Gene Research for GO Annotation Review Falcon citations file

Gene Research for GO Annotation Review

Target

UniProt Context

=== UNIPROT METADATA ===
UniProt ID: A5Y7B0
Entry Name: PIF3_ARATH
Gene Name: PIF3
Locus Tag: At1g09530 {ECO:0000312|Araport:AT1G09530}
Gene Synonyms: BHLH8 {ECO:0000303|PubMed:12679534}, EN100 {ECO:0000305},
Protein Name: Transcription factor PIF3
Organism: Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress)
NCBI Taxonomy ID: 3702
Function: Transcription factor acting in the phytochrome signaling pathway (PubMed:10466729, PubMed:14508006). Activates transcription by binding to the G box (5'-CACGTG-3'), particularly in the dark but barely in far-red light (PubMed:10797009, PubMed:31732705). Acts as a negative regulator of phytochrome B signaling (PubMed:14508006). Represses chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in the dark (PubMed:23548744). Recruits the histone deacetylase HDA15 to the promoters of chlorophyll biosynthetic and photosynthetic genes (PubMed:23548744). HDA15 represses their transcription by histone deacetylation (PubMed:23548744). Promotes the expression of MDP60 to modulate hypocotyl cell elongation in response to light and ethylene signaling (PubMed:29167353). Required for submergence-induced and ethylene-dependent underwater hypocotyl elongation (PubMed:31638649).
Subcellular Location: Nucleus
Subunit: Homodimer (PubMed:25944101). Can form a heterodimer with REP1 and PIF4. Phytochrome B binds specifically to DNA-bound PIF3, but only upon red light induced conversion to the Pfr form (PfrB). Reconversion to Pr form causes rapid dissociation. Interacts with APRR1/TOC1. Binds to PIA2; this interaction may trigger the repression of PHYA-mediated phosphorylation (PubMed:27143545). Interacts with TOPP4 (Probable) (PubMed:11828023, PubMed:12826627, PubMed:12897250, PubMed:26704640, PubMed:27143545). Interacts with FYPP1 and FYPP3 (PubMed:31527236). Interacts with HDA15 in the dark (PubMed:23548744). Associates to PTAC12/HMR/PAP5 which acts as a transcriptional coactivator (PubMed:25944101). Binds to PhyA (PubMed:31732705).
======================

Research Objective

Prepare a comprehensive literature-backed research report for GO annotation review of the target gene.

Focus on:

  1. The core biochemical activity of the gene product and any substrate specificity.
  2. The activation or maturation mechanism of the protein, including proteolytic processing if relevant.
  3. The best-supported subcellular localization and complexes where the active protein functions.
  4. The strongest experimentally supported biological processes in the target organism, or in very close orthologs when transfer is justified.
  5. Which annotations appear to reflect core function versus context-specific, pleiotropic, or over-extended roles.
  6. Any evidence bearing on apoptosis, developmental cell death, neuronal roles, inflammatory signaling, pyroptosis, synaptic remodeling, protein processing, and localization to cytoplasm, cytosol, nucleus, or signaling complexes.

Output Requirements

Structure the report as:

  1. Executive summary
  2. Molecular function
  3. Biological process roles
  4. Cellular localization and complexes
  5. Annotation-risk assessment
  6. Key literature

Use citations for all substantive claims.

Gene Research Report for GO Annotation Review: PIF3 (Arabidopsis thaliana; UniProt A5Y7B0; At1g09530)

1. Executive summary

PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 3 (PIF3) is a nuclear basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor that acts as a central node in phytochrome-controlled light signaling. Its core molecular function is sequence-specific DNA binding, with a strong preference for the G-box (5′-CACGTG-3′), and transcriptional regulation of target promoters. Recent biochemistry quantifies high-affinity G-box binding (sub-micromolar Kd) and demonstrates that key basic-region residues are required for this specificity. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14)

In dark-grown seedlings, PIF3 is best supported as a transcriptional repressor of chlorophyll biosynthetic and photosynthesis-associated genes through recruitment of the histone deacetylase HDA15, which reduces histone acetylation and RNA polymerase II–associated transcription. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)

PIF3 activity is strongly post-translationally regulated: red light–activated phytochrome signaling promotes PIF3 phosphorylation and ubiquitin–26S proteasome–dependent degradation, rapidly relieving repression. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12) A 2024 PNAS study further establishes a circadian-clock output (the F-box protein CFH1) that promotes daytime PIF3 degradation via an SCF/Cullin-1–linked mechanism, independently of phyB, supported by proteasome-inhibitor sensitivity and statistical testing. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2)

Overall, the strongest GO-relevant annotations for PIF3 are: DNA-binding transcription factor activity (G-box binding), negative regulation of photomorphogenesis / phytochrome signaling, repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis gene expression in darkness, nuclear localization, and regulation via ubiquitin–proteasome degradation. Broader roles (e.g., anthocyanin regulation, stress and temperature responses) are often context-specific and/or inferred from multi-PIF mutant backgrounds and should be annotated conservatively. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10, pashkovskiy2025involvementofphytochromeinteracting pages 1-2)

2. Molecular function

2.1 Key concepts and definitions (current understanding)

2.2 Core biochemical activity and substrate specificity

Sequence-specific DNA binding (G-box preference). A 2024 study using recombinant AtPIF3-bHLH quantified G-box binding by ITC and validated key recognition residues by point mutation. (Hsin et al., 2024, BMC Plant Biology; published Nov 2024; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z) (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14)
- WT AtPIF3-bHLH binds the G-box with Kd = 0.32 ± 0.014 µM. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14)
- Mutations in the basic region substantially reduce affinity:
- H348A: Kd 3.39 ± 0.275 µM
- R356A: Kd 106 ± 112 µM (very weak/variable binding)
These results support that PIF3’s core molecular function is high-specificity G-box binding mediated by defined basic-region residues. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14)

Competitive EMSA further supports motif preference, with the G-box outcompeting other E-box variants (competitor at 20-fold excess), implying that many E-boxes are not equivalently recognized by PIF3. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14)

2.3 Transcriptional regulatory mode: activation vs repression

Best-supported direct mechanism in Arabidopsis seedlings is repression in darkness via chromatin deacetylation. In etiolated (dark-grown) seedlings, PIF3 forms a complex with HDA15 (RPD3/HDA1-type histone deacetylase) that co-targets promoters of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis genes; repression is associated with reduced histone acetylation and reduced RNA Pol II–associated transcription. (Liu et al., 2013, The Plant Cell; Apr 2013; https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109710) (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)

Key mechanistic observations directly relevant to GO “transcription corepressor”–style annotations:
- Direct physical interaction between PIF3 and HDA15 is supported by multiple assay types (Y2H, pull-down, co-IP, BiFC). (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4)
- HDA15 binding to target genes depends on PIF3, indicating PIF3 acts as the recruiting DNA-bound factor. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)

While PIF3 (and PIFs) can be context-dependent (sometimes acting in coordination with other TFs at shared cis-elements), the best-supported direct mechanism from primary evidence in Arabidopsis for GO review is repression through HDAC recruitment under dark conditions. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)

3. Biological process roles

3.1 Core processes with strongest experimental support

1) Negative regulation of photomorphogenesis / phytochrome signaling
- PIF3 is described as a key negative regulator of light responses in the dark and is relieved by light-triggered phytochrome signaling and PIF3 degradation. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 13-13)

2) Repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis gene expression in etiolated seedlings
- PIF3 and HDA15 co-target chlorophyll biosynthetic and photosynthesis-associated genes in darkness and repress transcription through histone deacetylation; exposure to red light causes dissociation from target genes and derepression. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)
- A temporal detail relevant to condition-dependent annotations: after exposure to red light, PIF3 dissociates from target genes within ~2 hours, and HDA15 dissociates accordingly. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12)

3) Circadian timing of PIF3 protein degradation and growth regulation
A 2024 PNAS study identifies CFH1 as a circadian-clock output that sustains daytime PIF3 degradation even when phyB is absent. (Liu et al., 2024, PNAS; Aug 2024; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121) (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6)
- The study provides proteasome-dependent cell-free degradation evidence (recombinant GST-PIF3 incubated with plant extracts), and MG132 abolishes genotype-dependent differences. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2)
- Statistical support: two-way balanced ANOVA with Tukey HSD, n = 3 biological replicates (as stated in the figure legend). (liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2)
These data support annotation to biological processes involving ubiquitin–proteasome–mediated regulation of PIF3 abundance that is time-of-day dependent. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2)

3.2 Context-specific or pleiotropic roles (annotation should be conservative)

4. Cellular localization and complexes

4.1 Subcellular localization

Nucleus / chromatin-associated. The PIF3–HDA15 interaction is directly visualized as a nuclear BiFC signal in dark-incubated Arabidopsis protoplasts (with a nuclear marker), and PIF3 associates with promoters by ChIP, supporting nuclear/chromatin function. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13)

4.2 Protein complexes and interactions (best supported)

1) PIF3–HDA15 transcriptional repression complex
- Supported by Y2H, pull-downs, co-IP, and BiFC, with light-dependent weakening after red light due to PIF3 degradation. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13)
- Interaction mapping: HDA15 aa1–146 and PIF3 aa40–126 were sufficient for interaction. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)

2) Phytochrome binding via N-terminal APA/APB motifs (light-dependent interaction)
- 2024 Plant Cell biophysics dissects PIF3 binding determinants and quantifies how light and temperature shape AtPhyB:PIF interactions. (Yi et al., 2024, The Plant Cell; Sep 2024; https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae249) (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3)
- PIF3 contains an APA motif (for PhyA) and an APB motif (for PhyB) within its N-terminus; minimal N-terminal fragments retain binding in the in vitro assay framework. (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3)

3) SCF/Cullin-1–linked degradation pathway via CFH1
- CFH1 physically interacts with PIF3 (Y2H with decoy, split luciferase in tobacco, and co-IP in Arabidopsis). (liu2024acircadianclock pages 4-5)
- CFH1 co-immunoprecipitates with Cullin-1, supporting association with an SCF E3 ligase complex and implicating SCF-mediated control of PIF3 stability. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2)

4) HY5 interactions (evidence present but indirect in provided excerpts)
- The HY5–PIF module study states that PIF1 and PIF3 physically interact with HY5/HYH (citing prior work) and shows competition at a shared G-box for PIF vs HY5 binding. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10)
- Risk note: this is supportive for functional interplay, but direct PIF3–HY5 interaction evidence is not detailed in the provided excerpts; annotate to “protein binding”/complex terms cautiously unless the primary interaction paper is reviewed. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10)

5. Annotation-risk assessment (core vs over-extended)

This section highlights where GO annotations are strongly justified versus potentially over-extended.

5.1 Annotations strongly supported as core function

5.2 Likely valid but condition- or context-dependent

5.3 Annotations that appear unsupported in the retrieved primary evidence set

Evidence summary table (GO-oriented)

GO aspect Candidate GO term label Evidence summary (key experiment types) Key quantitative details (Kd, time, rates, stats) Conditions Primary sources (with year) Annotation risk
MF sequence-specific DNA binding to G-box Recombinant AtPIF3 bHLH tested by fluorescence EMSA, competitive fEMSA, ITC, mutagenesis, and structural modeling; strong preference for G-box over other E-boxes/PBE-like motifs; DNA-contact residues validated by loss-of-affinity mutants (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14, hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 1-2, hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 15-16) WT bHLH:G-box Kd = 0.32 ± 0.014 µM; H348A Kd = 3.39 ± 0.275 µM; R356A Kd = 106 ± 112 µM; 20-fold competitor used in competitive fEMSA (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14) In vitro biochemical assays Hsin et al., 2024 (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14, hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 1-2, hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 15-16) Core
MF transcription corepressor activity via histone deacetylase recruitment Y2H, GST pull-down, semi-in vivo pull-down, co-IP, BiFC, ChIP, HDAC assay, histone acetylation assays, transcriptomics; PIF3 recruits HDA15 to promoters of chlorophyll/photosynthesis genes and repression depends on PIF3 for HDA15 chromatin association (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4) PIF3-HDA15 interaction domains mapped to PIF3 aa40–126 and HDA15 aa1–146; PIF3/HDA15 dissociate from targets after ~2 h red light; increased histone H4 acetylation in pif3/hda15 backgrounds reported qualitatively (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12) Dark-grown etiolated seedlings; red-light transition Liu et al., 2013 (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4) Core
MF phytochrome binding Biophysical phytochrome-PIF assays with PIF3 N-terminal fragments fused to fluorophore; APA motif supports phyA binding, APB motif supports phyB binding; red/far-red switching drives reversible complex formation/dissociation (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3) PIF3 minimal interaction region tested within N-terminal residues 1–100 and 14–53; diffusional encounter rate for AtPhyB:PIF combinations ≈ 5.6 × 10^6 M−1 s−1 at 15 °C; association is ~18-fold lower than encounter rate for P3A, indicating many nonproductive collisions (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3, yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 9-10) Red/far-red light; 15–30 °C biophysical assays Yi et al., 2024 (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3, yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 9-10) Core
BP ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process Cell-free degradation assays, endogenous immunoblots, proteasome inhibition, co-IP; PIF3 degradation promoted by CFH1/SCF-linked machinery and by prior known CRL3-LRB/CRL1-EBF systems; MG132 abolishes genotype-dependent degradation differences (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock pages 7-8) GST-PIF3 decay assayed at 0, 10, 20 min; no significant genotype differences with MG132; analyses used two-way balanced ANOVA with Tukey HSD, n = 3 biological replicates (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2) Early day; constant red light; proteasome inhibition Liu et al., 2024 (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2, liu2024acircadianclock pages 7-8) Core for PIF3 turnover, but specific ligase assignment partly context-specific
BP regulation of photomorphogenesis Genetics and molecular analyses place PIF3 among core negative regulators of photomorphogenesis; light-dependent phosphorylation/degradation relieves repression; strongest direct evidence comes from dark-grown seedling and red-light transition studies (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 13-13, pashkovskiy2025involvementofphytochromeinteracting pages 1-2, toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 11-12) No single PIF3-specific effect size in provided excerpts; red light causes promoter dissociation/degradation within ~2 h in dark-to-light transition assays (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12) Etiolated seedlings; dark to red light Liu et al., 2013; Toledo-Ortiz et al., 2014 (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 13-13, toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 11-12) Core
BP repression of chlorophyll biosynthetic process / repression of photosynthesis gene expression in the dark ChIP, transcriptomics, mutant analysis, histone acetylation assays; PIF3 and HDA15 co-target chlorophyll biosynthetic and photosynthetic genes in etiolated seedlings and repress transcription by histone deacetylation (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13) Dissociation from target genes after ~2 h red light; qualitative increases in histone acetylation and target expression in pif3/hda15 mutants (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12) Dark-grown etiolated seedlings; red-light exposure Liu et al., 2013 (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13) Core
BP circadian-regulated protein degradation / growth timing CFH1 expression and function link clock output to daytime PIF3 degradation; overexpression/decoy lines alter PIF3 target expression and hypocotyl-associated outputs; integrates circadian timing with light signaling (liu2024acircadianclock pages 7-8, liu2024acircadianclock pages 1-2, liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6) CFH1 circadian period 23.2 h, RAE 0.22; CFH1 phased around ZT2–4; target expression increased in CFH1 decoy and 35S::PIF3 lines; assays sampled ZT2 vs ZT15 and every 4 h in constant red light (liu2024acircadianclock pages 7-8, liu2024acircadianclock pages 1-2) Early day; constant red light; time-of-day dependent Liu et al., 2024 (liu2024acircadianclock pages 7-8, liu2024acircadianclock pages 1-2, liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6) Core for timed degradation; context-specific for downstream growth phenotypes
MF/BP HY5 competitive/interaction module EMSA/ChIP and prior interaction evidence indicate PIFs and HY5 compete for G-box occupancy; PIF1/PIF3 reported to physically interact with HY5/HYH; module integrates light and temperature responses and can be antagonistic or, in some contexts, cooperative (anthocyanin genes) (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10) No PIF3-specific Kd in excerpts; competitive occupancy shown qualitatively by excess-protein competition in EMSA; no direct quantitative PIF3-HY5 binding constants reported here (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10) Light/dark and temperature-responsive promoter regulation Toledo-Ortiz et al., 2014 (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10) Context-specific; avoid over-annotation unless term reflects broader regulatory module
CC nucleus / chromatin-associated transcription regulator complex Nuclear BiFC signal in dark-incubated protoplasts and tobacco epidermis, co-IP from etiolated seedlings, ChIP promoter occupancy; supports nuclear and chromatin-associated function of active PIF3 complex (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2) Strong nuclear YFP BiFC signal reported; promoter occupancy lost after red light due to degradation (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4) Dark; red-light transition Liu et al., 2013 (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2) Core
CC SCF ubiquitin ligase complex involvement CFH1 interacts with PIF3 and with Cullin-1; decoy/full-length comparisons, co-IP, split luciferase, and MG132-sensitive degradation support SCF-linked regulation of PIF3 stability (liu2024acircadianclock pages 4-5, liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6) CFH1-PIF3 interaction detectable in vivo; MG132 required for some interaction readouts with full-length CFH1; degradation differences abolished by MG132; n = 3 biological replicates in degradation assays (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock pages 4-5) Early day; constant red light; proteasome-active conditions Liu et al., 2024 (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock pages 4-5) Context-specific for assigning PIF3 to SCF complex as substrate/regulatory partner rather than stable resident component

Table: This table organizes experimental evidence relevant to GO annotation review of Arabidopsis PIF3 across molecular function, biological process, and cellular component. It highlights which annotations are strongly supported as core functions versus those that are more conditional, family-level, or context-specific.

6. Key literature (prioritizing 2023–2024, plus seminal mechanistic studies)

Recent primary research (2024):
1) Hsin K-T, Lee Y-H, Lin K-C, Chen W, Cheng Y-S. Specific binding between Arabidopsis thaliana phytochrome-interacting factor 3 (AtPIF3) bHLH and G-box originated prior to embryophyte emergence. BMC Plant Biology. Published Nov 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14)
2) Liu W, Lowrey H, Xu A, et al. A circadian clock output functions independently of phyB to sustain daytime PIF3 degradation. PNAS. Published Aug 2024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121 (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6, liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2)
3) Yi C, Gerken U, Tang K, et al. Plant phytochrome interactions decode light and temperature signals. The Plant Cell. Published Sep 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae249 (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3, yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 9-10)

Seminal mechanistic studies (foundational):
4) Liu X, Chen C-Y, Wang K-C, et al. PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR3 Associates with the Histone Deacetylase HDA15 in Repression of Chlorophyll Biosynthesis and Photosynthesis in Etiolated Arabidopsis Seedlings. The Plant Cell. Published Apr 2013. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109710 (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12, liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2)
5) Toledo-Ortiz G, Johansson H, Lee KP, et al. The HY5-PIF Regulatory Module Coordinates Light and Temperature Control of Photosynthetic Gene Transcription. PLoS Genetics. Published Jun 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416 (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 4-5, toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 11-12)

Notes on “recent developments and real-world implementations”

Recent work increasingly quantifies phytochrome–PIF interaction dynamics across temperature and light intensity regimes and characterizes circadian outputs controlling PIF3 turnover, providing a mechanistic basis for engineering light/temperature responses in plant biotechnology (e.g., tunable signaling modules and optogenetic applications discussed in the phytochrome interaction study). (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3)

References

  1. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 12-14): Kuan-Ting Hsin, Yu-Hsuan Lee, Kai-Chun Lin, Wei Chen, and Yi-Sheng Cheng. Specific binding between arabidopsis thaliana phytochrome-interacting factor 3 (atpif3) bhlh and g-box originated prior to embryophyte emergence. BMC Plant Biology, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z, doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z. This article has 2 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 11-12): Xuncheng Liu, Chia-Yang Chen, Ko-Ching Wang, Ming Luo, Ready Tai, Lianyu Yuan, Minglei Zhao, Songguang Yang, Gang Tian, Yuhai Cui, Hsu-Liang Hsieh, and Keqiang Wu. Phytochrome interacting factor3 associates with the histone deacetylase hda15 in repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in etiolated arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Cell, 25:1258-1273, Apr 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109710, doi:10.1105/tpc.113.109710. This article has 262 citations.

  3. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 1-2): Xuncheng Liu, Chia-Yang Chen, Ko-Ching Wang, Ming Luo, Ready Tai, Lianyu Yuan, Minglei Zhao, Songguang Yang, Gang Tian, Yuhai Cui, Hsu-Liang Hsieh, and Keqiang Wu. Phytochrome interacting factor3 associates with the histone deacetylase hda15 in repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in etiolated arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Cell, 25:1258-1273, Apr 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109710, doi:10.1105/tpc.113.109710. This article has 262 citations.

  4. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 6-6): Wei Liu, Harper Lowrey, Anxu Xu, Chun Chung Leung, Christopher Adamchek, Jiangman He, Juan Du, Meng Chen, and Joshua M. Gendron. A circadian clock output functions independently of phyb to sustain daytime pif3 degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2408322121. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (liu2024acircadianclock media 856b7dc2): Wei Liu, Harper Lowrey, Anxu Xu, Chun Chung Leung, Christopher Adamchek, Jiangman He, Juan Du, Meng Chen, and Joshua M. Gendron. A circadian clock output functions independently of phyb to sustain daytime pif3 degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2408322121. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 8-10): Gabriela Toledo-Ortiz, Henrik Johansson, Keun Pyo Lee, Jordi Bou-Torrent, Kelly Stewart, Gavin Steel, Manuel Rodríguez-Concepción, and Karen J. Halliday. The hy5-pif regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genetics, 10:e1004416, Jun 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416. This article has 558 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (pashkovskiy2025involvementofphytochromeinteracting pages 1-2): Pavel Pashkovskiy, Anna Abramova, Alexandra Khudyakova, Mikhail Vereshchagin, Vladimir Kuznetsov, and Vladimir D. Kreslavski. Involvement of phytochrome-interacting factors in high-irradiance adaptation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26:11660, Dec 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311660, doi:10.3390/ijms262311660. This article has 0 citations.

  8. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 2-4): Xuncheng Liu, Chia-Yang Chen, Ko-Ching Wang, Ming Luo, Ready Tai, Lianyu Yuan, Minglei Zhao, Songguang Yang, Gang Tian, Yuhai Cui, Hsu-Liang Hsieh, and Keqiang Wu. Phytochrome interacting factor3 associates with the histone deacetylase hda15 in repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in etiolated arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Cell, 25:1258-1273, Apr 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109710, doi:10.1105/tpc.113.109710. This article has 262 citations.

  9. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 13-13): Gabriela Toledo-Ortiz, Henrik Johansson, Keun Pyo Lee, Jordi Bou-Torrent, Kelly Stewart, Gavin Steel, Manuel Rodríguez-Concepción, and Karen J. Halliday. The hy5-pif regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genetics, 10:e1004416, Jun 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416. This article has 558 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 4-5): Gabriela Toledo-Ortiz, Henrik Johansson, Keun Pyo Lee, Jordi Bou-Torrent, Kelly Stewart, Gavin Steel, Manuel Rodríguez-Concepción, and Karen J. Halliday. The hy5-pif regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genetics, 10:e1004416, Jun 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416. This article has 558 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (toledoortiz2014thehy5pifregulatory pages 11-12): Gabriela Toledo-Ortiz, Henrik Johansson, Keun Pyo Lee, Jordi Bou-Torrent, Kelly Stewart, Gavin Steel, Manuel Rodríguez-Concepción, and Karen J. Halliday. The hy5-pif regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genetics, 10:e1004416, Jun 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004416. This article has 558 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (liu2013phytochromeinteractingfactor3 pages 12-13): Xuncheng Liu, Chia-Yang Chen, Ko-Ching Wang, Ming Luo, Ready Tai, Lianyu Yuan, Minglei Zhao, Songguang Yang, Gang Tian, Yuhai Cui, Hsu-Liang Hsieh, and Keqiang Wu. Phytochrome interacting factor3 associates with the histone deacetylase hda15 in repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthesis in etiolated arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Cell, 25:1258-1273, Apr 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.109710, doi:10.1105/tpc.113.109710. This article has 262 citations.

  13. (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 2-3): Chengwei Yi, Uwe Gerken, Kun Tang, Michael Philipp, Matias D Zurbriggen, Jürgen Köhler, and Andreas Möglich. Plant phytochrome interactions decode light and temperature signals. The Plant Cell, 36:4819-4839, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae249, doi:10.1093/plcell/koae249. This article has 18 citations.

  14. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 4-5): Wei Liu, Harper Lowrey, Anxu Xu, Chun Chung Leung, Christopher Adamchek, Jiangman He, Juan Du, Meng Chen, and Joshua M. Gendron. A circadian clock output functions independently of phyb to sustain daytime pif3 degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2408322121. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 1-2): Kuan-Ting Hsin, Yu-Hsuan Lee, Kai-Chun Lin, Wei Chen, and Yi-Sheng Cheng. Specific binding between arabidopsis thaliana phytochrome-interacting factor 3 (atpif3) bhlh and g-box originated prior to embryophyte emergence. BMC Plant Biology, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z, doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z. This article has 2 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (hsin2024specificbindingbetween pages 15-16): Kuan-Ting Hsin, Yu-Hsuan Lee, Kai-Chun Lin, Wei Chen, and Yi-Sheng Cheng. Specific binding between arabidopsis thaliana phytochrome-interacting factor 3 (atpif3) bhlh and g-box originated prior to embryophyte emergence. BMC Plant Biology, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z, doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05777-z. This article has 2 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  17. (yi2024plantphytochromeinteractions pages 9-10): Chengwei Yi, Uwe Gerken, Kun Tang, Michael Philipp, Matias D Zurbriggen, Jürgen Köhler, and Andreas Möglich. Plant phytochrome interactions decode light and temperature signals. The Plant Cell, 36:4819-4839, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae249, doi:10.1093/plcell/koae249. This article has 18 citations.

  18. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 7-8): Wei Liu, Harper Lowrey, Anxu Xu, Chun Chung Leung, Christopher Adamchek, Jiangman He, Juan Du, Meng Chen, and Joshua M. Gendron. A circadian clock output functions independently of phyb to sustain daytime pif3 degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2408322121. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (liu2024acircadianclock pages 1-2): Wei Liu, Harper Lowrey, Anxu Xu, Chun Chung Leung, Christopher Adamchek, Jiangman He, Juan Du, Meng Chen, and Joshua M. Gendron. A circadian clock output functions independently of phyb to sustain daytime pif3 degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408322121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2408322121. This article has 9 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.