Functional-annotation report: *Drosophila melanogaster* CG13494 (Q8MZA7) Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 23 citations 1 artifacts 2026-09-10T14:51:26.977894

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Functional-annotation report: Drosophila melanogaster CG13494 (Q8MZA7)

Executive conclusion

The gene symbol “CG13494” is literature-limited for this specific protein. The supplied UniProt metadata consistently identifies the target as Drosophila melanogaster CG13494, FlyBase FBgn0034671, UniProt Q8MZA7, submitted protein name AT17606p, and EMBL translation AAM29281.1. Exact searches of all identifiers found neither a conflicting similarly named protein nor a gene-specific mechanistic publication. Thus, the search did not drift to another organism or gene.

No experimentally supported molecular function, catalytic reaction, substrate specificity, transporter substrate, protein family/domain, subcellular localization, pathway, interaction, or phenotype could be assigned. “AT17606p” is a submitted sequence name, not a functional description. The correct current annotation is therefore uncharacterized protein encoded by CG13494, rather than an enzyme, transporter, receptor, or structural protein of known class.

1. Identity verification

The identity chain provided in the query is internally coherent:

No independent publication-level alias was recovered. The identifier linkage above therefore rests on the supplied UniProt record metadata, not on a gene-specific experimental paper. This distinction matters because UniProtKB reviewed entries receive expert integration of functional domains, active sites, ligand-binding sites, variants, and post-translational modifications, whereas unreviewed entries are enriched mainly through automated annotation systems. Automated annotations should consequently be treated as predictions rather than experimental findings (Bateman et al., published online 21 November 2022; 2023 database issue; https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1052) (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 1-1, bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4).

2. Literature-search outcome

Exact Google Scholar searches were performed for “CG13494,” “FBgn0034671,” “Q8MZA7,” “AT17606p,” and “AAM29281.1,” both without date limits and with priority filtering for 2023–2024. Full-text and supplementary-material searches were then performed across 68 retrieved papers covering FlyBase, UniProt, Drosophila transcriptomics/proteomics, single-cell atlases, signaling pathways, and protein-family annotation.

No exact identifier was found in the retrieved literature. In particular, neither the Fly Cell Atlas nor the retrieved 2023–2024 tissue/cell-atlas papers mentioned CG13494 or FBgn0034671 in searchable article text or supplements (li2022flycellatlas pages 4-6, ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1, ferreira2023anatlasof pages 21-27, li2022flycellatlas pages 11-13). This is a negative literature-retrieval result—not evidence that the gene is unexpressed, dispensable, or biologically inactive.

3. Current functional understanding

Annotation category Current conclusion Evidence level What would establish it
Identity CG13494 = FBgn0034671 = UniProt Q8MZA7 = AT17606p, in Drosophila melanogaster, according to the user-provided UniProt metadata; EMBL protein accession AAM29281.1 is linked there. No conflicting same-symbol target was found. Identifier cross-reference supplied in the query; not independently demonstrated by a gene-specific paper Concordant current FlyBase, UniProtKB, and NCBI records plus sequence-level mapping of the gene model to Q8MZA7
Protein name/status The available name is the submitted annotation “AT17606p”; no experimentally validated descriptive protein name was recovered. This indicates an uncharacterized/unnamed product, not evidence that it lacks function. UniProt distinguishes expert-reviewed records from automatically annotated unreviewed records, so provenance matters (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 1-1, bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4). Database nomenclature only Manual curation supported by a biochemical, genetic, structural, or cell-biological study
Family/domains Unknown. The supplied UniProt information specifies neither a protein family nor domains. No family assignment was recovered from the searched literature; this is missing annotation, not evidence of domain absence. InterPro is an appropriate resource for sequence-family and domain inference (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4). No target-specific evidence InterPro/Pfam/CDD/HHpred results supported by conserved residues, orthology, and preferably an experimental or high-confidence structure
Molecular function, reaction, or substrate Unknown. There is no defensible classification as an enzyme, transporter, receptor, structural protein, or adaptor; consequently, no reaction, catalytic residues, ligand, transported substrate, or substrate specificity can be assigned. No target-specific biochemical or genetic evidence Purified-protein assays, activity-based profiling, ligand/transport measurements, catalytic-mutant tests, or validated close-ortholog function
Cellular localization Unknown. No evidence was recovered for cytosolic, nuclear, organellar, membrane, secreted, or extracellular localization. No microscopy, fractionation, topology, or gene-specific proteomic evidence Endogenous fluorescent tagging and microscopy, biochemical fractionation, proximity labeling, or independently validated signal-peptide/transmembrane predictions
Pathway Unknown. CG13494 cannot presently be placed in a signaling or metabolic pathway from the retrieved evidence. FlyBase’s pathway resource deliberately weights experimentally reported evidence, which is the appropriate standard here (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1, ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 2-3). No gene-specific pathway evidence Reproducible genetic epistasis, pathway-responsive molecular readouts, physical interaction with pathway components, or curated experimental GO/pathway annotations
Expression No gene-specific expression value or tissue/cell-type enrichment was recovered. This is an evidence gap, not proof of non-expression. FlyBase integrates FlyAtlas2 and Fly Cell Atlas displays, but detection depends on sampling and sequencing depth (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1). The Fly Cell Atlas used approximately 510,000 stringent-profile nuclei/cells across 15 adult tissues and annotated 251 cell types, with substantial modality and tissue-sampling differences (li2022flycellatlas pages 4-6). Potential high-throughput resources exist, but no target-specific result was verified Direct query and export of CG13494 counts from FlyBase/FlyAtlas2/Fly Cell Atlas, followed by RT-qPCR, RNA in situ hybridization, reporter, or endogenous protein validation
Phenotype/interactions Unknown. No validated loss-of-function, gain-of-function, viability, developmental, physiological, genetic-interaction, or protein-interaction result was recovered. This does not mean perturbation is phenotypically silent. No target-specific experimental evidence Defined CRISPR null alleles with rescue, tissue-specific RNAi replicated with independent reagents, quantitative phenotyping, and orthogonal interaction assays
Literature coverage Exact searches for CG13494, FBgn0034671, Q8MZA7, AT17606p, and AAM29281.1, including 2023–2024 searches and full-text/supplement scanning of the retrieved corpus, found no gene-specific mechanistic paper or exact mention. Current FlyBase updates emphasize integrated functional, orthology, and single-cell evidence, but their general availability cannot substitute for target-specific findings (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1, ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-2). Systematic negative literature-retrieval result; not a negative biological result A publication indexed under any verified alias, a curated FlyBase reference, or primary data explicitly mapping an experiment to FBgn0034671/Q8MZA7

Table: Evidence audit for CG13494 separates verified identifier metadata from unresolved biological annotation. “Unknown” denotes missing target-specific evidence, not evidence that the activity, localization, expression, or phenotype is absent.

Molecular function and substrate

There is no basis for classifying Q8MZA7 as an enzyme, transporter, receptor, adaptor, or structural component. Accordingly:

Assigning any reaction from a weakly similar protein would be unsafe without a verified family assignment, conservation of catalytic residues, and preferably experimental activity. This is especially important because UniProt’s automated systems use InterPro family/domain predictions and rule-based propagation to annotate unreviewed proteins; UniProt reported 8,280 such UniRules in release 2022_03 (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4).

Protein family and domains

The supplied record specifies no protein family or domain, and none was recovered from gene-specific literature. This means domain status is unknown, not that the protein has no domains. InterPro is the appropriate first-line resource because it integrates sequence signatures to classify proteins into families and identify functional domains and conserved regions (Paysan-Lafosse et al., 2023; https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac993). Any resulting assignment would remain computational until supported by conserved active-site architecture, orthology, structure, or experiment. UniProt explicitly uses InterPro predictions in automated annotation propagation (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4).

Cellular localization

No target-specific microscopy, fractionation, topology, secretion, proximity-labeling, or organellar-proteomics evidence was found. Q8MZA7 therefore cannot currently be assigned to the nucleus, cytosol, plasma membrane, endomembrane system, mitochondrion, extracellular space, or another compartment.

Localization should first be predicted from the actual Q8MZA7 sequence—signal peptide, transmembrane helices, organelle-targeting peptides, and disorder—and then tested by endogenous tagging. Prediction alone should not be reported as localization evidence.

Biological processes and pathways

No experimentally supported pathway assignment was recovered. In particular, there is no evidence placing CG13494 in a signaling cascade, metabolic pathway, developmental module, or trafficking process. This absence is meaningful as an annotation gap because the modern FlyBase signaling resource systematically curates 17 pathways while restricting its evidence-weighted framework to experimental findings reported in the literature (Attrill et al., January 2024; https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.202255). FlyBase also provides GO summaries, pathway/gene-group comparisons, enrichment analysis, enzyme-reaction graphics, and updated DIOPT/OrthoDB orthology integrations (Öztürk-Çolak et al., published 1 February 2024; https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad211) (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1, ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 2-3).

Expression

No CG13494-specific expression value or enriched tissue/cell type was verified from the retrieved texts. Current resources can support such analysis, but a database display must be queried directly for this identifier before making a gene-specific claim.

FlyBase integrates FlyAtlas2 bulk RNA-seq and Fly Cell Atlas single-nucleus data. Its displays distinguish the fraction of cells detecting a transcript from the mean expression among transcript-positive cells; these quantities should not be conflated (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1). FlyAtlas2 covers 13 male and female adult tissues, five sex-specific tissues, eight larval tissues, and larval garland-cell nephrocytes (Krause et al., 2022; https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab971).

The Fly Cell Atlas retained approximately 510,000 profiles in its stringent dataset and 570,000 in its relaxed dataset, spanning 15 adult tissues and 251 annotated cell types. Tissue sampling ranged from approximately 6,500 to 100,000 10x profiles, and Smart-seq2 detected more genes because of deeper sequencing. Unequal tissue sampling, modality-dependent sensitivity, transcript dropout, cluster merging, and batch correction therefore mean that failure to detect CG13494 would not prove biological absence (Li et al., March 2022; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2432) (li2022flycellatlas pages 4-6).

Phenotypes and interactions

No validated loss-of-function, gain-of-function, developmental, viability, fertility, physiological, genetic-interaction, or protein-interaction phenotype was recovered. Likewise, no direct interaction partner was identified. This must be interpreted as not studied or not retrievable, rather than “no phenotype.”

4. Recent developments relevant to annotation

No 2023–2024 publication directly characterized CG13494. The principal recent advances are instead improvements in the infrastructure capable of studying it:

  1. FlyBase 2024 introduced or improved single-cell displays, functional summaries, orthology pipelines, reaction graphics, and analysis tools. Approximately 20 high-level cell types are represented in its Gene Report ribbon, with links to finer cell types and underlying datasets (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1, ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 2-3).
  2. Experiment-weighted pathway curation now provides a stringent standard for determining whether a fly gene genuinely belongs to one of 17 curated signaling pathways, rather than relying on association or prediction alone.
  3. Expression Atlas 2024 supports harmonized bulk and single-cell expression exploration at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/ and https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/. Its authors caution that single-cell proteomics remains instrument-limited and that many available datasets are still primarily methodological, constraining protein-level localization inference (George et al., 2024; https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1021) (george2024expressionatlasupdate pages 6-8).
  4. UniProt/InterPro automation provides broad sequence and structural coverage but does not replace experimental validation. UniProtKB contained more than 227 million sequences, and AlphaFold structures were accessible for over 85% of entries at the time of the 2023 report; such a model may guide experiments but cannot by itself establish biochemical function (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 1-1).

5. Real-world implementation status

There is no identified real-world application specifically involving CG13494—no validated assay, engineered fly model described in a paper, diagnostic use, drug target, industrial enzyme application, or pathway reporter. At present its practical use is as a candidate uncharacterized Drosophila ORF for functional-genomics investigation.

The most immediately actionable implementations are database- and experiment-based:

  1. Retrieve the current Q8MZA7 sequence and confirm exact concordance with the FlyBase FBgn0034671 translation.
  2. Run InterProScan/Pfam/CDD and sensitive profile searches such as HHpred; inspect whether multiple methods converge on the same family.
  3. Examine an AlphaFold model for fold-level similarity, while checking per-residue confidence and predicted alignment error.
  4. Query FlyBase, FlyAtlas2, Fly Cell Atlas, modENCODE, and Expression Atlas directly using FBgn0034671, exporting quantitative counts rather than relying only on colored summary tiles.
  5. Generate an endogenous fluorescent knock-in to determine protein localization and abundance without overexpression artifacts.
  6. Create a defined CRISPR null allele, verify molecular loss, and perform genomic or cDNA rescue. Tissue-specific knockdown should use independent reagents and be interpreted cautiously.
  7. Select biochemical assays only after family/domain analysis produces a testable mechanistic hypothesis. If an enzyme family is predicted, test candidate substrates and catalytic-site mutants; if membrane topology is predicted, conduct transport or ligand-binding assays.

6. Evidence-weighted interpretation

The authoritative interpretation is conservative: CG13494/Q8MZA7 is a real annotated D. melanogaster protein-coding target whose precise biological role remains unresolved in the accessible literature. There is currently no defensible “primary function,” pathway, substrate, or cellular site of action to report. The strongest next step is sequence- and structure-guided family identification followed by endogenous localization and null/rescue genetics. Only after those results converge should a biochemical function be assigned.

Key references

References

  1. (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 1-1): A. Bateman, M. Martin, S. Orchard, M. Magrane, Shadab Ahmad, E. Alpi, E. Bowler-Barnett, R. Britto, Hema Bye-A-Jee, Austra Cukura, Paul Denny, Tunca Dogan, Thankgod Ebenezer, Jun Fan, Penelope Garmiri, Leonardo Jose da Costa Gonzales, E. Hatton-Ellis, Abdulrahman Hussein, A. Ignatchenko, Giuseppe Insana, Rizwan Ishtiaq, Vishal Joshi, Dushyanth Jyothi, Swaathi Kandasaamy, A. Lock, Aurélien Luciani, Marija Lugarić, Jie Luo, Yvonne Lussi, Alistair MacDougall, F. Madeira, Mahdi Mahmoudy, Alok Mishra, Katie Moulang, Andrew Nightingale, Sangya Pundir, G. Qi, Shriya Raj, P. Raposo, Daniel L Rice, Rabie Saidi, Rafael Santos, Elena Speretta, J. Stephenson, Prabhat Totoo, Edward Turner, N. Tyagi, Preethi Vasudev, Kate Warner, Xavier Watkins, Rossana Zaru, H. Zellner, A. Bridge, L. Aimo, Ghislaine Argoud-Puy, A. Auchincloss, K. Axelsen, Parit Bansal, Delphine Baratin, Teresa M Batista Neto, M. Blatter, Jerven T. Bolleman, E. Boutet, L. Breuza, B. Gil, Cristina Casals-Casas, Kamal Chikh Echioukh, E. Coudert, Béatrice A. Cuche, E. de Castro, A. Estreicher, M. Famiglietti, M. Feuermann, E. Gasteiger, P. Gaudet, S. Gehant, V. Gerritsen, A. Gos, N. Gruaz, C. Hulo, Nevila Hyka-Nouspikel, F. Jungo, A. Kerhornou, Philippe le Mercier, D. Lieberherr, P. Masson, A. Morgat, Venkatesh Muthukrishnan, S. Paesano, I. Pedruzzi, S. Pilbout, L. Pourcel, S. Poux, Monica Pozzato, Manuela Pruess, Nicole Redaschi, C. Rivoire, Christian J. A. Sigrist, K. Sonesson, S. Sundaram, Cathy H. Wu, C. Arighi, L. Arminski, Chuming Chen, Yongxing Chen, Hongzhan Huang, K. Laiho, P. McGarvey, D. Natale, Karen E. Ross, C. R. Vinayaka, Qinghua Wang, Yuqi Wang, and Jian Zhang. Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research, 51:D523-D531, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1052, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1052. This article has 6201 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4): A. Bateman, M. Martin, S. Orchard, M. Magrane, Shadab Ahmad, E. Alpi, E. Bowler-Barnett, R. Britto, Hema Bye-A-Jee, Austra Cukura, Paul Denny, Tunca Dogan, Thankgod Ebenezer, Jun Fan, Penelope Garmiri, Leonardo Jose da Costa Gonzales, E. Hatton-Ellis, Abdulrahman Hussein, A. Ignatchenko, Giuseppe Insana, Rizwan Ishtiaq, Vishal Joshi, Dushyanth Jyothi, Swaathi Kandasaamy, A. Lock, Aurélien Luciani, Marija Lugarić, Jie Luo, Yvonne Lussi, Alistair MacDougall, F. Madeira, Mahdi Mahmoudy, Alok Mishra, Katie Moulang, Andrew Nightingale, Sangya Pundir, G. Qi, Shriya Raj, P. Raposo, Daniel L Rice, Rabie Saidi, Rafael Santos, Elena Speretta, J. Stephenson, Prabhat Totoo, Edward Turner, N. Tyagi, Preethi Vasudev, Kate Warner, Xavier Watkins, Rossana Zaru, H. Zellner, A. Bridge, L. Aimo, Ghislaine Argoud-Puy, A. Auchincloss, K. Axelsen, Parit Bansal, Delphine Baratin, Teresa M Batista Neto, M. Blatter, Jerven T. Bolleman, E. Boutet, L. Breuza, B. Gil, Cristina Casals-Casas, Kamal Chikh Echioukh, E. Coudert, Béatrice A. Cuche, E. de Castro, A. Estreicher, M. Famiglietti, M. Feuermann, E. Gasteiger, P. Gaudet, S. Gehant, V. Gerritsen, A. Gos, N. Gruaz, C. Hulo, Nevila Hyka-Nouspikel, F. Jungo, A. Kerhornou, Philippe le Mercier, D. Lieberherr, P. Masson, A. Morgat, Venkatesh Muthukrishnan, S. Paesano, I. Pedruzzi, S. Pilbout, L. Pourcel, S. Poux, Monica Pozzato, Manuela Pruess, Nicole Redaschi, C. Rivoire, Christian J. A. Sigrist, K. Sonesson, S. Sundaram, Cathy H. Wu, C. Arighi, L. Arminski, Chuming Chen, Yongxing Chen, Hongzhan Huang, K. Laiho, P. McGarvey, D. Natale, Karen E. Ross, C. R. Vinayaka, Qinghua Wang, Yuqi Wang, and Jian Zhang. Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research, 51:D523-D531, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1052, doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1052. This article has 6201 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (li2022flycellatlas pages 4-6): Hongjie Li, Jasper Janssens, Maxime De Waegeneer, Sai Saroja Kolluru, Kristofer Davie, Vincent Gardeux, Wouter Saelens, Fabrice P. A. David, Maria Brbić, Katina Spanier, Jure Leskovec, Colleen N. McLaughlin, Qijing Xie, Robert C. Jones, Katja Brueckner, Jiwon Shim, Sudhir Gopal Tattikota, Frank Schnorrer, Katja Rust, Todd G. Nystul, Zita Carvalho-Santos, Carlos Ribeiro, Soumitra Pal, Sharvani Mahadevaraju, Teresa M. Przytycka, Aaron M. Allen, Stephen F. Goodwin, Cameron W. Berry, Margaret T. Fuller, Helen White-Cooper, Erika L. Matunis, Stephen DiNardo, Anthony Galenza, Lucy Erin O’Brien, Julian A. T. Dow, Heinrich Jasper, Brian Oliver, Norbert Perrimon, Bart Deplancke, Stephen R. Quake, Liqun Luo, Stein Aerts, Devika Agarwal, Yasir Ahmed-Braimah, Michelle Arbeitman, Majd M. Ariss, Jordan Augsburger, Kumar Ayush, Catherine C. Baker, Torsten Banisch, Katja Birker, Rolf Bodmer, Benjamin Bolival, Susanna E. Brantley, Julie A. Brill, Nora C. Brown, Norene A. Buehner, Xiaoyu Tracy Cai, Rita Cardoso-Figueiredo, Fernando Casares, Amy Chang, Thomas R. Clandinin, Sheela Crasta, Claude Desplan, Angela M. Detweiler, Darshan B. Dhakan, Erika Donà, Stefanie Engert, Swann Floc’hlay, Nancy George, Amanda J. González-Segarra, Andrew K. Groves, Samantha Gumbin, Yanmeng Guo, Devon E. Harris, Yael Heifetz, Stephen L. Holtz, Felix Horns, Bruno Hudry, Ruei-Jiun Hung, Yuh Nung Jan, Jacob S. Jaszczak, Gregory S. X. E. Jefferis, Jim Karkanias, Timothy L. Karr, Nadja Sandra Katheder, James Kezos, Anna A. Kim, Seung K. Kim, Lutz Kockel, Nikolaos Konstantinides, Thomas B. Kornberg, Henry M. Krause, Andrew Thomas Labott, Meghan Laturney, Ruth Lehmann, Sarah Leinwand, Jiefu Li, Joshua Shing Shun Li, Kai Li, Ke Li, Liying Li, Tun Li, Maria Litovchenko, Han-Hsuan Liu, Yifang Liu, Tzu-Chiao Lu, Jonathan Manning, Anjeli Mase, Mikaela Matera-Vatnick, Neuza Reis Matias, Caitlin E. McDonough-Goldstein, Aaron McGeever, Alex D. McLachlan, Paola Moreno-Roman, Norma Neff, Megan Neville, Sang Ngo, Tanja Nielsen, Caitlin E. O’Brien, David Osumi-Sutherland, Mehmet Neset Özel, Irene Papatheodorou, Maja Petkovic, Clare Pilgrim, Angela Oliveira Pisco, Carolina Reisenman, Erin Nicole Sanders, Gilberto dos Santos, Kristin Scott, Aparna Sherlekar, Philip Shiu, David Sims, Rene V. Sit, Maija Slaidina, Harold E. Smith, Gabriella Sterne, Yu-Han Su, Daniel Sutton, Marco Tamayo, Michelle Tan, Ibrahim Tastekin, Christoph Treiber, David Vacek, Georg Vogler, Scott Waddell, Wanpeng Wang, Rachel I. Wilson, Mariana F. Wolfner, Yiu-Cheung E. Wong, Anthony Xie, Jun Xu, Shinya Yamamoto, Jia Yan, Zepeng Yao, Kazuki Yoda, Ruijun Zhu, and Robert P. Zinzen. Fly cell atlas: a single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science, Mar 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2432, doi:10.1126/science.abk2432. This article has 937 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1): Arzu Öztürk-Çolak, Steven J Marygold, Giulia Antonazzo, Helen Attrill, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Victoria K Jenkins, Beverley B Matthews, Gillian Millburn, Gilberto dos Santos, Christopher J Tabone, Norbert Perrimon, Susan Russo Gelbart, Kris Broll, Madeline Crosby, Gilberto dos Santos, Kathleen Falls, L Sian Gramates, Victoria K Jenkins, Ian Longden, Beverley B Matthews, Jolene Seme, Christopher J Tabone, Pinglei Zhou, Mark Zytkovicz, Nick Brown, Giulia Antonazzo, Helen Attrill, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Aoife Larkin, Steven Marygold, Alex McLachlan, Gillian Millburn, Clare Pilgrim, Arzu Öztürk-Çolak, Thomas Kaufman, Brian Calvi, Seth Campbell, Josh Goodman, Victor Strelets, Jim Thurmond, Richard Cripps, and TyAnna Lovato. Flybase: updates to the drosophila genes and genomes database. Genetics, Feb 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad211, doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad211. This article has 479 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (ferreira2023anatlasof pages 21-27): AAG Ferreira, S Córdoba, R Rajesh, and BJ Choi. An atlas of the developing drosophila visual system glia and subcellular mrna localization of transcripts in single cells. bioRxiv, Aug 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.06.552169, doi:10.1101/2023.08.06.552169. This article has 2 citations.

  6. (li2022flycellatlas pages 11-13): Hongjie Li, Jasper Janssens, Maxime De Waegeneer, Sai Saroja Kolluru, Kristofer Davie, Vincent Gardeux, Wouter Saelens, Fabrice P. A. David, Maria Brbić, Katina Spanier, Jure Leskovec, Colleen N. McLaughlin, Qijing Xie, Robert C. Jones, Katja Brueckner, Jiwon Shim, Sudhir Gopal Tattikota, Frank Schnorrer, Katja Rust, Todd G. Nystul, Zita Carvalho-Santos, Carlos Ribeiro, Soumitra Pal, Sharvani Mahadevaraju, Teresa M. Przytycka, Aaron M. Allen, Stephen F. Goodwin, Cameron W. Berry, Margaret T. Fuller, Helen White-Cooper, Erika L. Matunis, Stephen DiNardo, Anthony Galenza, Lucy Erin O’Brien, Julian A. T. Dow, Heinrich Jasper, Brian Oliver, Norbert Perrimon, Bart Deplancke, Stephen R. Quake, Liqun Luo, Stein Aerts, Devika Agarwal, Yasir Ahmed-Braimah, Michelle Arbeitman, Majd M. Ariss, Jordan Augsburger, Kumar Ayush, Catherine C. Baker, Torsten Banisch, Katja Birker, Rolf Bodmer, Benjamin Bolival, Susanna E. Brantley, Julie A. Brill, Nora C. Brown, Norene A. Buehner, Xiaoyu Tracy Cai, Rita Cardoso-Figueiredo, Fernando Casares, Amy Chang, Thomas R. Clandinin, Sheela Crasta, Claude Desplan, Angela M. Detweiler, Darshan B. Dhakan, Erika Donà, Stefanie Engert, Swann Floc’hlay, Nancy George, Amanda J. González-Segarra, Andrew K. Groves, Samantha Gumbin, Yanmeng Guo, Devon E. Harris, Yael Heifetz, Stephen L. Holtz, Felix Horns, Bruno Hudry, Ruei-Jiun Hung, Yuh Nung Jan, Jacob S. Jaszczak, Gregory S. X. E. Jefferis, Jim Karkanias, Timothy L. Karr, Nadja Sandra Katheder, James Kezos, Anna A. Kim, Seung K. Kim, Lutz Kockel, Nikolaos Konstantinides, Thomas B. Kornberg, Henry M. Krause, Andrew Thomas Labott, Meghan Laturney, Ruth Lehmann, Sarah Leinwand, Jiefu Li, Joshua Shing Shun Li, Kai Li, Ke Li, Liying Li, Tun Li, Maria Litovchenko, Han-Hsuan Liu, Yifang Liu, Tzu-Chiao Lu, Jonathan Manning, Anjeli Mase, Mikaela Matera-Vatnick, Neuza Reis Matias, Caitlin E. McDonough-Goldstein, Aaron McGeever, Alex D. McLachlan, Paola Moreno-Roman, Norma Neff, Megan Neville, Sang Ngo, Tanja Nielsen, Caitlin E. O’Brien, David Osumi-Sutherland, Mehmet Neset Özel, Irene Papatheodorou, Maja Petkovic, Clare Pilgrim, Angela Oliveira Pisco, Carolina Reisenman, Erin Nicole Sanders, Gilberto dos Santos, Kristin Scott, Aparna Sherlekar, Philip Shiu, David Sims, Rene V. Sit, Maija Slaidina, Harold E. Smith, Gabriella Sterne, Yu-Han Su, Daniel Sutton, Marco Tamayo, Michelle Tan, Ibrahim Tastekin, Christoph Treiber, David Vacek, Georg Vogler, Scott Waddell, Wanpeng Wang, Rachel I. Wilson, Mariana F. Wolfner, Yiu-Cheung E. Wong, Anthony Xie, Jun Xu, Shinya Yamamoto, Jia Yan, Zepeng Yao, Kazuki Yoda, Ruijun Zhu, and Robert P. Zinzen. Fly cell atlas: a single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science, Mar 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2432, doi:10.1126/science.abk2432. This article has 937 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 2-3): Arzu Öztürk-Çolak, Steven J Marygold, Giulia Antonazzo, Helen Attrill, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Victoria K Jenkins, Beverley B Matthews, Gillian Millburn, Gilberto dos Santos, Christopher J Tabone, Norbert Perrimon, Susan Russo Gelbart, Kris Broll, Madeline Crosby, Gilberto dos Santos, Kathleen Falls, L Sian Gramates, Victoria K Jenkins, Ian Longden, Beverley B Matthews, Jolene Seme, Christopher J Tabone, Pinglei Zhou, Mark Zytkovicz, Nick Brown, Giulia Antonazzo, Helen Attrill, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Aoife Larkin, Steven Marygold, Alex McLachlan, Gillian Millburn, Clare Pilgrim, Arzu Öztürk-Çolak, Thomas Kaufman, Brian Calvi, Seth Campbell, Josh Goodman, Victor Strelets, Jim Thurmond, Richard Cripps, and TyAnna Lovato. Flybase: updates to the drosophila genes and genomes database. Genetics, Feb 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad211, doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad211. This article has 479 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  8. (ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-2): Arzu Öztürk-Çolak, Steven J Marygold, Giulia Antonazzo, Helen Attrill, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Victoria K Jenkins, Beverley B Matthews, Gillian Millburn, Gilberto dos Santos, Christopher J Tabone, Norbert Perrimon, Susan Russo Gelbart, Kris Broll, Madeline Crosby, Gilberto dos Santos, Kathleen Falls, L Sian Gramates, Victoria K Jenkins, Ian Longden, Beverley B Matthews, Jolene Seme, Christopher J Tabone, Pinglei Zhou, Mark Zytkovicz, Nick Brown, Giulia Antonazzo, Helen Attrill, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Aoife Larkin, Steven Marygold, Alex McLachlan, Gillian Millburn, Clare Pilgrim, Arzu Öztürk-Çolak, Thomas Kaufman, Brian Calvi, Seth Campbell, Josh Goodman, Victor Strelets, Jim Thurmond, Richard Cripps, and TyAnna Lovato. Flybase: updates to the drosophila genes and genomes database. Genetics, Feb 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad211, doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad211. This article has 479 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (george2024expressionatlasupdate pages 6-8): Nancy George, Silvie Fexova, Alfonso Munoz Fuentes, Pedro Madrigal, Yalan Bi, Haider Iqbal, Upendra Kumbham, Nadja Francesca Nolte, Lingyun Zhao, Anil S Thanki, Iris D Yu, Jose C Marugan Calles, Karoly Erdos, Liora Vilmovsky, Sandeep R Kurri, Anna Vathrakokoili-Pournara, David Osumi-Sutherland, Ananth Prakash, Shengbo Wang, Marcela K Tello-Ruiz, Sunita Kumari, Doreen Ware, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Yanhui Hu, Nick Brown, Norbert Perrimon, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Tony Burdett, Sarah Teichmann, Alvis Brazma, and Irene Papatheodorou. Expression atlas update: insights from sequencing data at both bulk and single cell level. Nucleic Acids Research, 52:D107-D114, Nov 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1021, doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1021. This article has 59 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 3-4
  2. ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-1
  3. li2022flycellatlas pages 4-6
  4. george2024expressionatlasupdate pages 6-8
  5. bateman2023uniprottheuniversal pages 1-1
  6. ferreira2023anatlasof pages 21-27
  7. li2022flycellatlas pages 11-13
  8. ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 2-3
  9. ozturkcolak2024flybaseupdatesto pages 1-2
  10. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1052
  11. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac993
  12. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.202255
  13. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad211
  14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab971
  15. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2432
  16. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/
  17. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1021
  19. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1052,
  20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk2432,
  21. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad211,
  22. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.06.552169,
  23. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1021,