this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 40 citations 2025-12-18T08:36:54.320784

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research plan and verification: We verified the target is Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) sigK (UniProt P12254), encoding the RNA polymerase sigma-K factor (σK), a σ70-family transcription factor produced as an inactive pro-σK precursor and activated late in sporulation within the mother cell. All evidence below pertains to this protein/organism and is consistent with σ70-family domain architecture and σK’s role in the sporulation sigma cascade (σE/σK in the mother cell and σF/σG in the forespore) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9).

Module Key concept Mechanistic highlights Timing / localization Top sources (year)
Identity / family sigK encodes pro-σK, a member of the σ70-family of transcription factors; produced as an inactive precursor (pro-σK) requiring proteolytic activation Pro-σK is synthesized as a proprotein with N-terminal inhibitory segment that must be removed for σK to bind RNAP and direct late mother-cell transcription (σ-classified as rK). Active in the mother cell after engulfment completion; σK functions in cytoplasm after pro-domain removal and release from membrane vicinity (mother-cell compartment). (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14)
Activation (SpoIVFB/BofA/SpoIVFA; SpoIVB/CtpB) Regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP): SpoIVFB (S2P-family intramembrane metalloprotease) cleaves Pro-σK when inhibition relieved SpoIVFB is inhibited by SpoIVFA and BofA which sterically block substrate access; forespore-produced proteases SpoIVB and CtpB cleave inhibitory partners (site-1 signalling), triggering SpoIVFB lateral-gate opening and Pro-σK processing. Activation requires intercompartmental signalling from forespore (SpoIVB/CtpB) to mother-cell SpoIVFB complex; spatially restricted to forespore-surrounding/mother-cell membranes during late engulfment. (olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21, orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12)
Structural insights (SpoIVFB–Pro-σK cryo-EM) Cryo-EM/mutational data reveal substrate positioning and putative water access path to membrane-buried active site SpoIVFB engages Pro-σK via β-sheet augmentation; interdomain linker and membrane lipids facilitate substrate capture; supports substrate-gating/lateral-gate model for regulated intramembrane proteolysis. Structural complex solved (cryo-EM) of SpoIVFB bound to Pro-σK shows membrane-embedded active site and substrate path relevant during mother-cell processing. (orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2, olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21)
Skin element excision (SpoIVCA) sigK is interrupted by a prophage-like 'skin' element in B. subtilis 168; SpoIVCA (site-specific recombinase) excises skin to restore an intact sigK spoIVCA (large serine recombinase) mediates precise excision of skin; expression of spoIVCA and timing of excision are controlled by mother-cell regulators (σE and SpoIIID) to restrict excision to the mother cell. Excision occurs toward end of engulfment in the mother cell, enabling later transcription/translation of pro-σK. (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 2-3, serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 5-7)
Sigma cascade hierarchy (σF/σE/σG → σK) Sequential, compartmentalized sigma cascade controls progressive sporulation programs across forespore and mother cell σF→σG in forespore and σE→(SpoIIID/GerR)→σK in mother cell; multiple feed-forward and repressive interactions ensure correct temporal order and prevent premature σK activity. Cascade is spatially compartmentalized (forespore vs mother cell); σK activation restricted to mother cell post-engulfment. (phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2)
σK regulon & GerE feed-forward control σK activates late mother-cell genes (coat/cortex/germination-related); GerE acts downstream to refine the late program σK directly activates a core set of late genes (many coat proteins); GerE both represses a large subset of σK-activated genes and activates a final cohort, forming linked feed-forward loops that sculpt late transcription. σK-driven transcription occurs after engulfment completion and pro-σK processing; GerE-dependent remodeling defines final gene expression stage for coat/cortex assembly. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 9-10)
Quantitative mother-cell program metrics Sizes and temporal structure of mother-cell regulons and program duration Mother-cell program activates ~383 genes (≈242 transcription units); σE controls ~262 genes (≈163 TUs); σK newly activates ~75 genes (44 TUs) (core rK=103 genes; up to ~144 when GerE-dependent genes included); expression occurs over ~5 h window post-asymmetric division. Program spans ~5 hours of mother-cell differentiation after asymmetric septation, with sampling/timepoints typically at ~2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5 h in transcriptional studies. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 2-3)

Table: Compact reference table summarizing sigK (pro-σK/σK) identity, activation mechanism, structural insights, skin excision, sigma cascade position, regulon control by GerE, and quantitative mother-cell program metrics with primary sources for each claim.

1) Key concepts and definitions (current understanding)
- Identity and compartment: sigK encodes pro-σK, a σ70-family sigma factor that, after proteolytic removal of its N-terminal pro-sequence, functions with RNA polymerase in the mother-cell cytoplasm to drive late sporulation gene expression (e.g., coat/cortex/germination genes) (PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328; Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9).
- Activation by regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP): The intramembrane metalloprotease SpoIVFB (site-2 protease, S2P family) cleaves pro-σK within the mother-cell membrane system, converting it to active σK. SpoIVFB is held inactive by SpoIVFA and BofA, and activation is triggered by intercompartmental signaling proteases made in the forespore (SpoIVB and CtpB) that relieve inhibition and permit substrate access (“substrate gating”) (eLife, 2022; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74275; PLoS Genet, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753) (olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14).
- Developmental gene rearrangement (“skin” excision) required for sigK expression: In B. subtilis 168, sigK is split by a prophage-like element (skinBs) into spoIVCB and spoIIIC; SpoIVCA, a large serine recombinase, excises skinBs late in engulfment to reconstitute sigK in the mother cell. Skin elements vary widely across Firmicutes but consistently encode SpoIVCA-like recombinases (Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22; CMLS, 2002; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9) (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9).
- Position in the sigma cascade: σF (forespore) activates σE (mother cell) via SpoIIR/SpoIIGA, σE enables σG (forespore) and sets the stage for σK activation in the mother cell; σK then drives late transcription and is further sculpted by GerE. Feed-forward and repressive interactions enforce temporal order and compartment specificity (CMLS, 2002; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9; PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328) (phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 2-3).

2) Recent developments and latest research (2023–2024 prioritized)
- Cryo-EM structure of SpoIVFB–pro-σK (2024): A high-resolution cryo-EM study resolved SpoIVFB bound to pro-σK, showing β-sheet augmentation for substrate engagement, critical contacts with the interdomain linker, and a plausible membrane water-access path to the buried active site; MD suggests lipid participation in substrate capture. These data substantiate the lateral/substrate gating model for regulated intramembrane proteolysis of pro-σK (Nat Commun, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6) (orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2).
- Inhibitory complex mechanism (2022 update): Cross-linking and modeling show that BofA (with SpoIVFA) occupies SpoIVFB’s active-site cleft to block substrate access; SpoIVB/CtpB cleavage of inhibitory partners relieves inhibition, enabling pro-σK processing. This provides a concrete steric mechanism for RIP control (eLife, 2022; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74275) (olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21, olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 30-31).
- Substrate-gating and conformational control (2018): In vivo genetics, imaging, and covariation-guided modeling support SpoIVFB closed/open states gated by F66 and IVB-dependent signaling; ATP-binding to the SpoIVFB CBS domain modulates efficiency but is not strictly required (PLOS Genet, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753) (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 4-5, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 14-15).
- Skin element diversity and conservation (2022): Comparative genomics across Firmicutes shows variable skin element sizes (2.6–48 kb), conserved SpoIVCA recombinase placement, and universal presence of the sporulation sigma set, including sigK, among spore formers (Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22) (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9).

3) Current applications and real-world implementations
- Mechanistic insights from σK activation have broader relevance for regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) across domains of life, informing inhibitor design and signal-transduction logic in membrane-embedded proteases. The SpoIVFB–BofA–SpoIVFA inhibitory interface and steric occlusion of the active-site cleft suggest design principles for modulators of S2P-family proteases (eLife, 2022; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74275). The cryo-EM structure of SpoIVFB–pro-σK further enables structure-guided hypotheses for lipid-dependent substrate capture within membranes (Nat Commun, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6) (olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21, orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2).
- Conservation analyses connecting σK and skin recombinases across spore-forming pathogens underscore translational relevance for controlling sporulation traits (e.g., cortex/coat assembly and germination), with implications for persistence/interventions in Bacillota pathogens (Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22) (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9).

4) Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources
- Mother-cell program architecture: A hierarchical series of coherent and incoherent feed-forward loops (σE→SpoIIID/GerR→σK→GerE) produces successive transcriptional pulses, ensuring timely shutoff of earlier genes and activation of late genes for spore maturation (PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 2-3, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 9-10).
- Intercompartmental signaling and spatial control: Activation of pro-σK requires forespore-secreted proteases SpoIVB and CtpB that act in the intermembrane space to cleave inhibitory partners, thereby coupling σK activation to developmental stage and membrane topology late in engulfment (CMLS, 2002; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9; PLoS Genet, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753) (phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12).
- Skin excision logic: SpoIVCA-dependent excision is controlled by σE and SpoIIID to ensure that functional sigK is reconstituted only in the mother cell late in development, preventing premature σK activity (Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22) (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 5-7).

5) Relevant statistics and data from recent/authoritative studies
- Quantitative mother-cell program (B. subtilis 168): The mother-cell lineage activates approximately 383 genes (~242 transcription units) over about 5 hours following asymmetric division. σE activates ~262 genes (163 TUs), many of which are then repressed by SpoIIID/GerR. σK newly activates ~75 genes (44 TUs) among a core σK regulon of 103 genes (63 TUs), expanding to ~144 genes (94 TUs) when strongly GerE-dependent σK targets are included. GerE represses roughly half of σK-activated genes while activating a final set of 36 genes (27 TUs) (PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 8-9, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 9-10, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 2-3).
- σK regulon content: The σK regulon includes many coat genes (e.g., cotA, cotB, cotD, cotE, cotH) and other maturation factors; GerE downstream further refines coat/cortex/germination gene expression through activation and repression in a feed-forward motif (PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 3-4, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 10-11).
- Skin element properties: In B. subtilis 168, the sigK gene is interrupted by a ~48 kb skinBs element; SpoIVCA recombinase excises skinBs towards the end of engulfment to reconstitute sigK. Across Firmicutes, skin elements vary from ~2.6–48 kb and consistently encode SpoIVCA-like recombinases near spoIIIC, reflecting likely phage-derived ancestry (Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22; CMLS, 2002; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9) (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9).
- Localization and kinetics of activation: Imaging and time-course assays show pro-σK associates with SpoIVFB at forespore-surrounding mother-cell membranes, and its processing/σK activation correlate with SpoIVB-dependent signaling onset; σK-responsive reporters (e.g., PgerE-lacZ) and immunoblots quantify processing during sporulation. Mutations such as SpoIVFB(F66A) support gating models (PLOS Genet, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753) (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14).

Focused functional narrative for sigK (UniProt P12254)
- Primary function: σK is a transcription initiation specificity factor (σ70 family) that reprograms RNA polymerase to transcribe late sporulation genes in the mother cell. It does not catalyze a metabolic reaction; rather, it recognizes σK-specific promoter motifs to activate target genes (PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 8-9).
- Activation mechanism: pro-σK is processed by SpoIVFB, an S2P intramembrane metalloprotease, once inhibition by SpoIVFA/BofA is relieved by forespore-derived SpoIVB/CtpB proteolysis. Structural and biochemical data reveal substrate β-sheet augmentation and steric blocking of the active-site cleft by inhibitors, with signaling converting SpoIVFB to an open, substrate-accessible state (Nat Commun, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6; eLife, 2022; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74275; PLoS Genet, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753) (orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2, olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14).
- Gene rearrangement prerequisite: In strain 168, skinBs excision by SpoIVCA reconstitutes intact sigK late in engulfment under σE/SpoIIID control, ensuring σK availability only in the mother cell (Journal of Bacteriology, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22) (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9, serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 5-7).
- Cellular localization: σK activity occurs in the mother-cell cytoplasm after pro-σK processing; pro-σK engagement occurs at forespore-surrounding mother-cell membranes where SpoIVFB and its inhibitors localize (PLOS Genet, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753) (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12, ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 14-15).
- Pathway position and outputs: σK operates in a hierarchical, feed-forward mother-cell program following σE and preceding GerE, activating coat/cortex/germination genes and orchestrating mother-cell lysis for spore release. Quantitatively, ~75 newly activated genes (of a 103-gene core σK regulon; up to ~144 with GerE-dependent targets) characterize this phase (PLoS Biol, 2004; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328) (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 8-9, eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 9-10).

Notes on verification and ambiguity
- The symbol “sigK” is used across spore-forming Firmicutes, occasionally with distinct features (e.g., σK lacking a pro-sequence in C. difficile), but all core claims above are restricted to B. subtilis 168 and its σK (pro-σK processing by SpoIVFB and skinBs excision by SpoIVCA) (PLOS Genet, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312) (serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 2-3, serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 19-20, serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 20-21).

References

  1. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9): Michael Y. Galperin, Natalya Yutin, Yuri I. Wolf, Roberto Vera Alvarez, and Eugene V. Koonin. Conservation and evolution of the sporulation gene set in diverse members of the firmicutes. Journal of Bacteriology, Jun 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22, doi:10.1128/jb.00079-22. This article has 88 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9): Z. E. V. Phillips and M. A. Strauch. Bacillus subtilis sporulation and stationary phase gene expression. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS, 59:392-402, Mar 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9, doi:10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9. This article has 275 citations.

  4. (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14): Fernando H. Ramírez-Guadiana, Christopher D. A. Rodrigues, Kathleen A. Marquis, Nathalie Campo, Rocío del Carmen Barajas-Ornelas, Kelly Brock, Debora S. Marks, Andrew C. Kruse, and David Z. Rudner. Evidence that regulation of intramembrane proteolysis is mediated by substrate gating during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLOS Genetics, 14:e1007753, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753. This article has 24 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21): Sandra Olenic, Lim Heo, Michael Feig, and Lee Kroos. Inhibitory proteins block substrate access by occupying the active site cleft of bacillus subtilis intramembrane protease spoivfb. eLife, Apr 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.74275, doi:10.7554/elife.74275. This article has 8 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2): Melanie A. Orlando, Hunter J. T. Pouillon, Saikat Mandal, Lee Kroos, and Benjamin J. Orlando. Substrate engagement by the intramembrane metalloprotease spoivfb. Nature Communications, Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6, doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6. This article has 3 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19): Fernando H. Ramírez-Guadiana, Christopher D. A. Rodrigues, Kathleen A. Marquis, Nathalie Campo, Rocío del Carmen Barajas-Ornelas, Kelly Brock, Debora S. Marks, Andrew C. Kruse, and David Z. Rudner. Evidence that regulation of intramembrane proteolysis is mediated by substrate gating during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLOS Genetics, 14:e1007753, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753. This article has 24 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12): Fernando H. Ramírez-Guadiana, Christopher D. A. Rodrigues, Kathleen A. Marquis, Nathalie Campo, Rocío del Carmen Barajas-Ornelas, Kelly Brock, Debora S. Marks, Andrew C. Kruse, and David Z. Rudner. Evidence that regulation of intramembrane proteolysis is mediated by substrate gating during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLOS Genetics, 14:e1007753, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753. This article has 24 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 2-3): Mónica Serrano, Nicolas Kint, Fátima C. Pereira, Laure Saujet, Pierre Boudry, Bruno Dupuy, Adriano O. Henriques, and Isabelle Martin-Verstraete. A recombination directionality factor controls the cell type-specific activation of σk and the fidelity of spore development in clostridium difficile. PLOS Genetics, 12:e1006312, Sep 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312. This article has 42 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 5-7): Mónica Serrano, Nicolas Kint, Fátima C. Pereira, Laure Saujet, Pierre Boudry, Bruno Dupuy, Adriano O. Henriques, and Isabelle Martin-Verstraete. A recombination directionality factor controls the cell type-specific activation of σk and the fidelity of spore development in clostridium difficile. PLOS Genetics, 12:e1006312, Sep 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312. This article has 42 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 9-10): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 2-3): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 30-31): Sandra Olenic, Lim Heo, Michael Feig, and Lee Kroos. Inhibitory proteins block substrate access by occupying the active site cleft of bacillus subtilis intramembrane protease spoivfb. eLife, Apr 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.74275, doi:10.7554/elife.74275. This article has 8 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 4-5): Fernando H. Ramírez-Guadiana, Christopher D. A. Rodrigues, Kathleen A. Marquis, Nathalie Campo, Rocío del Carmen Barajas-Ornelas, Kelly Brock, Debora S. Marks, Andrew C. Kruse, and David Z. Rudner. Evidence that regulation of intramembrane proteolysis is mediated by substrate gating during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLOS Genetics, 14:e1007753, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753. This article has 24 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 14-15): Fernando H. Ramírez-Guadiana, Christopher D. A. Rodrigues, Kathleen A. Marquis, Nathalie Campo, Rocío del Carmen Barajas-Ornelas, Kelly Brock, Debora S. Marks, Andrew C. Kruse, and David Z. Rudner. Evidence that regulation of intramembrane proteolysis is mediated by substrate gating during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLOS Genetics, 14:e1007753, Nov 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753. This article has 24 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  17. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 8-9): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  18. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 3-4): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 10-11): Patrick Eichenberger, Masaya Fujita, Shane T Jensen, Erin M Conlon, David Z Rudner, Stephanie T Wang, Caitlin Ferguson, Koki Haga, Tsutomu Sato, Jun S Liu, and Richard Losick. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biology, 2:e328, Sep 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328. This article has 474 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  20. (serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 19-20): Mónica Serrano, Nicolas Kint, Fátima C. Pereira, Laure Saujet, Pierre Boudry, Bruno Dupuy, Adriano O. Henriques, and Isabelle Martin-Verstraete. A recombination directionality factor controls the cell type-specific activation of σk and the fidelity of spore development in clostridium difficile. PLOS Genetics, 12:e1006312, Sep 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312. This article has 42 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  21. (serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 20-21): Mónica Serrano, Nicolas Kint, Fátima C. Pereira, Laure Saujet, Pierre Boudry, Bruno Dupuy, Adriano O. Henriques, and Isabelle Martin-Verstraete. A recombination directionality factor controls the cell type-specific activation of σk and the fidelity of spore development in clostridium difficile. PLOS Genetics, 12:e1006312, Sep 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312. This article has 42 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

Citations

  1. orlando2024substrateengagementby pages 1-2
  2. galperin2022conservationandevolution pages 7-9
  3. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 1-2
  4. phillips2002bacillussubtilissporulation pages 7-9
  5. ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 12-14
  6. olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 19-21
  7. ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 18-19
  8. ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 9-12
  9. serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 2-3
  10. serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 5-7
  11. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 4-5
  12. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 9-10
  13. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 2-3
  14. olenic2022inhibitoryproteinsblock pages 30-31
  15. ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 4-5
  16. ramirezguadiana2018evidencethatregulation pages 14-15
  17. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 8-9
  18. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 3-4
  19. eichenberger2004theprogramof pages 10-11
  20. serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 19-20
  21. serrano2016arecombinationdirectionality pages 20-21
  22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328;
  23. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22
  24. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74275;
  25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753
  26. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22;
  27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9
  28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9;
  29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328
  30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6
  31. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74275
  32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6;
  33. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312
  34. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020328,
  35. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00079-22,
  36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8431-9,
  37. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007753,
  38. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.74275,
  39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52634-6,
  40. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006312,