit differential and restricted expression patterns during xenopus laevis oogenesis and embryogenesis. The International journal of developmental biology, 41 4:607-20, Aug 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.9303349, doi:10.1387/ijdb.9303349. This article has 68 citations.

  9. (meyer1997ets1andets2 pages 5-6): David E. Meyer, Marcel Durliat, F. Senan, Michael W. Wolff, Michèle André, J. Hourdry, and Par Julien Remy. Ets-1 and ets-2 proto-oncogenes exhibit differential and restricted expression patterns during xenopus laevis oogenesis and embryogenesis. The International journal of developmental biology, 41 4:607-20, Aug 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.9303349, doi:10.1387/ijdb.9303349. This article has 68 citations.

  10. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 6-7): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 4-6): Chengdong Wang, Richard Kin Ting Kam, Weili Shi, Yin Xia, Xiongfong Chen, Ying Cao, Jianmin Sun, Yanzhi Du, Gang Lu, Zijiang Chen, Wood Yee Chan, Sun On Chan, Yi Deng, and Hui Zhao. The proto-oncogene transcription factor ets1 regulates neural crest development through histone deacetylase 1 to mediate output of bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290:21925-21938, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864, doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.644864. This article has 58 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 4-6): Shuyi Nie and Marianne E. Bronner. Dual developmental role of transcriptional regulator ets1 in xenopus cardiac neural crest vs. heart mesoderm. Cardiovascular research, 106 1:67-75, Apr 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvv043. This article has 50 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 8-10): Shuyi Nie and Marianne E. Bronner. Dual developmental role of transcriptional regulator ets1 in xenopus cardiac neural crest vs. heart mesoderm. Cardiovascular research, 106 1:67-75, Apr 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvv043. This article has 50 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 8-10): Chengdong Wang, Xufeng Qi, Xiang Zhou, Jianmin Sun, Dongqing Cai, Gang Lu, Xiongfong Chen, Zhihua Jiang, Yong‐Gang Yao, Wai Yee Chan, and Hui Zhao. Rna‐seq analysis on ets1 mutant embryos of xenopus tropicalis identifies microseminoprotein beta gene 3 as an essential regulator of neural crest migration. The FASEB Journal, 34:12726-12738, Jul 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000603r, doi:10.1096/fj.202000603r. This article has 8 citations.

  15. (wang2020rna‐seqanalysison pages 2-4): Chengdong Wang, Xufeng Qi, Xiang Zhou, Jianmin Sun, Dongqing Cai, Gang Lu, Xiongfong Chen, Zhihua Jiang, Yong‐Gang Yao, Wai Yee Chan, and Hui Zhao. Rna‐seq analysis on ets1 mutant embryos of xenopus tropicalis identifies microseminoprotein beta gene 3 as an essential regulator of neural crest migration. The FASEB Journal, 34:12726-12738, Jul 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000603r, doi:10.1096/fj.202000603r. This article has 8 citations.

  16. (simon2017vestigiallike3is pages 8-11): Emilie Simon, Nadine Thézé, Sandrine Fédou, Pierre Thiébaud, and Corinne Faucheux. Vestigial-like 3 is a novel ets1 interacting partner and regulates trigeminal nerve formation and cranial neural crest migration. Biology Open, 6:1528-1540, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.026153, doi:10.1242/bio.026153. This article has 40 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  17. (nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 3-4): Shuyi Nie and Marianne E. Bronner. Dual developmental role of transcriptional regulator ets1 in xenopus cardiac neural crest vs. heart mesoderm. Cardiovascular research, 106 1:67-75, Apr 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043, doi:10.1093/cvr/cvv043. This article has 50 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  18. (li2024themolecularmechanisms pages 6-7): Yingrui Li, Jianlin Du, Songbai Deng, Bin Liu, X. Jing, Yuling Yan, Ya-jie Liu, Jing Wang, Xiaobo Zhou, and Qiang She. The molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and related diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, Dec 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-02069-8, doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02069-8. This article has 133 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (meyer1997ets1andets2 pages 1-2): David E. Meyer, Marcel Durliat, F. Senan, Michael W. Wolff, Michèle André, J. Hourdry, and Par Julien Remy. Ets-1 and ets-2 proto-oncogenes exhibit differential and restricted expression patterns during xenopus laevis oogenesis and embryogenesis. The International journal of developmental biology, 41 4:607-20, Aug 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.9303349, doi:10.1387/ijdb.9303349. This article has 68 citations.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 3-4
  2. li2024themolecularmechanisms pages 6-7
  3. wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 2-3
  4. nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 6-7
  5. wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 7-9
  6. wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 9-10
  7. nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 18-20
  8. wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 6-7
  9. wang2015theprotooncogenetranscription pages 4-6
  10. nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 4-6
  11. nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 8-10
  12. nie2015dualdevelopmentalrole pages 3-4
  13. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.644864.
  14. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.026153.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000603R.
  17. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.9303349.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-02069-8.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m115.644864,
  20. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvv043,
  21. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.9303349,
  22. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000603r,
  23. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.026153,
  24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-02069-8,