MEGF10 notes
Deep research status (2026-10-03)
No provider deep-research file exists for this gene. deep_research_wrapper.py human MEGF10 falcon --fallback perplexity-lite failed: Falcon/Edison returned 402 Payment Required, and the perplexity provider is not available in this environment. A retry with openai failed with invalid_api_key. The synthesis below was made by hand from cached publications. Every claim carries an inline citation and quote.
Identity and architecture
- UniProtKB:Q96KG7, 1140 aa, single-pass type I membrane protein.
- Domain organization matches C. elegans CED-1: PMID:17498693.
- Classified as a class F scavenger receptor: PMID:27170117.
- Tyrosine phosphorylated: PMID:23954233.
Family assignment (see projects/PANTHER_FAMILY_ASSIGNMENT_DISCREPANCIES.md)
- The UniProt
DR PANTHER cross-reference (from InterPro) is PTHR24052:SF13. fetch-gene therefore pulled PTHR24052 family data.
- PANTHER 19.0's own classification places MEGF10 in PTHR24035:SF136. The CED-1/Draper subfamily, PTHR24035:SF109, sits in the same family.
- Its IBAs come from PAINT nodes PTN002372116, PTN009076277 and PTN002778616. Their sources include ced-1 (WB:WBGene00000415), Draper (FB:FBgn0027594) and mouse Megf10 (MGI:2685177).
Core: engulfment receptor for apoptotic cells (CED-1 ortholog)
Amyloid-beta uptake (cell lines)
- PMID:20828568. This fits the scavenger receptor activity definition, which lists amyloid-beta fibrils among ligands. Evidence comes only from overexpression and knockdown in cell lines, so no process annotation is proposed.
Retinal mosaic spacing (mouse): homotypic repulsion, not adhesion
- PMID:22407321.
- PMID:22407321.
- PMID:22407321.
- Consequence: GO:0034109 homotypic cell-cell adhesion (IDA, this paper) does not fit what the paper shows. The paper reports cell-cell recognition that leads to repulsion.
Skeletal muscle (EMARDD myopathy)
- PMID:22101682.
- PMID:28498977. Also PMID:28498977.
- Muscle roles are real but distinct from the conserved engulfment-receptor function. The mechanism (Notch modulation, Y1030 signaling) is incompletely defined, so these annotations are treated as non-core.
Open questions
- Does MEGF10 bind phosphatidylserine directly, or only through C1q (and other bridging molecules)?
- Which ligand drives the homotypic MEGF10 interaction in retina, given that no homophilic binding was detected?
- Is the Notch1 interaction direct, and does it explain the satellite-cell phenotypes?