No deep-research provider was available; literature collected by PubMed search
and cached abstracts or full texts. PMID:16030218 (Kosono et al. 2005) is
abstract-only here (PMC1196046 is a scanned PDF). Verdicts kept consistent
with the completed PA1055 (ShaC) and PA1057 (ShaE) reviews.
PTN002162906 = PTHR34702 root (LUCA), 19 leaves/16 taxa. GOA: 19 GO_Central
GO:0015385 IBAs plus 272 TreeGrafter rows with the same with/from (live
QuickGO). Sole seed PA1058. B. subtilis MrpF (O05228) has no experimental
GO:0015385 row. No GO:0035725 IBA from this node. Includes Thermococcus MBH
subunit B proteins TK2081 (MbhB) and TK1225 (MbxB).
| PTN node | node term | n_seeds | leaf IBAs | seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) | verdict | rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTN002162906 | GO:0015385 sodium:proton antiporter activity | 1 (sole) | 19 (GO_Central; plus 272 TreeGrafter) | GO:0015385, IMP, PMID:16030218 | INDIRECT-PHENOTYPE | The abstract describes no PA1058 mutant. The evidence is a PA1054 disruption plus whole-cluster complementation of E. coli TO114, which shows the Sha complex is an antiporter. Right as contributes_to (MrpF Asp32 is needed for antiport and assembly), not as enables + IMP. The LUCA-root node also covers MBH/MBX hydrogenase subunit B proteins (TK2081, TK1225), for which a stand-alone antiporter MF is doubtful. |
PMID:16030218 is still abstract-only here: the PubMed MCP returns no body
text (the PMC copy, PMC1196046, is a scanned PDF the publisher does not
release as XML), and the PMC, Europe PMC and ASM pages were not retrievable.
The WRONG_EVIDENCE_CODE (IMP) defects on this gene rest on the abstract not
describing a mutant of this gene, so they are lowered from PROBABLE to
SUSPECTED. The WRONG_QUALIFIER defects (enables vs contributes_to) rest on
positive statements in other Mrp papers and stay PROBABLE. The reference
correctness for PMID:16030218 is changed from MISCITED to UNVERIFIED.
Annotation actions are unchanged.
The full text of Kosono et al. 2005 was supplied by the user and read. It
supersedes the earlier notes above that describe this paper as abstract-only.
The only sha mutant the paper constructs is the PA1054 insertion; the
cluster-level evidence comes from expressing the whole PA1054-PA1059 cluster,
or the cluster with PA1054 disrupted, in an antiporter-deficient E. coli
strain. There is no PA1058 mutant, so the IMP evidence-code defects on PA1058 are CONFIRMED.