PCSK1N (ProSAAS / Q9UHG2) — review notes

This review is in response to upstream curator question
geneontology/go-annotation#6407
("term suitable to describe PCSK1N (ProSAAS)") asking which GO term best captures
ProSAAS's emerging "chaperone activity".

Gene identity

Curated proteolytic processing

ProSAAS is processed at paired-basic sites in the regulated secretory pathway
(Golgi/TGN, secretory granules) into multiple bioactive peptides
[UniProt; PMID:10632593; PMID:11435430; PMID:12914799]:

The motif L-L-R-V-K-R (residues 239–244) within the C-terminal inhibitory
domain is necessary and sufficient for PCSK1 inhibition; alanine substitutions of
K243 or R244 abolish inhibition PMID:11435430.

Function 1 — Endogenous PCSK1 (PC1/3) inhibitor

The original characterization showed that:

PCSK1/PC1/3 is a serine endopeptidase (subtilisin-like, MEROPS S8). Therefore the
appropriate molecular function for the C-terminal inhibitory peptide / Big PEN-LEN
is GO:0004867 serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity (already on the
record, IEA), with the parent GO:0004866 endopeptidase inhibitor activity
(already there as IBA/TAS) acceptable as a less specific synonym. The biological
process is GO:0010955 negative regulation of protein processing and/or
GO:0060570 negative regulation of peptide hormone processing.

Function 2 — Anti-aggregant / extracellular chaperone activity (the topic of issue #6407)

A coherent body of work, primarily from the Lindberg laboratory, establishes that
full-length ProSAAS or its 21-kDa N-terminal fragment (residues ~1–180) acts as a
secreted brain chaperone that prevents aggregation of multiple amyloidogenic
client proteins
, but does not refold proteins and does not disaggregate
preformed fibrils.

β-amyloid (Aβ1–42)

Hoshino et al. 2014 PMID:24102330:

This evidence supports MF GO:0001540 amyloid-beta binding and
GO:0051787 misfolded protein binding, plus BP GO:1905907 negative
regulation of amyloid fibril formation
(and more specifically
GO:1902430 negative regulation of amyloid-beta formation is not appropriate
because GO:1902430's parent describes the secretase-driven generation of Aβ
peptide from APP, not aggregation; Hoshino et al. measured fibrillation, not APP
processing). MF GO:0044183 protein folding chaperone is not appropriate
because the curators (Hoshino et al., Jarvela et al.) explicitly state it does
not refold; the analogous CLU (clusterin) review in this repo also annotates
GO:0051787 misfolded protein binding rather than GO:0044183 for this kind of
"holdase-like" activity.

α-synuclein (aSyn)

Jarvela et al. 2016 PMID:27457957:

Lindberg et al. 2022, in vivo extension PMID:35527562:

This supports MF GO:0051787 misfolded protein binding (binding aSyn
aggregates) and BP GO:1905907 negative regulation of amyloid fibril formation
in vivo, plus the neuroprotective phenotype (process: protection against
neurodegeneration, captured by parent terms below).

TDP-43 — caveats about cytoplasmic activity

Peinado et al. 2022 PMID:35549000:

Important caveat: the TDP-43-encapsulating sphere phenotype was obtained by
forcing non-physiological cytoplasmic expression of proSAAS (signal peptide
removed). ProSAAS is normally a secreted protein that resides in the secretory
pathway (TGN, secretory granules) and the extracellular space. Therefore the
TDP-43 sphere data should not be used to support a cytoplasmic localization
annotation, but it does corroborate the protein's intrinsic capacity to bind
prion-like / aggregation-prone clients. The "holdase" characterization in this
paper is the strongest single piece of textual support for using
GO:0140309 unfolded protein holdase activity as a chaperone MF; however,
GO:0140309's definition emphasizes a carrier function ("escorts it to an
acceptor molecule or to a specific location"), which is not strictly demonstrated
for proSAAS in vivo.

Disaggregation: what proSAAS does NOT do

The upstream issue notes "Cannot disaggregate preformed fibrils (27457957)" and
this is consistent with the broader literature: proSAAS prevents initial
aggregation but does not disassemble preformed fibrils, and it does not refold
denatured proteins. Therefore terms in the disaggregase branch (e.g. ATPase
disaggregase activity) and protein folding chaperone GO:0044183 are not
appropriate.

Recommended additions / new annotations for the chaperone activity:

Aspect GO term Rationale
MF GO:0051787 misfolded protein binding Binds Aβ, aSyn, TDP-43 aggregates
MF GO:0001540 amyloid-beta binding Direct Aβ co-IP and binding PMID:24102330
MF GO:0140309 unfolded protein holdase activity Used by Lindberg 2022 for TDP-43; partial fit
BP GO:1905907 negative regulation of amyloid fibril formation In vitro and in vivo Aβ + aSyn fibrillation block
BP GO:0050821 protein stabilization Holdase-like maintenance of soluble client state

GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) is not recommended — proSAAS does not
refold clients. GO:1902430 (negative regulation of amyloid-beta formation) is
not recommended — that term is for APP cleavage, not Aβ aggregation.

Function 3 — Bioactive peptide ligand activity (after processing)

Big LEN and PEN, generated by paired-basic processing of proSAAS, are
GPCR ligands [UniProt FUNCTION: by similarity, Q9QXV0]:

This may support future processed-peptide receptor-binding annotations, but not
the existing precursor-level GO:0005102 signaling receptor binding annotation
(TAS, PMID:10632593). The literature actually supporting GPR171/GPR83 binding is
more recent (e.g. Wardman et al., Gomes et al.) than the cited PMID:10632593,
which itself does not demonstrate receptor binding. Processed peptide ligands
should be re-evidenced separately if annotated. The peptide-receptor interaction
can also support GO:0007218 neuropeptide signaling pathway (already
keyword-derived on record).

Function 4 — Disease association markers (not function per se)

Existing annotations — proposed actions

GOA term Evidence Proposed action Rationale
GO:0004866 endopeptidase inhibitor activity IBA, IEA, TAS KEEP_AS_NON_CORE / MODIFY → GO:0004867 Parent of more-specific GO:0004867 (which is also already on record as IEA). PCSK1 is a serine endopeptidase (subtilisin) so the specific term is preferable.
GO:0004867 serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity IEA ACCEPT Mutagenesis maps inhibitory determinants to LLRVKR (PMID:11435430); appropriate for the C-terminal inhibitory peptide.
GO:0005102 signaling receptor binding TAS (PMID:10632593) REMOVE The cited PMID does not demonstrate receptor binding; future processed-peptide ligand annotations should use direct GPR83/GPR171 evidence if appropriate.
GO:0005576 extracellular region IEA, ISS, TAS ACCEPT Secreted; well-established.
GO:0005794 Golgi apparatus IEA ACCEPT True (parent of TGN).
GO:0005802 trans-Golgi network IEA ACCEPT More specific Golgi sublocation; consistent with regulated secretion / processing site.
GO:0030141 secretory granule IEA ACCEPT Stored in regulated secretory granules in neurons / endocrine cells [PMID:10632593, PMID:24102330].

Suggested new (proposed) annotations

Open questions for upstream curators (issue #6407)

  1. Should "anti-aggregant" chaperones that prevent fibrillation but do not refold
    be annotated to GO:0051787 misfolded protein binding + BP GO:1905907, or
    to GO:0140309 unfolded protein holdase activity when there is no documented
    carrier-to-acceptor handoff? A precedent in this repository is CLU/clusterin,
    which uses the GO:0051787 + GO:1905907 + GO:0050821 combination for a closely
    analogous extracellular anti-aggregant chaperone activity.
  2. Is there an MF term capturing "holdase-like activity that prevents amyloid
    fibrillation" that does not require either folding (GO:0044183) or carrier
    delivery (GO:0140309)? If not, would a new term be warranted? (See similar
    discussion in the SCG5/7B2 literature — Lindberg lab uses "anti-aggregant
    chaperone" language for both 7B2 and ProSAAS.)
  3. The TDP-43 sphere data PMID:35549000 is from forced cytoplasmic expression
    and may not reflect physiological ProSAAS function. Should this evidence be
    limited to "demonstrates capacity for prion-like client binding" rather than
    used to support a normal cellular MF?

Relevant PMIDs

Description cleanup note

The YAML description field was revised to keep it as a standalone biological summary. Project-specific curation framing moved here instead.