AIGR Hypothesis Review — HETGA *Cgas* (A0AAX6RS70) OpenScientist openscientist-autonomous 5 citations 5 artifacts 2026-09-21T02:23:21.055354 citations file

AIGR Hypothesis Review — HETGA Cgas (A0AAX6RS70)

Hypothesis (slug: exogenous-dsrna-response-versus-dna-sensing): Heterocephalus glaber Cgas participates in cellular response to exogenous double‑stranded RNA (GO:0071360).
Focus type: function_assignment.


Executive Judgment

Verdict: Refuted / over‑annotated (as a dsRNA response).

The seed hypothesis rests on a GO annotation that is a term‑selection error at the donor, not a genuine dsRNA‑response function. Mouse cGAS (Q8C6L5) carries GO:0071360 "cellular response to exogenous dsRNA" supported by four experimental references — PMID:23258413, PMID:24077100, PMID:28214358, PMID:28363908 — and every one of these papers assays double‑stranded DNA (transfected DNA, DNA virus, λ/dsDNA binding), with no exogenous dsRNA / poly(I:C) experiment at all. cGAS is the canonical cytosolic dsDNA sensor; it binds RNA structurally but is not catalytically activated by dsRNA, and even DNA:RNA hybrids are largely inert.

The HETGA annotation is pure phylogenetic inheritance (IEA:TreeGrafter via PANTHER node PTN002579681; the source IBA is GO_REF:0000033). There is no naked mole‑rat experimental evidence of any kind. Therefore this is ambiguity/error in the donor evidence, not target‑specific evolutionary divergence.

Important caveat honoured from the seed: lack of direct RNA binding or poly(I:C)‑stimulated catalysis does not, by itself, exclude an indirect cellular response to exogenous dsRNA (e.g., dsRNA‑induced mitochondrial damage → mtDNA release → cGAS). However, GO IDA/IMP evidence requires the cited experiment to demonstrate the process, and none of the four donor papers tests dsRNA. So even granting the indirect possibility, the cited evidence does not establish it.


Evidence Matrix

Citation Evidence type Supports/Refutes/Qualifies Claim tested Key finding Context Confidence & limitations
PMID:23258413 (Sun 2013, Science) Direct assay + mutant/knockdown (IMP for GO:0071360) Refutes dsRNA; supports dsDNA Is cGAS a nucleic‑acid sensor and of which? "cGAS is a cytosolic DNA sensor that induces interferons by producing…cGAMP"; assays = DNA transfection & DNA virus Mouse/human cells High. No RNA/poly(I:C) assay; term=dsRNA appears mis‑selected
PMID:24077100 (Ablasser 2013, Nature) Direct assay (IDA for GO:0071360) Refutes dsRNA; supports DNA/cGAMP How does cGAS‑derived immunity spread? "Cytosolic DNA is sensed by…cGAS"; cGAMP transferred via gap junctions Murine & human cells High. Concerns cGAMP transfer, not dsRNA sensing
PMID:28214358 (Lee 2017, FEBS Lett) Biochemical/structural (IDA) Refutes dsRNA; supports dsDNA N‑terminus effect on cGAS catalysis "catalytic activity of core‑cGAS decreased as the length of double‑stranded DNA (dsDNA) increased" In vitro / cells High. Explicitly dsDNA
PMID:28363908 (Tao 2017, J Immunol) Single‑molecule + biochem (IDA) Refutes dsRNA; supports dsDNA N‑terminus role in DNA binding/activation "binding of nonspecific dsDNA by the N‑terminal domain of cGAS promotes its activation" (λDNA) Human cGAS, in vitro/cells High. Explicitly dsDNA (λDNA)
PANTHER PTN002579681 / GO_REF:0000033 (IBA) Phylogenetic (ECO:0000318) Qualifies/competing Ortholog‑based propagation of donor terms Propagates the (erroneous) dsRNA term across the cGAS clade, incl. HETGA Computational Medium. Inherits donor error; no species data
A0AAX6RS70 IEA:TreeGrafter (UniProt/QuickGO) Computational (IEA) Qualifies Is HETGA term experimentally grounded? GO:0071360 on HETGA is IEA only; no experimental support H. glaber High that it is IEA‑only
PMID:42629426 (Lebrec 2026) Review‑adjacent primary tool paper Supports dsDNA identity cGAS ligand landscape "cGAS is the primary innate immune DNA sensor"; "simple DNA:RNA hybrids are inert" Human cells Medium. Orientation‑level for RNA inertness

GO Curation Implications

Lead (requires curator verification):


Mechanistic Scope

Immediate molecular function tested by the donor references: binding of cytosolic double‑stranded DNA by cGAS and DNA‑stimulated catalysis of 2′,3′‑cGAMP (a nucleotidyltransferase reaction, EC 2.7.7.86), which activates STING → TBK1/IRF3 → type I IFN. The N‑terminal papers (28214358, 28363908) dissect how the low‑complexity N‑terminus modulates dsDNA binding and catalytic output.


Conflicts and Alternatives


Knowledge Gaps

  1. Was the donor "dsRNA" term deliberate or a typo for "dsDNA"? Checked: all 4 cited abstracts test DNA; a DNA analog term exists. Matters because it determines whether to correct vs remove. Resolve by inspecting the original UniProt/MGI curation record and the exact figure cited.
  2. Any H. glaber‑specific cGAS immune data? Checked: no experimental UniProt evidence; HETGA term is IEA‑only. Matters for whether species divergence could rescue the term. Resolve with naked mole‑rat cGAS ligand/activation assays (poly(I:C) vs dsDNA).
  3. Does naked mole‑rat cGAS have altered nucleic‑acid selectivity? Not established here. Resolve with recombinant HETGA cGAS in vitro cGAMP assays across dsDNA, dsRNA, and RNA:DNA hybrids.

Discriminating Tests


Curation Leads (require curator verification)


Provenance / Artifacts

Computed provenance from QuickGO/UniProt REST queries (run 2026-09-21):

Key confirmation this iteration: the mouse and HETGA annotations use qualifier involved_in — i.e., the database positively asserts participation in exogenous-dsRNA response, so this is a genuine over-annotation to correct, not a mis-read NOT (does-not-respond) annotation.

Limitations

Artifacts