DGUOK (Q16854) review notes

Human deoxyguanosine kinase, mitochondrial. Deep research via falcon was unavailable
(provider out of credits, HTTP 402); this review is grounded in the UniProt record,
the seeded GOA TSV, and the cached publications.

Core biology

Localisation

Disease

Annotation-review reasoning highlights

2026-10-17 evidence reassessment

This entry supersedes the earlier action rationale while preserving it as a record. The source guide gives public originals, figure/table locators, source-role distinctions and access limits.

The full original PMID:8692979, Table 1 reports low dCyd phosphorylation. The earlier absolute purine-specificity and paralog-leakage claims are therefore withdrawn. The actual PAINT lineage contains the relevant ancestral nodes, and target self-evidence is legitimate. The inherited dCyd activity remains non-core. Human mitochondrial-enriched fibroblast assays (PMID:17073823(https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1798436/)) and muscle assays (PMID:23043144(https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3501975/)) corroborate dA/dG phosphorylation without proving equal activity of all six products. dIno yields dIMP; it is not another source of dGMP or dAMP.

The sperm-nucleus contamination rationale is also withdrawn. The coauthor's original supporting catalogue in thesis Appendix 8.2/Table 8.1 identifies Q16854 with two peptides and 13.4% coverage. The specialized nuclear detection is retained as non-core; no nuclear catalytic mechanism is inferred. Broad cytoplasm includes organelles and is compatible with matrix residence. Matrix-specific replacements cite independent human evidence and the explicit Reactome catalyst, rather than claiming each localization source resolved that compartment.

The two DCK interactions are retained with the supported kinase-binding partner class. Exact BioPlex records and the released U2OS edge establish co-complex associations, not purified direct binding, native mitochondrial heterodimers or activation. Rat-source tracing recovers genuine neurite and respiratory phenotype experiments. The neurite effect is retained as context-specific; electron-transport assignment is marked as mechanistically over-annotated because DGUOK supplies nucleotide precursors rather than performing electron transfer.

All 32 historical source dictionaries and six product objects remain intact. Current QuickGO source-version differences are described separately. The two core entries represent two reactions of one enzyme; no new annotation is proposed. Existing publication and provider files remain unchanged. The current provider attempt failed authentication/quota checks, and the source guide records the manual evidence used instead.

2026-10-17 ATP-binding and source-anchor clarification

ATP binding is retained as a true component of the enzyme mechanism, rather than replaced by kinase terms from a different ontology branch. The recombinant human assay uses ATP directly (PMID:8692979(https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC38970/), p.7259, Enzyme Assays/Table 1). The source guide now exposes the original low dCyd activity sentence and exact table values without altering the abstract-only publication cache. Focused cache-valid quotations were added to selected assertions, within a 25-word total per paper including inherited note quotations.

The two rat-source annotations describe different kinds of claims. The positive neurite screen supports a contextual negative-regulatory phenotype (PMID:18007665(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18007665/)); the exact DGUOK rat-validation panel remains inaccessible and is retained with explicit curator deference. This does not identify a direct axonal mechanism. In contrast, the respiratory phenotype reflects nucleotide supply and mtDNA integrity (PMID:30404003(https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6289059/), Figure 3), without demonstrating electron transfer by DGUOK. The non-core versus over-annotation distinction follows those term definitions, not different treatment of the same ortholog.

The homodimer is supported by curated structural evidence, and the mitochondrial targeting sequence remains a prediction rather than a newly mapped cleavage site. No equal-function claim is made for the six alternative products. Prior notes, including superseded judgments and inherited markup, are retained unchanged.