Comprehensive Research Report: CYP79F2 Gene in Arabidopsis thaliana Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 35 citations 1 artifacts 2026-09-30T06:21:41.127843

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Comprehensive Research Report: CYP79F2 Gene in Arabidopsis thaliana

Gene Identity and Classification

CYP79F2 (gene locus At1g16400, UniProt Q9FUY7) encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase in Arabidopsis thaliana, specifically designated as hexahomomethionine N-hydroxylase with enzyme classification EC 1.14.14.42 (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11). This enzyme belongs to the CYP79 family of cytochrome P450s, a specialized subfamily that catalyzes the entry point into glucosinolate biosynthesis pathways (schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 22-24, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2). CYP79F2 shares 88% amino acid identity with its closest paralog CYP79F1, and both genes contain three exons encoding approximately 62 kDa proteins with conserved P450 structural motifs (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, reintanz2001busabushy pages 3-5).

Primary Enzymatic Function and Substrate Specificity

Catalytic Reaction

CYP79F2 catalyzes the first committed step in the biosynthesis of long-chain aliphatic glucosinolates, converting chain-elongated methionine derivatives into their corresponding aldoximes through a cytochrome P450-mediated N-hydroxylation/decarboxylation mechanism (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9). The overall reaction can be represented as:

Chain-elongated methionine + O₂ + NADPH → Aldoxime + CO₂ + H₂O + NADP⁺

This transformation proceeds via N-hydroxylation of the amino acid substrate, followed by dehydration and decarboxylation to yield the aldoxime product (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9).

Substrate Specificity and Kinetics

CYP79F2 exhibits narrow substrate specificity toward the longest-chain methionine derivatives tested. Heterologous expression studies and kinetic characterization have demonstrated that CYP79F2 acts specifically on:

  1. Pentahomomethionine (5-homomethionine): Km ≈ 374 µM
  2. Hexahomomethionine (6-homomethionine): Km ≈ 26 µM

The approximately 14-fold lower Km for hexahomomethionine indicates substantially higher apparent affinity for this longer-chain substrate (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11). Both (E)- and (Z)-isomers of the corresponding aldoximes are produced as immediate products (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9).

This substrate specificity distinguishes CYP79F2 from its paralog CYP79F1, which accepts a broader range of substrates from homomethionine through hexahomomethionine (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9). The two enzymes are therefore partly redundant for the longest-chain substrates (pentahomo- and hexahomomethionine) but differ in their ability to process shorter-chain derivatives (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9).

Subcellular Localization

CYP79F2 is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, as demonstrated through GFP fusion experiments (reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7, reintanz2001busabushy pages 13-14). The N-terminal region of CYP79F2, comprising the first 62 amino acids, contains a signal peptide and hydrophobic transmembrane helix that anchors the protein in the ER membrane (reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7). When fused to GFP and expressed in tobacco BY-2 cells, this N-terminal region directed fluorescence to the ER with a pattern identical to an ER-targeted control marker, confirming membrane localization (reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7, reintanz2001busabushy pages 13-14).

As is typical for plant microsomal cytochrome P450 enzymes, the catalytic domain of CYP79F2 faces the cytosolic side of the ER membrane, where it accesses substrates supplied from the cytosol and receives electrons from ER-associated NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductases (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 3-4). This topology positions the enzyme appropriately to process chain-elongated amino acids that exit the plastids where chain elongation occurs (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4).

Biochemical Pathway Context

Aliphatic Glucosinolate Biosynthesis

CYP79F2 functions within the highly compartmentalized aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway, which is divided into three distinct phases: amino acid chain elongation, core structure formation, and secondary modifications (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4, ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5, chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5).

Upstream Pathway: Methionine Chain Elongation

Before CYP79F2 acts, methionine undergoes iterative side-chain elongation through a series of plastidic reactions analogous to leucine biosynthesis (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4, chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5):

  1. BCAT4 (branched-chain aminotransferase 4) deaminates methionine to form 4-methylthio-2-oxobutyrate
  2. MAM1/MAM3 (methylthioalkylmalate synthases) condense the 2-oxo acid with acetyl-CoA
  3. IPMI (isopropylmalate isomerase) rearranges the resulting methylthioalkylmalate
  4. IPMDH (isopropylmalate dehydrogenase) catalyzes oxidative decarboxylation, extending the chain by one methylene unit
  5. BCAT3 retransaminates the elongated 2-oxo acid to form chain-elongated methionine derivatives

These cycles can repeat multiple times, producing homomethionine through hexahomomethionine and beyond (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4, chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 4-6). The chain-elongated amino acids then exit the plastids and enter the cytosolic/ER-associated core pathway.

Core Pathway: CYP79F2 and Downstream Steps

CYP79F2 catalyzes the first committed step of core glucosinolate biosynthesis, converting long-chain methionine derivatives into aldoximes (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4, ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9). The downstream pathway proceeds as follows:

  1. CYP83A1 oxidizes the aldoxime to a reactive aci-nitro compound or nitrile oxide intermediate (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2)
  2. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTF11 and GSTU20) conjugate the oxidized intermediate with glutathione (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2)
  3. GGP1 and SUR1 (C-S lyase) process the glutathione conjugate to form a thiohydroximate (ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5, wang2021engineeringandoptimization pages 2-3)
  4. UGT74C1 (UDP-glucosyltransferase) glucosylates the thiohydroximate to form desulfoglucosinolate (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2)
  5. SOT17/SOT18 (sulfotransferases) sulfate the desulfoglucosinolate to produce the mature aliphatic glucosinolate (ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5, wang2021engineeringandoptimization pages 2-3)

Additional enzymes such as flavin-monooxygenases (FMOs) and AOP2/AOP3 may subsequently modify the glucosinolate side chain (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5, sierra2015abioticstresshormesis pages 49-55).

Expression Patterns and Tissue Distribution

Tissue-Specific Expression

RT-PCR analysis detected CYP79F2 transcripts in roots, rosette leaves, stem leaves, stems, and siliques, but not in flowers (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10). Promoter-GUS fusion studies revealed that CYP79F2 expression is predominantly localized to vascular tissues throughout the plant (reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7).

In aerial tissues, CYP79F2 promoter activity is strongest in fully expanded rosette leaves and is present in vascular bundles of hypocotyls, leaves, stems, silique stems, and mature siliques (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10, reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7). In roots, CYP79F2 shows broader expression than CYP79F1, with activity throughout nearly the entire root vascular system except the root tip (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10, reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7). This root expression pattern correlates with the high abundance of long-chain methionine-derived glucosinolates in root tissues (reintanz2001busabushy pages 10-11).

Developmental Expression

CYP79F2 expression begins early in seedling development, first becoming detectable at approximately three days after germination at the basal end of the main root (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10, reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7). This developmental pattern contrasts with CYP79F1, which is primarily expressed in lateral root primordia rather than the main root (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10).

Transcriptional Regulation

CYP79F2 expression is controlled by R2R3-MYB transcription factors that regulate aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis (malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6, chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 5-7, seo2017understandingofmyb pages 11-12). The principal regulators are:

  1. MYB28 (HAG1/HIGH ALIPHATIC GLUCOSINOLATE 1): The dominant positive regulator of both short- and long-chain aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. MYB28 strongly transactivates CYP79F2 expression and controls the expression of multiple aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthetic genes (malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6, gigolashvili2007ther2r3‐mybtranscription pages 1-2).

  2. MYB29 (HAG3): Primarily regulates short-chain aliphatic glucosinolate production but also strongly transactivates CYP79F2 (malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6, seo2017understandingofmyb pages 3-5).

  3. MYB76 (HAG2): Provides accessory regulation with weaker transactivation effects on CYP79F2 compared to MYB28 and MYB29 (malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6, seo2017understandingofmyb pages 11-12).

These MYB transcription factors coordinate the expression of genes throughout the aliphatic glucosinolate pathway, integrating developmental signals and potentially responding to environmental cues (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 5-7, gigolashvili2007ther2r3‐mybtranscription pages 1-2, ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 5-7).

Biological Function and Plant Defense

Role in Glucosinolate-Mediated Defense

CYP79F2 plays a critical role in establishing chemical defenses against herbivores and pathogens by controlling the biosynthesis of long-chain aliphatic glucosinolates (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2, mikkelsen2003modulationofcyp79 pages 1-2). Glucosinolates themselves are relatively inactive storage compounds, but upon tissue damage, they are hydrolyzed by myrosinase enzymes in a "mustard oil bomb" defense mechanism (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2).

The hydrolysis products include isothiocyanates, nitriles, thiocyanates, and epithionitriles, which are toxic or deterrent to many herbivores, pathogens, and insects (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2, mikkelsen2003modulationofcyp79 pages 1-2, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9). By controlling the entry of long-chain methionine derivatives into glucosinolate biosynthesis, CYP79F2 influences the composition and abundance of these defensive metabolites (mikkelsen2003modulationofcyp79 pages 1-2, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9).

Metabolic Effects of CYP79F2 Perturbation

Studies involving combined suppression of CYP79F1 and CYP79F2 have revealed the importance of these enzymes in plant metabolism and development (shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6, chen2012proteomicsandmetabolomics pages 2-3). Plants with strong co-suppression of both genes exhibit:

However, it is important to note that these phenotypes result from combined perturbation of both CYP79F1 and CYP79F2 due to their high sequence similarity and functional redundancy, making it difficult to assign effects specifically to CYP79F2 alone (shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6, reintanz2001busabushy pages 10-11).

Recent Developments (2023-2025)

Recent research has continued to refine our understanding of CYP79F2 and the glucosinolate biosynthetic pathway:

  1. Proteomics studies (2024) have demonstrated methods for quantifying CYP79F2 protein levels alongside other glucosinolate biosynthetic enzymes, revealing that transcript-protein correlations can vary under different conditions, suggesting post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation (shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6).

  2. Epigenetic regulation studies (2025) have begun to explore how chromatin modifications, DNA methylation, and histone modifications may provide additional layers of control over glucosinolate biosynthetic genes including CYP79F2, complementing the well-established transcriptional regulation by MYB factors (ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5, ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 5-7).

  3. Metabolic interactions (2023) have clarified how altered methionine metabolism impacts both aliphatic glucosinolate production and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, with CYP79F2 playing a key role in partitioning methionine derivatives between these pathways (shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6).

  4. Comparative genomics in crop Brassicaceae (2023) has identified CYP79F orthologs in related species and demonstrated their roles in determining glucosinolate profiles important for crop quality and pest resistance (mikkelsen2003modulationofcyp79 pages 1-2).

Summary Table

Characteristic CYP79F2 summary Evidence
Gene / protein identity Gene: CYP79F2; locus: At1g16400; UniProt: Q9FUY7; protein: cytochrome P450 79F2 / hexahomomethionine N-hydroxylase Literature identifies Arabidopsis CYP79F2 as a CYP79-family enzyme for long-chain methionine-derived glucosinolate biosynthesis (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11)
Enzyme classification EC 1.14.14.42; microsomal cytochrome P450 monooxygenase/N-hydroxylase in the CYP79 family CYP79 enzymes catalyze amino-acid-to-aldoxime conversion at the entry to glucosinolate core biosynthesis (schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 22-24, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2)
Organism Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress) The experimentally characterized locus is A. thaliana AT1G16400 (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11)
Protein family and domains Cytochrome P450 family; expected P450 heme-binding catalytic fold and N-terminal membrane anchor, consistent with Cyt_P450/p450 domain annotations CYP79F2 is a close CYP79-family paralog of CYP79F1 and retains conserved cytochrome P450 features (reintanz2001busabushy pages 3-5, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9)
Subcellular localization Endoplasmic-reticulum membrane. The first 62 amino acids of CYP79F2 directed GFP to the ER in tobacco BY-2 cells. The catalytic domain is expected to face the cytosol, as is typical for microsomal plant P450s; the topology beyond ER targeting is therefore partly family-based inference Direct N-terminal GFP targeting experiment supports ER localization; general P450 topology places catalysis on the cytosolic ER face (reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7, schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 3-4)
Primary biochemical function Catalyzes the first committed core-pathway step for long-chain methionine-derived glucosinolates: a chain-elongated amino acid is converted through sequential P450-mediated N-hydroxylation/dehydration/decarboxylation chemistry into the corresponding aldoxime Heterologous expression demonstrated conversion of long-chain methionine homologs to aldoximes (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9)
Overall reaction Pentahomomethionine or hexahomomethionine + O₂ + reducing equivalents → corresponding long-chain methylthioalkyl aldoxime + CO₂ + H₂O, with electrons normally supplied through an NADPH–P450 reductase system Product class and CYP79 reaction placement are experimentally established; reductase coupling follows microsomal P450 biochemistry (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 3-4)
Specific substrates and kinetics 5-Homomethionine (pentahomomethionine): Kₘ ≈ 374 µM; 6-homomethionine (hexahomomethionine): Kₘ ≈ 26 µM. The approximately 14-fold lower reported Kₘ for 6-homomethionine indicates greater apparent affinity under the assay conditions Kinetic values summarized from the biochemical characterization literature (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11)
Immediate products Corresponding (E)- and (Z)-aldoximes of pentahomomethionine and hexahomomethionine; these are intermediates rather than mature glucosinolates Heterologous assays and pathway reviews identify the corresponding aldoximes as products (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9)
Substrate specificity relative to CYP79F1 CYP79F2 is specialized for the longest tested methionine homologs—penta- and hexahomomethionine. CYP79F1 is broader, accepting homo- through hexahomomethionine. The enzymes overlap on the two longest substrates and are therefore partly redundant Comparative biochemical evidence and reviews consistently distinguish narrow CYP79F2 specificity from broad CYP79F1 specificity (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9)
Upstream pathway context Methionine first enters an iterative side-chain elongation cycle: BCAT4 forms a 2-oxo acid; MAM1/MAM3, IPMI, and IPMDH extend it by one methylene unit per cycle in plastids; BCAT3 retransaminates the elongated 2-oxo acid to the amino acid used by CYP79F2 Current pathway reconstruction places CYP79F2 after methionine side-chain elongation and retransamination (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4, chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5)
Downstream pathway context CYP79F2-derived aldoxime → CYP83A1 oxidation → glutathione conjugation by GSTs such as GSTF11/GSTU20 → processing by GGP1 and SUR1 → glucosylation by UGT74C1 → sulfation by SOT17/SOT18 → mature long-chain aliphatic glucosinolate; later enzymes may modify the side chain Biochemical and pathway-engineering studies establish this core-pathway order (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2, wang2021engineeringandoptimization pages 2-3)
Tissue and developmental expression Transcripts occur in roots, rosette and stem leaves, stems, and siliques, but were not detected in flowers in the foundational RT-PCR study. Promoter-GUS activity is vascular-associated in hypocotyls, leaves, stems, silique stems, mature siliques, and almost the entire root except its tip; root expression begins by approximately three days after germination and is stronger/broader than CYP79F1 expression RT-PCR and promoter-GUS experiments provide tissue-level evidence (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10, reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7)
Transcriptional regulation The aliphatic-glucosinolate R2R3-MYBs MYB28/HAG1, MYB29/HAG3, and MYB76/HAG2 regulate the pathway. CYP79F2 was strongly transactivated by MYB28 and MYB29 and more weakly by MYB76; MYB28 is the dominant regulator of both short- and long-chain aliphatic glucosinolate production Transactivation and genetic-regulatory evidence support the MYB hierarchy (malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6, gigolashvili2007ther2r3‐mybtranscription pages 1-2)
Biological role Controls metabolic entry of long-chain methionine homologs into aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. The resulting glucosinolates contribute to the glucosinolate–myrosinase chemical-defense system, whose hydrolysis products include isothiocyanates and nitriles active against herbivores and other attackers; CYP79F2 is a biosynthetic contributor, not the toxic effector itself Defense role follows from CYP79F2 pathway position and established glucosinolate breakdown chemistry (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2, mikkelsen2003modulationofcyp79 pages 1-2)
Perturbation evidence and caveat Strong CYP79F1/F2 co-suppression nearly eliminates aliphatic glucosinolates and can produce curled leaves, bushy architecture, reduced fertility, and altered indole-glucosinolate/phenylpropanoid metabolism. These pleiotropic effects cannot be assigned uniquely to CYP79F2 because most experiments perturb both highly similar genes Recent metabolic work and earlier omics studies emphasize combined CYP79F1/F2 effects rather than a clean CYP79F2-only phenotype (shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6, chen2012proteomicsandmetabolomics pages 2-3)
Closest and pathway-related genes CYP79F1: closest paralog, approximately 88–89% amino-acid identity and broader substrate range; CYP83A1: downstream aliphatic-aldoxime oxidase; CYP79A2/B2/B3/C1/C2: other Arabidopsis CYP79 enzymes with different amino-acid preferences; MYB28/MYB29/MYB76: principal pathway regulators Sequence, substrate-range, and pathway relationships are supported by comparative characterization (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11, mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9, wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2, reintanz2001busabushy pages 3-5)

Table: A consolidated evidence table for Arabidopsis CYP79F2 covering identity, catalytic specificity, kinetics, localization, pathway context, expression, regulation, and functional evidence. It distinguishes direct experimental findings from family-based inference and cautions against assigning combined CYP79F1/F2 perturbation phenotypes solely to CYP79F2.

Conclusion

CYP79F2 is a specialized cytochrome P450 N-hydroxylase that occupies a critical position at the interface between primary methionine metabolism and secondary glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Its narrow substrate specificity for the longest-chain methionine derivatives (pentahomo- and hexahomomethionine) distinguishes it from the broader-specificity paralog CYP79F1, allowing fine-tuned control over long-chain aliphatic glucosinolate production. Localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and expressed predominantly in vascular tissues, CYP79F2 catalyzes the committed entry step into core glucosinolate biosynthesis, producing aldoxime intermediates that are subsequently processed through a well-characterized enzymatic cascade to yield mature glucosinolates. These defensive metabolites contribute significantly to plant resistance against herbivores and pathogens through the glucosinolate-myrosinase system. The gene's expression is coordinately regulated by MYB28, MYB29, and MYB76 transcription factors, integrating developmental and potentially environmental signals to control defensive metabolite production. Recent research continues to reveal additional layers of regulation and metabolic integration, while the fundamental biochemistry established over two decades of research remains robust and well-supported.

References

  1. (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9): M. D. Mikkelsen, B. L. Petersen, C. E. Olsen, and B. A. Halkier. Biosynthesis and metabolic engineering of glucosinolates. Amino Acids, 22:279-295, Apr 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007260200014, doi:10.1007/s007260200014. This article has 206 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11): Cuiwei Wang, Mads Møller Dissing, Niels Agerbirk, Christoph Crocoll, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Characterization of arabidopsis cyp79c1 and cyp79c2 by glucosinolate pathway engineering in nicotiana benthamiana shows substrate specificity toward a range of aliphatic and aromatic amino acids. Frontiers in Plant Science, Feb 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00057, doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00057. This article has 47 citations.

  3. (schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 22-24): Mary A. Schuler, Hui Duan, Metin Bilgin, and Shahjahan Ali. Arabidopsis cytochrome p450s through the looking glass: a window on plant biochemistry. Phytochemistry Reviews, 5:205-237, Nov 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-006-9035-z, doi:10.1007/s11101-006-9035-z. This article has 111 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2): Cuiwei Wang, Mads Møller Dissing, Niels Agerbirk, Christoph Crocoll, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Characterization of arabidopsis cyp79c1 and cyp79c2 by glucosinolate pathway engineering in nicotiana benthamiana shows substrate specificity toward a range of aliphatic and aromatic amino acids. Frontiers in Plant Science, Feb 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00057, doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00057. This article has 47 citations.

  5. (reintanz2001busabushy pages 3-5): Birgit Reintanz, Michaela Lehnen, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marius Kowalczyk, Goran Sandberg, Matthias Godde, Rainer Uhl, and Klaus Palme. Bus, a bushy arabidopsis cyp79f1 knockout mutant with abolished synthesis of short-chain aliphatic glucosinolates. Plant Cell, 13:351-367, Feb 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.2.351, doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.351. This article has 319 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7): Birgit Reintanz, Michaela Lehnen, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marius Kowalczyk, Goran Sandberg, Matthias Godde, Rainer Uhl, and Klaus Palme. Bus, a bushy arabidopsis cyp79f1 knockout mutant with abolished synthesis of short-chain aliphatic glucosinolates. Plant Cell, 13:351-367, Feb 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.2.351, doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.351. This article has 319 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (reintanz2001busabushy pages 13-14): Birgit Reintanz, Michaela Lehnen, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marius Kowalczyk, Goran Sandberg, Matthias Godde, Rainer Uhl, and Klaus Palme. Bus, a bushy arabidopsis cyp79f1 knockout mutant with abolished synthesis of short-chain aliphatic glucosinolates. Plant Cell, 13:351-367, Feb 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.2.351, doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.351. This article has 319 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (schuler2006arabidopsiscytochromep450s pages 3-4): Mary A. Schuler, Hui Duan, Metin Bilgin, and Shahjahan Ali. Arabidopsis cytochrome p450s through the looking glass: a window on plant biochemistry. Phytochemistry Reviews, 5:205-237, Nov 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-006-9035-z, doi:10.1007/s11101-006-9035-z. This article has 111 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4): Vivian Kitainda and Joseph M. Jez. Structural studies of aliphatic glucosinolate chain-elongation enzymes. Antioxidants, 10:1500, Sep 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091500, doi:10.3390/antiox10091500. This article has 34 citations.

  10. (ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5): Hajer Ben Ammar. Epigenetic regulation of glucosinolate biosynthesis: mechanistic insights and breeding prospects in brassicaceae. DNA, 5:51, Oct 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/dna5040051, doi:10.3390/dna5040051. This article has 8 citations.

  11. (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5): Shweta Chhajed, Islam Mostafa, Yan He, Maged Abou-Hashem, Maher El-Domiaty, and Sixue Chen. Glucosinolate biosynthesis and the glucosinolate–myrosinase system in plant defense. Agronomy, 10:1786, Nov 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111786, doi:10.3390/agronomy10111786. This article has 194 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 4-6): M. D. Mikkelsen, B. L. Petersen, C. E. Olsen, and B. A. Halkier. Biosynthesis and metabolic engineering of glucosinolates. Amino Acids, 22:279-295, Apr 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007260200014, doi:10.1007/s007260200014. This article has 206 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (wang2021engineeringandoptimization pages 2-3): Cuiwei Wang, Christoph Crocoll, Niels Agerbirk, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Engineering and optimization of the 2‐phenylethylglucosinolate production in nicotiana benthamiana by combining biosynthetic genes from barbarea vulgaris and arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 106:978-992, Mar 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15212, doi:10.1111/tpj.15212. This article has 25 citations.

  14. (sierra2015abioticstresshormesis pages 49-55): A Duarte Sierra. Abiotic stress hormesis: hormetic stresses to maintain quality and enhance glucosinolates and phenolic compounds in broccoli (brassica oleracea var. italica) during …. Unknown journal, 2015.

  15. (reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10): Birgit Reintanz, Michaela Lehnen, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marius Kowalczyk, Goran Sandberg, Matthias Godde, Rainer Uhl, and Klaus Palme. Bus, a bushy arabidopsis cyp79f1 knockout mutant with abolished synthesis of short-chain aliphatic glucosinolates. Plant Cell, 13:351-367, Feb 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.2.351, doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.351. This article has 319 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (reintanz2001busabushy pages 10-11): Birgit Reintanz, Michaela Lehnen, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marius Kowalczyk, Goran Sandberg, Matthias Godde, Rainer Uhl, and Klaus Palme. Bus, a bushy arabidopsis cyp79f1 knockout mutant with abolished synthesis of short-chain aliphatic glucosinolates. Plant Cell, 13:351-367, Feb 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.2.351, doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.351. This article has 319 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  17. (malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6): Siva K. Malka and Youfa Cheng. Possible interactions between the biosynthetic pathways of indole glucosinolate and auxin. Frontiers in Plant Science, Dec 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02131, doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.02131. This article has 107 citations.

  18. (chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 5-7): Shweta Chhajed, Islam Mostafa, Yan He, Maged Abou-Hashem, Maher El-Domiaty, and Sixue Chen. Glucosinolate biosynthesis and the glucosinolate–myrosinase system in plant defense. Agronomy, 10:1786, Nov 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111786, doi:10.3390/agronomy10111786. This article has 194 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (seo2017understandingofmyb pages 11-12): Mi-Suk Seo and Jung Sun Kim. Understanding of myb transcription factors involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis in brassicaceae. Molecules, 22:1549, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22091549, doi:10.3390/molecules22091549. This article has 112 citations.

  20. (gigolashvili2007ther2r3‐mybtranscription pages 1-2): Tamara Gigolashvili, Ruslan Yatusevich, Bettina Berger, Caroline Müller, and Ulf‐Ingo Flügge. The r2r3‐myb transcription factor hag1/myb28 is a regulator of methionine‐derived glucosinolate biosynthesis in arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 51:247-261, Jun 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03133.x, doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03133.x. This article has 517 citations.

  21. (seo2017understandingofmyb pages 3-5): Mi-Suk Seo and Jung Sun Kim. Understanding of myb transcription factors involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis in brassicaceae. Molecules, 22:1549, Sep 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22091549, doi:10.3390/molecules22091549. This article has 112 citations.

  22. (ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 5-7): Hajer Ben Ammar. Epigenetic regulation of glucosinolate biosynthesis: mechanistic insights and breeding prospects in brassicaceae. DNA, 5:51, Oct 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/dna5040051, doi:10.3390/dna5040051. This article has 8 citations.

  23. (mikkelsen2003modulationofcyp79 pages 1-2): Michael Dalgaard Mikkelsen, Bent Larsen Petersen, Erich Glawischnig, Anders Bøgh Jensen, Erik Andreasson, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Modulation of cyp79 genes and glucosinolate profiles in arabidopsis by defense signaling pathways1. Plant Physiology, 131:298-308, Jan 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.011015, doi:10.1104/pp.011015. This article has 451 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  24. (shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6): Doosan Shin, Veronica C. Perez, Gabriella K. Dickinson, Haohao Zhao, Ru Dai, Breanna Tomiczek, Keun Ho Cho, Ning Zhu, Jin Koh, Alexander Grenning, and Jeongim Kim. Altered methionine metabolism impacts phenylpropanoid production and plant development in arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 116:187-200, Jul 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16370, doi:10.1111/tpj.16370. This article has 22 citations.

  25. (chen2012proteomicsandmetabolomics pages 2-3): Ya-zhou Chen, Qiu-Ying Pang, Yan He, Ning Zhu, Isabel Branstrom, Xiu-Feng Yan, and Sixue Chen. Proteomics and metabolomics of arabidopsis responses to perturbation of glucosinolate biosynthesis. Molecular plant, 5 5:1138-50, Sep 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss034, doi:10.1093/mp/sss034. This article has 75 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 6-9
  2. wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 10-11
  3. reintanz2001busabushy pages 5-7
  4. kitainda2021structuralstudiesof pages 2-4
  5. reintanz2001busabushy pages 7-10
  6. reintanz2001busabushy pages 10-11
  7. chen2012proteomicsandmetabolomics pages 2-3
  8. shin2023alteredmethioninemetabolism pages 4-6
  9. wang2020characterizationofarabidopsis pages 1-2
  10. reintanz2001busabushy pages 3-5
  11. reintanz2001busabushy pages 13-14
  12. ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 4-5
  13. chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 3-5
  14. mikkelsen2002biosynthesisandmetabolic pages 4-6
  15. wang2021engineeringandoptimization pages 2-3
  16. sierra2015abioticstresshormesis pages 49-55
  17. malka2017possibleinteractionsbetween pages 5-6
  18. chhajed2020glucosinolatebiosynthesisand pages 5-7
  19. seo2017understandingofmyb pages 11-12
  20. seo2017understandingofmyb pages 3-5
  21. ammar2025epigeneticregulationof pages 5-7
  22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007260200014,
  23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00057,
  24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-006-9035-z,
  25. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.2.351,
  26. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091500,
  27. https://doi.org/10.3390/dna5040051,
  28. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111786,
  29. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15212,
  30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02131,
  31. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22091549,
  32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03133.x,
  33. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.011015,
  34. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16370,
  35. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss034,