AIGR TreeGrafter Stress Test — PP_1969 (Q88LG4), GO:0061798 GTP 3',8'-cyclase OpenScientist openscientist-autonomous 2 artifacts 2026-10-14T22:59:08.722675

AIGR TreeGrafter Stress Test — PP_1969 (Q88LG4), GO:0061798 GTP 3',8'-cyclase

Executive Judgment

Verdict: SUPPORTED. PP_1969 (UniProt Q88LG4, Pseudomonas putida KT2440) is a
bona fide MoaA ortholog, and GO:0061798 (GTP 3',8'-cyclase activity) is the
correct, appropriately specific molecular function. None of the three
characteristic TreeGrafter failure modes apply:

  1. Granularity — PASS. GO:0061798 is the subfamily-specific MoaA term (not a
    broad family label). The protein maps to PANTHER PTHR22960:SF0
    ("molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis protein 1" = MoaA/MOCS1A).
  2. Pseudo-enzyme — PASS. All six catalytic cysteines of both [4Fe-4S]
    clusters are conserved and correctly spaced. The active site is intact.
  3. Within-superfamily mis-placement — PASS. The diagnostic MoaA C-terminal
    "twitch" domain (Pfam PF06463 / InterPro IPR010505) is present, placing it
    in the true MoaA subfamily rather than a neighboring radical-SAM activity.

Single most decisive evidence: 1:1 conservation of the C-terminal
GTP-binding [4Fe-4S] cluster II ligand cysteines (PP_1969 Cys268/Cys271/Cys285 ↔
E. coli MoaA Cys257/Cys260/Cys274) within the conserved twitch motif — this
cluster directly anchors the GTP substrate and defines GTP 3',8'-cyclase catalysis.

Paralogy caveat (resolved, Iteration 2): P. putida KT2440 carries three
MoaA-type radical-SAM paralogs — Q88E69 (the gene formally named moaA), Q88K11,
and Q88LG4/PP_1969. This is a textbook failure-mode-1 trap, but it does not
overturn the call: PP_1969 is actually the paralog most similar to the
characterized E. coli MoaA (40.9% vs 37.5% for the named moaA), and all three
paralogs retain the full six-cysteine active site. PP_1969's assignment is
therefore well justified; the multiplicity reflects lineage-specific MoaA
expansion, not functional reassignment.

Independent Family/Function Assignment

Evidence Matrix

Citation Evidence type Call Claim tested Key finding Context Confidence/limits
PMID 16632608 (Hänzelmann & Schindelin 2006) Structural/biochemical (direct) Supports MoaA = GTP→precursor-Z enzyme using two [4Fe-4S] clusters MoaA binds 5'-GTP at C-terminal [4Fe-4S] cluster; N-terminal cluster cleaves SAM E. coli/S. aureus MoaA, crystal + biochem High; reference enzyme, not PSEPK directly
PMID 41183211 (Pang et al. 2025) Mechanistic (direct) Supports MoaA is a radical SAM GTP 3',8-cyclase Confirms current term/mechanism nomenclature Radical SAM GTP 3',8-cyclase High
UniProt Q88LG4 xrefs Review/database + computational Supports Domain architecture = MoaA PF04055 + PF06463; IPR040064 MoaA-like; IPR010505 twitch; PANTHER SF0 PSEPK PP_1969 High
This report: NW alignment vs P30745 Computational (evolutionary) Supports Ortholog with intact active site 40.9% id; 6/6 cluster cysteines conserved & spaced PP_1969 vs E. coli MoaA High; heuristic aligner, but motifs unambiguous
This report: paralog scan (UniProt, Iter 2) Computational (evolutionary) Qualifies/supports Is PP_1969 the MoaA or a diverged paralog? 3 MoaA paralogs in KT2440; PP_1969 is CLOSEST to E. coli MoaA; all 3 keep 6/6 cys PSEPK High
This report: AlphaFold AF-Q88LG4 v6 (Iter 2) Computational (structural) Supports Are both [4Fe-4S] sites geometrically intact? SG–SG 5.8–6.9 Å per triad; pLDDT 86–95; 21.4 Å inter-cluster cleft PP_1969 model High for geometry; predicted (no metals in model)
UniProt Q88LG4 GO:0061799 (IEA:TreeGrafter) Database propagation Competing/qualifies Does PP_1969 also do the MoaC step? No MoaC (PF01967) domain present → sibling-term error PSEPK PP_1969 High

Active-Site / Placement Analysis

Pairwise alignment PP_1969 (Q88LG4) vs characterized E. coli MoaA (P30745):
40.0% identity (126/315 aligned positions).

Cluster Role E. coli MoaA PP_1969 Status
N-term radical-SAM, Cx₃Cx₂C SAM reductive cleavage → 5'-dAdo• Cys24 / Cys28 / Cys31 Cys36 / Cys40 / Cys43 Conserved, correct spacing
C-term cluster II (GTP-binding) Anchors 5'-GTP substrate Cys257 / Cys260 / Cys274 Cys268 / Cys271 / Cys285 Conserved, correct spacing

C-terminal motif alignment (twitch domain):

E.coli P30745:  D F C A T C N R L R V S S I G K L H L C L   (257,260,...,274)
PP_1969 Q88LG4: P F C R T C S R L R L S S T G W L H G C L   (268,271,...,285)

Conserved GGEP motif present (…ITGGEPLV…, ~res 86). All catalytic/metal-binding
residues are intact
— no evidence of pseudo-enzyme degeneracy.

3D geometry (AlphaFold AF-Q88LG4-F1 v6, mean pLDDT 90):

Cluster Cys triad SG–SG distances (Å) pLDDT
N-term radical-SAM 36 / 40 / 43 5.9, 6.9, 6.0 86–95
C-term GTP-binding 268 / 271 / 285 6.4, 5.8, 6.3 88–92

Both triads show SG–SG spacing consistent with 3-Cys coordination of a [4Fe-4S]
cluster (one unique Fe left open for SAM cleavage / GTP binding respectively). The
two cluster centroids sit 21.4 Å apart, flanking the central substrate cleft —
the canonical MoaA arrangement. (Metals are not present in the AF model; geometry
is inferred from the apo cysteine positions.)

Paralog placement (UniProt PANTHER PTHR22960, taxon 160488):

Accession Gene Length % id to E. coli MoaA 6-Cys active site
Q88LG4 (PP_1969, target) — 337 40.9% 6/6 intact
Q88E69 moaA 334 37.5% 6/6 intact
Q88K11 — 322 36.3% 6/6 intact

PP_1969 and Q88K11 are a recent duplication (67.0% mutual identity). PP_1969 is
the closest paralog to the characterized cyclase → not a diverged outlier.

Twitch / GTP-binding region conservation (Iteration 3). Aligning the C-terminal
substrate-binding region (E. coli cols ~248–282) shows the cluster-II motif intact
in all three paralogs:

E.coli : ...DFCATCNRLRVSSIGKLHLCL...
Q88E69 : ...NFCATCNRVRLTVEGRLLLCL...
Q88K11 : ...PFCRSCSRLRLSSTGRLYGCL...
PP_1969: ...PFCRTCSRLRLSSTGWLHGCL...

PP_1969 vs E. coli identity is balanced across domains — N-terminal radical-SAM
41%, C-terminal twitch 39% — i.e. the GTP-recognition domain is not selectively
eroded. This rules out the subtler form of failure-mode 1 (clusters kept but
substrate specificity re-tuned).

GO Curation Implications

Conflicts, Knowledge Gaps, Discriminating Tests

Conclusion

PP_1969 directly has the stated function. GO:0061798 is supported and
specific; the only curation fix is removing the co-propagated MoaC sibling term
GO:0061799.

Artifacts