ABRAXAS1 review notes

Evidence setup

Functional synthesis

ABRAXAS1/FAM175A/CCDC98 is a nuclear BRCA1-A complex scaffold and ubiquitin-recognition subunit. The primary literature identifies Abraxas as a BRCA1 BRCT-binding phosphoprotein and RAP80 partner: PMID:17525340 and PMID:17525340.

The supported biological role is DNA double-strand break response and checkpoint/repair signaling, not a standalone catalytic activity. The key experimental summary is that PMID:17525340. A second study frames CCDC98 as the factor that mediates BRCA1-RAP80 association and BRCA1-dependent G2/M checkpoint activation PMID:17643121.

ABRAXAS1 is also an organizer of the RAP80/BRCA1-A complex. Feng et al. describe CCDC98 as central to assembly: PMID:19261748. The BRCA1-A/RAP80 complex has BRCC36 K63-linked deubiquitinase activity, but the catalytic subunit is BRCC36, while Abraxas is required for that activity in the RAP80 complex context PMID:20656689.

PN projection decision

The PN projection has three ABRAXAS1 rows:

Annotation cautions

Falcon deep research findings (2026-06-07)

A Falcon deep-research report (ABRAXAS1-deep-research-falcon.md, Edison Scientific) was generated successfully on 2026-06-07, superseding the earlier failed run noted above. It is consistent with the existing review and adds the following, with NEW/CONFIRMS/PROVISIONAL labels. PMIDs could not be resolved via tooling for several of these primary papers (PubMed MCP unavailable); where only a DOI was available it is given, and these citations are kept in notes only rather than added as guessed PMIDs to the YAML.

Evidence re-review, 2026-09-20: context and family transfer

All three challenged microtubule/spindle IBAs are UNDECIDED. PAINT places the assertions at metazoan PTN001272083 with ABRAXAS2/Q15018 support. The primary BRISC study directly establishes ABRO1/BRISC microtubule association and NuMA-dependent spindle regulation [PMID:26195665, “The deubiquitinating enzyme complex BRISC is required for proper mitotic spindle assembly in mammalian cells.”]. Its source mechanism does not by itself prove conservation or loss in ABRAXAS1. Distinct BRCA1-A versus BRISC partners make divergence plausible, but a principal nuclear DNA-repair location is not an exclusive localization statement. The existing OpenScientist report is marked disputed where it converts lack of target assays and a single paralog source into refutation. Its exact excerpt and the primary source are incorporated. Other DNA-repair, ubiquitin-recognition, localization and core-function claims were screened and retained; generic protein binding is removed for informativeness.