cbrA / PA4725 (Q9HV74) review notes

Summary of the literature

CbrA is a 983-residue hybrid protein: an N-terminal solute:sodium symporter (SSSF/SLC5)
transporter domain of 12-13 predicted transmembrane helices (UniProt lists TRANSMEM features
through residue ~451), then a PAS domain and a C-terminal HisKA/HATPase kinase core of the NtrB
type. The UniProtKB entry is unreviewed, and its FUNCTION-level statements are ARBA-derived
(including, incorrectly for the whole protein, "Belongs to the sodium:solute symporter (SSF)
family"), so I did not use them as evidence.

Primary data:

  1. Nishijyo, Haas & Itoh 2001 PMID:11401699, abstract only. Discovery of CbrA-CbrB:
    PMID:11401699; architecture PMID:11401699; conclusion PMID:11401699. The experiments named in the abstract are mutant growth phenotypes,
    aot-argR induction, histidase and proline dehydrogenase assays, complementation and primer
    extension — i.e. genetics, not a phosphorylation assay.
  2. Yeung, Bains & Hancock 2011 PMID:21169488, abstract only: PMID:21169488,
    plus cytotoxicity and antibiotic-resistance phenotypes and a swarming microarray. These are
    the two PseudoCAP IMP rows (GO:2000147, GO:1900232).
  3. Ortholog biochemistry, full text cached: Wirtz et al. 2020 on P. putida KT2440
    PMID:32214184 and PMID:32214184 / PMID:32214184. Zhang et al. 2015 on P. fluorescens SBW25 reach the same
    conclusion genetically PMID:26148710, and find SSSF
    mutations that separate transport from signalling. Monteagudo-Cascales et al. 2019
    PMID:31235731 dissect the TM and PAS domains of P. putida CbrA in signalling.

So the kinase and transporter functions are established for the orthologs and inferred here;
neither has been assayed on the P. aeruginosa protein in anything I could read.

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale other seeds IBD stands without this seed?
PTN009166588 GO:0007165 signal transduction 7 268 (41 taxa) GO:0000160, IDA, PMID:11401699 (PseudoCAP) INDIRECT-PHENOTYPE (process right, code queried) CbrA really is the sensor kinase of the CbrA-CbrB pair, and the P. putida ortholog autophosphorylates and phosphorylates CbrB, so the claim is accepted. The cited paper, however, describes only sequence analysis, mutant growth phenotypes, complementation and primer extension in its abstract; IMP or IGI would fit. Confidence SUSPECTED: this rests on what the abstract does not say, and a 2001 two-component paper could well contain a phosphorylation gel in the full text. E. coli NtrB (P0AFB5), E. coli ZraS (P14377, IDA GO:0007165), E. coli AtoS (Q06067, IDA GO:0007165), S. pombe Mak3 (O74539), M. tuberculosis PdtaS (P9WGL5, IDA GO:0000160), P. aeruginosa FleS (Q9I4N4) — verified by live QuickGO query 2026-11-05 Yes. Four seeds have independent experimental kinase/signalling annotations. No GO_CENTRAL defect for this node; see genes/PSEAE/pprA/pprA-notes.md, where the node-level assessment for PTN009166588 is recorded once for this batch (pprA, fleS, cbrA all sit under it).

Annotation decisions

Knowledge gap not filed

Whether P. aeruginosa CbrA itself transports histidine is unmeasured, but that is a question
for a wet-lab experiment on a known activity of the orthologs rather than a genuine unknown of
the family, so it is recorded as a suggested experiment, not a knowledge_gaps entry.