this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate. Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 29 citations 2 artifacts 2026-06-12T02:18:52.419289

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research report: Human GET4 (TRC35) functional annotation (UniProt Q7L5D6)

0) Target verification (critical disambiguation)

The target is human GET4 (synonyms TRC35, C7orf20, CEE, CGI-20), the metazoan homolog of yeast Get4, and a core component of the mammalian TRC/GET tail-anchored (TA) protein targeting pathway. This mapping is explicitly stated in comparative pathway literature that equates metazoan Get4 with TRC35 and cites UniProt Q7L5D6 in this context. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23)

1) Key concepts and definitions (current understanding)

Tail-anchored (TA) proteins

TA proteins are single-pass membrane proteins whose hydrophobic transmembrane domain (TMD) is at the extreme C-terminus, so the targeting signal emerges only after translation terminates; therefore TA proteins are primarily handled by post-translational targeting systems. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 88-98)

GET/TRC pathway (guided entry of TA proteins / transmembrane recognition complex)

The GET pathway (yeast terminology) and TRC pathway (mammalian terminology) constitute a conserved cytosolic-to-ER relay that captures TA TMDs in the cytosol, loads them onto a targeting ATPase (Get3 in yeast; TRC40/ASNA1 in mammals), and delivers them to an ER membrane receptor/insertase (Get1/Get2 in yeast; WRB/CAML in mammals) for insertion. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3)

Where GET4/TRC35 fits

GET4/TRC35 is not an enzyme and does not catalyze a chemical reaction. Its primary role is as a scaffold/adaptor in the pre-targeting complex that promotes client handoff to TRC40 and coordinates targeting vs quality-control decisions for hydrophobic clients. (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7)

2) Molecular function and mechanism of GET4/TRC35

2.1 Core molecular function: pretargeting scaffold to load TA substrates onto TRC40

Multiple reviews and structural studies converge on a mechanistic model in which GET4/TRC35 participates in the cytosolic pretargeting complex that connects upstream TA capture factors to the downstream targeting ATPase:

2.2 Structural and biophysical evidence for GET4’s mechanistic role

A key primary structural study defined the metazoan pretargeting GET complex architecture (cBUGG: cBag6–Ubl4a–Get4–Get3) and how it promotes substrate transfer:

These data support the current view that GET4/TRC35 is a noncatalytic organizational factor that enhances the efficiency and fidelity of TA handoff to TRC40/ASNA1. (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7)

3) Interaction partners and complexes

3.1 The BAG6–UBL4A–GET4/TRC35 complex

In metazoans, yeast Get4/Get5 is replaced/augmented by a heterotrimeric complex containing BAG6, UBL4A (Get5 homolog), and TRC35/GET4. This complex is repeatedly described as central to TA biogenesis and transfer to TRC40. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2)

3.2 Upstream and downstream partners in the TA relay

4) Subcellular localization: where GET4 acts

4.1 Cytosolic and ribosome-proximal action

GET4/TRC35 functions in the cytosol, early in the pathway, in a ribosome-proximal capture/transfer environment as described in reviews of ER targeting and TA biogenesis. (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2)

4.2 Regulation of BAG6 nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution (direct human evidence)

A major human-specific mechanistic finding is that TRC35 directly regulates where BAG6 resides:

This provides a concrete mechanistic link between the TA targeting apparatus and cellular compartmentalization of a multifunctional cofactor (BAG6). (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2)

5) Quality control roles connected to GET4/TRC35 (proteostasis functions)

5.1 Targeting vs degradation decision-making in BAG6-containing complexes

Beyond productive TA targeting, BAG6-containing complexes are described as mediating triage of exposed hydrophobic segments: substrates can be transferred to TRC40 for insertion or directed toward ubiquitin–proteasome degradation when targeting fails or clients are defective/mislocalized. (costa2017intracellulartargetingof pages 25-30, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3)

This contextualizes GET4/TRC35 as part of a network that couples membrane-protein biogenesis to proteostasis quality control. (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9)

5.2 TRC35 stability is controlled by BAG6 association and ubiquitination

In human TRC35 biology, proper assembly with BAG6 affects TRC35 stability:

This supports a model in which GET4/TRC35 is itself surveilled by quality-control machinery, and correct complex assembly protects it. (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3)

6) Recent developments (prioritizing 2023–2024)

Direct GET4/TRC35-focused primary literature in 2024 was limited in the accessible corpus for this run; however, 2023 studies provide meaningful, mechanistically relevant updates on the stress sensitivity and broader proteostasis integration of the BAG6–UBL4A–GET4 module.

6.1 2023 review synthesis: targeting and surveillance mechanisms

A 2023 review summarizes the TRC/GET system as a conserved TA targeting route and reiterates the key role of the Get4/TRC35 pretargeting complex (with UBL4A, BAG6) in TA capture and transfer, emphasizing the integration of targeting with surveillance of mistargeted TA proteins. (qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2)

Publication: Qin et al. 2023-01, The Innovation Life. URL: https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013 (qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2)

6.2 2023 primary study: proteotoxic stress remodels the complex (with quantitative statistics)

A 2023 Biochemical Journal study tested how proteotoxic stresses affect complex integrity:

Publication: Hagiwara et al. 2023-10, Biochemical Journal. URL: https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267 (hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 7-10)

6.3 2023: broader proteostasis and translation surveillance contexts

A 2023 Nature paper (noncoding translation mitigation) identifies BAG6 pathway components including TRC35/GET4 in a broader proteostasis/surveillance context (as reported in the retrieved snippet), supporting the idea that GET4-containing modules participate not only in TA targeting but also in mitigation of aberrant translation-derived hydrophobic products. (OpenTargets Search: -GET4)

Publication: Kesner et al. 2023-04, Nature. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05946-4 (OpenTargets Search: -GET4)

7) Current applications and real-world implementations

7.1 Practical biological applications

In practice, GET4/TRC35 is used as a mechanistic handle to:

These applications are most mature in mechanistic cell biology and structural biology rather than direct clinical implementation.

7.2 Tooling and experimental platforms

8) Expert opinions and authoritative synthesis

Several authoritative reviews emphasize a consistent expert consensus:

9) Disease associations and phenotypes (evidence strength and caveats)

Open Targets aggregates evidence connecting GET4 to several disease/phenotype terms, including neurodegenerative disease, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and congenital disorder of glycosylation type IIy. These are associations drawn from specific studies/variants and functional screens, not proof of direct causality or a defined GET4 mechanism in each disease. (OpenTargets Search: -GET4)

9.2 Mechanistic plausibility from proteostasis literature

Given that the BAG6–UBL4A–GET4 module is implicated in:

it is mechanistically plausible that perturbations could contribute to proteostasis-linked diseases, but the accessible primary clinical genetics evidence for GET4 specifically was limited in this run.

10) Visual evidence (complex architecture)

The cryo-EM figure extracted from Keszei et al. illustrates the cBUGG (cBag6–Ubl4a–Get4–Get3) architecture and how SGTA remodels it, supporting the “recruitment platform” concept for GET4/TRC35 function. (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto media 33007d62, keszei2021structuralinsightsinto media 2e1a5e15)

11) Summary table of functional annotation

The following table consolidates identity, molecular function, partners, localization, QC roles, and key references.

Entity / aspect Summary for human GET4 / TRC35 Key evidence / mechanism Evidence type Key references
Identity GET4 encodes the human guided entry of tail-anchored proteins factor 4; common aliases include TRC35, C7orf20, CEE, and CGI-20. It is the metazoan homolog of yeast Get4 and matches the UniProt target Q7L5D6 discussed in the GET/TRC literature (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23). Conserved assignment of metazoan Get4 to TRC35/GET4 in reviews and comparative pathway analyses (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23). Comparative pathway mapping, review Qin 2023, The Innovation Life, doi: https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013 ; Pool 2022, IJMS, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073773
Primary molecular function GET4/TRC35 is a cytosolic pretargeting scaffold/adaptor in the GET/TRC pathway for tail-anchored (TA) membrane proteins. It does not catalyze a chemical reaction; instead, it helps organize factors that capture, shield, and hand off hydrophobic TA transmembrane domains to the targeting ATPase TRC40/ASNA1 for ER delivery (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, shan2019guidingtailanchoredmembrane pages 2-4, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7). Reviews and structural work place Get4/TRC35 in the upstream relay between SGTA/Sgt2 and Get3/TRC40, promoting efficient substrate loading onto the ATPase (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, shan2019guidingtailanchoredmembrane pages 2-4, keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7). Review, biochemical, cryo-EM Shan 2019, JBC, doi: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.rev119.006197 ; Keszei 2021, Nat Struct Mol Biol, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7
Core complex composition In mammals, GET4/TRC35 is a stable component of the BAG6–UBL4A–GET4 pretargeting complex (often treated as the metazoan counterpart of yeast Get4/Get5). BAG6 binds both GET4/TRC35 and UBL4A/Get5; SGTA acts upstream in TA capture; TRC40/ASNA1 is the downstream targeting ATPase; ER insertion is completed at WRB/CAML (costa2017intracellulartargetingof pages 25-30, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3). Human/metazoan studies and reviews describe a heterotrimeric BAG6–UBL4A–TRC35 complex that receives TA substrates from SGTA and transfers them to TRC40 for delivery to WRB/CAML (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3). Structural, biochemical, review Mock 2017, PNAS, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114 ; Farkas & Bohnsack 2021, J Cell Biol, doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105004
Mechanistic role in TA targeting: capture and handoff Canonical handoff sequence: ribosome / chaperones → SGTA → BAG6–UBL4A–GET4(TRC35) → TRC40/ASNA1 → WRB/CAML at the ER. GET4/TRC35 helps create the recruitment platform that positions upstream factors for TA substrate transfer to Get3/TRC40; in metazoan cryo-EM, UBL4A-cBAG6-GET4 forms a recruitment platform above the Get3 substrate chamber (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7, keszei2021structuralinsightsinto media 33007d62). Keszei et al. defined a metazoan pretargeting architecture where Get4 helps position Ubl4a/BAG6 to recruit SGTA and promote substrate transfer; mutations affecting the secondary Get3–Get4 interface impaired SGTA→Get3 transfer without blocking Get3 substrate capture per se (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7). Cryo-EM, crosslinking, biochemical Keszei 2021, Nat Struct Mol Biol, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7 ; Figure context (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto media 33007d62)
Ribosome association / early targeting stage GET4/TRC35 functions early, close to the site of synthesis. Reviews describe the mammalian pretargeting machinery as ribosome-associated or ribosome-proximal, with TA capture occurring at or near the ribosome before handoff to TRC40; Get4/TRC35 was also identified among ribosome-associated proteins in comparative analyses (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23). Pool 2022 describes TRC35 within ribosome-associated BAG6 complexes; Qin 2023 discusses ribosome-proximal capture and competition near the tunnel exit; comparative analysis notes Get4 identification in ribosome-associated screens (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2, najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23). Review, proteomic / comparative inference Pool 2022, IJMS, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073773 ; Qin 2023, The Innovation Life, doi: https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013
Subcellular localization Best-supported localization is cytosolic, within the pretargeting complex acting before ER membrane insertion. Functionally, GET4/TRC35 is linked to ER targeting through its interaction network, but it is not itself the ER insertase; ER insertion is mediated by WRB/CAML after TRC40 delivery (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3). Cytosolic pretargeting role is consistently reported in reviews and structural studies; downstream localization step is ER membrane insertion by WRB/CAML, not by GET4 itself (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3). Review, structural Mock 2017, PNAS, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114 ; Farkas & Bohnsack 2021, J Cell Biol, doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105004
Control of BAG6 nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution A key human-specific mechanistic finding is that TRC35 masks the BAG6 nuclear localization sequence (NLS), thereby retaining BAG6 in the cytosol. Overexpression of TRC35 increases cytosolic retention of BAG6; structural analysis showed TRC35 occludes the first basic cluster of the BAG6 NLS (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3). Human crystal structure and biochemical assays support direct Bag6–TRC35 interfaces; buried surface metrics and mutational effects showed that physiological complex assembly regulates BAG6 localization (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3). Crystal structure, biochemical, cell biology Mock 2017, PNAS, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114
Quality control role: substrate triage GET4/TRC35 participates in a module that links TA targeting with cytosolic quality control. BAG6-containing complexes can direct hydrophobic or mislocalized clients either toward productive loading onto TRC40 or toward ubiquitin-proteasome degradation, helping prevent aggregation of exposed transmembrane segments (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, costa2017intracellulartargetingof pages 25-30, farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3, hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 1-3). Reviews emphasize the dual targeting-versus-degradation role of BAG6 complexes; Hagiwara 2023 further links this machinery to aggregate/proteotoxic stress responses (farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3, hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 1-3). Review, biochemical Farkas & Bohnsack 2021, J Cell Biol, doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105004 ; Hagiwara 2023, Biochem J, doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267
Quality control role: RNF126 and TRC35 stability Human studies indicate that unassembled or mutant TRC35 can become a target of RNF126-mediated ubiquitylation in the BAG6-associated quality-control network. Proper Bag6 association protects TRC35; Bag6-disrupting mutants increased Ub-conjugated TRC35 and lowered steady-state TRC35 levels, reversible by proteasome inhibition (MG132) (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3). Mock et al. identified RNF126 as a Bag6-associated E3 ligase implicated in TRC35 ubiquitylation and showed that disrupted physiological Bag6–TRC35 interaction destabilizes TRC35 (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3). Structural, biochemical, ubiquitination assay Mock 2017, PNAS, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114
Proteotoxic stress effects (2023) In 2023, proteotoxic stress studies showed that the TA recognition complex is stress-sensitive: polyQ aggregates, proteasome inhibition, and CCCP-induced mitochondrial depolarization promoted dissociation of UBL4A from BAG6, implying that the BAG6–UBL4A–GET4 module is remodeled under proteotoxic conditions and may shift away from normal TA biogenesis (hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 7-10, hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 1-3). Hagiwara et al. reported quantitative assays: co-IP with n = 6 biological replicates analyzed by Student’s t-test; NanoBiT CCCP time-course n = 3, P < 0.01; CCCP 4 h assay n = 4, Welch’s t-test, P < 0.01 (hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 7-10). Biochemical, cell assay, quantitative stress biology Hagiwara 2023, Biochem J, doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267
Related nuclear / DNA-damage context The strongest direct evidence concerns BAG6, not GET4 as an autonomous nuclear factor. Because TRC35 controls BAG6 cytosolic retention, it indirectly interfaces with BAG6’s reported nuclear functions in p300 acetylation, histone methylation, and DNA-damage signaling-mediated cell death; however, direct GET4-specific nuclear signaling functions remain less established than its pretargeting role (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2). Mock 2017 explicitly ties TRC35 to BAG6 localization control while noting BAG6 nuclear functions; evidence is indirect for GET4 beyond localization control (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2). Structural, cell biology, literature synthesis Mock 2017, PNAS, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114
2023–2024 broader relevance / applications Recent literature places GET4/TRC35-containing BAG6 complexes in broader proteostasis surveillance, including mitigation of aberrant noncoding translation products and maintenance of membrane protein biogenesis fidelity. One 2023 Nature study identified BAG6, TRC35/GET4, RNF126, SGTA, and UBL4A in this surveillance axis (OpenTargets Search: -GET4). Disease links in Open Targets are currently association-level rather than definitive mechanism-level annotations for GET4 itself (OpenTargets Search: -GET4). Evidence supports translational quality control relevance but not yet a mature clinical application directly targeting GET4; Open Targets associations include neurodegenerative disease and congenital disorder of glycosylation type IIy, but these should be interpreted cautiously as evidence aggregation rather than causal proof (OpenTargets Search: -GET4). Genetics / CRISPRi association, database aggregation Kesner 2023, Nature, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05946-4 ; Open Targets context (OpenTargets Search: -GET4)

Table: This table summarizes the best-supported functions, interactions, localization, quality-control roles, and recent developments for human GET4/TRC35 (UniProt Q7L5D6). It emphasizes experimentally grounded mechanisms in tail-anchored protein targeting and distinguishes direct evidence from broader association-level disease links.

12) Key takeaways (functional annotation statement)

Human GET4/TRC35 (UniProt Q7L5D6) is a conserved, cytosolic, ribosome-proximal pretargeting scaffold in the TRC/GET pathway that promotes handoff of nascent tail-anchored membrane proteins from SGTA to the targeting ATPase TRC40/ASNA1, enabling delivery to the ER insertase WRB/CAML. Its best-supported additional roles are in proteostasis-linked triage (via the BAG6 module), including regulation of BAG6 localization through NLS masking and stabilization of TRC35 by preventing inappropriate RNF126/proteasome-mediated degradation of unassembled TRC35; and the complex is stress-sensitive, with proteotoxic insults promoting dissociation of UBL4A–BAG6 interactions. (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2, keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7, pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9, mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3, hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 7-10)

References

  1. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20): V Najdrová. Conserved mechanism for targeting of tail-anchored proteins in eukaryotes. Unknown journal, 2022.

  2. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23): V Najdrová. Conserved mechanism for targeting of tail-anchored proteins in eukaryotes. Unknown journal, 2022.

  3. (najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 88-98): V Najdrová. Conserved mechanism for targeting of tail-anchored proteins in eukaryotes. Unknown journal, 2022.

  4. (farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3): Ákos Farkas and Katherine E. Bohnsack. Capture and delivery of tail-anchored proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. The Journal of Cell Biology, Jul 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105004, doi:10.1083/jcb.202105004. This article has 49 citations.

  5. (pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9): Martin R. Pool. Targeting of proteins for translocation at the endoplasmic reticulum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23:3773, Mar 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073773, doi:10.3390/ijms23073773. This article has 41 citations.

  6. (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7): Alexander F. A. Keszei, Matthew C. J. Yip, Ta-Chien Hsieh, and Sichen Shao. Structural insights into metazoan pretargeting get complexes. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 28:1029-1037, Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7, doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7. This article has 16 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2): Jee-Young Mock, Yue Xu, Yihong Ye, and William M. Clemons. Structural basis for regulation of the nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution of bag6 by trc35. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114:11679-11684, Oct 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114, doi:10.1073/pnas.1702940114. This article has 29 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto media 33007d62): Alexander F. A. Keszei, Matthew C. J. Yip, Ta-Chien Hsieh, and Sichen Shao. Structural insights into metazoan pretargeting get complexes. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 28:1029-1037, Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7, doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7. This article has 16 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2): Qing Qin, Kang Shen, and Xiangming Wang. Targeting and surveillance mechanisms for tail-anchored proteins. The Innovation Life, 1:100013, Jan 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013, doi:10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013. This article has 2 citations.

  10. (mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3): Jee-Young Mock, Yue Xu, Yihong Ye, and William M. Clemons. Structural basis for regulation of the nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution of bag6 by trc35. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114:11679-11684, Oct 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114, doi:10.1073/pnas.1702940114. This article has 29 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (costa2017intracellulartargetingof pages 25-30): B. F. Costa, S. Colombo, P. Cassella, and N. Borgese. 'intracellular targeting of tail-anchored proteins'. Text, Jan 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.13130/b-g-figueiredo-costa_phd2017-01-27, doi:10.13130/b-g-figueiredo-costa_phd2017-01-27. This article has 0 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  12. (hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 7-10): Takumi Hagiwara, Ryosuke Minami, Chizuru Ushio, Naoto Yokota, and Hiroyuki Kawahara. Proteotoxic stresses stimulate dissociation of ubl4a from the tail-anchored protein recognition complex. Biochemical Journal, 480:1583-1598, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267, doi:10.1042/bcj20230267. This article has 0 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  13. (hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 1-3): Takumi Hagiwara, Ryosuke Minami, Chizuru Ushio, Naoto Yokota, and Hiroyuki Kawahara. Proteotoxic stresses stimulate dissociation of ubl4a from the tail-anchored protein recognition complex. Biochemical Journal, 480:1583-1598, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267, doi:10.1042/bcj20230267. This article has 0 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (OpenTargets Search: -GET4): Open Targets Query (-GET4, 5 results). Buniello, A. et al. (2025). Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Research.

  15. (shan2019guidingtailanchoredmembrane pages 2-4): Shu-ou Shan. Guiding tail-anchored membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum in a chaperone cascade. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 294:16577-16586, Nov 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.rev119.006197, doi:10.1074/jbc.rev119.006197. This article has 41 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (keszei2021structuralinsightsinto media 2e1a5e15): Alexander F. A. Keszei, Matthew C. J. Yip, Ta-Chien Hsieh, and Sichen Shao. Structural insights into metazoan pretargeting get complexes. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 28:1029-1037, Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7, doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7. This article has 16 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 88-98
  2. pool2022targetingofproteins pages 7-9
  3. keszei2021structuralinsightsinto pages 6-7
  4. mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 1-2
  5. mock2017structuralbasisfor pages 2-3
  6. qin2023targetingandsurveillance pages 1-2
  7. hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 7-10
  8. farkas2021captureanddelivery pages 1-3
  9. najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 16-20
  10. najdrova2022conservedmechanismfor pages 20-23
  11. costa2017intracellulartargetingof pages 25-30
  12. hagiwara2023proteotoxicstressesstimulate pages 1-3
  13. shan2019guidingtailanchoredmembrane pages 2-4
  14. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013
  15. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267
  16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05946-4
  17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073773
  18. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.rev119.006197
  19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7
  20. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114
  21. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105004
  22. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202105004,
  23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073773,
  24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-021-00690-7,
  25. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702940114,
  26. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-life.2023.100013,
  27. https://doi.org/10.13130/b-g-figueiredo-costa_phd2017-01-27,
  28. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20230267,
  29. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.rev119.006197,