this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 40 citations 2 artifacts 2026-05-31T17:39:00.070760

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research report: Functional annotation of prg-1 / PRG-1 (UniProt P90786) in Caenorhabditis elegans

Executive summary (current understanding)

Caenorhabditis elegans PRG-1 is the organism’s Piwi-clade Argonaute protein that binds piRNAs (21U-RNAs) and acts as a sequence-guided genome-surveillance factor in germ cells, initiating silencing by recruiting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP)–driven secondary 22G-RNA amplification that loads onto WAGO-class Argonautes (including nuclear HRDE-1) to enforce post-transcriptional and epigenetic silencing (including heritable RNA-induced epigenetic silencing, RNAe). (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2)

1) Target verification: correct gene/protein identity

The symbol prg-1 is used in the C. elegans literature to denote a Piwi-class Argonaute required for piRNA function. Recent mechanistic work explicitly states that C. elegans expresses a single functional Piwi protein known as PRG-1, which binds 21U-RNAs/piRNAs—matching the UniProt target identity (P90786, Piwi-like protein 1) and expected Argonaute/Piwi domain architecture. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2)

2) Key concepts and definitions (with PRG-1 context)

piRNAs / 21U-RNAs

In C. elegans, piRNAs are commonly called 21U-RNAs because they are typically ~21 nt long and show a strong 5′ uridine (U) bias. They derive from many genomic loci, including large clusters; primary literature reports >15,000 type I piRNA loci/21U-RNAs. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2)

Secondary siRNAs (22G-RNAs) and WAGO Argonautes

A defining feature of the worm germline silencing system is RdRP-generated “secondary” siRNAs, notably 22G-RNAs, which are loaded onto an expanded set of worm-specific Argonautes called WAGOs. In prg-1 mutants, many loci show both increased mRNA and depletion of RdRP-derived 22G-RNAs, consistent with PRG-1 acting upstream to trigger secondary small-RNA production. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2)

RNA-induced epigenetic silencing (RNAe)

RNAe is a stable, heritable silencing state in the germline. PRG-1 and its piRNAs are described as initiators of permanent silencing of foreign sequences/transgenes, while maintenance depends on downstream WAGO pathways and chromatin factors. (shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3)

3) Molecular function and mechanism of PRG-1

3.1 Primary molecular function: target recognition that triggers amplification

A central mechanistic model supported by primary evidence is that PRG-1 binds piRNAs and scans germline transcripts using imperfect but extensive base-pairing, thereby identifying “non-self”/foreign sequences and certain endogenous targets. In mutants lacking PRG-1 (and thus piRNAs), many normally silent loci show increased mRNA with a concomitant depletion of 22G-RNAs, implying PRG-1/piRNAs trigger RdRP activity that generates secondary silencing RNAs. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2)

Lee et al. further show that PRG-1 is required to initiate, but not maintain, silencing of engineered transgenes containing complementarity to endogenous 21U-RNAs, supporting a “trigger” role upstream of the WAGO system. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2)

Figure-supported evidence: Figure 1 of Lee et al. visualizes that 21U-RNAs are absent in prg-1 mutants (reported as 0% in the small RNA composition panel) and shows strong depletion of 22G-RNAs at subsets of targets in prg-1 mutants, consistent with PRG-1 functioning upstream of secondary 22G-RNA biogenesis. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas media f5ce01e5)

3.2 Catalytic “slicer” activity vs recruitment-based silencing

Argonautes are RNase H-like proteins and may be “slicers,” but C. elegans PRG-1 function in the piRNA pathway is best supported as recruitment/amplification-based rather than primarily endonucleolytic. A dissertation synthesis of the pathway explicitly notes reports that PRG-1 catalytic activity is not required for piRNA-induced silencing, consistent with a model in which PRG-1’s key function is guide-dependent target engagement that recruits RdRP/WAGO silencing rather than direct cleavage. (seth2016functionsofargonaute pages 34-39)

3.3 Substrates/targets and specificity

PRG-1/piRNA complexes can target a broad spectrum of germline transcripts and some transposable element RNAs. Classic work highlights that PRG-1 has a surprisingly limited set of clearly established transposon targets in C. elegans, with Tc3 cited as a prominent PRG-1-dependent transposon family; nevertheless, piRNAs provide genome-wide surveillance capacity via mismatch-tolerant recognition. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2)

4) Pathways and interacting partners

4.1 Upstream piRNA biogenesis and loading (context for PRG-1 function)

Recent 2024 mechanistic work summarizes the C. elegans piRNA biogenesis pipeline that culminates in PRG-1 loading: piRNA precursors are short capped RNAs (csRNAs, ~25–29 nt), processed at the 5′ end by a Schlafen-domain nuclease, trimmed at the 3′ end by PARN-1, and finally 2′-O-methylated by HENN-1. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3)

4.2 Downstream silencing machinery: RdRPs → 22G-RNAs → WAGOs/HRDE-1

PRG-1/piRNA target engagement initiates a cascade in which RdRPs are recruited to generate secondary siRNAs (22G-RNAs). These 22G-RNAs are loaded onto WAGO Argonautes to execute silencing, including nuclear effectors such as HRDE-1 that support transgenerational inheritance of silencing. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4)

4.3 Maternal effects and de novo establishment of silencing

Maternal inheritance of piRNA pathway components is critical in certain contexts. De Albuquerque et al. provide evidence that maternal piRNAs are essential for germline development after de novo establishment of endo-siRNAs, consistent with a role for PRG-1/piRNAs in initiating new 22G-RNA populations (particularly for transposon targets) and establishing heritable silencing. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3)

A quantitative example: prg-1 mutants alone show very low Tc1 excision/reversion frequency (~10^-5), but prg-1; hrde-1 double mutants exhibit an approximately 100-fold increase in Tc1 excision, supporting functional synergy between PRG-1 initiation and downstream nuclear maintenance machinery. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4)

5) Cellular and subcellular localization

PRG-1 acts in the germline and is described as localizing to perinuclear germ granules/P granules, consistent with a model where piRNA targeting occurs in germline RNP granule compartments and interfaces with adjacent Mutator foci. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 1-4)

6) Phenotypes and biological roles

Loss of PRG-1/piRNA function is associated with germline defects such as reduced brood size, temperature-sensitive sterility, and progressive fertility decline (a “mortal germline” phenotype), consistent with PRG-1’s essential role in long-term germline integrity. (almeida2012geneticrequirementsfor pages 32-36, montgomery2021dualrolesfor pages 1-3)

7) Recent developments (prioritizing 2023–2024)

7.1 2024: piRNA 3′ trimming as protection against erroneous RdRP engagement

Pastore et al. (published 27 Feb 2024; open access) identify a quality-control function for piRNA 3′ trimming: in parn-1 mutants, untrimmed pre-piRNAs are converted into a new class of small RNAs termed “anti-piRNAs” (17–19 nt, often starting with A or G) that associate with Piwi proteins. The study supports a model where untrimmed pre-piRNAs are aberrantly modified by RDE-3 and templated by the RdRP EGO-1 to produce anti-piRNAs, implying that proper maturation helps prevent misdirection of RdRP activity. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 12-13)

This advances understanding of PRG-1 pathway fidelity by showing how maturation steps shape downstream amplification behavior (and potential off-pathway products). (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3)

7.2 2024: updated context for TE silencing in worms

A 2024 review reports that transposable elements comprise ~15% of the C. elegans genome, providing genomic context for PRG-1/piRNA-mediated genome defense and the broader network of RNA-based TE silencing in worms. (Published 2 Apr 2024) (fischer2024activityandsilencing pages 1-2)

7.3 2023: piRNA pathway modulation in a neurodegeneration model (non-canonical application)

Huang et al. (published Oct 2023) report that in C. elegans models overexpressing human α-synuclein (A53T), piRNAs are dysregulated and functional perturbation of piRNA biogenesis genes can suppress behavioral/physiological neurodegenerative phenotypes; tofu-1 deletion reduced piRNA levels and altered H3K9me3 while improving disease-model readouts. While this is not PRG-1’s primary annotated physiological role (germline genome defense), it is an example of how the piRNA pathway is being experimentally leveraged in real-world model-system implementations relevant to proteostasis and neurodegeneration hypotheses. (huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 1-2, huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 8-9)

8) Current applications and real-world implementations

  1. Genome surveillance and epigenetic memory assays in vivo. PRG-1-dependent initiation and WAGO-dependent maintenance of silencing are routinely assayed using engineered transgenes with piRNA complementarity and inheritance readouts across generations (RNAe paradigm). (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2)
  2. Small-RNA sequencing and Argonaute-IP workflows. Recent mechanistic work integrates PRG-1-associated small RNA profiling and provides publicly deposited datasets and analysis resources enabling reproducible small-RNA pathway analysis (e.g., PRJNA683039; SRP131397; PRJNA291851; GSE244073 as cited by Pastore et al.). (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 12-13)
  3. Modeling disease-relevant small-RNA dysregulation. The 2023 Nature Communications study illustrates deployment of piRNA pathway genetics (including biogenesis factors upstream of PRG-1) in a C. elegans neurodegeneration model, combining behavioral assays, confocal imaging, and chromatin mark analyses. (huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 8-9)

9) Expert synthesis / interpretation (authoritative perspective)

Collectively, the evidence supports PRG-1 as a front-end specificity factor for germline “non-self” detection: PRG-1/piRNAs provide a massive guide repertoire capable of mismatch-tolerant transcript recognition, while robust and heritable repression is implemented downstream via RdRP amplification into 22G-RNAs and WAGO/HRDE-1 effector systems. This architecture explains why PRG-1 is crucial for initiation of silencing and establishment of heritable epigenetic states, yet in multiple paradigms is less critical for the long-term maintenance of an already-established silenced locus. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2)

10) Key statistics and quantitative findings (from cited sources)


Evidence map (summary table)

Aspect Evidence/Key finding Representative sources (with year, journal) URL/DOI
Target identity / family prg-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans encodes the worm Piwi-class Argonaute that binds piRNAs/21U-RNAs; this matches UniProt P90786 (Piwi-like protein 1) and the Argonaute/Piwi family assignment. PRG-1 is described as the single functional Piwi protein in C. elegans. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2) Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports; Lee et al., 2012, Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016
Primary molecular function PRG-1 is a small-RNA-guided surveillance Argonaute: PRG-1/piRNA complexes base-pair with germline transcripts and initiate silencing indirectly by recruiting RdRP-dependent secondary siRNA production rather than acting mainly as a direct mRNA-cleaving enzyme. PRG-1 is required to initiate, but not maintain, silencing of piRNA-targeted transgenes. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2) Lee et al., 2012, Cell; de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell; Shirayama et al., 2012, Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015
Catalytic activity vs non-slicer role Although Argonautes are RNase H-like proteins, available evidence emphasizes that PRG-1 catalytic/slicer activity is not required for piRNA-induced silencing in the canonical pathway; instead, PRG-1 functions primarily as a target-recognition and recruitment platform for downstream silencing factors. (seth2016functionsofargonaute pages 34-39, lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2) Seth, 2016, dissertation; Lee et al., 2012, Cell https://doi.org/10.13028/m2c30k; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016
Small-RNA cofactor: piRNAs / 21U-RNAs PRG-1 binds 21U-RNAs, the C. elegans piRNAs. Mature piRNAs are typically ~21 nt and strongly biased for 5′ U. More than 15,000 21U-RNAs/type I piRNA loci are reported, largely organized in two large clusters on chromosome IV; dissertation/database-style summaries report >30,000 total piRNAs when broader classes are included. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, seth2016functionsofargonaute pages 34-39) Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports; Lee et al., 2012, Cell; Seth, 2016, dissertation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016; https://doi.org/10.13028/m2c30k
piRNA targeting rules piRNA targeting is broad and mismatch-tolerant, with imperfect but extensive base pairing sufficient to trigger downstream 22G-RNA synthesis; this enables transcriptome-wide surveillance of germline RNAs and foreign/non-self detection. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8) Lee et al., 2012, Cell; Weiser & Kim, 2019, Annual Review of Genetics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505
Upstream biogenesis: transcriptional factors Type I piRNA genes are associated with the Ruby motif and require factors including PRDE-1, SNPC-4, TOFU-4, TOFU-5 for promoter activity/precursor accumulation. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8) Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports; Weiser & Kim, 2019, Annual Review of Genetics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505
Upstream biogenesis: precursor processing C. elegans piRNA precursors are short capped small RNAs (csRNAs) of about 25–29 nt. Processing includes removal of the 5′ cap and first two nucleotides by a Schlafen-domain nuclease, 3′ trimming by PARN-1, and 3′ terminal 2′-O-methylation by HENN-1. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3) Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692
Biogenesis quality control / recent mechanism In parn-1 mutants, untrimmed pre-piRNAs accumulate and are aberrantly converted into anti-piRNAs (17–19 nt, often starting with A or G) via RDE-3 and EGO-1, showing that correct piRNA maturation is needed to prevent erroneous RdRP engagement. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 12-13) Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692
Secondary small RNAs PRG-1/piRNA target recognition recruits RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs) to generate secondary 22G-RNAs, which are the principal downstream effectors of silencing. Loss of prg-1 causes depletion of subsets of 22G-RNAs at normally silent loci. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, lee2012c.eleganspirnas media f5ce01e5) Lee et al., 2012, Cell; de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010
Downstream effector machinery The PRG-1 pathway interfaces with the Mutator complex and WAGO Argonautes. PRG-1-triggered 22G-RNAs are loaded onto WAGOs, including the nuclear Argonaute HRDE-1, to enforce heritable gene silencing/RNAe. Key associated factors include MUT-7, RDE-3, RdRPs, and WAGO proteins. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4, shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2, weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8) de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell; Shirayama et al., 2012, Cell; Weiser & Kim, 2019, Annual Review of Genetics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505
Subcellular localization PRG-1 localizes to perinuclear germ granules / P granules, and recent work indicates association with P and Z granule compartments, with enrichment in Z granules. Mutator foci act adjacent to these granules. (wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 1-4, wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 4-7, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3) Wallis & Phillips, 2025, bioRxiv; de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010
Germline expression / tissue context PRG-1 is germline-restricted; expression is absent in animals lacking a germline. Its core physiological role is therefore in the germline, where it supports fertility and genome defense. (almeida2012geneticrequirementsfor pages 32-36, pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3) Almeida, 2012; Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports Unknown journal; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692
Biological process: genome defense The canonical role of PRG-1/piRNAs is to safeguard germline genome integrity by targeting foreign sequences, transgenes, and some transposable elements, triggering epigenetic and post-transcriptional silencing programs. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3, shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2, weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8) Pastore et al., 2024, Cell Reports; Shirayama et al., 2012, Cell; Weiser & Kim, 2019, Annual Review of Genetics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505
Transposon silencing specificity PRG-1 has a surprisingly limited direct transposon spectrum in C. elegans compared with some other animals; Tc3 is the clearest established PRG-1-dependent transposon target, although PRG-1 is still important for broader genome surveillance and de novo transposon silencing states. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3) Lee et al., 2012, Cell; de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010
Epigenetic inheritance / RNAe PRG-1 initiates RNA-induced epigenetic silencing (RNAe) and establishment of a heritable memory of non-self sequences; maintenance of the silent state can persist without continued PRG-1, relying on WAGO/HRDE-1 and chromatin factors. (shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2, weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8) Shirayama et al., 2012, Cell; Weiser & Kim, 2019, Annual Review of Genetics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015; https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505
Maternal contribution Maternal piRNAs/PRG-1 activity are critical when 22G-RNA silencing programs must be established de novo; maternal 21U-RNAs are required for efficient initiation of transposon silencing and normal germline development after re-establishment of endo-siRNA pathways. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3, albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4) de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010
Phenotypes of prg-1 loss Loss of prg-1 causes reduced brood size, temperature-sensitive sterility, progressive mortal germline / germline immortality defects, and altered germline morphology. (almeida2012geneticrequirementsfor pages 32-36, montgomery2021dualrolesfor pages 1-3, wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 4-7) Almeida, 2012; Montgomery et al., 2021, Cell Reports; Wallis & Phillips, 2025, bioRxiv Unknown journal; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110101; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514
Quantitative figure-supported evidence In Lee et al. Figure 1, WT small RNAs include substantial 21U-RNA and 22G-RNA fractions, whereas prg-1 mutants lose the 21U-RNA fraction (shown as 0%) and display strong depletion of 22G-RNAs at WAGO targets, visually supporting PRG-1’s upstream role in secondary silencing. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas media f5ce01e5, lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2) Lee et al., 2012, Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016
Quantitative transposon data In de Albuquerque et al., prg-1 mutants alone showed very low Tc1 excision/reversion frequency (~10^-5), whereas prg-1; hrde-1 double mutants showed an approximately 100-fold increase in Tc1 excision, supporting synergistic action of PRG-1 with downstream nuclear silencing machinery. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4) de Albuquerque et al., 2015, Developmental Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010
Genome context statistic Transposable elements comprise approximately 15% of the C. elegans genome, providing the genomic context for PRG-1/piRNA-mediated genome surveillance. (fischer2024activityandsilencing pages 1-2) Fischer, 2024, DNA https://doi.org/10.3390/dna4020007
Emerging non-canonical relevance Recent disease-model work found that perturbing piRNA biogenesis genes in C. elegans neuronal α-synuclein models can improve neurodegenerative phenotypes, but this is best interpreted as pathway repurposing in a model system, not as the primary annotated function of PRG-1, which remains germline piRNA surveillance. (huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 1-2, huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 8-9) Huang et al., 2023, Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8

Table: This table summarizes core functional-annotation facts for C. elegans PRG-1/Piwi (UniProt P90786), including mechanism, pathway placement, localization, phenotypes, and quantitative findings. It is designed as a quick evidence map linking each annotation-relevant claim to representative cited sources and URLs.


References (URLs/DOIs; publication dates where available)

References

  1. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas pages 1-2): Heng-Chi Lee, Weifeng Gu, Masaki Shirayama, Elaine Youngman, Darryl Conte, and Craig C. Mello. C. elegans pirnas mediate the genome-wide surveillance of germline transcripts. Cell, 150:78-87, Jul 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016. This article has 482 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3): Bruno F.M. de Albuquerque, Maria Placentino, and René F. Ketting. Maternal pirnas are essential for germline development following de novo establishment of endo-sirnas in caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental cell, 34 4:448-56, Aug 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010. This article has 126 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2): Masaki Shirayama, Meetu Seth, Heng-Chi Lee, Weifeng Gu, Takao Ishidate, Darryl Conte, and Craig C. Mello. Pirnas initiate an epigenetic memory of nonself rna in the c. elegans germline. Cell, 150:65-77, Jul 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015. This article has 718 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3): Benjamin Pastore, Hannah L. Hertz, and Wen Tang. Pre-pirna trimming safeguards pirnas against erroneous targeting by rna-dependent rna polymerase. Cell reports, 43:113692-113692, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692. This article has 12 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (lee2012c.eleganspirnas media f5ce01e5): Heng-Chi Lee, Weifeng Gu, Masaki Shirayama, Elaine Youngman, Darryl Conte, and Craig C. Mello. C. elegans pirnas mediate the genome-wide surveillance of germline transcripts. Cell, 150:78-87, Jul 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016. This article has 482 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (seth2016functionsofargonaute pages 34-39): Meetu Seth. Functions of argonaute proteins in self versus non-self recognition in the c. elegans germline: a dissertation. ArXiv, Jan 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.13028/m2c30k, doi:10.13028/m2c30k. This article has 0 citations.

  7. (albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4): Bruno F.M. de Albuquerque, Maria Placentino, and René F. Ketting. Maternal pirnas are essential for germline development following de novo establishment of endo-sirnas in caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental cell, 34 4:448-56, Aug 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010. This article has 126 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 1-4): Dylan C. Wallis and Carolyn M. Phillips. Rg motifs promote pirna-mediated gene silencing in c. elegans. bioRxiv, May 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514, doi:10.1101/2025.05.12.653514. This article has 3 citations.

  9. (almeida2012geneticrequirementsfor pages 32-36): MDD de Vasconcelos Almeida. Genetic requirements for piwi-induced stable transgenerational gene silencing in caenorhabditis elegans. Unknown journal, 2012.

  10. (montgomery2021dualrolesfor pages 1-3): Brooke E. Montgomery, Tarah Vijayasarathy, Taylor N. Marks, Charlotte A. Cialek, Kailee J. Reed, and Taiowa A. Montgomery. Dual roles for pirnas in promoting and preventing gene silencing in c. elegans. Cell reports, 37:110101-110101, Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110101, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110101. This article has 31 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 12-13): Benjamin Pastore, Hannah L. Hertz, and Wen Tang. Pre-pirna trimming safeguards pirnas against erroneous targeting by rna-dependent rna polymerase. Cell reports, 43:113692-113692, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692. This article has 12 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (fischer2024activityandsilencing pages 1-2): Sylvia E. J. Fischer. Activity and silencing of transposable elements in c. elegans. DNA, 4:129-140, Apr 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/dna4020007, doi:10.3390/dna4020007. This article has 9 citations.

  13. (huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 1-2): Xiaobing Huang, Changliang Wang, Tianjiao Zhang, Rongzhen Li, Liang Chen, Ka Lai Leung, Merja Lakso, Qinghua Zhou, Hongjie Zhang, and Garry Wong. Piwi-interacting rna expression regulates pathogenesis in a caenorhabditis elegans model of lewy body disease. Nature Communications, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8. This article has 24 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 8-9): Xiaobing Huang, Changliang Wang, Tianjiao Zhang, Rongzhen Li, Liang Chen, Ka Lai Leung, Merja Lakso, Qinghua Zhou, Hongjie Zhang, and Garry Wong. Piwi-interacting rna expression regulates pathogenesis in a caenorhabditis elegans model of lewy body disease. Nature Communications, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8, doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8. This article has 24 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8): Natasha E. Weiser and John K. Kim. Multigenerational regulation of the caenorhabditis elegans chromatin landscape by germline small rnas. Annual review of genetics, 53:289-311, Dec 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505, doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505. This article has 48 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 4-7): Dylan C. Wallis and Carolyn M. Phillips. Rg motifs promote pirna-mediated gene silencing in c. elegans. bioRxiv, May 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514, doi:10.1101/2025.05.12.653514. This article has 3 citations.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. seth2016functionsofargonaute pages 34-39
  2. pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 1-3
  3. albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 1-3
  4. albuquerque2015maternalpirnasare pages 3-4
  5. fischer2024activityandsilencing pages 1-2
  6. pastore2024prepirnatrimmingsafeguards pages 12-13
  7. huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 8-9
  8. shirayama2012pirnasinitiatean pages 1-2
  9. wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 1-4
  10. almeida2012geneticrequirementsfor pages 32-36
  11. montgomery2021dualrolesfor pages 1-3
  12. huang2023piwiinteractingrnaexpression pages 1-2
  13. weiser2019multigenerationalregulationof pages 6-8
  14. wallis2025rgmotifspromote pages 4-7
  15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692;
  16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016
  17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016;
  18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010;
  19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015
  20. https://doi.org/10.13028/m2c30k;
  21. https://doi.org/10.13028/m2c30k
  22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505
  23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692
  24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010
  25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015;
  26. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514;
  27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110101;
  28. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514
  29. https://doi.org/10.3390/dna4020007
  30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8
  31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.016,
  32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.010,
  33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.015,
  34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113692,
  35. https://doi.org/10.13028/m2c30k,
  36. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.12.653514,
  37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110101,
  38. https://doi.org/10.3390/dna4020007,
  39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41881-8,
  40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043505,