RFC3 (P38629, YNL290W) notes
2026-10-21 — Full re-review, independent of the ProtNLM2 predictions
Context: RFC3 is the closest experimentally characterised relative of the ProtNLM2 benchmark gene
SCHPO/rfc3 (O14003). This review was done without consulting any ProtNLM2 output.
Deep research
just deep-research-falcon yeast RFC3 --fallback perplexity-lite failed: falcon returned
"Failed to authenticate" and the perplexity-lite fallback returned HTTP 401 (insufficient quota).
No deep-research file was produced. The review is based on the cached publications (21 GOA-cited
papers plus PMID:14530260, PMID:15964801, PMID:15201901 fetched for this review) and the UniProt record.
Evolutionary grounding
- PANTHER: PTHR11669 (RFC / DNA pol III gamma-tau), subfamily PTHR11669:SF9, whose official name is
"REPLICATION FACTOR C SUBUNIT 5". The pombe benchmark protein rfc3 (O14003) is in the same subfamily
(family review interpro/panther/PTHR11669/PTHR11669-review.yaml), so S. cerevisiae RFC3 and
S. pombe rfc3 are orthologs. PANTHER subfamily numbering does not follow yeast gene numbering.
- PAINT nodes: PTN000186209 (RFC small subunits: clamp loader activity, RFC complex, DNA repair),
PTN000186208 (DNA-templated DNA replication; deeper node including bacterial donors),
PTN000912313 (Rad17/Ctf18/Elg1 RFC-like complexes; yeast RFC3 SGD:S000005234 is a donor),
PTN001705380 (nucleus). RFC3 is a donor for several of these; this is expected, not circular.
- DNA clamp unloader activity (GO:0061860): QuickGO shows yeast annotations only on the complex
(CPX-422, IDA PMID:23499004); IBA rows sit on the large subunits (human RFC1, ATAD5). PomBase gives
the S. pombe small subunits including rfc3 an IC annotation (PMID:16040599). PAINT did not propagate
this to the small-subunit node; I treat that as deliberate and did not add a NEW row. It is raised as
a suggested question.
Experimentally established in S. cerevisiae (with Rfc3 itself, or its complexes)
Complex-level / inferred (not dissected for Rfc3)
- Sister chromatid cohesion: rfc4-ts and rfc5-1 alleles show precocious separation; no rfc3 allele
tested in the cited papers. Kept as non-core.
- Mismatch repair / DNA repair: via general PCNA loading; review-level (TAS) and IBA. Kept as non-core.
- Leading strand elongation (IDA PMID:1346062) designation is "by analogy" with SV40; RFC acts on both
strands. Kept as non-core; general strand elongation is core.
Decisions summary
- All 15 GO:0005515 protein binding IPI rows REMOVE (complex membership is captured by CC terms).
- Cytosol (hypoxia relocalization study) KEEP_AS_NON_CORE.
- All complex, clamp loader, ATPase, ATP binding, replication and nucleus rows ACCEPT.